TABLE OF CONTENTS

UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the


Securities Exchange Act of 1934


(Amendment No.     )

Filed by the Registrant  x                               Filed by a Party other than the Registrant  ¨

Filed by the Registrant ☒
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant  o

Check the appropriate box:

xPreliminary Proxy Statement
¨ oConfidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
¨ oDefinitive Proxy Statement
¨ oDefinitive Additional Materials
¨ oSoliciting Material under Rule 14a-12

NISOURCE INC.
(Name of registrant as specified in its charter)

(Name of person(s) filing proxy statement, if other than the registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

NISOURCE INC.
(Name of registrant as specified in its charter)
(Name of person(s) filing proxy statement, if other than the registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
x
No fee required.
¨
 o
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11.
(1)
(1)

Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

(2)
(2)

Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

(3)
(3)

Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

(4)
(4)

Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

(5)
(5)
Total fee paid:
 o

¨
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
¨
 o
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
(1)
(1)

Amount Previously Paid:

(2)
(2)

Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

(3)
(3)

Filing Party:

(4)
(4)

Date Filed:

TABLE OF CONTENTS


LOGO

NiSource Inc.

801 E. 86th Avenue Merrillville, INIndiana 46410 (877) 647-5990

PRELIMINARY PROXY STATEMENT - SUBJECT TO COMPLETION

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING

April 7, 20151, 2019

To the Holders of Our Common Stock of NiSource Inc.:Stock:

The 2019 annual meeting of the stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) of NiSource Inc., a Delaware corporation, (the “Company”), will be held at the Hyatt Rosemont, 6350 N. River Road, Rosemont, ILIllinois 60018 on Tuesday, May 12, 2015,7, 2019, at 10:00 a.m., local time, for the following purposes:

(1)To elect eleventen directors named in the proxy statement to hold office until the next annual stockholders’ meeting and until their respective successors have been elected or appointed;appointed and qualified;

(2)To approve named executive officer compensation on an advisory basis;

(3)To ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company’sour independent registered public accountantsaccounting firm for the year 2015;2019;

(4)To approve an amendment to the Company’sour Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (“Certificate of Incorporation”) to give stockholdersincrease the power to request special meetingsnumber of the stockholders;authorized shares of common stock;

(5)To approve an amendment to the Company’s Amended and Restatedour Certificate of Incorporation to reduceeliminate the minimum numberrequirement of Company directors from nine to seven;“cause” for removal of directors;

(6)To re-approve the Company’s 2010 Omnibus Incentive Plan pursuant to Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code;

(7)To approve an amendment to the Company’sour Amended and Restated Employee Stock Purchase Plan to increase the maximum number of shares available under the plan;

(8)(7)To consider a stockholder proposal regarding reports on political contributions, if properly presented;reducing the threshold stock ownership requirement for stockholders to call a special stockholder meeting from 25% to 10%; and

(9)(8)To transact such other business as may properly come before the meetingAnnual Meeting and any adjournment or postponement thereof.

All persons who were stockholders of record atas of the close of business on March 16, 2015 will be entitled12, 2019, are eligible to vote at the Annual Meeting and any adjournment or postponement thereof.

Please act promptlyYour vote is very important. Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, please vote at your shares with respect to the proposals described above.earliest convenience. You may vote your shares by marking, signing, dating and mailing the enclosed proxy card. You may also vote by telephone or through the Internet by following the instructions set forth on the proxy card. If you attend the Annual Meeting, you may be able to vote your shares in person, even if you have previously submitted a proxy. See the section “Voting in Person” for specific instructions on voting your shares.

If you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, please so indicate in the space provided on the proxy card or respond when prompted on the telephone or through the Internet.

PLEASE VOTE YOUR SHARES BY TELEPHONE, THROUGH THE INTERNET OR BY PROMPTLY

MARKING, DATING, SIGNING AND RETURNING THE ENCLOSED PROXY CARD.

John G. Nassos
Corporate Secretary

LOGO

Robert E. Smith

Corporate Secretary

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials


For the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be Held on May 12, 20157, 2019

The Proxy Statement, Notice of Annual Meeting and 20142018 Annual Report to Stockholders


are available athttp: https://ir.nisource.com/annuals.cfmwww.nisource.com/filings


TABLE OF CONTENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1

1

1

1

2

2

2

2

9

9

9

9

10

10

10

10

11

14

17

20

20

20

Executive Compensation Highlights

20

Overview of Our 2014 Executive Compensation Program

21

Our Executive Compensation Philosophy

22

Principal Elements of Our Compensation Program

22

Other Compensation and Benefits

24

Our Executive Compensation Process

25

ONC Committee Actions Related to 2014 Compensation

27

Changes to Our Executive Compensation Program in 2015

33

OFFICER NOMINATION AND COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

34

35

35

49

49

50

51

51

52

53


53

PROPOSAL 7 — APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE COMPANY’SAMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN TO INCREASE THE MAXIMUM NUMBER OF SHARES AVAILABLE UNDER THE PLAN

61

63

65

65

65

66

66

A-1

B-1

C-1


TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY

This summary highlights information that may be expanded upon elsewhere in this proxy statement (“Proxy Statement”). This summary does not contain all of the information that you should consider and you should read the entire Proxy Statement before voting. The accompanying proxy is solicited on behalf of the Board of Directors of NiSource Inc. (the “Board”) for the 20152019 annual meeting of the stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”).


2019 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
Time and Date: 10:00 a.m., local time on Tuesday, May 7, 2019
Place: Hyatt Rosemont, 6350 N. River Road, Rosemont, Illinois 60018
Record Date: March 12, 2019
Shares of Common Stock Outstanding on Record Date: [•]
Voting: Each share is entitled to one vote for each director to be elected and on each matter to be voted upon at the Annual Meeting.
This proxy statement and the accompanying proxy card are first being sent to stockholders on April 1, 2019.

VOTING MATTERS AND BOARD RECOMMENDATIONS
Item
Board
Recommendations
Page
Reference
Proposal 1
Election of ten directors named in this proxy statement;
For All Nominees
Proposal 2
Advisory approval of the compensation of our named executive officers (the “Named Executive Officers”) on an advisory basis;
For
Proposal 3
Ratification of Deloitte & Touche LLP (“Deloitte”) as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2019;
For
Proposal 4
Approval of an amendment to our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (“Certificate of Incorporation”) to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock;
For
Proposal 5
Approval of an amendment to our Certificate of Incorporation to eliminate the requirement of “cause” for removal of directors;
For
Proposal 6
Approval of an Amended and Restated Employee Stock Purchase Plan to increase the number of shares available under the plan; and
For
Proposal 7
To consider a stockholder proposal reducing the threshold stock ownership requirement for stockholders to call a special stockholder meeting from 25% to 10%.
Against

In addition, a stockholder has notified us of his intent to propose a resolution at the Annual Meeting requesting that the Board issue an annual report, beginning in 2019, of actually incurred corporate costs and associated actual and significant benefits accruing to shareholders and the climate from our subsidiary NIPSCO’s climate-related activities that are voluntary and exceed government regulatory requirements (the “Floor Proposal”). We have not received notice of, and are not aware of, any business to come before the meeting other than the agenda items referred to above and the possible submission of the Floor Proposal.

The Floor Proposal is not included in this proxy statement. If the Floor Proposal is presented at the Annual Meeting, the proxy holders will have discretionary voting authority under Rule 14a-4(c) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 with respect to the Floor Proposal and intend to exercise such discretion to vote AGAINST such proposal. If any other matter properly comes before the stockholders for a vote at the meeting, the proxy holders will vote your shares in accordance with their judgment.

1

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 
   
BOARD OF DIRECTORS NOMINEES
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Director Nominees (10)
Board Committees
 
 
 
 
Name
Age
Director
Since
Position
Audit
Comp
Finance
ESS
Nom
&
Gov
 
Peter A. Altabef
59
2017
Chairman, President & CEO, Unisys Corporation
 
 
✔*
✔ 
✔ 
 
 
Theodore H. Bunting, Jr.
60
2018
Retired Group President, Entergy Corporation
✔ 
✔ 
 
 
 
 
 
Eric L. Butler
58
2017
Retired Executive Vice President, Union Pacific Corporation
✔ 
✔ 
 
✔ 
 
 
 
Aristides S. Candris
67
2012
Retired President & CEO, Westinghouse
 
 
✔ 
✔*
✔ 
 
 
Wayne S. DeVeydt
49
2016
CEO, Surgery Partners, Inc.
✔ 
✔ 
✔ 
 
 
 
 
Joseph Hamrock
55
2015
President & CEO, NiSource Inc.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Deborah A. Henretta
57
2015
Partner, G100 Companies; Retired Group President, Procter & Gamble Co.
 
✔ 
✔ 
✔ 
 
 
 
Michael E. Jesanis
62
2008
Retired President & CEO, National Grid USA
✔*
✔ 
✔ 
 
 
 
 
Kevin T. Kabat
62
2015
Vice Chairman of the Board, NiSource Inc.; Retired Vice Chairman & CEO, Fifth Third Bancorp
✔ 
✔*
 
 
✔ 
 
 
Carolyn Y. Woo
64
1998
Retired President & CEO, Catholic Relief Services
✔ 
 
 
✔ 
✔*
 
 
* Chair of Committee

✔ 9 of 10
Are
Independent
(90%)
✔2 of 10
Are
Female
(20%)
✔3 of 10
Are
Diverse (Race/Ethnicity)
(30%)

✔Average Director
Age:
59 Years
✔Average Director
Tenure:
6 Years
See “Proposal 1 – Election of Directors” for more information on our director nominees.

2

TABLE OF CONTENTS


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE HIGHLIGHTS
Annual election of directors
Majority voting for all directors with resignation policy
No supermajority voting provisions
No stockholder rights plan (“poison pill”)
Proxy access by-law (3% ownership / 3 years / 20%)
Stockholder right to call special meetings
Separate chairman and CEO
All directors independent except CEO
Board committees comprised of all independent directors
Regular executive sessions of independent directors
Annual Board and committee evaluation process and ongoing evaluations of individual directors
Strategic and risk oversight by Board and committees
Annual “Say-on-Pay” advisory votes
Strong alignment between pay and performance in incentive plans
Commitment to safety and customer care
Political contributions disclosure
Enhanced independent registered public accounting firm disclosure
See “Corporate Governance” for more information on our corporate governance practices.

3

TABLE OF CONTENTS


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION HIGHLIGHTS
We have designed our executive compensation program to meet our business objectives using various compensation elements intended to drive both long-term and short-term performance. We believe that a significant portion of total compensation should consist of at-risk performance-based compensation. Our executive compensation practices include the following, each of which the Compensation Committee believes reinforces our executive compensation policy and objectives.
See “Executive Compensation” for more information on our executive compensation program.
We DO Have This Practice
We Do NOT Have This Practice
Incentive award metrics that are tied to key company performance measures
Repricing of options without stockholder approval
Share ownership guidelines applicable to executive officers and independent directors
Hedging or pledging transactions or short sales by executive officers or directors
Compensation recoupment policy
Tax gross-ups for Named Executive Officers
Limited perquisites
Automatic single-trigger equity vesting upon a change-in-control
Prohibition against pledging unearned shares in our long-term incentive plan
Excise tax gross-ups under change-in-control agreements
Double-trigger severance benefits upon a change-in-control
Excessive pension benefits or defined benefit supplemental executive retirement plan
One-year minimum vesting for equity awards
Excessive use of non-performance based compensation
Significant portions of the executive compensation opportunity that are entirely contingent on performance against pre-established performance goals
Excessive severance benefits
Independent compensation consultant
Dividend equivalent rights or dividends on unvested performance shares or restricted stock units granted to executive officers
Annual Say-on-Pay vote by stockholders

4

TABLE OF CONTENTS


GENERAL INFORMATION
Stock Symbol:   NI
Stock Exchange:   NYSE
Registrar and Transfer Agent:   Computershare Investor Services
State of Incorporation:   Delaware
Corporate Headquarters:   801 E. 86th Avenue, Merrillville, Indiana 46410
Corporate Website:   www.nisource.com

BUSINESS AND STRATEGY
We are an energy holding company under the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 2005 whose subsidiaries are fully regulated natural gas and electric utility companies serving customers in seven states. We generate substantially all of our operating income through these rate-regulated businesses which are summarized for financial reporting purposes into two primary reportable segments: Gas Distribution Operations and Electric Operations.
Our goal is to develop strategies that benefit all stakeholders as we address changing customer conservation patterns, develop more contemporary pricing structures and embark on long-term infrastructure investment programs. These strategies are intended to improve reliability and safety, enhance customer service, and reduce emissions, while generating sustainable returns. Additionally, we continue to pursue regulatory and legislative initiatives that will allow residential customers not currently on our system to obtain gas service in a cost effective manner.
Our directors possess the necessary breadth and depth of skills and experience to oversee our business operations and long term strategy as set forth in “Proposal 1 – Election of Directors – Biographical Information and Skills.”

5

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROXY STATEMENT

The accompanying proxy is solicited on behalf of the Board for the Annual Meeting to be held at the Hyatt Rosemont, 6350 North River Road, Rosemont, ILIllinois 60018 on Tuesday, May 12, 20157, 2019, at 10:00 a.m., local time. The common stock, $.01 par value per share, of the Company represented by the accompanying proxy will be voted as directed. If you return a signed proxy card without indicating how you want to vote your shares, the shares represented by the accompanying proxy will be voted as recommended by the Board “FOR”Board:

“FOR” all of the nominees for director; “FOR”
“FOR” advisory approval of the compensation of the Company’sour Named Executive Officers; “FOR”
“FOR” the ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP (“Deloitte”) as the Company’sour independent registered public accountantsaccounting firm for 2015; “FOR” both2019;
“FOR” approval of the proposed amendmentsamendment to our Certificate of Incorporation to increase the Company’snumber of authorized shares of common stock;
“FOR” approval of the amendment to our Certificate of Incorporation to eliminate the requirement of “cause” for removal of directors;
“FOR” approval of our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (the “Certificate of Incorporation”); “FOR” the re-approval of the Company’s 2010 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “Omnibus Plan”); “FOR” the proposed amendment to the Company’s Employee Stock Purchase Plan;Plan to increase the number of shares available under the plan; and “AGAINST” the
“AGAINST” a stockholder proposal regarding reports on political contributions.reducing the threshold stock ownership requirement for stockholders to call special stockholder meeting from 25% to 10%.

In addition, a stockholder has notified us of his intent to propose a resolution at the Annual Meeting requesting that the Board issue an annual report, beginning in 2019, of actually incurred corporate costs and associated actual and significant benefits accruing to shareholders and the climate from NIPSCO’s climate-related activities that are voluntary and exceed government regulatory requirements (the “Floor Proposal”). We have not received notice of, and are not aware of, any business to come before the meeting other than the agenda items referred to above and the possible submission of the Floor Proposal.

The Floor Proposal is not included in this proxy statement. If the Floor Proposal is presented at the meeting, the proxy holders will have discretionary voting authority under Rule 14a-4(c) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 with respect to the Floor Proposal and intend to exercise such discretion to vote AGAINST such proposal. If any other matter properly comes before the stockholders for a vote at the meeting, the proxy holders will vote your shares in accordance with their judgment.

This Proxy Statementproxy statement and the accompanying proxy card are first being sent to stockholders on April 7, 2015.1, 2019. We will bear the expense of this mail solicitation, which may be supplemented by telephone, facsimile,e-mail email and personal solicitation by our officers, employees and agents. To aid in the solicitation of proxies, we have retained D.F. King for a fee of approximately $9,500, plus reimbursement of expenses. We may incur additional fees if we request additional services. We will also request brokerage houses and other nominees and fiduciaries to forward proxy materials, at our expense, to the beneficial owners of stock held as of 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on March 16, 2015,12, 2019, the record date for voting.

We use the terms “NiSource,” the “Company,” “we,” “our” and “us” in this proxy statement to refer to NiSource Inc.

Who May Vote

Holders of shares of common stock as of the close of business on March 16, 201512, 2019, are entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting and any adjournment thereof. As of March 16, 2015, [12, 2019, [•] shares of common stock were issued and outstanding. Each share of common stock outstanding on that date is entitled to one vote on each matter presented at the Annual Meeting.

Voting Your Proxy

If you are a “stockholder of record” (that is, if your shares of common stock are registered directly in your name on the Company’s records), you may vote your shares by proxy using any of the following methods:

Telephoning the toll-free number listed on the proxy card;

Using the Internet website listed on the proxy card; or

Marking, dating, signing and returning the enclosed proxy card.

All votes must be received by the proxy tabulator by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on May 11, 2015.6, 2019.

If your shares are held in a brokerage account or by a bank, broker, trust or other stockholder of recordnominee (herein referred to as a “Broker”), you are considered a “beneficial owner” of shares held in “street name.” As a beneficial owner, you will receive proxy materials and voting instructions from the stockholder of record that holds your shares. You must follow the voting instructions in order to have your shares of common stock voted.

Discretionary Voting by Brokers Banks and Other Stockholders of Record“Broker Non-Votes”

If your shares are held in street name and you do not provide the Broker with instructions as to how to vote such shares, your Broker will only be able to vote your shares at its discretion on certain “routine” matters as permitted by New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) rules. The proposal to ratify the appointment of our independent registered public accountantsaccounting firm is the only proposal considered a routine matter. At this meeting,matter and, accordingly, at the Annual Meeting, Brokers will only have discretionary authority to vote your shares with regard to Proposal No. 3, the ratification of the appointment of Deloitte

6

TABLE OF CONTENTS

as our independent registered public accountantsaccounting firm for 2015.2019. A “broker non-vote” occurs when a Broker holding shares for a beneficial owner does not have discretionary authority to vote the shares and has not received instructions from the beneficial owner as to how the beneficial owner would like the shares to be voted. Brokers will not have discretionary authority to vote your shares with respect to the election of directors,other proposals to be presented at the advisory approval of executive compensation, either of the

proposed amendments to our Certificate of Incorporation, the re-approval of the Omnibus Plan, the proposed amendment to our Employee Stock Purchase Plan, or the stockholder proposal.Annual Meeting. Therefore, it is important that you instruct your Broker or other nominee how to vote your shares. If Brokers exercise their discretionary voting authority on Proposal No. 3, such shares will be considered present at the Annual Meeting for quorum purposes and broker non-votes will occur as to each of the other proposals presented at the Annual Meeting, which are considered “non-routine.”

Voting Shares Held in Our 401(k) Plan

If you hold your shares of common stock in our 401(k) Plan, (“401(k) Plan”) administered bythose shares are held in the name of Fidelity Management Trust Company (“Fidelity”), youthe administrator of the 401(k) Plan. You will receive a proxy card that includes the number of shares of our common stock held in the 401(k) Plan. You should instruct Fidelity how to vote your shares by one of the methods discussed in this Proxy Statement. If you do not instruct the 401(k) Plan how to vote your shares by completing and returning the proxy card or by using thevoting your shares by Internet or by telephone, or Internet,as detailed above under “Voting Your Proxy.” If you do not instruct Fidelity how to vote your shares, or if you sign the proxy card with no further instructions as to how to vote your shares, the 401(k) Plan provides for Fidelity towill vote your shares in the same proportion as the shares for which it receives instructions from all other participants, to the extent permitted under applicable law. To allow enough time for Fidelity to vote your shares in accordance with your direction, your voting instructions must be received by Fidelity no later than 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on May 2, 2019.

Voting in Person

You also may come to the Annual Meeting and vote your shares in person by obtaining and submitting a ballot that will be available at the meeting.Annual Meeting. However, if your shares are held in street name by a Broker, then, in order to be able to vote at the meeting,Annual Meeting, you must obtain an executed proxy from the Broker indicating that you were the beneficial owner of the shares on March 16, 2015,12, 2019, the record date for voting, and that the Broker is giving you its proxy to vote the shares.

If your shares are held in the 401(k) Plan, you will not be able to vote your shares at the meeting. In order to vote your shares you must provide instructions to Fidelity either by returning your proxy card or by voting via the telephone or internet no later than 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on May 11, 2015.Annual Meeting.

Votes cast in person or represented by proxy at the meetingAnnual Meeting will be tabulated by the inspectors of election.

If you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, please so indicate when you vote,return your proxy card, so that we may send you an admission ticket and make the necessary arrangements. Stockholders who plan to attend the meetingAnnual Meeting must present picturevalid, government-issued photo identification along with an admission ticket or evidence of beneficial ownership.

Revoking Your Proxy

You may revoke your proxy at any time before a vote is taken or the authority granted is otherwise exercised. To revoke a proxy, you may send a letter to the Company’sour Corporate Secretary a letter (which must be received before a vote is taken) indicating that you want to revoke your proxy, or you can supersede your initial proxy by submitting a duly executed proxy bearing a later date, voting by telephone or through the Internet on a later date, or attending the meetingAnnual Meeting and voting in person. Attending the Annual Meeting will not in and of itself revoke a proxy.

Quorum for the Meeting

A quorum of stockholders is necessary to take action at the Annual Meeting. A majority of the outstanding shares of common stock, present in person or represented by proxy, will constitute a quorum at the Annual Meeting. The inspectors of election appointed for the Annual Meeting will determine whether or not a quorum is present. The inspectors of election will treat abstentions and broker non-votes as present and entitled to voteAbstentions are counted for purposes of determining whether a quorum is present. As explained above under “Discretionary Voting by Brokers and ‘Broker Non-Votes,” if Brokers exercise their discretionary voting authority on Proposal No. 3, such shares will be considered present at the presence of a quorum. Ameeting for quorum purposes and broker non-vote occurs when a Broker holding shares for a beneficial owner does not have discretionary authority to vote the shares and has not received instructions from the beneficial ownernon-votes will occur as to howeach of the beneficial owner would likeother proposals presented at the shares to be voted.Annual Meeting.

7

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROPOSAL 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

At the recommendation of the CorporateNominating and Governance Committee, the Board has nominated the persons listed below to serve as directors, each for a one-year term, beginning at the Annual Meeting on May 12, 20157, 2019, and running untilexpiring at the 20162020 annual meeting of the Company’sour stockholders (the “2016“2020 Annual Meeting”). and until their successors are duly elected or appointed and qualified. The nominees include tennine independent directors, as defined in the applicable rules of the NYSE, and our President and Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”). The Board does not anticipate that any of the nominees will be unable to serve, but if any nominee is unable to serve, the proxies will be voted in accordance with the judgment of the person or persons voting the proxies.

All of the nominees currently serve on the Board.

The Company has announced plans to separate its natural gas pipeline and related businesses into a stand-alone publicly traded company, Columbia Pipeline Group, Inc. (“CPG, Inc.”). If the planned separationSet forth below is information regarding all of CPG, Inc. from the Company (the “Separation”) occurs in mid-2015, we expect that six of the Company’s directors — Sigmund L. Cornelius, Marty R. Kittrell, W. Lee Nutter, Deborah S. Parker, Robert C. Skaggs and Teresa A. Taylor — are expected to resign from the Company’s Board and will become directors of CPG, Inc. The other five Company directors — Richard A. Abdoo, Aristides S. Candris, Michael E. Jesanis, Richard L. Thompson and Carolyn Y. Woo — will continue to serve on the Company’s Board until the 2016 Annual Meeting. In addition, in connection with the Separation, Joseph Hamrock is expected to become CEO of the Company and to be named to the Company’s Board. Mr. Hamrock is currently Executive Vice President and Group CEO of the Company’s gas distribution business unit and one of the Company’s Named Executive Officers for 2014. Mr. Hamrock is not a nominee for director at the Annual Meeting.

The following chart gives information about allour nominees (each of whom has consented to being named in the proxy statementProxy Statement and to serving, if elected). The dates shown for service as a director include service as a director of the Company and its corporate predecessor.

Vote Required

In order to be elected, a nominee must receive more votes cast in favor of his or her election than against election. Abstentions by those present or represented by proxy and broker non-votes will not be votedcounted as a vote cast either “for” or “against” with respect to the election of directors and, therefore, will have no effect on the outcome. Brokers will not have discretionary authority to vote on the election of directors. Accordingly, there could be broker non-votes which will have no effect on the vote.

Under our Corporate Governance Guidelines, each nominee will tender a conditional resignation prior to the Annual Meeting, effective only if both (a) the votes “against” a nominee’s election exceed the votes “for” election (a “failed re-election”) and (b) such resignation is subsequently accepted by the Board. Any failed re-election will be referred to the Nominating and Governance Committee, which will make a recommendation to the Board as to whether to accept or reject the resignation. The Board will make a determination and publicly disclose its decision, the rationale for the decision and the directors who participated in the process within 90 days after the election. The Board expects the director who has not been re-elected to abstain from participating in the Nominating and Governance Committee or Board discussion or vote regarding whether to accept his or her resignation offer. A director who has had a failed re-election may participate in discussions or votes with respect to other directors who have had a failed re-election.

Biographical Information and Skills

Biographical information regarding each director nominee and his or her qualifications to serve as a director is set forth on the succeeding pages.

Our director nominees possess the necessary breadth and depth of skills and experience to oversee our business operations and long-term strategy as shown below:*

Industry Experience
   •
Gas Distribution or Transmission (50%)
   •
Electricity Distribution, Transmission or Generation (50%)
   •
Energy Markets or Technology (70%)
Other Operations / Customer Service (90%)
Government and Regulatory (90%)
Public Company Board (80%)
Financial or Capital Markets (90%)
Risk Management (100%)
Technology (50%)
Safety (60%)
Environmental, Sustainability, Corporate Responsibility and Ethics (100%)
Non-Profit Board / Community Service (100%)
CEO (Current or Prior) (70%)
Strategic Planning (100%)
Financial Literacy and Expertise (100%)
Talent Management (Executive Compensation and Benefits, and Talent Development) (100%)

* Percentages shown represent the portion of the Board with the indicated skill or experience.

8

TABLE OF CONTENTS

THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” THE ELECTION OF EACH OF THE NOMINEES LISTED BELOW.

Peter A. Altabef

Name, Age and Principal Occupations

for Past Five Years and Directorships Held


Director Since: 2017
Has Been a
Director SinceStanding Board Committees:

Directors Expected to Remain on the Board Following the Separation:

Age: 59
Environmental, Safety and Sustainability Committee
Finance Committee (Chair)

Richard A. Abdoo, 71

2008
Nominating and Governance Committee


Executive Experience: Mr. Altabef currently serves as Chairman, President and CEO of Unisys Corporation, a global information technology company, and is a member of its board of directors, a position he has held since January 2015. Prior to his current role, he served as president and CEO of MICROS Systems, Inc., a provider of integrated software and hardware solutions to the hospitality and retail industries, from 2013 to 2014, when it was acquired by Oracle Corporation. Before that, he served as president and CEO of Perot Systems Corporation from 2004 to 2009, when it was acquired by Dell Inc. Following that transaction, Mr. Altabef served as president of Dell Services, the information technology services and business process solutions unit of Dell Inc. until his departure in 2011.

Outside Board and Other Experience: Mr. Altabef is a member of the board of directors of Unisys Corporation. He is also a member of the President’s National Security Telecommunications Advisory Committee, a board member of EastWest Institute, and a member of the advisory board of Merit Energy Company, LLC and of the board of directors of Petrus Trust Company, LTA. He has previously served as a senior advisor to 2M Companies, Inc., in 2012, and as a director of MICROS Systems, Perot Systems Corporation and Belo Corporation. He is also active in community service activities, having served on the boards and committees of several cultural, medical, educational and charitable organizations and events.

Skills and Qualifications: Mr. Altabef has experience leading large organizations as CEO and a strong background in strategic planning, financial reporting, risk management, business operations and corporate governance. He also has more than 20 years of senior leadership experience at some of the world’s leading information technology companies. As a result, he has a deep understanding of the cybersecurity issues facing businesses today. His overall leadership experience and his cybersecurity background provide the Board with valuable perspective and insight into significant issues that we face.

Theodore H. Bunting, Jr.

Since May 2004, Mr. Abdoo has been President of R.A. Abdoo & Co. LLC, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, an environmental and energy consulting firm. Prior thereto, Mr. Abdoo was Chairman and CEO of Wisconsin Energy Corporation from 1991 until his retirement in April 2004. He also served as President of Wisconsin Energy Corporation from 1991 to April 2003. Mr. Abdoo is also a director of A.K. Steel Corporation and ZBB Energy Corp.


Director Since: 2018
Standing Board Committees:
Age: 60
Audit Committee

By virtue of his former positions as Chairman and CEO of a large electric and gas utility holding company, as well as his current positions as director of one other energy-related company and a steel maker that is a major user of energy, Mr. Abdoo has extraordinary expertise and experience with the issues facing the energy industry in general and public utilities in particular. As a former CEO, Mr. Abdoo has deep understanding about the issues facing executive management of a major corporation. Mr. Abdoo’s credentials as a registered professional engineer in several states allow him to offer a unique technical perspective on certain issues under consideration by the Board. As a long-time champion of humanitarian and social causes, including on behalf of the Lebanese-American community, Mr. Abdoo brings expertise and understanding with respect to social issues confronting the Company. His commitment to and work on behalf of social causes earned him the Ellis Island Medal of Honor, presented to Americans of diverse origins for their outstanding contributions to their own ethnic groups and to American society.

Compensation Committee



Executive Experience: Mr. Bunting most recently served as group president, utility operations, at Entergy Corporation (“Entergy”), an integrated energy company, from 2012 until his retirement in 2017. Before that, he was senior vice president and chief accounting officer at Entergy from 2007 to 2012, and chief financial officer of several subsidiaries from 2000 to 2007. He held other management positions of increasing responsibility in accounting and operations at Entergy since joining the company in 1983.

Outside Board and Other Experience: Mr. Bunting has been a director of Unum Group since 2013 and is currently chairman of its regulatory compliance committee and a member of its human capital committee. He previously served as a director of Imation Corp., a global data storage and information security company. He also serves on the board of Foundation for the Mid South and previously served on the board of Hendrix College.

Skills and Qualifications: Mr. Bunting’s utility industry knowledge, including his experience in customer service, safety and regulatory relations, are valuable to us as we continue to execute on our robust long-term utility infrastructure investment plans. He also brings additional public company experience in the areas of strategic finance, accounting, auditing, and capital and risk management to the Board. He is a certified public accountant.

9

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Eric L. Butler

Name, Age and Principal Occupations

for Past Five Years and Directorships Held


Director Since: 2017
Has Been a
Director SinceStanding Board Committees:
Age: 58
Audit Committee
Compensation Committee
Environmental, Safety and Sustainability Committee


Executive Experience: Mr. Butler served in a number of executive leadership roles at Union Pacific Corporation (“Union Pacific”), a transportation company located in Omaha, Nebraska, until his retirement in February 2018. He began his career at Union Pacific in 1985 and held leadership roles in financial planning and analysis and in marketing, sales and commercial, including as Executive Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer from March 2012 to December 2016. He also held leadership roles in supply, procurement and purchasing, including as Vice President and General Manager – Industrial Products from April 2005 to March 2012. Most recently, he was Senior Vice President of Union Pacific from December 2017, Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer from December 2016 through November 2017, and Corporate Secretary from February 2017 through November 2017.

Outside Board and Other Experience: Mr. Butler was appointed to the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City’s Omaha Branch Board in 2015 and, in 2018, was elected chairman. Additionally, he serves on the board of the Omaha Airport Authority, which he joined in 2007.

Skills and Qualifications: Mr. Butler developed and led strategic and financial planning, marketing, sales, commercial; and supply, procurement and purchasing for one of the largest transportation companies in the world, Union Pacific. He most recently led the corporate governance, human resources, labor relations and administration functions at Union Pacific. His knowledge of the railroad transportation industry and the challenges in maintaining top-tier safety, customer service and risk management standards while providing an important part of the nation’s infrastructure provides him with unique skills and insights that are valuable to the Board. In addition, he has experience in the purchase of fuel and energy materials and equipment. As a result, Mr. Butler has an understanding of the aging infrastructure, safety, organizational and regulatory issues facing utilities today and provides a fresh viewpoint from an industry that is similarly positioned. His overall leadership experience and his regulated public company background provides the Board with another perspective on significant issues that we face.

Aristides S. Candris 63

2012

Dr. Candris was President and CEO of Westinghouse Electric Company (“Westinghouse”), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, a unit of Tokyo-based Toshiba Corp., from July 2008 until his retirement on March 31, 2012. During his 36 years of service at Westinghouse, Dr. Candris served in various positions, including Senior Vice President, Nuclear Fuel from September 2006 to July 2008. Dr. Candris was also on the board of Westinghouse until October 1,


Director Since: 2012 and is a director of Kurion, Inc.

Standing Board Committees:
Age: 67
Environmental, Safety and Sustainability Committee (Chair)

Dr. Candris is a nuclear scientist and engineer, and has significant experience gained through leading a global nuclear power company. His knowledge of the electric industry gives him significant insight on the issues impacting the electric utility industry. His experience managing highly technical engineering operations is valuable as we build and maintain facilities to address increasing environmental regulations and make long-term strategic decisions on electric power generation. His technical and management skills are helpful as we build and modernize both our transmission and distribution systems. Dr. Candris’ experience developing customer focused programs and attaining excellence in business processes and behaviors is insightful as we better meet the increasing expectations of customers and regulators. He serves on the Boards of Carnegie Mellon University and Transylvania University. He also serves on the Board of Directors for The Hellenic Initiative.

Finance Committee

Michael E. Jesanis, 58

Nominating and Governance Committee


Executive Experience: Dr. Candris was President and CEO of Westinghouse Electric Company (“Westinghouse”), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, a nuclear engineering company, which was a unit of Tokyo-based Toshiba Corp., from July 2008 until his retirement in March 2012. During his 36 years of service at Westinghouse, Dr. Candris served in various positions, including as Senior Vice President, Nuclear Fuel, from September 2006 to July 2008, and continued to serve on the board of Westinghouse until October 2012.

Outside Board and Other Experience: Dr. Candris is an advisory board member of Atomos Nuclear and Space Corporation. He is also a member of the advisory boards of the Carnegie Institute of Technology and the Wilton E. Scott Institute for Energy Innovation at Carnegie Mellon University. He also serves on the boards of trustees of Transylvania University and the Hellenic-American University and the board of directors of The Hellenic Initiative. He previously served on the boards of Westinghouse, and Kurion Inc.

Skills and Qualifications: Dr. Candris is a nuclear scientist and engineer, and has significant experience leading a global nuclear power company. His knowledge of the electric industry gives him significant insight to the issues impacting the electric utility industry. His experience managing highly technical engineering operations, and particularly his extensive experience and expertise in risk assessment, as well as process optimization methodologies (such as Lean/Six Sigma), are of great value as we build and maintain facilities to address increasing environmental regulations and make long-term strategic decisions on electric power generation and gas and electric delivery. His technical and management skills are helpful as we build and modernize both our transmission and distribution systems. Dr. Candris has great insight from his experience developing customer focused programs and attaining excellence in business processes and behaviors, which will assist us to better meet the increasing expectations of customers and regulators.

10

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Wayne S. DeVeydt

Since July 2013, Mr. Jesanis has been a co-founder and Managing


Director of HotZero, LLC, a firm formed to develop hot water district energy systems in New Hampshire. Mr. Jesanis has also, since November 2007, been a principal with Serrafix, Boston, Massachusetts, a firm providing energy efficiency consulting and implementation services, principally to municipalities. Mr. Jesanis also serves as an advisor to several startups in energy related fields. From July 2004 through December 2006, Mr. Jesanis was President and CEO of National Grid USA, a natural gas and electric utility, and a subsidiary of National Grid plc, of which Mr. Jesanis was also an Executive Director. Prior to that, Mr. Jesanis was Chief Operating Officer of National Grid USA from January 2001 to July 2004. Mr. Jesanis also is a director of Ameresco, Inc.

Since:
2016
Standing Board Committees:
Age: 49
Audit Committee

By virtue of his former positions as President and CEO, Chief Operating Officer and, prior thereto, Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) of a major electric and gas utility holding company, as well as his current role with an energy efficiency consulting firm, Mr. Jesanis has extraordinarily broad and deep experience with regulated utilities. He has strong financial acumen and extensive managerial experience, having led modernization efforts in the areas of operating infrastructure improvements, customer service enhancements and management-team development. Mr. Jesanis also demonstrates a commitment to education as the former chair of the board of a college and a current trustee (and past chair of the audit committee) of a university. As a result of his former senior managerial roles and his non-profit board service, Mr. Jesanis also has particular expertise with board governance issues.

Compensation Committee

Name, Age and Principal Occupations

for Past Five Years and Directorships Held

Finance Committee



Executive Experience: Mr. DeVeydt has been serving as Chief Executive Officer and member of the board of directors of Surgery Partners, Inc., a healthcare services company, since January 2018. Previously, he served as a Senior Advisor to the Global Healthcare division of Bain Capital located in Boston, Massachusetts from January 2017 to January 2018, and as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) at Anthem, Inc., a health insurance company and an independent licensee of the Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association from May 2007 until his retirement in June 2016. He also served as Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer at Anthem, Inc. beginning in 2005 and Chief of Staff to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer from 2006 to 2007. Prior to joining Anthem, Inc., Mr. DeVeydt was a partner at PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP from 1996 to 2005, where he served in many roles in the financial services industry.

Outside Board and Other Experience: Mr. DeVeydt is a member of the board of directors of Surgery Partners, Inc., where he currently serves as Chief Executive Officer. He is also a member of the board of directors of Grupo Notre Dame Intermedica. He also served as a director of Myovant Sciences Ltd. from 2016 until July 2018 and served as its lead independent director, chair of its audit committee, and a member of its compensation committee. Mr. DeVeydt is an active leader in his community through his charitable activities.

Skills and Qualifications: Mr. DeVeydt’s positions as CEO and CFO at public companies in regulated industries and as a partner at PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP provide him with strong financial acumen along with a deep understanding of regulated industry operations and extensive leadership skills, particularly in the areas of accounting and finance. His significant experience in internal controls, capital markets, corporate governance, risk management and strategic planning from both a public company and public accounting perspective make him an asset to the Board.

Has Been a
Director SinceJoseph Hamrock

Richard L. Thompson, 75


2004

Independent Chairman of the Board since May 2013. Prior to his retirement in 2004, Mr. Thompson was Group President, Caterpillar Inc., Peoria, Illinois, a leading manufacturer of construction and mining equipment, diesel and natural gas engines and industrial gas turbines. Mr. Thompson also is lead director of Lennox International, Inc. He was also on the board of Gardner Denver Inc. from November 1998 to July 2013.

In his prior role as Group President of a large, publicly traded manufacturing company, Mr. Thompson had responsibility for its gas turbine and reciprocating engine business, as well as research and development activities. By virtue of this and prior positions, Mr. Thompson possesses significant experience in energy issues generally and gas turbine electric power generation and natural gas pipeline compression in particular. He is a graduate electrical engineer with experience in electrical transmission system design and generation system planning. This experience provides Mr. Thompson a valuable understanding of technical issues faced by the Company.

Carolyn Y. Woo, 60

1998

Since January 2012, Dr. Woo has been President and CEO of Catholic Relief Services, the international humanitarian agency of the Catholic community in the United States. Prior thereto, Dr. Woo was Martin J. Gillen Dean and Ray and Milann Siegfried Professor of Entrepreneurial Studies, Mendoza College of Business, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana. Dr. Woo is also a director of AON Corporation.

Dr. Woo’s current position as President and CEO of an international organization provides her with knowledge and experience in managing a large organization. Her experience as the dean of a major business school and her experience as a professor of entrepreneurship provided her a deep understanding of business principles and extensive expertise with management and strategic planning issues. Through her current and previous service on the boards of directors, audit committees and compensation committees of a number of public companies, including a global reinsurance and risk management consulting company, a pharmaceutical distribution company, an international automotive manufacturer and a financial institution, Dr. Woo has developed an excellent understanding of corporate governance, internal control, financial and strategic analysis and risk management issues. Dr. Woo is a leader in the areas of corporate social responsibility and sustainability, which adds an important perspective to the Company. She is also a current and past board member of several non-profit organizations, including an international relief organization, a global business school accreditation organization, leadership development organizations and an educational organization. This commitment to social and educational organizations provides Dr. Woo with an additional important perspective on the various community and social issues confronting the Company in the various communities that the Company serves.

Name, Age and Principal Occupations

for Past Five Years and Directorships Held

Has Been a
Director, Since

Directors Expected to Resign from the Board in Connection with the Separation:

Sigmund L. Cornelius, 60

2011

Since April 1, 2014, Mr. Cornelius has been President and Chief Operating Executive Officer of Freeport LNG, LLC. From October 2008 to October 2010, Mr. Cornelius served as Senior Vice President, Finance and CFO of ConocoPhillips, Houston, Texas, an integrated energy company, before retiring at the end of 2010. During his 30-year tenure at ConocoPhillips, Mr. Cornelius served in various positions, including Senior Vice President, Planning, Strategy and Corporate Affairs from September 2007 to October 2008; Regional President, Exploration & Production-Lower 48 from 2006 to September 2007; and President, Global Gas from 2004 to 2006. Mr. Cornelius served on the board of DCP Midstream L.P. from 2007 to 2008 and is also a director of USEC, Inc., Carbo Ceramics Inc., Western Refining, Inc. and Parallel Energy Inc.

Standing Board Committees:
None
Director Since: 2015

Mr. Cornelius has significant experience in the oil and natural gas industry, which enables him to provide valuable insight on issues impacting our pipeline business. He also has significant experience in exploration, production as well as the midstream business, which is valuable to us as we expand our presence in the Utica and Marcellus Shale gas plays. In addition, as the former CFO of a public company, he has extensive experience and skills in the areas of corporate finance, accounting, strategic planning and risk oversight.

Age: 55


Executive Experience: Mr. Hamrock has been our President and CEO since July 2015. From May 2012 to June 2015, he was Executive Vice President and Group CEO for NiSource’s Gas Distribution Operations, comprised of local gas distribution companies in Kentucky, Maryland, Massachusetts, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Virginia. Prior thereto, he served in a variety of senior executive positions with American Electric Power (“AEP”), an electrical service public utility holding company in Columbus, Ohio, including as President and Chief Operating Officer of AEP Ohio from January 2008 to May 2012. He also served in leadership roles in engineering, transmission and distribution operations, customer service, marketing and information technology.

Outside Board and Other Experience: Mr. Hamrock is currently a member of the board of the American Gas Association, a gas industry trade association. He is also a board member of OhioHealth, a not-for-profit healthcare system in central Ohio, and A Kid Again, which supports families caring for children with life-threatening illnesses.

Skills and Qualifications: Mr. Hamrock has extensive knowledge of our industry from his more than 30 years of experience in a variety of positions at AEP and the Company. He began his career in the energy industry as an electrical engineer in transmission and distribution planning, and progressed to work in commercial and industrial customer services, earning a leadership role in commercial marketing, customer services, and strategic development, among other executive roles, before becoming CEO at NiSource. Consequently, he has a firm understanding of the needs of our customers and is uniquely qualified to lead a focused utility company to meet our customer commitments. Additionally, he has a solid understanding of our organization through his leadership of our gas distribution operations, where he led financial, operational, regulatory and commercial performance for the Columbia gas business. This significant industry experience provides Mr. Hamrock with a unique perspective into our operations, our markets, our people and the strategic vision needed to meet our long-term safety, customer value, business, financial and technology performance goals. In addition, he has been, and continues to be, an active supporter of educational, charitable and utility industry organizations.

11

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Deborah A. Henretta

Marty R. Kittrell, 58


Director Since: 2015
2007
Standing Board Committees:

In February 2011, Mr. Kittrell retired as Executive Vice President & CFO of Dresser, Inc. (“Dresser”), Addison, Texas, after serving in that capacity since December 2007. Dresser, a worldwide leader in providing highly engineered products for the global energy industry, was acquired by General Electric Company in February 2011. Prior to joining Dresser, Mr. Kittrell was Executive Vice President and CFO of Andrew Corporation from October 2003 to December 2007. Mr. Kittrell is also a director of On Assignment, Inc.

Age: 57
Compensation Committee
Environmental, Safety and Sustainability Committee

Mr. Kittrell brings to the Board over 25 years of experience as a CFO, having served in that role at several public companies. As a result of this experience, he has significant expertise with financial reporting issues facing the Company, including Securities and Exchange Commission reporting, and Sarbanes-Oxley internal control design and implementation. His position with a company that supplies infrastructure products to the energy industry gives Mr. Kittrell a particular familiarity with the issues facing the Company’s gas transmission and storage and gas distribution businesses. Mr. Kittrell also has extensive experience with mergers and acquisitions and capital markets transactions. He formerly practiced accounting with a national accounting firm and is an active member of the American Institute of CPAs, the National Association of Corporate Directors, and Financial Executives International. Mr. Kittrell also serves on the Executive

Finance Committee and as Chair of the Finance and Real Estate Committee of Lipscomb University.




Executive Experience: Ms. Henretta currently is a partner at G100 Companies, a C-suite learning and development company, where she serves as Senior Advisor spearheading digital transformation practice for SSA & Company, a G100 Company. She retired from Procter & Gamble Co. (“P&G”) in 2015, where she served as Group President of Global e-Business. Prior to her appointment as Group President of Global e-Business in January 2015, she held various senior positions throughout several P&G sectors, including as Group President of Global Beauty from 2012 to 2015 and as Group President of P&G Asia from 2007 to 2012. Prior to her appointment as Group President of P&G Asia, she was President Asia from 2005 to 2007 and President of Global Baby, Toddler and Adult Care from 2004 to 2005. She joined P&G in 1985.

Outside Board and Other Experience: Ms. Henretta has been a director at American Eagle Outfitters, Inc. since February 2019. Ms. Henretta has been a director at Corning Incorporated since 2013, and currently serves on its audit and corporate relations committees. She is a director of Meritage Homes Corporation, and serves on its nominating and corporate governance committees. Ms. Henretta served as a director of Staples, Inc. from June 2016 until September 2017 and served on its compensation committee. Additionally, she serves on the board of trustees for Xavier University and St. Bonaventure University.

Skills and Qualifications: Ms. Henretta has over 30 years of business leadership experience with P&G in a multi-jurisdictional regulatory and competitive business environment. She has experience across many markets, including P&L responsibility for multi-billion dollar businesses at P&G and responsibility for strategic planning, sales, marketing, e-business, government relations and customer service. Ms. Henretta led a dynamic business segment and is, therefore, keenly aware of the delicate balance of keeping pace with customer expectations in a changing environment, as well as maximizing the benefits that inclusion and diversity can provide. Because of this experience, Ms. Henretta brings valuable insights to the Board and strategic leadership to us as we operate in multiple regulatory environments and develop products and customer service programs to meet our customer commitments. In her partner role at G100 Companies, she assisted in establishing a Board Excellence Program, which provides board director education on board oversight and governance responsibilities, including in the areas of digital transformation and cybersecurity.

Michael E. Jesanis

Name, Age and Principal Occupations

for Past Five Years and Directorships Held


Director Since: 2008
Has Been a
Director SinceStanding Board Committees:

W. Lee Nutter, 71

Age: 62
2007
Audit Committee (Chair)

Prior to his retirement in 2007, Mr. Nutter was Chairman, President and CEO of Rayonier, Inc., Jacksonville, Florida, a leading supplier of high performance specialty cellulose fibers and owner of timberlands and other higher value land holdings. Mr. Nutter was a director of Rayonier, Inc. from 1996 to 2009. He is also a director of Republic Services Inc. and the non-executive Chairman of J.M. Huber Corporation. He is also a member of the Advisory Board at the University of Washington Foster School of Business.

Compensation Committee
Finance Committee


Executive Experience: Mr. Jesanis is a co-founder and, since July 2013, has been Managing Director of HotZero, LLC, a firm formed to develop hot water district energy systems in New England. Mr. Jesanis has served as an advisor to several startups in energy-related fields. From July 2004 through December 2006, Mr. Jesanis was President and CEO of National Grid USA, a natural gas and electric utility, and a subsidiary of National Grid plc, of which Mr. Jesanis was also an Executive Director. Prior to that position, Mr. Jesanis was COO and CFO of National Grid USA from January 2001 to July 2004 and CFO of its predecessor utility holding company from 1998 to 2000.

Outside Board and Other Experience: Mr. Jesanis previously served as a director for several electric and energy companies, including Ameresco, Inc. Mr. Jesanis is the former chair of the board of a college and a past trustee (and past chair of the audit committee) of a university.

Skills and Qualifications: By virtue of his former positions as President and CEO, COO and, prior thereto, CFO, of a major electric and gas utility holding company as well as his current role with an energy efficiency consulting firm, Mr. Jesanis has extensive experience with regulated utilities. He has strong financial acumen and extensive managerial experience, having led modernization efforts in the areas of operating infrastructure improvements, customer service enhancements and management team development. Mr. Jesanis also demonstrates a commitment to education as the former chair of the board of a college and a past trustee (and past chair of the audit committee) of a university. As a result of his former senior managerial roles and his non-profit board service, Mr. Jesanis also has particular expertise with board governance issues.

12

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Kevin T. Kabat

Mr. Nutter’s former positions as


Vice Chairman and CEO of a forest products company, and his current positions as director of one company engaged in waste management and another involved in the forest products and energy industries, give him a particular familiarity with the issues involved in managing natural resources. These issues include compliance with environmental laws and exercising responsible environmental stewardship. Mr. Nutter also has an extensive background and familiarity in human resource and compensation issues, which complements well his service as chair of the Company’s Officer Nomination and Compensation Committee. In addition, as a former CEO, Mr. Nutter understands how to address the complex issues facing major corporations.

Standing Board Committees:

Deborah S. Parker, 62

Director Since: 2015
2007
Audit Committee

Ms. Parker retired as Senior Vice President, Quality and Environmental, Health and Safety of Alstom Power, a business segment of Alstom, in August 2014, after serving in that capacity since April 2011. Alstom Power, a global leader in power generation located in Zurich, Switzerland, has agreed to be acquired by General Electric Company. From April 2008 until April 2011, Ms. Parker was President and CEO of International Business Solutions, Inc. (“IBS”), Washington, D.C., a provider of strategic planning and consulting services to profit and not-for-profit organizations. Before joining IBS, Ms. Parker was Executive Vice President and Chief Operations Officer of the National Urban League from July 2007 through April 2008. Prior thereto, Ms. Parker served in numerous operating positions, including Vice President of Global Quality at Ford Motor Company. During her tenure at Ford Motor Company, Ms. Parker also served as CEO and Group Managing Director at Ford Motor Company of Southern Africa (Pty) Ltd. from September 2001 to December 2004.

Age: 62
Compensation Committee (Chair)
Nominating and Governance Committee



Executive Experience: From April 2007 to November 2015, Mr. Kabat was CEO of Fifth Third Bancorp, a bank holding company. He continued to serve as Vice Chairman of the board of directors of Fifth Third Bancorp until his retirement in April 2016. Before becoming CEO, he served as Fifth Third Bancorp’s President from June 2006 to September 2012 and as Executive Vice President from December 2003 to June 2006. Additionally, he was previously President and CEO of Fifth Third Bank (Michigan). Prior to that position, he was Vice Chairman and President of Old Kent Bank, which was acquired by Fifth Third Bancorp in 2001.

Outside Board and Other Experience: Mr. Kabat has been a director of Unum Group since 2008 and is currently chairman of the board and chair of its governance committee. In 2016, Mr. Kabat became the lead independent director of E*Trade Financial Corporation and is a member of its bank board and its compensation and governance committees. He has also held leadership positions on the boards and committees of local business, educational, cultural and charitable organizations and campaigns.

Skills and Qualifications: Mr. Kabat has significant leadership experience as a CEO in a regulated industry at a public company. As a result, he has a deep understanding of operating in a regulatory environment and balancing the interests of many stakeholders. His extensive experience in strategic planning, risk management, financial reporting, internal controls and capital markets makes him an asset to the Board, as he is able to provide unique strategic insight, financial expertise and risk management skills. In addition, he has broad corporate governance skills and perspective gained from his service in leadership positions on the boards of other publicly traded companies.

Carolyn Y. Woo

Ms. Parker brings a unique combination of community development and industrial management experience to the Board. As a Senior Vice President of Quality, Environmental, Health and Safety of a global power generation firm, she brings knowledge and understanding of operations, health and safety issues that are valuable to us as we execute on our commitment to increase our investment in environmental projects and focus on safety. As a former CEO of a consulting firm and Chief Operating Officer of a national civil rights organization dedicated to economic empowerment of historically underserved urban communities, Ms. Parker brings expertise and understanding with respect to the social and economic issues confronting the Company and the communities it serves. As a result of her 23-year career at a global manufacturing company, Ms. Parker has extensive experience managing industrial operations, including turning around several struggling business units, finding innovative solutions to management and union issues, implementing quality control initiatives and rationalizing manufacturing and inventory. This experience positions her well to provide valuable insights on the Company’s operations and processes, as well as on social issues confronting the Company.


Director Since: 1998

Standing Board Committees:

Name, Age and Principal Occupations

for Past Five Years and Directorships Held

Age: 64
Has Been a
Director Since
Audit Committee

Robert C. Skaggs, Jr., 60

2005
Environmental, Safety and Sustainability Committee

Chief Executive Officer of the Company since July 2005

Nominating and President of the Company since October 2004. Prior thereto, Mr. Skaggs served as Executive Vice President, Regulated Revenue from October 2003 to October 2004; President of Columbia Gas of Ohio, Inc. from February 1997 to October 2003; President of Columbia Gas of Kentucky, Inc. from January 1997 to October 2003; President of Bay State Gas Company and Northern Utilities from November 2000 to October 2003; and President of Columbia Gas of Virginia, Inc., Columbia Gas of Maryland, Inc. and Columbia Gas of Pennsylvania, Inc. from December 2001 to October 2003.

The Board believes it is important that the Company’s CEO serve on the Board. Mr. Skaggs has a unique understanding of the challenges and issues facing the Company. During his nearly 32 years with the Company, he has served in a variety of positions across the organization, including the legal and finance departments, President of a number of our gas distribution subsidiaries, and Executive Vice President, Regulated Revenue, where he was responsible for developing regulatory strategies and leading external relations across all of our energy distribution markets, as well as our interstate pipeline system. He also led regulated commercial activities, including large customer and marketer relations, energy supply services, as well as federal governmental relations. This wide and deep experience provides an incomparable knowledge of our operations, our markets and our people. Over the course of his career, Mr. Skaggs has been involved in a wide array of community-based organizations as well as a number of industry organizations, further providing him with a valuable perspective on the communities the Company serves and the issues facing our industry. He served as Chairman of the American Gas Association in 2010.

Teresa A. Taylor, 51

2012

Ms. Taylor is currently CEO of Blue Valley Advisors, LLC. Ms. Taylor served as Chief Operating Officer of Qwest Communications, Inc. (“Qwest”), Denver, Colorado, from August 2009 to April 2011. Prior thereto, she was Executive Vice President, Business Markets Group of Qwest from January 2008 to April 2009 and served as Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer from December 2005 to January 2008. Ms. Taylor served in various positions with Qwest and the former US West since 1987. Ms. Taylor also is a director of T-Mobile USA, Inc. and First Interstate BancSystem, Inc.

In her position as Chief Operating Officer, Ms. Taylor was responsible for the daily operations of a publicly traded telecommunications company. In this role, she led a senior management team responsible for field support, technical development, sales, marketing, customer support and information technology systems. During her 24-year tenure with Qwest and US West, she held various leadership positions responsible for strategic planning and execution, sales, marketing, product development, human resources, corporate communications and social responsibility. Ms. Taylor is keenly aware of the technical and managerial skills necessary to operate a customer service company in a complex regulatory and competitive business environment. This experience will provide valuable insights to the Company as it operates in multiple regulatory environments and develops products and customer service programs to meet the expectations of our customers.

Governance Committee (Chair)

Executive Experience: Dr. Woo was President and CEO of Catholic Relief Services, an international humanitarian agency serving over 100 countries, from January 2012 until her retirement in December 2016. Prior thereto, Dr. Woo was dean and a professor of Entrepreneurial Studies at the Mendoza College of Business, University of Notre Dame in Notre Dame, Indiana.

Outside Board and Other Experience: In addition to serving on our Board, Dr. Woo has been a director at AON plc since 1998, and currently serves on its audit, compliance, and organization and compensation committees. She is also on the board of Arabesque. She has previously served on the boards of directors of four additional public companies: Circuit City, St. Joseph Capital Bank, Arvin Industries and Bindley-Western Industries. She is also a current and past board member of several non-profit organizations, including an international relief organization, a global business school accreditation organization, leadership development organizations and an educational organization.

Skills and Qualifications: Dr. Woo’s experience as President and CEO of an international organization provides her with knowledge and experience in managing a large organization. Her experience as the dean of a major business school and her experience as a professor of entrepreneurship provides her with a deep understanding of business principles and extensive expertise with management and strategic planning issues. Through her current and previous service on the boards of directors, audit committees and compensation committees of public companies, including a global reinsurance and risk management consulting company, a pharmaceutical distribution company, an international automotive manufacturer and a financial institution, Dr. Woo has developed an excellent understanding of corporate governance, internal control, financial and strategic analysis and risk management issues. Dr. Woo is a leader in the areas of corporate social responsibility, sustainability and ethics, which adds an important perspective to the Board. In 2017, she was named to the Top 100 Most Influential in Business Ethics by the Ethisphere Institute. Dr. Woo’s commitment to social and educational organizations provides her with an important perspective on the various community and social issues confronting us in the communities that we serve.

13

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Director Independence

Under our Corporate Governance Guidelines, a majority of the Board must be comprised of “independent directors.” In order to assist the Board in making its determination of director independence, the Board has adopted categorical standards of independence consistent with the standards contained in Section 303A.02(b)303A.02 of the NYSE Corporate Governance Standards.Listed Company Manual. The Board also has adopted an additional independence standard providing that a director who is an executive officer or director of a company that has made payments to or receivedreceives payments from the Company for property or services within the last three yearsus in excess ofan amount which exceeds 1% of such other company’s consolidated gross revenues is not independent“independent” until three years after payments fallfalling below thatsuch threshold. A copy of our Corporate Governance Guidelines is posted on our website athttp:https://ir.nisource.com/governance.cfm.www.nisource.com/investors/governance.

The Board has affirmatively determined that, with the exception of Mr. Skaggs,Hamrock, all of the members of the Board and all nominees are “independent directors” as defined in Section 303A.02(b)303A.02 of the NYSE Corporate Governance StandardsListed Company Manual and meet the additional standard for independence set by the Board.

Policies and Procedures with Respect to Transactions with Related Persons

We have established policies and procedures with respect to the review, approval and ratification of any transactions with related persons as set forth in the Audit Committee Charter and the Code of Business Conduct.persons.

Under its Charter,charter, the AuditNominating and Governance Committee is charged with the review ofreviews reports and disclosures of insider and affiliated partyrelated person transactions. Under theour Code of Business Conduct, the following situations may present a conflict of interest and must be reviewed by the Nominating and Governance Committee to determine if they involve a direct or indirect interest of any director, executive officer or employee (including immediate family members):

or otherwise present a conflict of interest:

owning more than a 10% equity interest or a general partner interest in any entity that transacts business with the Company (including lending or leasing transactions, but excluding the receipt of utility service from the Company at tariff rates), if the total amount involved in such transactions may exceed $120,000;

selling anything to the Company or buying anything from the Company (including lending or leasing transactions, but excluding the receipt of utility service from the Company at tariff rates), if the total amount involved in such transactions may exceed $120,000;

consulting for or being employed by a competitor of the Company; and

being in the position of supervising, reviewing or having any influence on the job evaluation, pay or benefit of any immediate family member employed by the Company.

Related partyperson transactions requiring review under the Code of Business Conduct are annually reviewed and, if appropriate, ratified by the AuditNominating and Governance Committee. Directors, individuals subject to Section 16 (“Section 16 Officer(s)”) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, (“Section 16 Officers”as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and senior executive officers are expected to raise any potential transactions involving a conflict of interest that relatesrelate to them with the AuditNominating and Governance Committee so that they may be reviewed in a prompt manner.

There were no transactions between the Company and any officer, director or nominee for director, or any affiliate of or person related to any of them, since January 1, 20142018, of the type or amount required to be disclosed under the applicable Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) rules.

Executive Sessions of Non-Management Directors

To promote open discussion among the non-management directors, the Board schedules regular executive sessions at meetings of the Board and each of its Committees.committees. The non-management members met separately from management sixseven times in 2014 in sessions at which the2018. The independent Chairman of the Board presided.presided at all these executive sessions. All of the non-management members are “independent directors” as defined under the applicable NYSE and SEC rules.

14

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Communications with the Board and Non-Management Directors

Stockholders and other interested persons may communicate any concerns they may have regarding the Company as follows:

Communications to the Board may be made to the Board generally, any director individually, the non-management directors as a group, or the Chairman of the Board, by writing to the following address:

NiSource Inc.


Attention: Board of Directors, or any Board member, or non-management directors, or Chairman
of the Board


c/o Corporate Secretary


801 East 86
th Avenue


Merrillville, Indiana 46410

The Audit Committee has approved procedures with respect to the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints regarding accounting, internal accounting controls or audit matters. Communications regarding such matters may be made by contacting the Company’sour Ethics and Compliance Officer atethics@nisource.com, calling the business ethics hotline at 1-800-457-2814, or writing to:

NiSource Inc.


Attention: Director, Corporate Ethics


801 East 86
th Avenue


Merrillville, Indiana 46410

Stockholder Engagement

We are committed to engaging with our stockholders and soliciting their views and input on important governance, environmental, social, executive compensation and other matters. Our Nominating and Governance Committee is responsible for overseeing the stockholder engagement process and the periodic review and assessment of stockholder input on governance matters. We engage with our stockholders on governance each year outside of the proxy season. Our independent directors are available to engage in dialogue with stockholders on matters of significance in order to understand stockholders’ views. In addition, management regularly participates in investor and industry conferences throughout the year to discuss performance and share its perspective on the Company and industry developments.

Code of Business Conduct

The Company has adoptedWe have a Code of Business Conduct to promotepromote: (i) ethical behavior, including the ethical handling of conflicts of interest,interest; (ii) full, fair, accurate, timely and understandable financial disclosure,disclosure; (iii) compliance with applicable laws, rules and regulations,regulations; (iv) accountability for adherence to our codecode; and (v) prompt internal reporting of violations of our code. Our Code of Business Conduct satisfies applicable SEC and NYSE requirements and applies to all directors, officers (including our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer and controller), as well as to our employees of the Company and itsour affiliates. A copy of our Code of Business Conduct is available on our website athttp:https://ir.nisource.com/governance.cfmwww.nisource.com/investors/governanceand also is available to any stockholder upon written request to our Corporate Secretary.Secretary at the address noted above under the heading “Communications with the Board and Non-Management Directors.”

Any waiver of our Code of Business Conduct for any director, executive officer or Section 16 Officer or senior executiveofficer may be made only by the Audit Committee of the Board and must be promptly disclosed to the extent and in the manner required by the SEC or the NYSE and posted on our website. No such waivers have been granted.

Corporate Governance Guidelines

The CorporateNominating and Governance Committee is responsible for annually reviewing and reassessing the Corporate Governance Guidelines and will submitsubmitting any recommended changes to the Board for its approval. A copy of the Corporate Governance Guidelines can be found on our website athttp:https://ir.nisource.com/governance.cfmwww.nisource.com/investors/governance and is also available to any stockholder upon written request to the Company’sour Corporate Secretary.

Board Leadership Structure and Risk Oversight

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines state that the Companywe should remain free to configure leadership of the Board in the way that best serves the Company’sour interests at the time and, accordingly, the Board has no fixed policy with respect to combining or separating the offices of Chairman and CEO. If the Chairman is not an independent director, an independent lead directorLead Director will be chosen annually by the CorporateBoard, taking into account the recommendation of the Nominating and Governance Committee. The Chairman or, if the Chairman is not an independent director, the lead directorLead Director will serve as chair of the Corporate Governance Committee and asbe the presiding director for purposesof executive sessions of the NYSE rules.Board.

Since late 2006, the offices of Chairman and CEO of the Company have been held by different individuals, with the Chairman being an independent director. In deciding to separate

15

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The duties of the offices,Chairman of the Board determined that having a director with a long tenure serveare as Chairman would help ensure continuity and stability. At this time,follows:

providing leadership to the Board believes thatand management, and monitoring the discharge of their duties;
presiding at meetings of stockholders and the Board, including executive sessions of the Board and meetings of the independent directors;
serving as a liaison between the independent directors and management;
in consultation with the CEO, setting agendas for the meetings of the Board, and developing annual Board meeting schedules for approval by the Board;
ensuring proper flow of information to the Board;
having the authority to call special meetings of the Board and independent directors;
being available for consultation and direct communication with stockholders and other key stakeholders, as appropriate; and
having such other responsibilities and perform such duties as may from time to time be assigned to him or her by the Board.

The Board periodically reviews the structure and the division of responsibilities between the role of independent Chairman and CEO. The structure and division of responsibilities is intended to maintain the integrity of the oversight function of the Board by providing a separate framework of responsibilities for the independent Chairman arrangement serves the Company well.

as set forth above.

Board Oversight of Risk

The Board takes an active role in monitoring and assessing the Company’sour strategic, compliance, operational and financial risks, which include risks associated with operations, credit, energy supply, financing, capital investments, and compensation policies and practices.as well as cybersecurity risks. The Board administers its oversight function through utilization of its various committees, as well as through acommittees. Our Risk Management Committee, consistingwhich consists of members of our senior management, which is responsible for theoversight of our risk management process. Senior management regularly provides an annual reportreports on our risks to the Board, and to the Audit Committee.Committee and the Board committees that oversee the applicable risks. Additionally, the Audit Committee discusses with management and the independent auditorregistered public accounting firm the effect of regulatory and accounting initiatives on the Company’sour financial statements and is responsible for review and evaluation of the Company’sour major risk exposures, including cybersecurity and supplier risks, and the steps management has taken to monitor and control such exposures. The Audit Committee reviews and assesses the adequacy of the Company’s Risk Management Committee Charter annually and amends the charter as appropriate. In addition, the FinanceCompensation Committee, Officer Nomination and Compensation (“ONC”) Committee and the Environmental, Safety and Sustainability (“ESS”) Committee, the Finance Committee and the Nominating and Governance Committee are each charged with overseeing the risks associated with their respective areas of responsibility.

Meetings and Committees of the Board

The Board met fourteen10 times during 2014.2018. Each incumbent director attended at least 93%90% of the total number of meetings of the Board meetings and the meetings of the committees of the Board on which he or she was a member.served, and in each case, during the periods that he or she served. Pursuant to our Corporate Governance Guidelines, all directors are expected to attend all Board meetings, to spend the Annual Meeting.time needed to discharge their responsibilities as directors, and to attend the annual meeting of stockholders. All incumbentthen-serving directors attended the 2014 Annual Meeting2018 annual meeting of Stockholders.stockholders.

Pursuant to our Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Board expects that our senior officers will regularly attend Board and Committee meetings, present proposals and otherwise assist in the work of the Board. Members of the Board have direct access to all of our employees, outside advisors and independent registered public accounting firm.

The Board has established five standing committees to assist the Board in carrying out its duties: the Audit Committee, the Corporate GovernanceCompensation Committee, the ESS Committee, the Finance Committee and the ONCNominating and Governance Committee. Beginning in 2015, the Board also established a Search Committee, an ad hoc committee to assist the Nominating and Governance Committee and the Board in identifying qualified director candidates. The Search Committee met twice during 2018. The Board evaluates the structure and membership of its committees on an annual basis, and appoints the independent members of the Board to serve on the committees and elects committee chairs following the Annual Meetingannual meeting of Stockholders.stockholders. The following tables showtable shows the composition of each standing Board committee during 2014.as of the date of this proxy statement. Mr. SkaggsHamrock does not serve on any committee, but is invited to attend various committee meetings. Mr. Thompson, who is Chairman of the Board, also serves as the Chairand Mr. Kabat, Vice Chairman of the Corporate Governance Committee and isBoard, are invited to attend all meetings of each of the standing committees.

16

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Board Committee Composition

Director
Audit
Compensation
ESS
Finance
Nominating
and
Governance
Peter A. Altabef
✔ 
✔*
✔ 
Theodore H. Bunting, Jr. (1) (2)
✔ 
✔ 
Eric L. Butler
✔ 
✔ 
✔ 
Aristides S. Candris
✔*
✔ 
✔ 
Wayne S. DeVeydt
✔ 
✔ 
✔ 
Deborah A. Henretta
✔ 
✔ 
✔ 
Michael E. Jesanis (2)
✔*
✔ 
✔ 
Kevin T. Kabat (3)
✔ 
✔*
✔ 
Richard L. Thompson (4)
✔ 
Carolyn Y. Woo
✔ 
✔ 
✔*
DirectorAuditCorporate
Governance
ESSFinanceONC

Richard A. Abdoo

XXX

Aristides S. Candris

XXX

Sigmund L. Cornelius

XXX

Michael E. Jesanis

XXX

Marty R. Kittrell

X*(F)XX

W. Lee Nutter

XXX

Deborah S. Parker

XXX

Teresa A. Taylor

XXX

Richard L. Thompson(1)

X

Carolyn Y. Woo

XXX

*Committee Chair. Mr. Nutter was Chair of the ONC Committee until May 14, 2014, when Ms. Taylor became Chair.

(1)Independent Chairman ofMr. Bunting was appointed to the Board.Board on September 5, 2018 and appointed to the Audit and Compensation Committees on October 23, 2018.

(F)(2)Audit Committee Financial Expert, as defined by the SEC rules.

(3)Independent Vice Chairman of the Board.
(4)Independent Chairman of the Board.

The summaries below are qualified by reference to the entire charter for each of the Audit, Corporate Governance,Compensation, ESS, Finance and ONCNominating and Governance Committees; each of which can be found on our website athttp:https://ir.nisource.com/governance.cfmwww.nisource.com/investors/governanceand is also available to any stockholder upon written request to the Company’sour Corporate Secretary. Additionally, any committee may perform other duties and responsibilities, consistent with their respective charters, our Amended and Restated Bylaws (our “Bylaws”), governing law, the rules of the NYSE, the federal securities laws and such other requirements applicable to us, delegated to any committee by the Board, or in the case of the Compensation Committee, under any provision of any of our benefit or compensation plans.

Audit Committee

The Audit Committee met eightnine times in 2014. Among other things,2018. Our Audit Committee is responsible for the oversight of our internal audit function and financial reporting process. The Audit Committee has the sole authority to appoint, retain or replace theour independent auditorsregistered public accounting firm and is responsible for:

for, among other things:

reviewing theour independent auditors’registered public accounting firm’s qualifications and independence;

independence and compensating our independent registered public accounting firm;

overseeing the performance of the Company’sour internal audit function and theour independent auditors;

registered public accounting firm;

reviewing and discussing with management and theour independent auditorregistered public accounting firm our annual and quarterly financial statements;

statements before earnings announcements;

reviewing and discussing with management our annual and quarterly earnings press releases;
reviewing and discussing with management and theour independent auditorregistered public accounting firm major issues regarding accounting principles and financial statement presentations, adequacy of internal controls, and any critical judgments andor accounting estimates made in connection with the preparation of financial statements;

reviewing related party transactions; and

evaluating our major risk exposures, including cybersecurity and supplier risks, and the steps management has taken to monitor and control such exposures, including discussion of our risk assessment and risk management policies; and

overseeing the Company’sour compliance with legal and regulatory requirements.

The Board has determined that all of the members of the Audit Committee are independent as defined under the applicable NYSE and SEC rules, including the additional independence standard for audit committee members, and meet theour additional independence standard set forth in theour Corporate Governance Guidelines. The Audit Committee has reviewed and approved theour independent registered public accountants, bothaccounting firm for 2014each of 2018 and 2015,2019, and the fees relating to audit services and other services performed by them.our independent registered public accounting firm.

17

TABLE OF CONTENTS

For more information regarding the Audit Committee, see “Audit Committee Report” and “Proposal 3 — Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” below.

   Compensation Committee

The Compensation Committee met seven times in 2018. The Compensation Committee apprises the Board with respect to the evaluation, compensation and benefits of our executives. Its responsibilities include, among others:

evaluating the performance of our CEO and other executive officers in light of our goals and objectives;
reviewing and approving the corporate goals and objectives relevant to CEO and executive officer compensation;
making recommendations to the independent Board members regarding CEO compensation and approving compensation of the other executive officers;
reviewing and approving periodically a general compensation policy for our other officers and officers of our principal subsidiaries;
approving, or if appropriate, making recommendations to the Board with respect to incentive compensation plans and equity-based plans;
reviewing our officer candidates for election by the Board;
reviewing and evaluating the executive officers’ development and succession plan (other than our CEO’s succession plan, which is reviewed by the Nominating and Governance Committee);
evaluating the risks associated with our compensation policies and practices and the steps management has taken to monitor and control such risks; and
overseeing equal employment opportunity and diversity initiatives.

In making recommendations regarding the compensation of our CEO and approving the compensation of the other executive officers, the Compensation Committee takes into consideration its evaluation of the individual performance of each person. The Compensation Committee also considers recommendations from the independent compensation consultant that the Compensation Committee engages to advise it with respect to executive compensation design, comparative compensation practices and compensation matters relating to the Board. Each year, the Compensation Committee evaluates the independence and quality of the services provided by its independent compensation consultant. Additionally, when considering changes in compensation for senior executives that report to our CEO, including the Named Executive Officers, the Compensation Committee also considers input from our CEO; Chief Services Officer; and Senior Vice President, Human Resources.

The Compensation Committee first engaged the services of Meridian Compensation Partners, LLC (“Meridian”) in August 2017 as its independent compensation consultant after conducting a request for proposal process. In reviewing the engagement in 2018, the Compensation Committee considered the factors set forth in SEC Rule 10C-1(b)(4) and the applicable NYSE rules and determined that Meridian was independent. Meridian provided no other services to the Company in 2018.

The Compensation Committee has authority to delegate its responsibilities to subcommittees as deemed appropriate, provided the subcommittees are composed entirely of independent directors who also meet the other requirements for membership of the Compensation Committee.

All of the directors serving on the Compensation Committee are: (i) independent as defined under the applicable NYSE and SEC rules and meet the additional independence standard set forth in the Corporate Governance Guidelines and the additional NYSE independence standard for members of compensation committees; (ii) “non-employee directors” as defined under Rule 16b-3 of the Exchange Act; and (iii) “outside directors” as defined by Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code (hereafter “Section 162(m) of the Code” or “Code Section 162(m)”).

   Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

As of December 31, 2018, Messrs. Bunting, Butler, DeVeydt, Jesanis and Kabat, and Ms. Henretta served on the Compensation Committee. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018, there were no compensation committee interlocks or insider participation.

   Environmental, Safety and Sustainability Committee

The CorporateESS Committee met five times during 2018. The ESS Committee assists the Board in overseeing the programs, performance and risks relative to environmental, safety and sustainability matters. Its responsibilities include, among others:

evaluating our environmental and sustainability policies, practices and performance;
evaluating our safety policies, practices and performance relating to our employees, contractors and the general public;
reviewing and assessing stockholder proposals related to the environment, safety and sustainability;
reviewing and evaluating our programs, policies, practices and performance with respect to health and safety compliance auditing; and
assessing major legislation, regulation and other external influences that pertain to the ESS Committee’s responsibilities and assessing the impact on us.

18

TABLE OF CONTENTS

   Finance Committee

The Finance Committee met six times during 2018. Its responsibilities include the following, among others:

reviewing and evaluating our financial plans, capital structure, equity and debt levels, dividend policy and financial policies;
reviewing our corporate insurance programs;
reviewing our investment strategy and investments;
reviewing and evaluating our financial, tax, third party credit and commodity risks and the steps management has taken to monitor and control such risks;
reviewing our annual earnings guidance and capital budgets and recommending approval to the Board; and
reviewing our hedging policies and exempt swap transactions.

   Nominating and Governance Committee

The Nominating and Governance Committee met fourfive times in 2014.2018. Its responsibilities include:

include, among others:

identifying individuals qualified to become Board members, consistent with criteria approved by the Board;

recommending to the Board director nominees for election at the next annual meeting of the stockholders;

developing and recommending to the Board a set of corporate governance principles applicable to the Company;

Corporate Governance Guidelines;

consulting with management to determine the appropriate response to stockholder proposals submitted pursuant to SEC rules;

reviewing and evaluating risks to our reputation and the steps management has taken to monitor and control such risks;
reviewing and evaluating our CEO succession plan;

plan and working with the Board to evaluate potential successors to our CEO;

reviewing and overseeing, at least annually, corporate and business unit political spending;

evaluating any resignation tendered by a director and making recommendations to the Board about whether to accept such resignation; and

overseeing the evaluation of the performance of the Board and its Committees.

committees.

Pursuant to the CorporateThe Nominating and Governance Guidelines, the Committee, with the assistance of the ONC Committee and its independent compensation consultant, Exequity LLP,annually reviews the amount and composition of non-employee director compensation from time to time and makes recommendations tocompensation. Please see the Board when it concludes changes are needed. The Committee is also responsiblediscussion under the heading “Director Compensation” for evaluating the performancea description of the CEOcompensation we provide to our non-employee directors.

Director Selection Process.   The Nominating and his executive direct reports. The Committee reviews and approves the Company’s goals and objectives relevant to the CEO and his executive direct reports and evaluates their performance in light of those goals and objectives and after receiving input from the Board. The Chair of the Committee reports the Committee’s findings to the ONC Committee, which uses these findings to set the compensation of the CEO and his executive direct reports.

TheGovernance Committee identifies and screens candidates for director and makes its recommendations for director to the Board. At times the Board as a whole. Themay establish an ad hoc search committee to assist the Nominating and Governance Committee in this process. Additionally, the Nominating and Governance Committee has the authority to retain a search firm to help it identify director candidates to the extent it deems necessary or appropriate. In 2015, the Board established a search committee to assist the Nominating and Governance Committee and the Board in identifying qualified director candidates. In 2017 and 2018, the Nominating and Governance Committee also engaged the firm of Heidrick & Struggles International, Inc., which firm recommended Messrs. Butler and Bunting for director. In considering candidates for director, the Nominating and Governance Committee con-

sidersconsiders the natureskills, expertise, experience and qualifications that will best complement the overall mix of skills and expertise of the expertise and experience required for the performanceBoard in view of the dutiesstrategy of, a director of a company engaged in our businesses,and the risks and opportunities that we face, as well as each candidate’s relevant business, academic and industry experience, professional background, age, current employment, community service, other board service and other factors. Pursuant toIn addition, the CorporateNominating and Governance Guidelines, the Committee also considerstakes into account the racial, ethnic and gender diversity of the Board. Board and actively seeks minority and female candidates.

The Nominating and Governance Committee seeks to identify and recommend candidates with a reputation for, and record of, integrity and good business judgment who:who have experience in positions with a high degree of responsibility and are leaders in the organizations with which they are affiliated; are effective in working in complex collegial settings; are free from conflicts of interest that could interfere with a director’s duties to the Companyus and itsour stockholders; and are willing and able to make the necessary commitment of time and attention required for effective service on the Board.Board, including limiting their service on other boards to a reasonable number. The Nominating and Governance Committee also takes into account the candidate’s level of financial literacy. The Nominating and Governance Committee monitors the mix of skills and experience of the directors in order to assess whether the Board has the necessary tools to perform its oversight function effectively. The Nominating and Governance Committee also assesses the diversity of the Board as a part of its annual self-assessment process.process as described in more detail below. The Nominating and Governance Committee will consider nominees for directors recommended by stockholders and will use the same criteria to evaluate candidates proposed by stockholders.stockholders as it uses to evaluate the candidates identified by the Board.

The Board has determined that all of the members of the Nominating and Governance Committee are independent as defined under the applicable NYSE rules and meet the additional independence standard set forth in the Corporate Governance Guidelines.

For information on how to nominate a person for election as a director at the 20162020 Annual Meeting, please see the discussion under the heading “Stockholder Proposals and Nominations for 20162020 Annual Meeting.”

Environmental, Safety & Sustainability Committee19

The ESS Committee met five times during 2014. The ESS Committee assists the Board in overseeing the programs, performance and risks relative to environmental, safety and sustainability matters. In this regard, the Committee:

TABLE OF CONTENTS

evaluatesBoard Evaluation Process.   The Nominating and Governance Committee oversees the Company’s environmental and sustainability policies and practices;

evaluates the Company’s safety policies and practices relating to our employees, contractors, and the general public;

reviews and assesses the impact of shareholder proposals related to environmental safety and sustainability;

evaluates the Company’s programs, policies, practices and performance with respect to health and safety compliance auditing; and

assesses major legislation, regulation and other external influences that pertain to the Committee’s responsibilities.

Finance Committee

The Finance Committee met five times during 2014. Its responsibilities include overseeing and monitoring the following:

the financial plans of the Company, capital structure, long and short-term debt levels, and financial policy;

the Company’s dividend policy and periodic dividends, investment strategy, investments, capital budgets, financial risks and steps taken to control those risks;

the Company’s corporate insurance coverage; and

the Company’s hedging policies and exempt swap transactions.

Officer Nomination and Compensation Committee

The ONC Committee met six times in 2014. The ONC Committee advises the Board with respect to nomination, evaluation, compensation and benefits of our executives. In that regard, the Committee:

approves the CEO’s compensation based on the Corporate Governance Committee’s report on the evaluation of the CEO’s performance;

approves the compensation of the CEO’s executive direct reports;

makes recommendations to the Board with respect to incentive compensation plans and equity-based plans;

reviews and approves periodically a general compensation policy for other officers of the Company and officers of its principal subsidiaries;

recommends Company officer candidates for electionself-evaluation process, which is used by the Board and oversees the evaluation of management;

reviews and evaluates the management succession plan, except for the CEO’s succession plan;

evaluates the risks associated with our compensation policies and practices; and

oversees equal employment opportunity and diversity initiatives.

In approving the compensationby each committee of the CEOBoard to determine effectiveness and his executive direct reports,identify opportunities for improvement. Annually at its meeting in March, the Nominating and Governance Committee takes into considerationinitiates the Corporate Governance Committee’sself-evaluation process and approves the form of written evaluation ofquestionnaires that are distributed to each director for completion. The written evaluation questionnaires are updated each year as necessary to reflect changes identified in the individual performance of each. When consideringprior year, any committee charter changes in compensation for the Named Executive Officers, the Committee also considers inputand any suggestions from the Senior Vice President, Human Resourcesdirectors. The questionnaires solicit feedback on Board composition, Board meeting mechanics including information received, core responsibilities, relationship with management, committee functioning and Exequity LLP,other relevant matters. Our Chief Legal Officer compiles and summarizes the responses for discussion at the subsequent Board and committee meetings. In addition, on an executive compensation consulting firm thatongoing basis, the Committee engagedChairman meets with each director individually to advise itsolicit feedback with respect to executive compensation design, comparative compensation practicesboth the full Board and compensation matters relatingany committee on which the director serves, in addition to individual director performance and Board dynamics. Our Board utilizes the results of these evaluations in making decisions on Board agendas, Board structure, committee responsibilities and agendas, information presented to the Board. Exequity LLP provides no other services to the Company. The ONC Committee has determined Exequity LLP is independent under the NYSE rules.

AllBoard, and continued service of theindividual directors serving on the ONC CommitteeBoard. This information is then shared with the Board, and appropriate actions or changes are (i) independent as defined under the applicable NYSE and SEC rules and meet the additional independence standard set forth in thethen identified.

No Mandatory Retirement Age or Term Limits.   Our Corporate Governance Guidelines set forth that we do not believe that mandatory retirement ages or term limits serve our needs. The Board periodically evaluates the performance and qualifications of individual directors in connection with the nomination process. In addition, although the Nominating and Governance Committee will consider length of service in recommending candidates for re-election, the Board does not believe that adopting a set term limit for directors serves our interests. Such limits may result in the loss of contributions from directors who have been able to develop, over a period of time, increasing insight into our operations and our strategic direction. The Nominating and Governance Committee reviews these policies as part of its annual governance review and will consider modifications to these policies as deemed necessary and in our best interests and the additional NYSE standard for compensation committees, (ii) “non-employee directors” as defined under Rule 16b-3best interests of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”), and (iii) “outside directors” as defined by Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code (“Section 162(m)”).our stockholders.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014, Messrs. Abdoo, Cornelius, Jesanis and Nutter, Ms. Taylor and Dr.  Woo served on the ONC Committee. There were no compensation committee interlocks or insider participation.

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

Director Compensation.   This section describes compensation for our non-employee directors. To attract and retain highly qualified candidates to serve on the Board, we useprovide a combination of cash and equity awards. Our non-employee director compensation is reviewed annually by our Nominating and Governance Committee with the assistance of Meridian, the Compensation Committee’s independent compensation consultant. The Nominating and Governance Committee, with the assistance of Meridian, reviewed the amount and composition of director compensation for 2018 and recommended an increase of $7,500 in the value of the equity portion of the annual retainer and $7,500 in the cash portion of the annual retainer we provide to our non-employee directors, which was implemented. A full-time employee who serves as director does not receive any additional compensation for service on the Board. Consequently, because Mr. SkaggsHamrock is also our President and CEO, he does not receive additional compensation for his service as a Board member.

Each non-employee director receives an annual retainer of $210,000,$235,000, consisting of $90,000$97,500 in cash and an award of restricted stock units valued at $120,000$137,500 at the time of the award. The cash retainer is paid in arrears in four equal installments at the end of each calendar quarter.

The restricted stock units are awarded annually, and the number of restricted stock units is determined by dividing the value of the grant by the closing price of our common stock on the grant date. Restricted stock units are granted to non-employee directors under the NiSource Inc. 2010 Omnibus Incentive Plan (“Omnibus Plan”), which was approved by the stockholders on May 11, 2010.2010, and re-approved on May 12, 2015.

Additionally, each non-employee director who serves as chair of a Board committee receives compensation for this responsibility. The annual committee chair fees are $20,000 for each of the standing committees. The Chairman of the Board receives additional annual compensation of $160,000 for his role and the Vice Chairman of the Board receives additional annual compensation of $75,000 for his role. These fees are paid in cash in arrears in four equal installments and are prorated in the case of partial year service.

All Other Compensation.   The other compensation included under the column “All Other Compensation” in the 2018 Director Compensation tableTable below consists of matching contributions made by the NiSource Charitable Foundation.

Omnibus PlanPlan..   The Omnibus Plan permits equity awards to be made to non-employee directors in the form of incentive and non-qualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, and restricted stock units, performance shares, performance units, cash-based awards and other stock-based awards. TermsExcept as provided below, terms and conditions of awards to non-employee directors are determined by the Board prior to grant. Since May 11, 2010,

awards to directors have been made fromunder the Omnibus Plan. Awards of restricted stock units associated with periods prior to June 1, 2011, vested immediately, but are not distributed in shares of common stock until after the director terminates or retiresseparates from the Board. Beginning June 1, 2011, the awardsAwards of restricted stock units made after June 1, 2011, vest and are payable in shares of our common stock on the earlier ofto occur of: (a) the last day of the director’s annual term for which the restricted stock units are awardedawarded; or (b) the date that the director separates from service due to a “Change-in-Control” (as defined in the Omnibus Plan); provided, however, that effective in 2015, any director that commences services after the start of an annual term vests on the first anniversary of the initial grant; and, provided further, that in the event that the director separates from service prior to such time as a result of “Retirement” (defined as the cessation of services after providing a minimum of five continuous years of service as a member of the Board), death or “Disability” (as defined in the Omnibus Plan), the director’s restricted stock unit awards shall pro-ratawill pro rata vest in an amount determined by using a fraction, where the numerator is the number of full or partial calendar months elapsed between the grant date and the date of the director’s Retirement, death or Disability, and the denominator of which is the number of full or partial calendar months elapsed between the grant date and the last day of the director’s annual term for which the director is elected that corresponds to the year in which the restricted stock units are awarded. The vested restricted stock units awarded on or after June 1, 2011, are payable as soon as practicable following vesting, unless otherwise provided pursuant to any prior election the non-employee director may have made to defer distribution.

With respect to restricted stock units that have not been distributed, additional restricted stock units are credited to each non-employee director to reflect dividends paid to stockholders on common stock. The restricted stock units have no voting or other stock ownership rights and are payable in shares of our common stock upon distribution.

20

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Director Stock Ownership.   The Board maintains stock ownership requirements for its directors that are included in theour Corporate Governance Guidelines. Within five years of becoming a non-employee director, each non-employee director is required to hold an amount of Companyour stock with a value equal to five times the annual cash retainer paid to directors by the Company.directors. Company stock that counts towards satisfaction of this requirement includes shares purchased on the open market, awards of restricted stock or restricted stock units through the prior Non-Employee Director Stock Incentive Plan or Omnibus Plan, and shares beneficially owned in a trust or by a spouse or other immediate family member residing in the same household. All of the non-employee director nominees are in compliance with the stock ownership requirements that are included in the Corporate Governance Guidelines.

Each director has a significant portion of his or her compensation directly aligned with long-term stockholder value. Fifty-sevenApproximately fifty-nine percent (57%(59%) of a non-employee director’s 2018 annual retainer (valued as of the time of award) consistsaward and excluding committee retainers) consisted of restricted stock units, which are converted into common stock when vested and distributed to the director.

The table below shows the number of shares of common stock beneficially owned by each non-employee director, the number of non-voting restricted stock units that have been awarded, and the combined total as of February 27, 2015.

Name 

Shares of

Common Stock

  

Non-Voting
Restricted

Stock Units

  

Total Number of
Shares of
Common Stock
and

Non-Voting
Restricted Stock

Units(1)

 

Richard A. Abdoo

  15,000    38,127    53,127  

Aristides S. Candris

  2,000    11,959    13,959  

Sigmund L. Cornelius

  8,043    8,078    16,121  

Michael E. Jesanis

  7,715    25,154    32,869  

Marty R. Kittrell

  845    31,339    32,184  

W. Lee Nutter

  114,970    39,888    154,858  

Deborah S. Parker

      39,514    39,514  

Teresa A. Taylor

  4,444    7,291    11,735  

Richard L. Thompson

  12,871    50,691    63,562  

Carolyn Y. Woo

  16,315    58,801    75,116  

(1)The number includes non-voting restricted stock units granted under the Non-Employee Director Stock Incentive Plan and the Omnibus Plan.

2018 Director Compensation

The table below sets forth all compensation earned by or paid to our non-employee directors in 2014.2018. Our CEO doesdid not receive any additional compensation for his service on the Board. His compensation for serving as CEO is listed underdiscussed in the Executive Compensation section of Executive Officers.this Proxy Statement.

Name Fees Earned or
Paid in Cash
($)(1)
  Stock  Awards
($)(2)
  

All Other

Compensation

($)(3)

  

Total

($)

 

Richard A. Abdoo

  107,238    120,000    15,000    242,238  

Aristides S. Candris

  87,238    120,000    20,000    227,238  

Sigmund L. Cornelius

  87,238    120,000    10,000    217,238  

Michael E. Jesanis

  107,238    120,000    10,000    237,238  

Marty R. Kittrell

  107,238    120,000        227,238  

W. Lee Nutter

  94,604    120,000    20,000    234,604  

Deborah S. Parker

  87,238    120,000        207,238  

Teresa A. Taylor

  99,872    120,000        219,872  

Richard L. Thompson

  267,238    120,000        387,238  

Carolyn Y. Woo

  87,238    120,000    10,000    217,238  

Name
Fees Earned or
Paid in Cash
($)(1)
Stock Awards
($)(2)(3)
All Other
Compensation
($)(4)
Total
($)
Richard A. Abdoo(5)
 
31,956
 
 
31,956
 
Peter A. Altabef
 
107,816
 
 
137,500
 
 
10,000
 
 
255,316
 
Theodore H. Bunting, Jr.(6)
 
31,417
 
 
92,727
 
 
124,144
 
Eric L. Butler
 
94,859
 
 
137,500
 
 
5,000
 
 
237,359
 
Aristides S. Candris
 
114,859
 
 
137,500
 
 
10,000
 
 
262,359
 
Wayne S. DeVeydt
 
94,859
 
 
137,500
 
 
232,359
 
Deborah A. Henretta
 
94,859
 
 
137,500
 
 
10,000
 
 
242,359
 
Michael E. Jesanis
 
114,859
 
 
137,500
 
 
10,000
 
 
262,359
 
Kevin T. Kabat
 
184,819
 
 
137,500
 
 
322,319
 
Richard L. Thompson
 
261,902
 
 
137,500
 
 
10,000
 
 
409,402
 
Carolyn Y. Woo
 
114,859
 
 
137,500
 
 
9,500
 
 
261,859
 
(1)The fees shown include the annual cash retainer and any Board and chair fees paid during the year to each non-employee director. With respect to Messrs. Abdoo and Bunting, the fees were prorated for partial year service on the Board; with respect to Messrs. Altabef, Kabat and Thompson the fees were prorated for partial year service as committee chairs. Mr. Abdoo, who did not stand for reelection in 2018, served on the Board until May 8, 2018. Mr. Bunting was appointed to the Board on September 5, 2018.

(2)The amounts reportedshown reflect the grant date fair value of awards computed in accordance with FASB ASCthe Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 718. For restricted stock units, the grant date fair value is the number of shares multiplied by the closing price of our stock on the award date. Each non-employee director who was elected on May 13, 20148, 2018, received an award of restricted stock units valued at $120,000$137,500 which was equal to approximately 3,3465,478 restricted stock units valued at $35.86$25.10 per unit.unit, the closing price of our common stock on that date. See “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” and the footnotes to that table for information regarding the number of shares of stock held by each current director as of March 1, 2019.

(3)This column includesAs of December 31, 2018, the number of equity awards (in the form of restricted stock units) that were outstanding for each non-employee director was as follows: Mr. Abdoo, 0; Mr. Altabef, 5,559; Mr. Bunting, 3,392; Mr. Butler, 5,559; Dr. Candris, 38,182; Mr. DeVeydt, 11,195; Ms. Henretta, 23,165; Mr. Jesanis, 5,559; Mr. Kabat, 5,559; Mr. Thompson, 63,900; and Dr. Woo, 33,767.
(4)The amounts shown reflect matching contributions made by the NiSource Charitable Foundation under the Director Charitable Match Program. The Foundation matches up to $10,000 annually in contributions by any non-employee director to approved tax-exempt charitable organizations. Any amount not utilized for the match in the year it is first available is carried over to the following year.
(5)Mr. Abdoo served on the Board until May 8, 2018.
(6)The amount shown in the Stock Awards column for Mr. Bunting is a pro-rated award which was equal to approximately 3,367 restricted stock units valued at $27.54 per unit, the closing price of our common stock on September 5, 2018, the date of his appointment to the Board.

21

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

The following table contains information about those persons or groups that are known toshows as of March 1, 2019, the Company to benumber of shares of our outstanding common stock beneficially owned by: (i) each of our directors; (ii) each of the Named Executive Officers; (iii) our directors and executive officers as a group; and (iv) beneficial owners of more than five percent5% of theour outstanding common stock based(based solely on the latest SchedulesSchedule 13G filings and any amendments thereto filed with the SEC on or before February 27, 2015.March 1, 2019) except as noted below. None of the Named Executive Officers or directors has any outstanding stock options as of that date. The business address of each of our directors and executive officers is our address.

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner  

Amount and Nature of

Beneficial Ownership

   

Percent of Class

Outstanding

 

The Vanguard Group(1)

   24,716,611     7.8%  

100 Vanguard Blvd.

Malvern, PA 19355

          

T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc.(2)

   21,991,926     6.9%  

100 East Pratt Street

Baltimore, MD 21202

          

BlackRock, Inc.(3)

   21,005,426     6.7%  

55 East 52nd Street

New York, NY 10022

          

Deutsche Bank AG(4)

   19,417,886     6.1%  

Taunusanlage 12

60325 Frankfurt am Main

Germany

          

State Street Corporation(5)

   16,275,486     5.2%  

One Lincoln Street

Boston, MA 02111

          

FMR LLC(6)

   16,099,997     5.1%  

245 Summer Street

Boston, MA 02210

          

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner
Number of Shares of
Common Stock
Beneficially Owned
Percent of Class
Outstanding
5% Owners
 
 
 
 
 
 
T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc.(1)
100 East Pratt Street
Baltimore, MD 21202
 
61,526,324
 
 
16.5
%
The Vanguard Group(2)
100 Vanguard Blvd.
Malvern, PA 19355
 
41,591,007
 
 
11.2
%
BlackRock, Inc.(3)
55 East 52nd Street
New York, NY 10055
 
32,194,606
 
 
8.7
%
Directors and Executive Officers
 
 
 
 
 
 
Peter A. Altabef(4)
 
7,166
 
*
Donald E. Brown(5)
 
73,144
 
*
Theodore H. Bunting, Jr(4)
*
Eric L. Butler(4)
 
8,243
 
*
Aristides S. Candris(4)
 
12,769
 
*
Wayne S. DeVeydt(4)
 
11,613
 
*
Joseph Hamrock(5)
 
394,708
 
*
Deborah A. Henretta(4)
 
1,294
 
*
Carrie J. Hightman (5)(6)
 
352,034
 
*
Michael E. Jesanis(4)
 
32,400
 
*
Kevin T. Kabat(4)
 
17,006
 
*
Violet G. Sistovaris(5)
 
153,979
 
*
Richard L. Thompson(4)
 
37,226
 
*
Pablo A. Vegas(5)
 
69,487
 
*
Carolyn Y. Woo(4)
 
39,486
 
*
All directors and executive officers as a group (18 persons)
 
1,277,751
 
*
*Less than 1%
(1)As reported on an amendment to statement on Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on behalf of The Vanguard Group on February 10, 2015. The Vanguard Group has sole voting power with respect to 568,067 shares, sole dispositive power with respect to 24,203,397 shares and shared dispositive power with respect to 513,214 shares reported as beneficially owned.

(2)As reported on an amendment to statement on Schedule 13G13G/A filed with the SEC on behalf of T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. on February 13, 2015.14, 2019. T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. hasreported sole voting power with respect to 6,960,11119,349,267 shares and sole dispositive power with respect to 21,991,92661,526,324 shares reported as beneficially owned.

(2)As reported on an amendment to statement on Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on behalf of The Vanguard Group on February 11, 2019. The Vanguard Group reported sole voting power with respect to 489,941 shares, shared voting power with respect to 172,007 shares, sole dispositive power with respect to 41,000,081 shares and shared dispositive power with respect to 590,926 shares.
(3)As reported on an amendment to statement on Schedule 13G13G/A filed with the SEC on behalf of BlackRock, Inc. on January 29, 2015.February 6, 2019. BlackRock, Inc. hasreported sole voting power with respect to 18,198,31229,259,631 shares and sole dispositive power with respect to 21,005,42632,194,606 shares reported as beneficially owned.reported.

(4)As reported on a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on behalf of Deutsche Bank AG on February 17, 2015. Deutsche Bank AG has sole voting power with respect to 19,331,470 shares, sole dispositive power with respect to 19,415,886 shares and shared dispositive power with respect to 2,000 shares reported as beneficially owned.

(5)As reported on a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on behalf of State Street Corporation on February 12, 2015. State Street Corporation has shared voting power and shared dispositive power with respect to 16,275,486 shares reported as beneficially owned.

(6)As reported on a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on behalf of FMR LLC on February 13, 2015. FMR LLC has sole voting power with respect to 298,188 shares and sole dispositive power with respect to 16,099,997 of the shares reported as beneficially owned.

The following table contains information about the beneficial ownership of our common stock as of February 27, 2015 for each of the directors, director nominees and Named Executive Officers, and for all directors and executive officers as a group. Beneficial ownership reflects sole voting and sole investment power, unless otherwise noted.

(4)Does not include restricted stock units issued under the Omnibus Plan and the former Non-Employee Director Stock Incentive Plan unless the shares have been distributed or the non-employee director has the right to acquire the shares within 60 days of March 1, 2019.
Name of Beneficial Owner

Amount and Nature of

Beneficial Ownership(1)

Richard A. Abdoo

15,000

Aristides S. Candris

2,000

Sigmund L. Cornelius

8,043

Joseph Hamrock

43,486

Carrie J. Hightman(2)

116,862

Michael E. Jesanis

7,715

Glen L. Kettering

109,243

Marty R. Kittrell

845

W. Lee Nutter

114,970

Deborah S. Parker

Robert C. Skaggs, Jr.(3)

863,265

Stephen P. Smith

185,388

Teresa A. Taylor

4,444

Richard L. Thompson

12,871

Carolyn Y. Woo

16,315

All directors and executive officers as a group (18 persons)

1,601,968

(1)(5)Includes shares held in our 401(k) Plan and shares that are distributable within 60 days pursuant to restricted stock units, as applicable. The percentage of common stock owned by any director or Named Executive Officer, or all directors and executive officers as a group, does not exceed one percent of the common stock outstanding as of February 27, 2015.March 1, 2019.

(2)(6)Includes shares owned by a trust over which Ms. Hightman maintains investment control and of which one or more of her immediate family members are the sole beneficiaries.

22

(3)Includes shares owned by trusts over which Mr. Skaggs maintains investment control and of which he and his immediate family members are the sole beneficiaries.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Certain of our directors and executive owners own common units representing limited partnership interests of Columbia Pipeline Partners LP (“CPPL”), a master limited partnership that the Company controls and in which the Company has a 46.5% ownership interest through its subsidiary, Columbia Energy Group. The table below shows the number of common units beneficially owned as of February 27, 2015. Beneficial ownership reflects sole voting and sole investment power.

Name of Beneficial Owner

Amount and Nature of
Beneficial Ownership
of CPPL Common

Units(1)

Richard A. Abdoo

Aristides S. Candris

3,800

Sigmund L. Cornelius

4,400

Joseph Hamrock

2,500

Carrie J. Hightman

1,200

Michael E. Jesanis

2,000

Glen L. Kettering

1,300

Marty R. Kittrell

W. Lee Nutter

25,000

Deborah S. Parker

Robert C. Skaggs, Jr.

37,500

Stephen P. Smith

37,500

Teresa A. Taylor

3,000

Richard L. Thompson

10,000

Carolyn Y. Woo

All directors and executive officers as a group (18 persons)

133,200

(1)The percentage of common units owned by any director or Named Executive Officer, or all directors and executive officers as a group, does not exceed one percent of the common units outstanding as of February 27, 2015.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CD&A)

2014 AccomplishmentsIntroduction

This CD&A describes our compensation philosophy and the material elements of our 2018 executive compensation program applicable to the Named Executive Officers.

The Named Executive Officers in 2018 were:

Joseph Hamrock—President and Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”)

Donald E. Brown—Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”)

Pablo A. Vegas—Executive Vice President and President, Gas Utilities

Violet G. Sistovaris—Executive Vice President and President, Northern Indiana Public Service Company had another yearLLC (“NIPSCO”)

Carrie J. Hightman—Executive Vice President and Chief Legal Officer (“CLO”)

2018 Business Developments

On September 13, 2018, a series of significant achievementsfires and explosions occurred in 2014 including:Lawrence, Andover and North Andover, Massachusetts, related to the delivery of natural gas by our subsidiary, Columbia Gas of Massachusetts (the “Greater Lawrence Incident”). As discussed further below, the Compensation Committee considered the impact of the Greater Lawrence Incident when evaluating 2018 performance which resulted in no payouts to the Named Executive Officers under our 2018 annual cash incentive plan.

We continued to execute on our established infrastructure-focused and investment-driven business strategy, despite the Greater Lawrence Incident noted above. Key business developments during 2018 included:

Another industry leading yearInvesting approximately $1.8 billion of capital across our Columbia Gas and NIPSCO utilities in stock price appreciation;

support of long-term safety and service reliability for our customers and communities.
Replacing approximately 302 miles of priority gas pipelines across seven states, with the goal of enhancing gas system safety and reliability, and reducing methane emissions.
Replacing approximately 64 miles of underground electric cable and more than 1,300 electric poles in Indiana to further support increased electric reliability.
Submitting our 2018 Integrated Resource Plan to the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission, which outlines the transition of NIPSCO’s electric generation away from coal toward cleaner and more cost-competitive renewable energy sources, with the goal of reducing carbon emissions by more than 90 percent by 2028.
Opening a fourth state-of the-art field training center, completing the plans announced in 2016 to enhance training for gas operations employees and local first responders.
Achieving significant industry and national recognition, including: being named to the Dow Jones Sustainability-North America Index for the fifth consecutive year; one of the World’s Most Ethical Companies by the Ethisphere Institute for the eighth consecutive year; one of 104 companies globally in the inaugural Bloomberg Gender Equality Index; one of America’s Best Large Employers by Forbes magazine; the second-highest ranked utility in JUST Capital’s 2018 rankings of America’s Most Just Companies; and being named to the FTSE4Good index, an index that measures the performance of companies demonstrating strong environmental, social and governance practices.

DeliveringOur total shareholder return of approximately 32%;

Increasing our annual dividend by approximately 4%;

Outperforming thewas two percent for 2018, which underperformed both major utility indices forand which also reflected the sixth consecutive year;challenges experienced by the broader utility sector in 2018. Consequently, our shareholder return and

Generating earnings growth in line with our guidance range for the eighth consecutive year.

LOGO

Our 2014 performance was once again driven in large part by our continued disciplined execution across all facets share price appreciation fell short of our established infrastructure focusedrecent historic trends and investment-driven business strategy. Key business accomplishments duringthe utility indices.


Total shareholder return shown in the chart above is calculated by share price appreciation plus the annual dividend amount. The NiSource 2015 share price appreciation and total shareholder return shown in the charts above are based on a 2014 include:

Initiating our strategic and transformational growth plan, includingyear-end closing price calculated utilizing the creation of CPPL and plannedBloomberg separation formula taking into account the separation of our natural gas pipeline and related business into CPG, Inc., a stand-alone, publicly traded company;

Being selected to the Dow Jones Sustainability North American Index;

Completing the second of several electric generation environmental upgrades;

Originating several transformational, customer-driven growth projects at Columbia Pipeline Group, including placing into service more than $300 million in system expansion projects, adding approximately 1.1 billion cubic feet of system capacity; placing into service nearly $200 million in new midstream projects; and completing approximately $325 million in system modernization projects duringInc. from the year;Company on July 1, 2015 (the “Separation”).

23

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Continuing our multi-billion dollar system modernization programs across each of our business units;2018 Compensation Committee Notable Actions

Being selected as one ofDuring 2018, the World’s Most Ethical Companies for the fourth consecutive year;

Increasing equity market capitalization by approximately $3 billion.

In addition, we continued to strengthen our financial profile, and deliver on our capital investment program of just over $2.2 billion while maintaining an investment grade credit rating, and providing a solid and growing dividend.

The ONC Committee considered these achievements while performing its oversight activities throughout the course of the year.

Executive Compensation Highlights

In connection with its ongoing review of our executive compensation program, the ONC Committee made a number of compensationthe following key decisions with respect to 2014 including:

2018 compensation:

ApprovingRecommended to the independent members of the Board an increase in our CEO’s base salary increases for eachand the grant date value of the Named Executive Officershis 2018 annual long-term equity incentive opportunity for the reasons explained in the section entitled “2014 Base Salaries;”

Approving an increase“Compensation Committee Actions Related to 2018 Compensation” in the trigger, targetsections entitled “2018 Base Salaries” and stretch award opportunities for the annual cash short-term incentive for the Chief Executive Officer for the reasons explained“2018 LTIP Awards,” respectively.

Approved increases in the section entitled “Annual Performance-Based Cash Incentives;”

Delivering the 2014 annual long-term equity awards to our Named Executive Officers solely in the form of performance shares that vest upon the achievement of performance goalsbase salary and continuous employment over the course of the multi-year performance period;

Further aligning the performance goals for our 2014 annual long-term equity awards with the Company’s strategic operating plan and with the interests of shareholders by removing “funds from operations” as a performance goal under the 2014 annual long-term equity incentive program and substantially increasing the weighting for relative total shareholder return;

Approving increases in the grant date value of the 20142018 annual long-term equity awardincentive opportunities for Messrs. Skaggs, Smith,Brown and HamrockVegas and Ms. Sistovaris for the reasons explained in “Compensation Committee Actions Related to 2018 Compensation” in the sections entitled “2018 Base Salaries” and “2018 LTIP Awards,” respectively.

Approved uniform trigger and stretch award opportunities of 40% and 160% of target opportunity, respectively, under the annual cash performance-based incentive plan, which is intended to provide consistent motivation towards achieving stretch performance goals.
Approved an increase in the target opportunities for Mr. Vegas and Ms. Sistovaris under the annual cash performance-based incentive plan for the reasons explained in “Compensation Committee Actions Related to 2018 Compensation” in the section entitled “LTIP Awards;“2018 Cash Incentive Plan.

Awarding Mr. Kettering

Approved a special cash bonus of $100,000 and a special grant of time-vestedredesigned annual long-term incentive program for 2018 to enhance its retentive characteristics by adding service-based restricted stock units (“RSUs”) to the mix of long-term equity incentives resulting in a long-term incentive program delivered in the form of performance-based restricted stock units (“PSUs”) (weighted 80%) and RSUs (weighted 20%).
Refined the PSU performance goals as compared to prior years by adding operational performance goals to the mix of financial and relative performance goals in order to (i) continue to incentivize financial performance with a grant date fair value of $500,000 in recognition of his role as interim Business Unit CEO;

Approving discretionary cash bonuses for each80% of the Named Executive Officerstarget PSUs vesting based on their significant contributionsthe achievement of a financial performance goal, subject to a +/- 25% vesting modifier based on relative total shareholder return (“RTSR”) performance and (ii) further incentivize individual performance and drive accountability by tying the vesting of 20% of the target PSUs to the Company’s successachievement of key business imperatives and a financial vesting trigger, as further explained in the sectionsections entitled “Additional Discretionary Lump Sum Payouts“Long-Term Incentive Program” and “2018 LTIP Awards.”

Greater Lawrence Incident

In January 2019, the Compensation Committee applied negative discretion retained by the Compensation Committee under the Omnibus Plan to entirely eliminate 2018 annual cash incentive plan payouts to the Named Executive Officers Based on 2014 Performance;”

Approving a change to our 2014 restricted stock and restricted stock unit awards so that change-in-control vesting is contingent on the occurrence of both a qualifying change-in-control and employment termination; and

Modifying the Comparative Group (as defined below) to further align the Company with companies that are operationally similar and with which we compete for executive talent.

Overview of Our 2014 Executive Compensation Program

Compensation Practices

Our compensation program is intended to attract, retain and motivate highly qualified executives.

The principal elements of compensation we provide to our executives are: base salary, annual short-term performance-based cash incentives and long-term performance-based equity incentive awards. Taken together these three elements are referred to as “total compensation.”

We generally target total compensation to be competitive with the compensation paid to similarly positioned executives at companies within our peer group of companies (the “Comparative Group”) as described in the section entitled “Our Executive Compensation Process — Competitive Market Review.” We do not, however, manage pay to a certain target percentilelight of the Comparative Group practices.

We use shortGreater Lawrence Incident. For details, please see the sections entitled “2018 Cash Incentive Plan” and long-term performance-based compensation to motivate our executives to meet and exceed the short and long-term business objectives“Implications of the Company.Greater Lawrence Incident.”

Historically, we have used 100% performance-based equity compensation for our annual long-term equity incentive awards as a means to align the interests of our executives with those of our stockholders. See the section entitled “Changes to Our Executive Compensation Program in 2015” for an explanation of our use of restricted stock units for our 2015 annual long-term equity awards. We also occasionally use special awards of time-vested restricted stock and restricted stock units to attract and retain executive talent, promote management continuity and reward outstanding performance.

We employ leading governance practices, such as clawback policies and stock ownership guidelines, and we conduct an annual risk assessment of the Company’s compensation practices.

In addition, our executive officers are prohibited from trading in Company securities during quarterly blackout periods and they are also prohibited from engaging in hedging or short sales of the Company’s equity securities.

Finally, when making decisions about our executive compensation program, we take into account the stockholders’ view of such matters. In 2014, 96% of our investors voted in favor of our Say on Pay Proposal at our Annual Meeting. No changes were made to the design of our executive compensation program as a result of the stockholder vote.

Our Executive Compensation Philosophy

The discussion of executive compensation philosophy, program and practices that follows applies to our Company’s Named Executive Officers in 2014. They were: Robert C. Skaggs, Jr., President and CEO, Stephen P. Smith, Executive Vice President and CFO; Glen L. Kettering, Executive Vice President and Group Chief Executive Officer, Columbia Pipeline Group (“CPG”); Carrie J. Hightman, Executive Vice President and Chief Legal Officer; and Joseph Hamrock, Executive Vice President and Group Chief Executive Officer, NiSource Gas Distribution (“NGD”).

The key design priorities of the Company’sour 2018 executive compensation program arewere to:

Maintain a financially responsible program that is aligned with the Company’sour strategic plan to build stockholder value and support long-term, sustainable earnings growth;

and dividend growth.

Provide a total compensation package that is aligned with the standards in our industry thereby enhancing our ability to:
Attract and retain executives with competitive compensation opportunities;
Motivate and reward executives for sustaining high performance; and
Ensure that significant portions of pay remain at-risk for failure to achieve our business objectives.
Reward executives based upon level of responsibility and performance, as measured by the individual’s contribution to the Company’s ability to:

achievement of its business objectives.

Attract

Provide compensation that is both competitive with the market for executive talent and retain executives with competitive compensation opportunities;

Motivateappropriately correlated to Company performance so that the executive receives increased payouts under our incentive programs when Company performance is high and reward for achieving and exceedingdecreased payouts under our business objectives; and

incentive programs when Company performance is low.

Provide substantial portions of pay at risk for failure to achieve our business objectives;

Align the interests of stockholders and executives by emphasizing stock-denominated compensation opportunities that are contingent on goal achievement; and

Comply with all applicable laws and regulations.

The ONCCompensation Committee believes that the Company’sour executive compensation program is thoughtfully and effectively constructed to fulfill our compensation objectives and rewards decision makingreward effective leadership decisions that createscreate value for our stockholders, customers and other key stakeholders.

Principal ElementsOverview of Our 2018 Executive Compensation Program

We have designeddesign our executive compensation program to meetattract, retain and motivate highly-qualified executive talent. We believe highly-qualified executive talent is an essential driver of the Company’s success in achieving its business objectives.

24

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The principal elements of compensation that we provide to the Named Executive Officers, and all our business objectives using various compensation elements intended to drive bothexecutives, are: base salary, annual short-term performance-based cash incentives, and long-term performance.performance-based and service-based equity incentive awards. We use short- and long-term performance-based compensation to motivate our executives to meet and exceed our short- and long-term business objectives. We included service-based equity in the 2018 executive compensation program in order to enhance the attractiveness and talent retention aspects of our executive compensation program.

Our long-term incentive program is denominated entirely in common stock to align the interests of executives with those of our stockholders as the ultimate value of our long-term incentive compensation is determined by the performance of our stock. The principal elements of our 2018 total compensation program, time horizon and design objectives of each element are shown below.

Elements of Total Compensation and Compensation Design Priorities
Element of
Total Compensation
Form of Compensation
Talent Attraction
Alignment with
Stockholder Interest
Talent Retention
Short-term:
Base Salary
Cash
Annual Performance-Based Cash Incentive
Cash
Long-term:
Long-Term Equity Incentive
PSUs
RSUs

We generally target total compensation (base salary, annual short-term performance-based cash incentives and long-term equity incentive awards) to be competitive with the compensation paid to similarly positioned executives at companies within our compensation peer group (the “Comparator Group”) as described in the section entitled “Our Executive Compensation Process - Competitive Market Review.” We do not, however, manage pay to a stipulated percentile of the Comparator Group practices.

When making decisions about our executive compensation program, the Compensation Committee takes into account the stockholders’ view of such matters. In 2018, approximately 97% of the votes cast by our investors were voted in favor of our Say-on-Pay Proposal at our 2018 annual meeting of stockholders. No changes were made to the design of our executive compensation program in response to the 2018 stockholder vote.

Our Executive Compensation Mix

We believe that a significant percentage of total compensation for ourthe Named Executive Officers should be largely performance-based,consist of variable and the proportion of at-risk performance-based compensation should increase as the executive’s level of responsibility within the Company increases.compensation. The ONCCompensation Committee believes the appropriate mix of thecompensation elements of compensation should take into account the Company’s businessfinancial and strategic objectives, the competitive environment, retentive elements, Company performance, individual performance and responsibilities, and evolving governance practices.

For 2014, Additionally, the approximate percentage of ourCompensation Committee reviews and assesses total Named Executive Officers’ 2014Officer compensation to evaluate whether we offer well-balanced incentives for senior executives to focus on serving the interests of the Company and its stockholders.

The following charts illustrate the extent to which 2018 target total compensation for our CEO and the other Named Executive Officers was payable in fixed (base salary, the annualsalary) and variable and at-risk (annual performance-based cash incentive payable at the target level and the grant date fair value of the annual long-term performance-based equity incentive award payable at the target level) that was fixed (base salary) was as follows:formats.


25

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Target Total Compensation
Named Executive Officer
Annualized
Base Salary
($)
Annual
Cash Incentive
Target ($)
RSUs
($)
PSUs
Target
($)
Total
($)
Joseph Hamrock
President and CEO
 
1,000,000
 
 
1,200,000
 
 
860,000
 
 
3,440,000
 
 
6,500,000
 
Donald E. Brown
Executive Vice President and CFO
 
575,000
 
 
431,250
 
 
190,000
 
 
760,000
 
 
1,956,250
 
Pablo A. Vegas
Executive Vice President and President, Gas Utilities
 
525,000
 
 
393,750
 
 
190,000
 
 
760,000
 
 
1,868,750
 
Violet G. Sistovaris
Executive Vice President and President, NIPSCO
 
475,000
 
 
332,500
 
 
140,000
 
 
560,000
 
 
1,507,500
 
Carrie J. Hightman
Executive Vice President and CLO
 
490,000
 
 
294,000
 
 
140,000
 
 
560,000
 
 
1,484,000
 

Principal Elements of Our 2018 Executive Compensation Program

LOGO

The principal elements of our total compensation package, as more fully described below, help us achieve the objectives of our compensation program as follows:

Time Horizon

Element of Total Compensation

Form of
Compensation
AttractionShort-
Term
Long-
Term
Alignment with
Stockholder Interest
Retention

Base Salary

Cashüü

Annual Performance-Based

Cash Incentive

Cashüüüü

Long-Term Performance-Based

Equity Incentive

Performance
Shares
üüüü

Base Salary.    

Base salary is designed to provide the Named Executive Officers, and all our other employees, with a level of fixed pay that is commensurate with the employee’s role and responsibility. We believe that by delivering base salaries that are reflective of market norms, the Company iswe are well-positioned to attract, retain and motivate top caliber executives in an increasingly competitive labor environment. The ONCCompensation Committee annually reviews the base salaries of the Company’s senior executives, including the Named Executive Officers, along with the salaries of all our senior executives, to ensureevaluate whether they are competitive within our industry. In so doing,reviewing the ONCbase salaries, the Compensation Committee considers the base salaries paid toof similarly situated executives by the companies in the ComparativeComparator Group. See the section entitled “Our Executive Compensation Process - Competitive Market Review” listing the companies in our Comparative Group. Review.”

The ONCCompensation Committee determines any base salary changes for the Company’sNamed Executive Officers, and all our senior executives, based on a combination of factors that includesinclude: competitive pay standards, level of responsibility, experience, internal equity considerations and historical compensation, andcompensation. Additionally, the Compensation Committee considers recommendations from our CEO, Mr. Hamrock, reflecting his assessment of individual Named Executive Officer performance and contributiontheir contributions to the achievement of business objectives, as well as recommendations from the CEO. The CEOobjectives. Mr. Hamrock’s pay is evaluated separately by the Compensation Committee, taking into account those factors reviewed for all other senior executives as well asother than the Corporate Governance Committee’s evaluationrecommendation from Mr. Hamrock. The Compensation Committee then provides its recommendation regarding CEO compensation to the independent members of the CEO’s performance.Board for approval. See the section below entitled “ONC“Compensation Committee Actions Related to 2014 Compensation”2018 Compensation — 2018 Base Salaries” for more information.

Annual Performance-Based Cash Incentive Plan (“Cash Incentive Plan”).    This component of total compensation

The Cash Incentive Plan provides employeesthe Named Executive Officers with the opportunity to earn a cash award tied to both Company performance and their individual contributions to our performance. A threshold financial trigger of net operating earnings per share (hereafter “NOEPS” as defined in the annual performance ofsection entitled “2018 Cash Incentive Plan”) must be met before any award may be paid under the Company and individual contributionCash Incentive Plan. Once the financial trigger is met, awards to the organization’s success. Annual cash incentivesNamed Executive Officers, and all our senior executives, are authorized by the Omnibus Plan which was previously approved by stockholders in May 2010. subject to one corporate financial performance goal (weighted 75%) and several operational goals related to customer care and safety (weighted 25%).

The NOEPS financial performance goals for the Incentive Plan aregoal is determined based on the Company’s annual financial plan, which is approved by the Board at the beginning of the year. The financial planyear, and is designed to achieve the Company’s aimour goal of creating sustainable stockholder value by growing earnings effectively managing the Company’s cash and providing a strong dividend. The customer care and safety goals are designed to incent achievement of our business imperatives. Additionally, the Compensation Committee retains discretion under the Omnibus Plan to reduce the formulaic payouts determined by the above performance goals to further reflect Company or individual performance.

Cash Incentive Plan
75% Financial Performance
25% Customer Care and Safety

EligibilityImportantly, eligibility for participation in the Cash Incentive Plan extends to nearly all Companyour employees. Every eligible employee has an incentive opportunity at trigger, target and stretch levels of performance and the ONCperformance. The Compensation Committee identifies expectations for all employees, senior executives, includingand the Named Executive Officers. With respect to the CEO, the Compensation Committee makes recommendations regarding his award opportunities for consideration and approval by the independent members of the Board. See the section below entitled “ONC“Compensation Committee Actions Related to 2014 Compensation”2018 Compensation — 2018 Cash Incentive Plan” for more information regarding the 20142018 Cash Incentive Plan, including incentive opportunities, performance measures and weightings, goals and payouts for each of the Named Executive Officers.

26

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Long-Term EquityIncentive Program (“LTIP”)

LTIP Design Overview. The LTIP provides the Named Executive Officers and our senior executives with the opportunity to earn shares of our stock based on performance and service. The 2018 LTIP awards consist of PSUs (80% of the 2018 LTIP award) that are eligible to vest based on financial performance and progress with respect to several key business imperatives that we believe build stockholder value, subject to a threshold cumulative financial trigger and RSUs (20% of the 2018 LTIP award) that will vest after the completion of a multi-year service condition. For 2018, the Compensation Committee approved a redesigned award program designed to:

Establish a direct link between compensation earned and the achievement of longer-term financial objectives through the grant of 80% of the target PSUs (65% of the 2018 LTIP award) with vesting tied to financial performance, while still maintaining a relative performance goal with the incorporation of a +/- 25% RTSR performance payout modifier with respect to this portion of the 2018 LTIP award.
Focus executives on key business imperatives that we believe build stockholder value in the categories of safety, customer care, cost containment, organizational culture and environmental impact, each weighted equally (the “Customer Value Framework”) in order to further align payouts with individual contributions and drive accountability through the grant of 20% of the target PSUs (15% of the 2018 LTIP award) with vesting tied to achievement of goals relating to the Customer Value Framework, with the vesting level subject to modification based on an assessment of the executive’s contributions towards the Company’s achievement of the Customer Value Framework.
Enhance retention by rewarding long-term service through the grant of RSUs (20% of the 2018 LTIP award), which vest subject to the executive’s continued employment through a multi-year service period.

For 2018, the long-term incentive award was delivered entirely in equity in the form of PSUs and RSUs. The key LTIP design elements that are intended to drive Company financial and operational performance and align with stockholder interests are shown below.

PSUs
80% of the target long-term incentive opportunity
Three-year performance period
80% of target PSUs (65% of the 2018 LTIP award) vesting based on NOEPS performance, subject to a +/- 25% payout modifier based on RTSR performance
20% of target PSUs (15% of the 2018 LTIP award) vesting based on Customer Value Framework performance goals and a NOEPS vesting trigger, subject to a payout modifier based on an assessment of executive’s contribution towards the Customer Value Framework
RSUs
20% of the long-term incentive opportunity
Vesting subject to the executive’s continued employment through a multi-year service period (in excess of three years)

The 2018 PSUs are eligible for vesting only if a cumulative NOEPS performance trigger is met over a three-year performance period. The Compensation Committee utilized NOEPS as a performance measure for the 2018 LTIP award in recognition that this straightforward measure is deemed to support enterprise-wide strategy and performance and be aligned with stockholder value. This measure was also used as a performance measure in our 2018 Cash Incentive Plan (“LTIP”to align with stockholder value over the short-term and long-term.

For 2018, both the short- and long-term incentive programs are supplemented by additional measures to strike an appropriate balance with respect to incentivizing earnings strength and nonfinancial business imperatives. The remaining 20% of the 2018 LTIP award consists of RSUs that will vest based on the executive’s continued employment through February 26, 2021, subject to earlier vesting for certain qualifying terminations of employment prior to that date. This service-based award is designed to reward long-term service with the Company and thereby adds a retention incentive to our compensation mix. Additionally, RSUs are considered by the Compensation Committee to be at-risk and aligned with stockholder interests as the ultimate value of the RSUs will fluctuate based on our stock price performance.

Long-Term Performance Goals. The PSUs are subject to the achievement of a NOEPS performance trigger in order for any vesting to occur. The NOEPS financial performance goal is determined based on the Company’s annual financial plan, which is approved by the Board at the beginning of the performance period, and is designed to achieve our goal of creating sustainable stockholder value by growing earnings and providing a strong dividend. If the NOEPS performance trigger is achieved, 80% of the target PSUs (65% of the 2018 LTIP award) will vest based on NOEPS performance above the trigger, as modified by our RTSR performance (which can reduce or increase the vested amount of the award by up to 25%).    Our compensation program also includes The Compensation Committee selected cumulative NOEPS as a long-term equity incentive component. The ONC Committeegoal and RTSR as a modifier because it believes it is important that each executive in particular each of our senior executives, has personal financial exposure to the performance of the Company’sour stock and, therefore, is aligned with the financial interests of stockholders.

If the NOEPS vesting trigger is achieved, the remaining 20% of the target PSUs (15% of the 2018 LTIP award) will vest based on the Company’s successful execution of the Customer Value Framework goals and a discretionary assessment of the Named Executive Officer’s contributions to the Company’s achievement relative to the Customer Value Framework goals. Under the 2018 LTIP program design, the Company’s overall Customer Value Framework goal must be met in the respective category before a payout may occur with respect to such category. Once the Company’s Customer Value Framework goal is met, the actual payout for the Customer Value Framework portion of the award is determined based on a discretionary assessment of the individual executive’s contribution to the successful achievement of the respective Customer Value Framework goal over the three-year performance period.

27

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Provided the Customer Value Framework goal is met, the CEO performs the discretionary assessment of each Named Executive Officer other than himself and makes a recommendation to the Compensation Committee, with the Customer Value Framework vesting level approved by the Compensation Committee. In the case of the CEO, the Compensation Committee performs the discretionary assessment of his performance relative to the Customer Value Framework goals, and the independent members of the Board approve the CEO’s Customer Value Framework vesting level.

Design Considerations. The ONCCompensation Committee also believes that the long-term equity incentives promoteincentive program promotes decision making that is consistent with the Company’s long-range operating goals.

To ensure that our executives’ interests are aligned with those of our stockholders and the Company’s long-term business objectives, the ONC Committee determined that the annualobjectives. When establishing long-term equity incentive awards should be delivered solely in performance shares. Performance shares provide the opportunity to earn shares of the Company’s common stock contingent on the achievement of multi-year performance goals that we believe drive stockholder value. The number of performance shares that can be earned ranges from 50% of target when performance reaches the trigger level to 200% of target when performance reaches the maximum creditable level of results.

When establishing award opportunity levels for eachthe Named Executive Officer,Officers, and our senior executives, the ONCCompensation Committee considers, among other things, the executive’s base salary, the appropriate mix of cash and equity awardincentive opportunities,

prior awards under the LTIP and the compensation practices for similarly situated executives within the Company and at other companies in our ComparativeComparator Group. The actual value of each performance-basedthe 2018 LTIP award, if any, depends onwill depend upon Company performance against pre-established performance measures, the individual executive’s performance as well as our stock price at the time the award is paid out.awards are settled.

Other Compensation and Benefits

The ONC Committee may also approve special equity awards that are not performance-based to attract and retain executive talent or to recognize significant contributions. See the section below entitled “ONC Committee Actions Related to 2014 Compensation” for more information regarding the 2014 LTIP awards for each of the Named Executive Officers including the performance measuresalso receive executive severance and goalschange-in-control compensation and vesting requirements for the 2014 performance share awards, Mr. Kettering’s special time-vested equity award in recognition of his role as interim Chief Executive Officer of CPG, and the performance results and payout amounts for the 2012 performance share awards.

Other Compensation and Benefits

We also provide other forms ofbenefits, an executive deferred compensation to our executives, including the Named Executive Officers, consisting ofplan, a limited number of perquisites severance and change-in-control arrangements and a number of other employee benefits that generally are extended to our entire employee population. These other forms of compensation and benefits are generally comparable to those that are provided to similarly situated executives at other companies of our size.

Perquisites.    Perquisites are not a principal elementsize and thereby serve the objectives of our executive compensation program. They are intendedprogram to assist executive officers in the performance of their duties on behalf of the Company or otherwise to provide benefits that have a combined personalattract and business purpose. The Company does not reimburse the Named Executive Officers for the payment of personal income taxes incurred by the executives in connection with their receipt of these benefits. For more information on these perquisites, see the Summary Compensation Table and footnote 6 to that table.retain our senior executives.

Severance and Change-In-Control Benefits.    Benefits

We maintain an executive severance policy,provide Change-in-Control and Termination Agreements with eachthe intent of the Named Executive Officers and a letter agreement with Mr. Smith regarding paymentsensuring that our senior executives continue to be made in the event of termination of his employment.

Change-in-Control Agreements are intended to ensure thatapply thoroughly objective judgments are madejudgment to appropriately safeguard stockholder value and maximize investor return in relation to any potential change in corporate ownership so that stockholder value is appropriately safeguarded and returns to investors are maximized.change-in-control. The Change-in-Control and Termination Agreements provide forfurnish cash severance benefits upon a double triggerdouble-trigger (meaning there must be both a qualifying change-in-control and termination of employment) and do not provide forinclude any “gross-up” payments to executives for excise taxes incurred with respect to benefits received under a Change-in-Control and Termination Agreement. We maintain Change-in-Control and Termination Agreements with each of the Named Executive Officers and all the Named Executive Officers are subject to our executive severance policy.

Additionally, the Omnibus Plan provides for double-trigger vesting for equity awards that are assumed or replaced by an acquiring company upon a change-in-control; meaning that there must be both a change-in-control and a qualifying termination of employment in order for the equity awards to vest in connection with or following such change-in-control. In the event equity awards are not assumed or replaced in a change-in-control, then the outstanding equity awards will vest upon the occurrence of a change-in-control alone. For further discussioninformation regarding the benefits to be received upon termination of these agreements,employment or change-in-control, see the table in the section entitled “Potential Payments upon Termination of Employment or a Change-in-Control of the Company” table and the accompanying narrative.

Perquisites

Perquisites are not a principal element of our executive compensation program. They are intended to assist executives in the performance of their duties on our behalf or to otherwise provide benefits that have a combined personal and business purpose. Generally, we do not reimburse the Named Executive Officers for the payment of personal income taxes they incur in connection with their receipt of these benefits. For information regarding 2018 perquisites, see the 2018 Summary Compensation Table and footnote (6) to that table.

Deferred Compensation Plan

Eligible executives, including the Named Executive Officers, may elect to defer between 5% and 80% of their base salary and annual cash incentive payout under our Executive Deferred Compensation Plan (the “Deferred Compensation Plan”). The Deferred Compensation Plan provides an opportunity for eligible executives to defer their cash compensation without regard to the limits imposed by the IRS for amounts that may be deferred under the 401(k) Plan. The material terms of the Deferred Compensation Plan are described in the narrative to the 2018 Non-qualified Deferred Compensation Table.

Pension Programs.

During 2014,2018, we maintained a tax-qualified defined benefit pension plan for essentially all salaried exempt employees hired before January 1, 2010, all non-exempt employees (both non-union and certain union employees) hired before January 1, 2013, as well as for other union employees, regardless of hire date, and a non-qualified defined benefit pension plan (the “Pension Restoration Plan”) for all eligible employees with annual compensation or pension benefits in excess of the limits imposed by the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”), including theany eligible Named Executive Officers.Officer. The Pension Restoration Plan provides for a pension benefit under the same formula provided under the tax-qualified plan but without regard to the IRS limits and reduced by amounts paid under the tax-qualified plan. The material terms of the pension programs are described in the narrative to the 2018 Pension Benefits table.Table.

Savings Programs.    ProgramsOur

The Named Executive Officers are eligible to participate in the same tax-qualified 401(k) Plan as most employees and in a non-qualified defined contribution plan (the “Savings Restoration Plan”) maintained for eligible executive employees. The 401(k) Plan includes a Company match that varies depending on the pension plan in which the employee participates and a Company profit sharing contribution for most employees of between 0.5% and 1.5% of the employee’s eligible earnings based on achievement of the overall corporate net operating earnings per shareNOEPS measure. In addition, for salaried employees hired after January 1, 2010, and non-

union hourlynon-union non-exempt employees hired after January 1, 2013, the 401(k) Plan includes a 3% Company contribution to the employee accounts. The Savings Restoration Plan provides for Company contributions in excess of IRS limits under the 401(k) Plan for eligible employees, including the Named Executive Officers. The material terms of the Savings Restoration Plan are described in the narrative to the 2018 Non-qualified Deferred Compensation table.Table.

28

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Health and Welfare Benefits

Deferred Compensation Plan.We also maintain the Executive Deferred Compensation Plan (the “Deferred Compensation Plan”) through which eligible Company executives, includingprovide the Named Executive Officers may elect to defer between 5% and 80% of their base salary and annual cash incentive payout. The Company makes the Deferred Compensation Plan available to eligible executives so they have the opportunity to defer their cash compensation without regard to the limits imposed by the IRS for amounts that may be deferred under the 401(k) Plan. The material terms of the Deferred Compensation Plan are described in the narrative to the Non-qualified Deferred Compensation table.

Health and Welfare Benefits.    We also provide other broad-based benefits such as medical, dental, life insurance and long-term disability coverage on the same terms and conditions to all employees, including the Named Executive Officers.employees. We believe that these broad-based benefits enhance the Company’sour reputation as an employer of choice and thereby serve the objectives of our compensation program to attract, retain and motivate our employees.choice.

Our Executive Compensation Process

The ONCCompensation Committee is responsible for determining salaries, performance-based incentivesevaluating and other matters related todetermining the compensation of our senior executives and for overseeing the administration of our equity plans including equity award grants to our executive officers. The ONCand grants. In doing so, Compensation Committee takes into account various factors when making compensation decisions, including:

Attainment of our established business and financial goals of the Company;

goals;

Competitiveness of the Company’sour compensation program based upon competitive market data; and

An executive’s position, level of responsibility and performance, as measured by the individual’s contribution to the Company’s achievement of its business objectives.

The ONCCompensation Committee reviews the compensation of our CEO and his executive direct reports each year. In determiningyear and apprises the compensationBoard accordingly. For our CEO, the Compensation Committee evaluates CEO performance in light of the CEOCompany’s goals and his executive direct reports,objectives and considers recommendations from Meridian, the Committee takes into considerationCompensation Committee’s independent compensation consultant, that are reflective of the Corporate GovernanceCompensation Committee’s evaluationassessment of theour CEO’s performance and compensation competitiveness. Following this evaluation, the CEO’s recommendation with respectCompensation Committee submits its recommendations to his executive direct reports. the independent members of the Board for review and approval.

When considering changes in compensation for senior executives that report to our CEO, including the Named Executive Officers, the ONCCompensation Committee also considers input from the CEO, the Chief Services Officer and the Senior Vice President, Human Resources, andin addition to the ONCCompensation Committee’s independent executive compensation consultant, Exequity LLP.consultant.

Competitive Market Review.Review

In connection with its compensation decision making, the ONCCompensation Committee reviews the executive compensation practices in effect at other companies in the ComparativeComparator Group. These companies comprisecomprised leading gas, electric, combination utility and natural gas transmission companiesmulti-line utilities that have beenwere selected by the ONCCompensation Committee for their operational comparability to the Company and because we generally compete with these companies for the samesimilar executive talent. For 2014,2018, the ONCCompensation Committee, with input from Exequity LLP, removed PG&E Corporation, PNM Resources Inc. andMeridian, made one change to the Comparator Group removing Southern Company Gas due to its increased revenues as compared to the Comparator Group. For purposes of evaluating 2018 compensation practices, the Comparator Group included the companies shown below.

Alliant Energy Corporation
Piedmont Natural Gas Company, Inc.
Ameren Corporation
PNM Resources, Inc.
American Electric Power Company, Inc.
PPL Corporation
Atmos Energy Corporation
Public Service Enterprise Group Incorporated
CenterPoint Energy, Inc.
SCANA Corporation
CMS Energy Corporation
Sempra Energy
Dominion Energy, Inc.
Spire, Inc.
DTE Energy Company
Vectren Corporation
FirstEnergy Corp.
WEC Energy Group, Inc.
OGE Energy Corp.
WGL Holdings, Inc.
ONE Gas, Inc.
Compensation Peer Group
 
Revenue(1)
(millions)
 
Market Cap(1)
(millions)
NiSource
$
4,493
 
$
7,868
 
NiSource Percentile Rank
 
46th
%ile
 
29th
%ile
75th Percentile
$
9,208
 
$
20,524
 
Median
$
6,076
 
$
12,652
 
25th Percentile
$
2,350
 
$
6,609
 
(1)The Compensation Committee selected the 2018 Compensation Peer Group in August 2017 based on fiscal year-end 2016 revenue and market capitalization data. Fiscal year-end revenue and market capitalization data was compiled by Meridian.

29

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Compensation Committee Actions Related to 2018 Executive Compensation

The Compensation Committee reviewed and, as appropriate, took action with respect to each element of total compensation for each Named Executive Officer following the principles, practices and processes described above. The Compensation Committee’s compensation determinations and recommendations were based primarily upon recognition of the roles, responsibilities and performance of each Named Executive Officer, a review of the Comparator Group and an assessment of total Named Executive Officer compensation.

   2018 Base Salaries

The Compensation Committee annually reviews the base salaries of the Named Executive Officers, and all our senior executives, to evaluate whether they are competitive and appropriately reflect performance. In setting 2018 base salary levels, the Compensation Committee considered competitive market data, the competitiveness of annual total target compensation of each Named Executive Officer, responsibilities, experience, internal pay equity, historical compensation practices, individual performance and contributions to achievement of business objectives. Based on this assessment, the Compensation Committee (or, in the case of Mr. Hamrock, the independent members of the Board) approved 2018 base salary levels, effective June 1, 2018. In the case of Mr. Brown’s increase of approximately 9.5%, the Compensation Committee considered in particular his effective performance during 2017 in core aspects of the chief financial officer role, his strong leadership in the execution of the Company’s customer value strategy and the need for further alignment of his cash compensation with the market median. Below are the 2018 and 2017 annual base salary levels for each Named Executive Officer.

 
Base Salary           
 
 
Named Executive Officer
2018 Annual Salary ($)
 
2017 Annual Salary ($)
Joseph Hamrock
 
1,000,000
 
 
975,000
 
Donald E. Brown
 
575,000
 
 
525,000
 
Pablo A. Vegas
 
525,000
 
 
500,000
 
Violet G. Sistovaris
 
475,000
 
 
450,000
 
Carrie J. Hightman
 
490,000
 
 
490,000
 

   2018 Cash Incentive Plan

In January 2018, the Compensation Committee established performance measures and goals to be used to determine the 2018 Cash Incentive Plan payouts for the Named Executive Officers and all of our other participating employees. In determining Cash Incentive Plan opportunities for the Named Executive Officers, the Compensation Committee considered competitive information from the ComparativeComparator Group, input from Meridian, the Compensation Committee’s independent compensation consultant, historical payouts and added Spectra Energy.individual performance in its review of the trigger, target and stretch opportunities for the Named Executive Officers and made no changes to the target opportunities for Named Executive Officers, except for Mr. Vegas and Ms. Sistovaris. The Committee approved increases from 70% to 75% of target opportunity and from 65% to 70% of target opportunity for Mr. Vegas and Ms. Sistovaris, respectively, to reward exemplary leadership during 2017 and maintain market competitiveness.

Additionally, in its review of the trigger, target and stretch opportunities for the Named Executive Officers, the Compensation Committee (and, in the case of the CEO, the independent members of the Board) approved uniform trigger and stretch opportunities among all the Named Executive Officers relative to their target opportunities. Meridian reported to the Compensation Committee that market practice is to establish trigger and stretch opportunities as uniform percentages of target for all participants, (i.e., comparable proportionate pay outcomes for comparable performance). The Compensation Committee considered Meridian’s input and changed the trigger and stretch opportunities to 40% and 160%, respectively, of the target opportunity for each Named Executive Officer. Previously, their trigger opportunities ranged from 33% to 43% of the target opportunity while their stretch opportunities ranged from 146% to 162% of the target opportunity. These changes were made to further alignsimplify the compensation structure, provide consistent motivation towards the achievement of the underlying performance goal, and to be consistent with market practice as reported by Meridian.

30

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The 2018 Cash Incentive Plan awards for the Named Executive Officers, and all our senior executives, were subject to achievement of one corporate financial goal, NOEPS, and operational goals related to customer care and safety, as detailed in the table below. The Compensation Committee approved these measures for the annual performance period because they were deemed important to the Company’s success in increasing stockholder value. The incentive opportunities for the Named Executive Officers were contingent on achievement of goals relating to these measures. In addition, under the terms of the Omnibus Plan, the Compensation Committee retained discretion to adjust 2018 Cash Incentive Plan awards downward, either on a formulaic or discretionary basis, as the Compensation Committee determined to be appropriate in order to reflect other items of Company with itsor individual performance deemed relevant by the Compensation Committee.

Performance Goal
Description
Reason Selected
Earnings
Net Operating Earnings Per Share (“NOEPS”), a non-GAAP measure.
Income from continuing operations determined in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”), including, without limitation, the impact of incentive payouts and adjusted for certain items, such as fluctuations in weather and other significant unusual events disclosed in the Company’s earnings reports, (examples of which may include transaction-related costs, debt extinguishment costs or certain income tax items).(1)
Viewed by the Board as representative of the fundamental earnings strength and performance of the Company.
Net operating earnings is used internally for budgeting and reporting to the Board.
Consistent with the Company’s external reporting of results.
(1)For 2018, a pre-tax adjustment of $855 million was excluded from GAAP earnings and attributable to expenses and lost revenues related to the Greater Lawrence Incident. For details regarding the Greater Lawrence Incident, please see Note 18-E to our consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Customer Care
2018 JD Power Gas and Electrical Utility Residential Customer Satisfaction Studies (“JD Power Studies”)
Measures relative performance of our operating companies as compared to peer companies within each operating company’s jurisdiction (based on company size and geographic region), as reported in the 2018 JD Power Studies, with the target set using the Company’s 2017 performance as the baseline. Threshold, target and maximum performance goals are based on the scoring set forth in the JD Power Studies.
Designed to track our progress in delivering satisfaction to our customers relative to our peers.
Aligned with our stakeholder commitment of top-tier customer satisfaction and brand perception.
2018 MSR Group overall post transaction customer satisfaction survey results (“MSR Group Survey”)
Measures our operating companies’ performance in a post transaction survey designed to assess the customer experience, with the target set using the Company’s 2017 performance as the baseline. Threshold, target and maximum performance goals are based on our percentile ranking as compared to the other surveyed companies.
Designed to track our progress in delivering satisfaction to our customers relative to our prior performance.
Aligned with our stakeholder commitment of top-tier customer satisfaction and brand perception.
Safety
DART Rate
Measures the rate of employee injuries that resulted in work days missed or restricted or an employee transfer, with the target set using industry benchmark of top decile.
Designed to track our progress in achieving the optimum safety climate.
2018 National Safety Council Barometer Survey developed by the National Safety Council (“NSCBS”)
A survey that gauges employee perception of our safety programs and benchmarks results against a proprietary database of over 800 companies, with the target set using the Company’s 2017 performance as the baseline. Threshold, target and maximum performance goals are based on our percentile ranking as compared to the other surveyed companies.
Designed to track our progress in achieving the optimum safety climate supported by the appropriate activities while also gauging management, supervisor and employee engagement.

31

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The performance measures and their associated weightings applicable to each of the Named Executive Officers and formulaic results as a percentage of the target Cash Incentive Plan opportunity for 2018 (prior to the negative discretionary adjustment made by the Compensation Committee, as discussed below) are shown below.

Corporate Measures(1)
Weight
Trigger
Target
Stretch
Result(2)
Weighted
Achievement(3)
Formulaic
Result
% of Target
NOEPS
 
75
%
$
1.23
 
  $1.28- $1.30  
$
1.35
 
$
1.30
 
 
75
%
 
84
%
Customer Care (JD Power Studies)
 
10
%
 
737
 
738 
 
739
 
 
734
 
 
0
%
Customer Care (MSR Group Survey)
 
5
%
 
89
%
90%
 
91
%
 
90
%
 
5
%
Safety (DART Rate)
 
5
%
 
.43
 
.41 
 
.20
 
 
0.67
 
 
0
%
Safety (NSCBS)
 
5
%
 
89
%
92%
 
95
%
 
91
%
 
4
%
(1)For performance between two performance levels (for example, between target and stretch goals), the incentive opportunity is determined by interpolation and is expressed as a percentage of the target opportunity.
(2)The 2018 results were calculated as discussed above under “2018 Cash Incentive Plan.”
(3)Weighted achievement is determined by multiplying the weight by the achievement percentage.

   Implications of the Greater Lawrence Incident

In January 2019, in light of the profound effect of the Greater Lawrence Incident on the communities of Andover, North Andover and Lawrence, Massachusetts, the Compensation Committee exercised negative discretion retained by the Compensation Committee under the Omnibus Plan to eliminate the performance-based cash incentive payouts for all of the Named Executive Officers, and separately, with respect to revenue size, market capitalizationour CEO, the Compensation Committee made a recommendation to the independent members of the Board that Mr. Hamrock’s annual performance-based cash incentive payout also be eliminated. The independent members of the Board considered and operational similarity. For purposesaccepted the Compensation Committee’s recommendation.

The Compensation Committee certified the performance results relative to the goals set in 2018 as shown in the tables above and then exercised negative discretion in accordance with the terms of considering 2014 compensation decisions, the Comparative Group includedOmnibus Plan to eliminate payouts to our Named Executive Officers. The formulaic result shown below would have been used to calculate payouts to the Named Executive Officers under the 2018 Cash Incentive Plan but for the Compensation Committee’s negative discretionary adjustment to eliminate payouts. The Compensation Committee exercised negative discretion in accordance with the terms of the Omnibus Plan in order to underscore our commitment to safe operations. In making such determination, the Compensation Committee noted the strong performance of certain business units and corporate functions of certain executives, but determined that the significance of the Greater Lawrence Incident and the totality of the community impact outweighed any consideration of business unit or individual performance.

With respect to our CEO, the Compensation Committee made a recommendation to the independent members of the Board that Mr. Hamrock’s 2018 Cash Incentive Plan payout also be eliminated in order to underscore our commitment to safe operations. The Compensation Committee determined it was appropriate to recommend that no 2018 Cash Incentive Plan payout be made to Mr. Hamrock due to the profound effect of the Greater Lawrence Incident on the communities served by our subsidiary, Columbia Gas of Massachusetts. The independent members of the Board considered and accepted the Compensation Committee’s recommendation.

Consequently, no 2018 Cash Incentive Plan payouts were made to any of the Named Executive Officers. The 2018 Cash Incentive Plan opportunities, formulaic amounts that would have been payable in accordance with the performance results shown in the tables above relative to the 2018 goals and the actual payouts following companies:the Compensation Committee’s exercise of negative discretion are shown in the table below.

   2018 Cash Incentive Plan Payouts to the Named Executive Officers

The 2018 Cash Incentive Plan opportunities and actual payout amounts as approved by the Compensation Committee (and with respect to the CEO, by the independent members of the Board) are shown below.

Named Executive Officer
2018
Salary
($)
Target
  (% of Salary)|(1)
Formulaic
Result
  (% of Target)(2)
Formulaic
Amount

  ($)(3)
2018
Award
  ($)(4)
No payout
per
Compensation
Committee
exercise of
negative
discretion
Joseph Hamrock
 
1,000,000
 
 
120
%
 
84
%
 
1,008,000
 
 
-0-
 
Donald E. Brown
 
575,000
 
 
75
%
 
84
%
 
362,250
 
 
-0-
 
Pablo A. Vegas
 
525,000
 
 
75
%
 
84
%
 
330,750
 
 
-0-
 
Violet G. Sistovaris
 
475,000
 
 
70
%
 
84
%
 
279,300
 
 
-0-
 
Carrie J. Hightman
 
490,000
 
 
60
%
 
84
%
 
246,960
 
 
-0-
 
(1)Each Named Executive Officer has a trigger bonus opportunity equal to 40% of target and a stretch bonus opportunity equal to 160% of target.
(2)Formulaic Result reflects the percentage of  Target that would have been payable to the Named Executive Officers based on the Company’s 2018 results as determined by the pre-established performance goals, prior to the Compensation Committee’s negative discretionary adjustment.
(3)The Formulaic Amounts were calculated as follows: 2018 annual salary multiplied by his or her Target (% of Salary) multiplied by the applicable Formulaic Result (% of Target).
(4)The Compensation Committee exercised negative discretion to eliminate the 2018 award payouts, and in the case of our CEO, make its recommendation to the independent members of the Board to eliminate the 2018 award payout to Mr. Hamrock.

32

TABLE OF CONTENTS

   2018 LTIP Awards

In January 2018, the Compensation Committee redesigned the long-term equity incentive component of the executive compensation program to enhance its retention characteristics, better align payouts with individual executive contributions and drive accountability for achievement of certain key business imperatives while continuing to align incentives to Company financial performance and stockholder interests. Consistent with the philosophy and principles articulated above, the Compensation Committee believes that the 2018 LTIP awards:

Align the interests of executives with our stockholders as the ultimate value of the award is dependent upon the value of our stock;
Support our philosophy of paying for performance because the PSUs are not eligible to vest unless the Company achieves a threshold financial performance goal over the three-year performance period;
Provide competitive compensation to recruit and retain executive talent by including a long-term equity incentive component with vesting based on a multi-year service condition, subject to earlier vesting in the event of certain qualifying terminations of employment;
Offers compensation that emphasizes the value of continuous long-term service; and
Endorses the enterprise-wide customer value initiatives and drives accountability by aligning the actual value of the award to an assessment of an executive’s contributions to the achievement of the Customer Value Framework.

In determining the 2018 LTIP award values awarded to the Named Executive Officers and all our senior executives in January 2018, the Compensation Committee considered the competitive pay practices at companies within our Comparator Group, input from Meridian, the Compensation Committee’s independent compensation consultant, the historical mix of fixed compensation versus variable incentive compensation, internal pay equity and the expectations of the executive’s role in driving the Company’s strategic and financial objectives and individual performance. Based on this assessment, the Compensation Committee (or, in the case of Mr. Hamrock, the independent members of the Board) approved the 2018 award values for each Named Executive Officer.

In the case of Mr. Hamrock, the Compensation Committee noted that Mr. Hamrock’s 2017 performance consistently exceeded expectations and considered, in particular, his total compensation in relation to the Comparator Group and recommended to the independent members of the Board, an increased LTIP award value as compared to prior years to maintain the market competitiveness of his total compensation. In determining Mr. Hamrock’s 2018 total compensation levels, the Board delivered the majority of his increase in the form of long-term equity incentives in order to tie a greater percentage of his compensation to the Company’s long-term performance, with the value of the LTIP award fluctuating based on performance against key performance objectives and/or stock price performance over the three-year performance or service period.

In the case of Mr. Vegas, in considering his increase from the 2017 award value, the Compensation Committee considered his consistent strong performance in 2017, sustained leadership in his role in driving the Company’s strategic and financial objectives, his historical award levels and the market competiveness of his total compensation. The LTIP award values for the other Named Executive Officers were established based on the factors above considering, in particular, internal pay equity and the competitive market. The 2018 and 2017 LTIP award values for each Named Executive Officer are shown below.

 
LTIP Award Values      
 
 
Named Executive Officer
2018 Grant Date Face Value ($)
 
2017 Grant Date Face Value ($)
Joseph Hamrock
 
4,300,000
 
 
3,000,000
 
Donald E. Brown
 
950,000
 
 
900,000
 
Pablo A. Vegas
 
950,000
 
��
850,000
 
Violet G. Sistovaris
 
700,000
 
 
650,000
 
Carrie J. Hightman
 
700,000
 
 
750,000
 

The 2018 LTIP award values shown above were granted in the form of PSUs (80% of the 2018 LTIP award) and in the form of RSUs (20% of the 2018 LTIP award) as shown below. Vesting of the 2018 PSUs is dependent on the Company meeting certain financial performance measures over the 2018-2020 performance period (the “performance period”) and the executive’s continued employment through February 26, 2021. Vesting of the RSUs is dependent on the executive’s continued employment through February 26, 2021. Special vesting rules apply to both the PSUs and RSUs in the event of death, “Retirement,” “Disability” or a “Change-in-Control” (each as defined in the Omnibus Plan). Termination for any other reason prior to February 26, 2021 will result in forfeiture of the entire 2018 LTIP award.

33

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The 2018 LTIP awards to Named Executive Officers are shown below.

Named Executive Officer
Target
Number of PSUs Awarded(1)
Number of RSUs Awarded(2)
Joseph Hamrock
 
140,408
 
 
35,102
 
Donald E. Brown
 
31,122
 
 
7,781
 
Pablo A. Vegas
 
31,122
 
 
7,781
 
Violet G. Sistovaris
 
22,932
 
 
5,733
 
Carrie J. Hightman
 
22,932
 
 
5,733
 
(1)All 2018 PSU awards were granted in January 2018, and vest based on Company performance, the application of the RTSR and individual performance modifier, as well as the satisfaction of the service condition (the executive’s continued employment through February 26, 2021), as detailed below.
(2)All 2018 RSU awards were granted in January 2018, and will vest based on the executive’s continued employment through February 26, 2021, as detailed below.

2018 PSUs. All of the 2018 PSUs are subject to the achievement of a cumulative NOEPS trigger (calculated as detailed earlier under 2018 Cash Incentive Plan) in order for any vesting to occur. If the NOEPS trigger is achieved, 80% of the target PSUs (65% of the 2018 LTIP award) will vest based on NOEPS performance above the trigger, as modified by our RTSR performance (which can reduce or increase the vested amount of the award by up to 25%). The remaining 20% of the target PSUs (15% of the 2018 LTIP award) will vest based on the achievement of the Customer Value Framework goals and a discretionary assessment of the Named Executive Officer’s contribution to the Company’s achievement of the Customer Value Framework goals. Vesting of the entire PSU portion of the 2018 LTIP award is subject to the executive’s continued employment through February 26, 2021. Termination for any reason other than death, “Retirement,” “Disability” or a “Change-in-Control” (each as defined in the Omnibus Plan) prior to February 26, 2021 will result in forfeiture of the entire 2018 LTIP award.

For the cumulative NOEPS portion of the 2018 PSU (65% of 2018 LTIP award and 80% of the target PSU component) the Company’s RTSR performance is a modifier in contrast to the 2017 design of vesting based on cumulative NOEPS and RTSR, each weighted equally. The Compensation Committee approved the use of cumulative NOEPS as the primary performance goal in the 2018 LTIP program design to tie a greater percentage of the PSUs to the achievement of a key financial goal for the Company while still measuring and rewarding relative performance with the use of the RTSR payout modifier. The Compensation Committee also believes that this design enhances pay for performance transparency as payouts are directly linked to the Company’s absolute performance. As noted above, the NOEPs goal was established after considering the Company’s annual financial plan at the beginning of the performance period and was designed to be achievable with strong management performance over the three-year performance period.

Additionally, the Compensation Committee approved the vesting of a portion of the 2018 PSUs (15% of the 2018 LTIP award and 20% of the target PSU component) based on an assessment of each Named Executive Officer’s contribution to the successful execution of the Company’s Customer Value Framework over the three-year performance period in order to drive greater individual accountability through the program design. In so doing, the Compensation Committee supplemented the financial measures that incentivize earnings strength with execution-focused transparency to strike an appropriate balance over the long-term.

The Company’s overall Customer Value Framework goal must be met in the respective category before a payout may occur with respect to such category. Once the Company’s Customer Value Framework goal is met, the actual payout of the Customer Value Framework PSUs is determined based on a discretionary assessment of the individual executive’s contribution to the successful achievement of each Customer Value Framework goal over the three-year performance period.

The CEO performs the discretionary assessment of each Named Executive Officer other than himself and makes a recommendation to the Compensation Committee, with the vesting level approved by the Compensation Committee. In the case of the CEO, the Compensation Committee performs the discretionary assessment of performance, with the independent members of the Board approving the CEO’s vesting level. The Customer Value Framework measures are based on key business imperatives relating to safety, customer care, cost containment, organizational culture and environmental impact, with each measure weighted equally in determining the payout for this portion of the LTIP. The Customer Value Framework performance goals were designed to be achievable with the coordinated, cross-functional focus and effort of the Named Executive Officers.

34

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The measures and goals pertaining to the 2018 PSUs are shown below.

2018 PSU Performance Measures
AGL Resources Inc.Pepco Holdings, Inc.
Cumulative NOEPS
Ameren Corporation
Threshold Goal(1)
Measure
PPL Corporation
Trigger, Target and Stretch Goals
% of LTIP
% of Award Earned if Modifier is
Applied
American Electric Power Company, Inc.
Three-year Cumulative NOEPS: $3.88
Three-year Cumulative NOEPS
Public Service Enterprise Group Incorporated
Trigger (50% Payout): $3.88(1)
65
RTSR Performance(2)
CenterPoint Energy, Inc.
Target (100% Payout): $4.08(1)
Top Quartile=
Questar Corporation
+25% modifier
CMS Energy Corporation
Stretch (200% Payout): $4.28(1)
Bottom Quartile=
SCANA Corporation
-25% modifier
Dominion Resources, Inc.Sempra Energy
Customer Value Framework
DTE Energy Company
Threshold Goal(1)
Measure
Spectra Energy Corp.
Categories
% of LTIP
% of Award Earned following
Discretionary Individual Assessment
EQT Corporation
Three-year
Cumulative NOEPS:
$3.88
Three-year Customer Value Framework
WGL Holdings, Inc.
Safety
Customer Care
Cost Containment
Organizational Culture
Environmental Impact
15
0-200%(3)
(1)The goals were originally approved in January 2018, but updated in March 2018 to reflect changes to the Company’s financial plan as a result of the expected impact of tax reform. The goals approved by the Compensation Committee were designed to be challenging but achievable with strong management performance over the three-year performance period. The NOEPS result will generally be calculated as discussed above under “2018 Cash Incentive Plan.”
(2)RTSR will be determined by the annualized growth in the price of a share of the Company’s common stock, assuming dividends are reinvested, over the period beginning December 31, 2017 and ending on December 31, 2020, compared to a similar calculation for a group of 34 energy services companies within our industry or providing similar services to ours and companies with which we compete for the sale of equity capital, 18 of which are in the Comparator Group.
(3)The Company’s overall Customer Value Framework goal must be met in the respective category before a payout may occur with respect to such category. Once met, the actual payout is determined based on a discretionary assessment of the individual executive’s contribution to the successful achievement of each Customer Value Framework goal over the three-year performance period.

2018 RSUs. As discussed above, a portion of the 2018 LTIP award (20%) was granted in the form of RSUs in order to reward long-term service with the Company and retain executives over a multi-year service period. While the RSUs vest based on the executive’s continued service, the Compensation Committee views RSUs to be at-risk compensation because the ultimate value of the RSUs will fluctuate based on the Company’s stock price performance. The RSUs granted in January 2018 will vest after the completion of a three-year service period and the executive’s continued employment through February 26, 2021, subject to earlier vesting in the event of death, “Retirement,” “Disability” or a “Change-in-Control” (each as defined in the Omnibus Plan) prior to February 26, 2021.

2016 Performance Share Awards. In 2016, the Compensation Committee and the independent members of the Board approved grants of performance share awards to the Named Executive Officers and the CEO, respectively. Vesting of the 2016 grants of performance share awards was dependent on Company achievement relative to certain performance goals over the 2016-2018 performance period. The performance measures related to cumulative NOEPS and RTSR. Based on the Company’s performance during the three-year performance period beginning January 1, 2016 and ending December 31, 2018, 120% of the 2016 performance share awards vested as described below.

The performance measures, their weightings and results, as certified by the Compensation Committee, are shown below.

Performance Measure(1)
Weight
Trigger
(50% Award)
Target
(100% Award)
Stretch
(200% Award)
Actual
Results(2)
Cumulative NOEPS for 2016—2018
50%
$3.19
$3.34
$3.64
$3.60(3)
RTSR for 2016—2018
50%
40th
Percentile
50th
Percentile
100th
Percentile
41st
Percentile
(1)Performance results are calculated in the same manner as discussed above.
(2)For performance results between two performance levels (for example, between the target and stretch goal), the incentive opportunity is determined by interpolation.
(3)Based upon cumulative NOEPS performance from January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2018. The 2016-2018 cumulative NOEPS result consists of 2016, 2017 and 2018 NOEPS results, as disclosed in the Company’s earnings report for the applicable year. The 2018 NOEPS result was calculated as discussed above under “2018 Cash Incentive Plan.”

35

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Vesting of the 2016 performance share awards remained subject to the satisfaction of a service condition; the executive’s continued employment through February 28, 2019. Thereafter, the 2016 performance shares fully vested and were paid to each Named Executive Officer one-for-one in shares of our common stock, as shown below.

Named Executive Officer
Number of 2016 Performance Shares Vested
FirstEnergy Corp.
Joseph Hamrock
The Williams Companies, Inc.
142,790
Donald E. Brown
48,549
Pablo A. Vegas
33,752
Violet G. Sistovaris
34,270
Carrie J. Hightman
42,837

Stock Ownership and Retention Guidelines

Senior executives, including the Named Executive Officers, are generally expected to satisfy their applicable ownership guideline within five years of becoming subject to the guidelines provided below. Once the senior executive satisfies the applicable guideline, he or she must continue to own a sufficient number of shares to remain in compliance with the guideline. Until such time as the senior executive satisfies the applicable stock ownership guideline, the executive is required to hold at least 50% of the shares of common stock received upon the lapse of the restrictions on RSUs, the vesting of PSUs, performance shares or exercise of stock options. At the end of 2018, all of the Named Executive Officers exceeded the applicable ownership guideline, except for Mr. Brown who has until 2020 to meet his guideline.

Executive Level
Share Ownership Level
CEO
5x base salary
All other senior executive officers
3x base salary

Risk Management Policies and Guidelines.Guidelines

We maintain various guidelines and policies to help us meet our compensation objectives including:

Executive Stock Ownership and Retention Guidelines.    Senior executives, including the Named Executive Officers, are generally expected to satisfy their applicable ownership guidelines within five years of becoming subject to the guidelines. The stock ownership guideline for the CEO is five times his annual base salary. The other senior executives have a stock ownership guideline of three times their respective annual base salaries. Once the senior executive satisfies the guidelines, he/she must continue to own a sufficient number of shares to remain in compliance with the guidelines. Until such time as the senior executives satisfy the stock ownership guidelines, they are required to hold at least 50% of the shares of common stock received upon the lapse of the restrictions on restricted stock units and the vesting of performance shares. At the end of 2014, each of the Named Executive Officers exceeded their ownership guidelines with the exception of Mr. Hamrock who has an additional two years to satisfy his ownership guideline.

Trading Windows/Trading Plans/HedgingHedging.. We restrict the ability of certain employees to freely trade in the Company’sour common stock because of their periodic access to our material non-public information regarding the Company.information. Under our insider trading policy, our key executives are prohibited from trading in Companyour securities during quarterly blackout periods.periods, and at such other times as the CLO may deem appropriate. In addition, under our Securities Transaction Compliance Policy for Certain Employees and our Securities Transaction Compliance Policy for Directors and Executive Officers, all directors and all senior executives, including ourthe Named Executive Officers, are prohibited from engaging in short sales of the Company’sour equity securities or in buying or selling puts, calls or other options on the Company’sour securities or otherwise hedging against or speculating in the potential changes in the value of the Company’sour common stock. None of our directors or executive officers ownsown Company securities that are pledged.

Compensation Recovery for MisconductMisconduct.. While we believe our executives conduct business with the highest integrity and in full compliance with our Code of Business Conduct, the ONCCompensation Committee believes it is appropriate to ensure that the Company’sour compensation plans and agreements provide for financial penalties to an executive who engages in certain fraudulent or other inappropriate conduct. Consequently, our Incentive Plan, the Omnibus Plan and its predecessor, the 1994 Long-Term Incentive Plan, containcontains “clawback” provisions that require reimbursement of amounts received under the plansCash Incentive Plan and LTIP in the event of certain acts of misconduct with respect to both the annual short-term cash incentive and long-term equity awards.

misconduct.

Tax Treatment of Executive Compensation.Compensation

Section 162(m) of the Code provides that annual compensation in excess of $1,000,000 paid to the CEO orand certain of theour other Named Executive Officers, other than compensation meeting the definition of “performance-based compensation,”executive officers will not be deductible by a corporation for federal income tax purposes. In January 2014,Historically, there was an exception to this annual deduction limit for compensation meeting the ONC Committee established a threshold performance target based on the Company’s operating income in order to qualify certain compensation as performance based for purposesdefinition of Section 162(m). The ONC Committee reviews the deductibility of compensation“performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m) and related regulations published byof the IRS. The ONC Committee retains the discretion to amend any compensation arrangement to comply with Section 162(m)’s requirements for deductibilityCode, which was repealed in accordanceconnection with the terms of such arrangements and what it believes is in the best interestadoption of the Company.

Tax Cuts and Jobs Act in 2017. The ONCCompensation Committee considers the anticipated tax treatment to the Company and our overall executive compensation objectives when determining executive compensation and routinely seeks to structure its executive compensation program in a way that preserves thecompensation. Accordingly, tax deductibility is one of compensation payments and benefits. It should be noted, however, that there are many factors which are considered by the ONCCompensation Committee in determining executive compensation and, similarly, there are many factors which may affect the deductibility of executive compensation. To maintain the flexibility to compensate the Named Executive Officers in a manner designed to promote varying corporate goals, the ONC Committee has not adopted a policy that all executive compensation must be deductible under Section 162(m).

In addition, Sections 280G and 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) impose excise taxes on Named Executive Officers, directors who own significant stockholder interests in the Company and other service providers who receive payments in excess of a threshold level upon a change-in-control. Although the Company does not provide any gross up payments to reimburse officers, directors or others for any such taxes, the36

Company or its successor could lose a deduction for amounts subject to the additional tax. As discussed under “Potential Payments upon Termination of Employment or a Change-in-Control of the Company” below, it is possible that payments to the Named Executive Officers could be subject to these taxes.

Finally, Section 409A of the Code imposes additional taxes on Named Executive Officers, directors and other service providers who defer compensation in a manner that does not comply with Section 409A. The Company has reviewed its compensation arrangements for compliance with applicable Section 409A requirements.

TABLE OF CONTENTSONC Committee Actions Related to 2014 Compensation

During 2014, the ONC Committee reviewed and, as appropriate, took action with respect to each element of total compensation for each Named Executive Officer following the principles, practices and processes described above. In doing so, the ONC Committee concluded that the total compensation provided for each of the Company’s senior executives in 2014, including the Named Executive Officers, was consistent with the Company’s compensation philosophy and was reasonable, competitive and appropriate.

The ONC Committee’s compensation determinations, though subjective in part, were based primarily upon recognition of the performance of each Named Executive Officer, and a determination that the total compensation awarded to each Named Executive Officer provided well-balanced incentives to focus on serving the interests of the Company and its stockholders.

In addition, the ONC Committee considered the stockholders’ advisory approval of the 2013 compensation of our Named Executive Officers at the 2014 Annual Meeting and determined that no changes were necessary or advisable in connection with the design of our senior executive compensation program as a result of the stockholders’ vote.

2014 Base Salaries.    Historically, base salaries of senior executives, including the Named Executive Officers, have been adjusted when deemed necessary to maintain competitiveness and reflect performance. During 2014, the Committee reviewed the base salaries of the Company’s senior executives, including the Named Executive Officers, and approved salary increases for each of the Named Executive Officers.

In so doing, the Committee considered the base salaries earned by similarly situated executives of companies in the Comparative Group, increased responsibilities, experience, internal pay equity, historical compensation practices, individual performance and contribution to achievement of business objectives. In particular, the ONC Committee noted the strong performance of each of the Named Executive Officers, Mr. Kettering’s increased responsibilities as Executive Vice President and Group CEO of CPG and the fact that, with the exception of Mr. Hamrock, there had been no salary increases for the Named Executive Officers since 2012.

The 2014 base salary adjustments for each Named Executive Officer are shown in the table below.

Name 2013
Annual Salary
  2014
Annual Salary
 

Robert C. Skaggs, Jr.

 $900,000   $980,000  

Stephen P. Smith

 $575,000   $600,000  

Glen L. Kettering

 $340,000   $500,000  

Carrie J. Hightman

 $475,000   $490,000  

Joseph Hamrock

 $470,000   $500,000  

Annual Performance-Based Cash Incentives.    In January 2014, the ONC Committee established performance measures to determine the 2014 incentive payouts to the Named Executive Officers. In determining incentive compensation ranges for the Named Executive Officers, the ONC Committee considered competitive information from the Comparative Group, input from the independent compensation consultant, historical payouts and individual performance and determined that the cash-based incentive compensation range for Mr. Skaggs should be increased to a target of 125% from 100%. Mr. Skaggs’ trigger and stretch amounts were increased to 50% and 200% respectively from 40% and 160% after considering his strong leadership and an evaluation of the competitive market data, including a recognition that Mr. Skaggs’ target cash compensation remained below the market median. The trigger, target and stretch levels were unchanged from the prior year for

the other Named Executive Officers. For more information on the 2014 payout amounts for each of the Named Executive Officers, see the section below entitled “2014 Incentive Plan Payouts to the Named Executive Officers.”

The 2014 Incentive Plan awards for senior executives, including all of the Named Executive Officers, were subject to achievement with respect to two corporate financial goals, net operating earnings per share and corporate funds from operations, as well as an additional operational measure relating to safety. The ONC Committee approved these measures because they were deemed to be important to the Company’s success in increasing stockholder value.

Earnings, cash flow and safety were measured as follows:

The measure of earnings was net operating earnings per share (after accounting for the cost of any incentive payout). Net operating earnings was defined as income from continuing operations determined in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”), adjusted for certain items, such as weather, gains and losses on the sale of assets, certain out-of-period items and reserve adjustments. The ONC Committee uses net operating earnings, a non-GAAP financial measure, for determining financial performance for incentive compensation plans because the Board and management believe this measure better represents the fundamental earnings strength and performance of the Company. The Company uses net operating earnings internally for budgeting and for reporting to the Board.

The cash flow measure, corporate funds from operations, was calculated by taking net income from operations and adding back non-cash items such as depreciation. The ONC Committee uses corporate funds from operations as an Incentive Plan measure because the ONC Committee and management believe this measure fairly represents the amount of cash produced by the Company’s operations.

Safety was measured by the number of employee work days missed or restricted or the number of days an employee was transferred, known as the DART metric, which was developed by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Each business unit of the Company had its own safety goal. The safety goal for corporate staff was based upon the respective business unit goals, weighted by employee hours for each business unit.

The incentive opportunities for the senior executives, including the Named Executive Officers, were contingent on achievement of goals relating to these measures, subject to final discretionary adjustment by the ONC Committee.

The 2014 Incentive Plan awards for the leaders of our business units also are subject to achievement with respect to business unit net operating earnings and funds from operations goals for each of the business units. The ONC Committee believes the inclusion of business unit goals in the annual Incentive Plan improves the line of sight between employees and the incentive measures, thereby enhancing Company performance. The ONC Committee extended to Mr. Skaggs the authority to establish the annual business unit targets for the year. He assigned goals that, if accomplished, were expected to ensure the Company’s attainment of its overall corporate objectives.

Consequently, the incentive opportunities for Messrs. Kettering and Hamrock were subject to achievement with respect to the corporate financial measures (net operating earnings per share and corporate funds from operations), and achievement with respect to performance measures tied to the business unit net operating earnings (net of interest expense and income taxes) and business unit funds from operations and business unit safety measures for which they have responsibility. As such, each of their measures is weighted differently than the other Named Executive Officers who are members of the corporate service group, as shown in the tables below.

The applicable performance measures and their associated weightings and results as a percentage of the target incentive opportunity for Messrs. Skaggs and Smith, and Ms. Hightman were:

Corporate  Measures(1) Weight Trigger Target Stretch Result Robert C. Skaggs,  Jr. Stephen P. Smith Carrie J.  Hightman
      

Formulaic

Amounts(2)

 

Formulaic

Amounts(2)

 

Formulaic

Amounts(2)

      

Payout

as a %

of

Target

 

Weighted

Adjusted

Payout

as a %

of

Target

 

Payout
as a %

of

Target

 

Weighted

Adjusted
Payout
as a %
of

Target

 

Payout
as a %

of

Target

 

Weighted

Adjusted

Payout
as a %

of

Target

NiSource Net Operating Earnings Per Share

 50% $1.61 $1.66 $1.71 $1.72 160% 80% 157.14% 78.57% 158.33% 79.17%

NiSource Funds from Operations

 40% $1,205M $1,355M $1,505M $1,456M(3) 140.40% 56.16% 138.48% 55.39% 139.28% 55.71%

Safety

 10% .79 days .71 days  .76 days 37.50% 3.75% 37.50% 3.75% 37.50% 3.75%

(1)When the result for a particular measure lands between two goals (for example, between the target and stretch goal), the incentive opportunity is determined by interpolation and is expressed as a percentage of the target incentive opportunity. Interpolation for the safety goal only applies between trigger and target. Consequently, target is the maximum available level for the safety goal.

(2)These amounts reflect a percentage of each executive’s target incentive opportunity. The trigger, target and stretch incentive opportunities for each of the Named Executive Officers are provided in the section entitled “2014 Incentive Plan Payouts to the Named Executive Officers.”

(3)This includes an upward adjustment to Funds from Operations of $92.4 million taking into consideration the impact of non-recurring items, such as incremental pension expense subsidized by the Company and changes in accounting.

The applicable performance measures and their associated weightings and results as a percentage of the target incentive opportunity for Mr. Kettering were:

Corporate Measures(1) Weight Trigger Target Stretch Result Formulaic
Payout as a
% of Target(2)
 

Weighted

Adjusted

Formulaic
Payout as a %
of  Target(2)

NiSource Net Operating Earnings Per Share

 25% $1.61 $1.66 $1.71 $1.72 158.33% 39.58%

NiSource Funds from Operations

 20% $1,205M $1,355M $1,505M $1,456M(3) 139.28% 27.86%

CPG Safety

 10% .25 days .19 days  .09 days 100.00% 10.00%

CPG Net Operating Earnings

 22.50% $264M $269M $279M $274M(4) 129.17% 29.06%

CPG Funds from Operations

 22.50% $397M $440M $483M $527M(5) 158.33% 35.63%

(1)When the result for a particular measure lands between two goals (for example, between the target and stretch goal), the incentive opportunity is determined by interpolation and is expressed as a percentage of the target opportunity. Interpolation for the safety goal only applies between trigger and target. Consequently, target is the maximum available level for the safety goal.

(2)These amounts reflect a percentage of Mr. Kettering’s target incentive opportunity. The trigger, target and stretch incentive opportunities for Mr. Kettering are provided in the section entitled “2014 Incentive Plan Payouts to the Named Executive Officers.”

(3)This includes an upward adjustment to Funds from Operations for NiSource of $92.4 million taking into consideration the impact of non-recurring items, such as incremental pension expense subsidized by the Company and changes in accounting.

(4)This includes an upward adjustment to Net Operating Earnings for CPG of $9.8 million taking into consideration the impact of changes in tax law, and the impact of non-recurring items such as incremental pension expense subsidized by the Company and other changes in accounting.

(5)This includes an upward adjustment to Funds from Operations for CPG of $38.6 million taking into consideration the impact of non-recurring items, such as incremental pension expense subsidized by the Company and changes in accounting.

The applicable performance measures and their associated weightings and results as a percentage of the target incentive opportunity for Mr. Hamrock were:

Corporate Measures(1) Weight Trigger Target Stretch Result Formulaic
Payout as a
% of Target(2)
 

Weighted

Adjusted

Formulaic
Payout as a %
of  Target(2)

NiSource Net Operating Earnings Per Share

 25% $1.61 $1.66 $1.71 $1.72 161.54% 40.38%

NiSource Funds from Operations

 20% $1,205M $1,355M $1,505M $1,456M(3) 141.44% 28.29%

NGD Safety

 10% .91 days .82 days  1.03 days 0.00% 0.00%

NGD Net Operating Earnings

 22.50% $214M $220M $231M $216M(4) 58.97% 13.27%

NGD Funds from Operations

 22.50% $287M $397M $507M $444M(5) 126.29% 28.42%

(1)When the result for a particular measure lands between two goals (for example, between the target and stretch goal), the incentive opportunity is determined by interpolation and is expressed as a percentage of the target opportunity. Interpolation for the safety goal only applies between trigger and target. Consequently, target is the maximum available level for the safety goal.

(2)These amounts reflect a percentage of Mr. Hamrock’s target incentive opportunity. The trigger, target and stretch incentive opportunities for Mr. Hamrock are provided in the section entitled “2014 Incentive Plan Payouts to the Named Executive Officers.”

(3)This includes an upward adjustment to Funds from Operations for NiSource of $92.4 million taking into consideration the impact of non-recurring items, such as incremental pension expense subsidized by the Company and changes in accounting.

(4)This includes an upward adjustment to Net Operating Earnings for NGD of $2.3 million taking into consideration the impact of changes in accounting.

(5)This includes a downward adjustment to Funds from Operations for NGD of $34.1 million taking into consideration the impact of changes in tax law.

2014 Incentive Plan Payouts to the Named Executive Officers.    For 2014, the annual incentive opportunities and actual payout amounts for each of the Named Executive Officers as approved by the ONC Committee were:

Named Executive Officer 

Trigger

(% of Salary)

  

Target

(% of Salary)

  

Stretch

(% of Salary)

  

2014 Award

(% of Target)

  2014
Award(1)
 

Robert C. Skaggs, Jr.

  50  125  200  140 $1,715,000  

Stephen P. Smith

  30  70  110  138 $579,600  

Glen L. Kettering

  25  60  95  142 $426,000  

Carrie J. Hightman

  25  60  95  139 $408,660  

Joseph Hamrock

  25  65  105  110 $357,500  

(1)The 2014 Awards for each of the Named Executive Officers were calculated as follows: annual base salary multiplied by his/her Target (% of Salary) multiplied by the applicable 2014 Award (% of Target).

In January 2015, the ONC Committee certified the performance results set forth in the tables above. The ONC Committee determined it was appropriate to approve an Incentive Plan payout of $1,715,000 to Mr. Skaggs based on the Company’s above-target performance relative to the net operating earnings per share financial metric and funds from operations financial metric as well as his continued strong leadership in 2014. Mr. Skaggs also

made recommendations to the ONC Committee with respect to the award of Incentive Plan payouts to the other senior executives, including the other Named Executive Officers. In making his recommendations, Mr. Skaggs considered the Company’s performance and the performance of the senior executives in delivering strong stockholder returns again in 2014, as well as the performances of the business unit and corporate functions the executives led. The ONC Committee considered and accepted Mr. Skaggs’ recommendations and approved Incentive Plan payouts to the Named Executive Officers in accordance with the Incentive Plan formula, as set forth in the table above.

2014 Discretionary Lump Sum Payout to Mr. Kettering.    In January 2014, the ONC Committee awarded Mr. Kettering a special one-time cash bonus award of $100,000 in recognition of his role as interim CEO of the CPG. The bonus amount is set forth in the Bonus column of the Summary Compensation Table because it was not based on performance relative solely to the pre-established performance criteria under the Incentive Plan.

Additional Discretionary Lump Sum Payouts to the Named Executive Officers Based on 2014 Performance.    In January 2015, the ONC Committee exercised its discretion to award bonuses to each of the Named Executive Officers in addition to amounts based on performance relative to pre-established performance criteria described above under the section entitled “Incentive Plan.” The ONC Committee approved a discretionary bonus of $1,785,000 for Mr. Skaggs based on the Company’s consistently superior performance over the last several years under his stewardship, including 207% cumulative total shareholder return over the past five years and Mr. Skaggs’ strategic leadership in developing and executing on the decision to create CPPL and to separate the Company’s natural gas pipeline and related businesses into a stand-alone publicly traded company.

In addition, the ONC Committee approved discretionary bonuses of $750,000 for Mr. Smith, and $500,000 for Mr. Kettering based on their significant contributions to the development and execution of the decision to create CPPL and to separate the Company’s natural gas pipeline and related businesses into a stand-alone publicly traded company. In particular, the ONC Committee considered Mr. Smith’s and Mr. Kettering’s key roles in developing and executing on the formation of CPPL and the Separation, including strategic and financial analysis, transition analysis and preparation. The ONC Committee also approved discretionary bonuses of $400,000 and $300,000 for Mr. Hamrock and Ms. Hightman, respectively, based on their contributions to the preparation for the Separation. In particular the ONC Committee considered Mr. Hamrock’s strategic leadership in developing a post-separation organization for our Company and Ms. Hightman’s performance in executing on the preparation for the Separation, as well as the creation of CPPL and its initial public offering.

The amounts of these discretionary bonuses are set forth in the Bonus column of the Summary Compensation Table because they are in addition to the amounts based on performance relative to the pre-established performance criteria under the Incentive Plan, described above, which are set forth in the Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation column of the Summary Compensation Table.

LTIP Awards.

2014 Performance Share Awards.    In January 2014, the ONC Committee approved a grant of performance shares to senior executives of the Company, including each of the Named Executive Officers. In determining the 2014 long-term incentive grant values to be awarded to the Named Executive Officers, the ONC Committee considered the competitive pay practices at companies within our Comparative Group, input from the ONC Committee’s independent compensation consultant, the historical mix of fixed compensation versus variable incentive compensation and individual performance. In particular, the ONC Committee considered the continued strong leadership of Messrs. Skaggs and Smith and the increased leadership experience of Mr. Hamrock, in addition to the appropriateness of market adjustments for Messrs. Skaggs and Hamrock based on Comparative Group information. The ONC Committee approved an increase for 2014 grant values for Messrs. Skaggs, Smith and Hamrock that were approximately 25%, 8%, and 17% greater than their prior year’s award values, respectively.

Vesting of the 2014 grant of performance shares is dependent on the Company meeting certain performance measures over a three-year performance period and the executive’s continued employment through January 28, 2017. Special vesting rules apply in the event of death, “Retirement,” “Disability” or a “Change-in-Control” (each as defined in the Omnibus Plan). Termination for any other reason will result in forfeiture of all performance shares.

The performance measures on which vesting of 2014 performance shares is contingent relate to cumulative net operating earnings per share over the three-year period from January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2016,

and Relative Total Shareholder Return (“RTSR”). The ONC Committee approved the application of these measures for the 2014-2016 performance cycle because they were deemed to be important to the Company’s success in increasing stockholder value. The ONC Committee determined it appropriate to eliminate funds from operations as a performance measure for the 2014 performance share awards in order to further align the 2014 performance shares with the Company’s strategic operating plan.

For the 2014 awards, we defined RTSR as the annualized growth in the dividends and share price of a share of the Company’s common stock, calculated using a 20-day trading average of the closing price of the Company’s common stock, over a period beginning December 31, 2013 and ending on December 31, 2016 compared to the similarly calculated total shareholder return performance of a peer group of energy companies, pre-determined by the ONC Committee. The peer group of companies selected by the ONC Committee for the purpose of determining RTSR is broader than the Comparative Group utilized by the ONC Committee in its compensation decision-making. The 36 energy companies, including 15 companies from the Comparative Group, were selected by the ONC Committee because each of the companies is similarly affected by external factors that impact stock price such as interest rates and industry opportunities and challenges.

If the pre-established performance goals and service condition are met at target performance levels, award recipients will earn 100% of the target number of performance shares awarded. The ONC Committee also approved trigger and stretch goals for each measure for each executive. If the trigger level is not met, then the executive will not receive any portion of the grant. If the target level is exceeded, the executive could receive up to a maximum of 200% of the target value of the grant unless total shareholder return is negative for the performance period, in which case, the maximum payout for RTSR would be at target regardless of performance relative to the peer group. When the result of net operating earnings per share and RTSR above the 50th percentile lands between two goals (for example, between the target and stretch goal), then the long-term incentive payout is determined by linear interpolation and is expressed as a percentage of the target opportunity. There is no interpolation between goals below the 50th percentile for the RTSR metric.

The measures and goals pertaining to the 2014 performance share awards are:

Performance Measure Weight 

Trigger

(50% Award)

 

Target

(100% Award)

 

Stretch

(200% Award)

Cumulative Net Operating Earnings Per Share for 2014-2016

 50% $5.11 $5.26 ³$5.63

Relative Total Shareholder Return as of December 31, 2016

 50% 40-49th

Percentile

 50th

Percentile

 100th

Percentile

The ONC Committee authorized 2014 performance share awards to the Named Executive Officers in the following amounts:

Named Executive OfficerTarget Number of  Performance Shares Awarded

Robert C. Skaggs, Jr.

109,457

Stephen P. Smith

39,405

Glen L. Kettering

14,594

Carrie J. Hightman

21,891

Joseph Hamrock

20,432

Consistent with the philosophy and principles articulated above, the ONC Committee believes that the 2014 performance share awards:

Align the interests of executives with the Company’s stockholders as the ultimate value of the award is dependent upon the value of the Company’s stock;

Support the Company’s philosophy of paying for performance as the performance shares will not vest unless the Company achieves its performance goals over the measurement period; and

Provide competitive compensation to recruit and retain executive talent by including a long-term incentive component with a three-year service condition.

Special 2014 Restricted Stock Unit Award for Mr. Kettering.    In January 2014, the ONC Committee granted Mr. Kettering a special award of 14,594 restricted stock units in recognition of his role as interim CEO of CPG. All of these restricted stock units vest three years from the date of grant. The grant date fair value of this restricted stock unit award is included in the Stock Awards column of the Summary Compensation Table.

2012 Performance Share Awards.    In 2012, the ONC Committee awarded a grant of performance shares to each of the Named Executive Officers. Vesting of the 2012 grant of performance shares was dependent upon the Company meeting certain performance measures over the three-year period from 2012 through 2014 and the executive’s continued employment through January 30, 2015. The performance measures related to cumulative net operating earnings per share and cumulative funds from operations over the three-year period and RTSR beginning December 31, 2011 through December 31, 2014. The peer group of companies selected by the ONC Committee for the purpose of determining RTSR for the 2012 awards was comprised of 36 energy companies including ten companies from the Comparative Group that the ONC Committee looked to for purposes of 2012 compensation decision making. Based on the Company’s performance as certified by the ONC Committee in January 2015, 183% of the performance share awards vested as described below.

The performance measures, their weightings and results, as certified by the ONC Committee, were:

Performance Measure(1) Weight 

Trigger

(50% Award)

 

Target

(100% Award)

 

Stretch

(200% Award)

 

Actual

Results

Cumulative Net Operating Earnings Per Share for 2012-2014

 40% $4.41 $4.56 ³$4.88 $4.76

Cumulative Funds from Operations for 2012-2014

 40% $3,002M $3,302M ³$3,902M $3,964M

Relative Total Shareholder Return as of December 31, 2014

 20% 40-49th

Percentile

 50th

Percentile

 100th

Percentile

 95th

Percentile

(1)When the result for a particular measure lands between two goals (for example, between the target and stretch goal), then the long-term incentive award opportunity is determined by interpolation and is expressed as a percentage of the target opportunity.

Thereafter, each Named Executive Officer fully vested in the performance shares, payable one-for-one in shares of the Company’s common stock, as set forth in the table below:

Named Executive Officer2012 Performance  Shares

Robert C. Skaggs, Jr.

234,917

Stephen P. Smith

97,881

Glen L. Kettering

39,153

Carrie J. Hightman

58,728

Joseph Hamrock

43,710

Changes to Our Executive Compensation Program in 2015

In January 2015, the ONC Committee determined that the 2015 annual long-term incentive awards to all Company executives, including the Named Executive Officers, should be in the form of service-based restricted stock units instead of performance-based shares in anticipation of the Separation. These restricted stock units do not vest until February 2, 2018, at which time they will vest in full subject to the award recipient’s continued service through the vesting date.

Additionally, the ONC Committee intends to exercise its discretion to make adjustments to the performance conditions and performance periods for outstanding performance share awards in order to preserve the value of such awards for Company executives, contingent upon the occurrence of the Separation. The same service vesting conditions as the original awards would continue. The ONC Committee also intends to make adjustments to the performance conditions and performance period for the 2015 annual performance-based cash incentive awards under the Incentive Plan, contingent upon the occurrence of the Separation.

The Named Executive Officers who are expected to become executive officers of CPG, Inc. at Separation are Messrs. Skaggs, Smith and Kettering. At such time, CPG, Inc. will become a separate publicly traded company, and each of these Named Executive Officers will cease to be employees of the Company. The unvested awards held by each of the Named Executive Officers who become executive officers of CPG, Inc. will be cancelled by the Company and we anticipate that CPG, Inc. will provide awards of equivalent value in lieu of such awards. Their separation from employment will not constitute a “Change-in-Control” for purposes of the Change-in-Control Agreements or a termination of employment for purposes of the Executive Severance Policy.

OFFICER NOMINATION AND COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

The Officer Nomination and Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (the “ONC Committee”“Committee”) has furnished the following report to the stockholders of the Company in accordance with rules adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission.

The ONC Committee states that it reviewed and discussed with management the Company’s Compensation Discussion and Analysis contained in this Proxy Statement.

Based upon the review and discussions referred to above, the ONC Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement and the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014.2018.

This report is submitted on behalf of the members of the ONCCompensation Committee:

Compensation Committee
Kevin T. Kabat, Chair
Theodore Bunting
Eric L. Butler
Wayne S. DeVeydt
Deborah A. Henretta
Michael E. Jesanis

Officer Nomination and Compensation Committee

Teresa A. Taylor, Chair

Richard A. Abdoo

Sigmund L. Cornelius

Michael E. Jesanis

W. Lee Nutter

Carolyn Y. Woo

March 2, 2015

ASSESSMENT OF RISK

The Company annually assesses whether its incentiveWe perform an annual risk assessment of our compensation programs are constructed in a manner that might induce participant behaviors that could cause the Company material harm.program. An assessment was performed in 2014,2018, and the Companywe concluded that the incentive components of our program for senior executives are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company, for reasons that include the following:

Our operations are highly regulated at both the federal and state levels and, therefore, are subject to continuous oversight by independent bodies.

Policies are in place to recoup compensation in the event of certain acts of misconduct and to prohibit hedging of our stock by ourthe senior executive officers.

Our compensation program is evaluated annually for its effectiveness and alignment with the Company’sour goals without promoting excessive risk.

Senior executive compensation is weighted toward long-term incentives, thereby ensuring thatproviding senior executives havewith an ongoing, multi-year focus of attention.

The performance measures that are the basis of incentive awards are approved each year by an independent committee of the Board.

The long-term incentive equity awards to senior executives generally have three-year vesting periods and are performance basedpredominately performance-based so that their upside potential and downside risk are designed to be aligned with that of our stockholders and promote long-term performance over the vesting period.

The senior executive officers are subject to stock ownership and retention guidelines that are independently set by the Board which are intended to ensuredesigned so that senior executives assume financial risk that is coincident with our stockholders.

The senior executive officers’ performance incentive measures include safety metrics in order to encourage a strong culture of safety.safety and motivate the prioritization of safe operations.

37

TABLE OF CONTENTS

COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

Summary.    The following table summarizes compensation for services to NiSourcethe Company and its affiliates for 2014, 2013 and 2012 awarded to, earned by or paid to each of the Named Executive Officers as of December 31, 2014.during 2018.

2018 Summary Compensation Table

Name and Principal
Position
 Year  

Salary

($)(1)

  

Bonus

($)(2)

  

Stock
Awards

($)(3)

  

Non-equity
Incentive

Plan
Compensation

($)(4)

  

Change in
Pension

Value and
Non-qualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings

($)(5)

  

All Other
Compensation

($)(6)

  

Total

($)

 

Robert C. Skaggs, Jr.

  2014    946,667    1,785,000    3,395,356    1,715,000    357,545    82,471    8,282,039  

President and Chief

Executive Officer

  2013    900,000        2,662,652    1,224,000    306,743    85,625    5,179,020  
  2012    900,000        2,635,436    720,000    347,464    79,336    4,682,236  

Stephen P. Smith

  2014    589,583    750,000    1,222,343    579,600    80,415    52,993    3,274,934  

Executive Vice President and

CFO

  2013    575,000        1,109,438    539,350    70,691    52,436    2,346,915  
  2012    564,583        1,098,088    438,725    70,947    54,601    2,226,944  

Glen L. Kettering

  2014    448,333    600,000    908,914    426,000    109,019    299,848    2,792,114  

Executive Vice President and

Group CEO

  2013    340,000    500,000    443,775    275,400    120,229    68,226    1,747,630  
  2012    340,000        439,239    222,360    82,106    71,750    1,155,455  

Carrie J. Hightman

  2014    483,750    300,000    679,059    408,660    62,395    47,520    1,981,384  

Executive Vice President and
Chief Legal Officer

  2013    475,000        665,663    384,750    55,232    49,274    1,629,919  
  2012    475,000        658,849    310,650    53,288    51,300    1,549,087  

Joseph Hamrock

  2014    487,500    400,000    633,801    357,500        48,930    1,927,731  

Executive Vice President and
Group CEO

  2013    461,667        532,540    418,535        46,529    1,459,271  
  2012    298,370    392,500    1,105,313            28,564    1,824,747  

Name and Principal Position
Year
Salary
($)(1)
Bonus
($)(2)
Stock
Awards
($)(3)
Non-equity
Incentive
Plan
Compensation
($)(4)
Change in
Pension
Value and
Non-qualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
($)(5)
All Other
Compensation
($)(6)
Total
($)
Joseph Hamrock
President and CEO
2018
 
989,583
 
 
4,706,148
 
 
82,784
 
 
5,778,515
 
2017
 
943,750
 
 
87,750
 
 
2,624,150
 
 
1,667,250
 
 
84,302
 
 
5,407,202
 
2016
 
858,333
 
 
54,830
 
 
2,302,476
 
 
1,045,170
 
 
73,349
 
 
4,334,158
 
Donald E. Brown
Executive Vice President and CFO
2018
 
554,167
 
 
1,039,730
 
 
50,682
 
 
1,644,579
 
2017
 
514,583
 
 
783,752
 
 
612,833
 
 
54,718
 
 
1,965,886
 
2016
 
479,167
 
 
782,843
 
 
435,488
 
 
49,705
 
 
1,747,203
 
Pablo A. Vegas
Executive Vice President and President, Gas Utilities
2018
 
514,583
 
 
1,039,730
 
 
44,223
 
 
1,598,536
 
2017
 
483,333
 
 
737,676
 
 
535,465
 
 
50,348
 
 
1,806,822
 
2016
 
298,295
 
 
150,000
 
 
1,560,554
 
 
226,466
 
 
27,421
 
 
2,262,736
 
Violet G. Sistovaris
Executive Vice President and President, NIPSCO
2018
 
464,583
 
 
766,102
 
 
153,630
 
 
44,051
 
 
1,428,366
 
2017
 
429,167
 
 
40,599
 
 
566,046
 
 
459,401
 
 
101,772
 
 
44,676
 
 
1,641,661
 
2016
 
400,000
 
 
46,320
 
 
552,597
 
 
303,680
 
 
88,473
 
 
39,679
 
 
1,430,749
 
Carrie J. Hightman
Executive Vice President and CLO
2018
 
490,000
 
 
766,102
 
 
87,851
 
 
46,340
 
 
1,390,293
 
2017
 
490,000
 
 
653,121
 
 
453,025
 
 
76,824
 
 
49,057
 
 
1,722,027
 
2016
 
490,000
 
 
690,737
 
 
339,305
 
 
66,376
 
 
61,929
 
 
1,648,347
 
(1)SalaryAny salary deferred at the election of the Named Executive Officer is reported in the category and year in which such salary was earned.

(2)This column shows discretionary bonus payouts that are in addition to any amounts paid under the Cash Incentive Plan described in footnote 4. These bonus amounts are more fully described in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — ONC Committee Actions Related to 2014 Compensation — 2014 Discretionary Lump Sum Payout to Mr. Kettering” and “Additional Discretionary Lump Sum Payouts to the Named Executive Officers Based on 2014 Performance.”Plan. For 2018, there were no discretionary payouts.

(3)For a discussion of stock awards granted in 2014,2018, please see “Compensationthe Compensation Discussion and Analysis — “Compensation Committee Actions Related to 2018 Executive Compensation-2018 LTIP Awards” above and the 2018 Grants of Plan-Based Awards table. ThisTable. Amounts reported in this column showsrepresent the aggregate grant date fair value, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, with respect to 80% of the restricted stock, restricted stock units,PSUs and performance sharesall RSUs granted in 20142018, calculated based on the average market price of our common stock on the NYSEgrant date, less the present value of any dividends not received during the vesting period. With respect to 20% of the PSUs that vest based on a discretionary assessment of performance with respect to the Customer Value Framework, amounts reported in this column represent the aggregate service inception date fair value, computed in accordance with ASC Topic 718, calculated based on the closing market price of our common stock on the service inception date. For this portion of the PSUs, the grant date discounted for accounting purposes will not occur until the valueCompensation Committee exercises discretion to determine vesting following the conclusion of dividends not received in the vestingthree-year performance period. SinceAll of the performance share awardsPSUs are subject to performance conditions, therefore, the grant date value reported in this column for these awards is based upon the probable outcome of such conditions. The following table shows the value of the performance share awards reported in the Summary Compensation Table at the grant date assuming that the highest level of performance conditions will be achieved.

38

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The following table shows the value of the 2018 PSUs reported in the 2018 Summary Compensation Table at the grant date assuming that the highest level of performance conditions will be achieved and less the present value of any dividends not received in the vesting period. For information on the valuation assumptions used in these computations, see Note 13 to our consolidated financial statements included in our 2018 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Name
Name

Maximum Performance Share
Share
Potential as

of Grant Date for
For Awards
($)

Robert C. Skaggs, Jr.

Joseph Hamrock
7,222,797
6,790,712

Stephen P. Smith

Donald E. Brown
1,597,561
2,444,686

Glen L. Kettering

Pablo A. Vegas
1,597,561
905,412

Violet G. Sistovaris
1,177,124
Carrie J. Hightman

1,177,124
1,358,118

Joseph Hamrock

1,267,601

(4)For 2014, the2018, Cash Incentive Plan payout amount for each ofpayouts to the Named Executive Officers reflected above in the column entitled Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation was based upon overall corporate and business unit performance.were eliminated. For more information regarding 20142018 corporate and business unit performance, 2018 Cash Incentive Plan payout opportunities for the Named Executive Officers and the actual payout amounts,Compensation Committee’s exercise of negative discretion to eliminate payouts, please see “CompensationCompensation Discussion and Analysis — ONCAnalysis—“Compensation Committee Actions Related to 2014 Compensation — Annual Performance-Based2018 Executive Compensation—2018 Cash IncentivesIncentive Plan” and 2014 Incentive Plan Payouts“Compensation Committee Actions Related to 2018 Executive Compensation—Implications of the Named Executive Officers.”Greater Lawrence Incident” and the discussion on the pages that follow.

(5)This column shows the change in the present value of each pension eligible Named Executive Officer’sexecutive’s accumulated benefits under our tax-qualified pension plans and the non-qualified Pension Restoration Plan as a result of annual pay and interest credits to their account balance under the plans as described in the narrative to the 2018 Pension Benefits table. Mr.Table. Mses. Hightman and Sistovaris are the only Named Executive Officers who are eligible to participate in our pension plans. Messrs. Hamrock, isBrown, and Vegas are not eligible to participate in either of the Company’sour pension plans.plans due to their hire dates. For a description of these plans and the basis used to develop the present values, see the 2018 Pension Benefits tableTable and accompanying narrative. No earnings on deferred compensation are shown in this column, since no earnings were above market or preferential.

(6)The table below provides a breakdown of the amounts shown in the “All Other Compensation” column for each Named Executive Officer in 2014.2018.

       Other Compensation     
Name 

Perquisites &

Personal

Benefits(a)

($)

  

Company

Contributions
To 401(k)
Plan(b)

($)

  

Company

Contributions

To Savings

Restoration

Plan(c)

($)

  

Total

($)

 

Robert C. Skaggs, Jr.

  11,471    19,500    51,500    82,471  

Stephen P. Smith

  8,774    19,500    24,719    52,993  

Glen L. Kettering

  257,973    19,500    22,375    299,848  

Carrie J. Hightman

  11,239    19,500    16,781    47,520  

Joseph Hamrock

  12,367    19,500    17,063    48,930  

 
Other Compensation
Name
Perquisites &
Personal
Benefits(a)
($)
Tax
Gross-Ups
($)
Company
Contributions
To 401(k)
Plan(b)
($)
Company
Contributions
To Savings
Restoration
Plan(c)
($)
Total
($)
Joseph Hamrock
 
13,513
 
 
19,250
 
 
50,021
 
 
82,784
 
Donald E. Brown
 
11,890
 
 
19,250
 
 
19,542
 
 
50,682
 
Pablo A. Vegas
 
8,202
 
 
19,250
 
 
16,771
 
 
44,223
 
Violet G. Sistovaris
 
11,530
 
 
19,250
 
 
13,271
 
 
44,051
 
Carrie J. Hightman
 
12,040
 
 
19,250
 
 
15,050
 
 
46,340
 
(a)All perquisites are valued based on the aggregate incremental cost to the Company,us, as required by the rules of the SEC. The “CompensationPlease see the Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Other“Other Compensation and Benefits — Perquisites” section of this Proxy Statement containsabove for additional information about the perquisites provided bywe provide to the Company to its Named Executive Officers. The perquisite amounts listed include financial planning and tax services as follows: Mr. Skaggs, $11,471; Mr. Smith, $8,774; Mr. Kettering, $9,870, Ms. Hightman, $11,104,for each of the Named Executive Officers and Mr. Hamrock, $12,367; travel expense as follows: Mr. Kettering, $233,579; living expense as follows: Mr. Kettering, $14,155; spousal travel as follows: Mr. Kettering, $369;for Messrs. Hamrock and taxable gift as follows: Ms. Hightman $135. The travel expense for Mr. Kettering was calculated by the Company based on the incremental variable operating costs associated with the use of the Company-leased aircraft to commute to the executive’s office, which includes an hourly use rate, fuel rate and other flight related fees and expenses. Executives are responsible for all taxes associated with the use of the Company aircraft for this purpose.Vegas.

(b)This column reflects Company matching contributions and profit sharing contributions made on behalf of each of the Named Executive Officers and a Company non-elective contribution of 3% of compensation on behalf of Mr. Hamrock, Mr. Brown, and Mr. Vegas to the 401(k) Plan. The 401(k) Plan is a tax-qualified defined contribution plan, as described above under “Compensationin the Compensation Discussion and Analysis —“Other Compensation and Benefits — Savings Programs.”

(c)This column reflects Company matching contributions and profit sharing contributions made on behalf of theall eligible Named Executive Officers and a Company non-elective contribution of 3% of compensation on behalf of Mr.Messrs. Hamrock, Brown, and Vegas in excess of IRS limits to the Savings Restoration Plan. The Savings Restoration Plan is a non-qualified defined contribution plan, as described above under “Compensationin the Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Other“Other Compensation and Benefits — Savings Programs,” and in the narrative following the 2018 Non-qualified Deferred Compensation table.Table.

39

TABLE OF CONTENTS

2018 Grants of Plan-Based Awards

The following table sets forth information concerning plan-based awards granted under the Omnibus Plan to the Named Executive Officers in 2014.2018.

       

Estimated Future Payouts Under

Non-Equity Incentive

Plan Awards(1)

  

Estimated Future Payouts Under

Equity Incentive

Plan Awards(2)

  

 All Other Stock 
Awards

Number

of Shares of

Stock or Units

(#)(3)

  

Grant Date Fair Value
of Stock and
Option Awards

($)(4)

 
Name 

Grant

Date

  Threshold
($)
  

Target

($)

  Maximum
($)
  Threshold
(#)
  

Target

(#)

  Maximum
(#)
   

Robert C. Skaggs, Jr.

  01/30/2014    490,000    1,225,000    1,960,000    54,729    109,457    218,914        3,395,356  

Stephen P. Smith

  01/30/2014    180,000    420,000    660,000    19,703    39,405    78,810        1,222,343  

Glen L. Kettering

  01/30/2014    125,000    300,000    475,000    7,297    14,594    29,188    14,594    908,914  

Carrie J. Hightman

  01/30/2014    122,500    294,000    465,500    10,946    21,891    43,782        679,059  

Joseph Hamrock

  01/30/2014    125,000    325,000    525,000    10,216    20,432    40,864        633,801  

Name
Grant
Date
Approval
Date(1)
Estimated Future Payouts
Under
Non-Equity Incentive
Plan Awards(2)
Estimated Future Payouts
Under
Equity Incentive
Plan Awards(3)
All Other
Stock
Awards
Number
of Shares of
Stock or Units
(#)(4)
Grant Date Fair Value
of Stock and
Option Awards
($)(5)
Threshold
($)
Target
($)
Maximum
($)
Threshold
(#)
Target
(#)
Maximum
(#)
Joseph Hamrock
 
480,000
 
 
1,200,000
 
 
1,920,000
 
 
1/26/2018
 
 
1/26/2018
 
 
70,204
 
 
140,408
 
 
280,816
 
 
3,933,904
 
 
1/26/2018
 
 
1/26/2018
 
 
35,102
 
 
772,244
 
Donald E. Brown
 
172,500
 
 
431,250
 
 
690,000
 
 
1/25/2018
 
 
1/25/2018
 
 
15,561
 
 
31,122
 
 
62,244
 
 
870,026
 
 
1/25/2018
 
 
1/25/2018
 
 
7,781
 
 
169,704
 
Pablo A. Vegas
 
157,500
 
 
393,750
 
 
630,000
 
 
1/25/2018
 
 
1/25/2018
 
 
15,561
 
 
31,122
 
 
62,244
 
 
870,026
 
 
1/25/2018
 
 
1/25/2018
 
 
7,781
 
 
169,704
 
Violet G. Sistovaris
 
133,000
 
 
332,500
 
 
532,000
 
 
1/25/2018
 
 
1/25/2018
 
 
11,466
 
 
22,932
 
 
45,864
 
 
641,065
 
 
1/25/2018
 
 
1/25/2018
 
 
5,733
 
 
125,037
 
Carrie J. Hightman
 
117,600
 
 
294,000
 
 
470,400
 
 
1/25/2018
 
 
1/25/2018
 
 
11,466
 
 
22,932
 
 
45,864
 
 
641,065
 
 
1/25/2018
 
 
1/25/2018
 
 
5,733
 
 
125,037
 
(1)The awards were approved and granted in January 2018. In March 2018, the Compensation Committee updated the NOEPS performance goals to reflect changes to the Company’s financial plan as a result of the expected impact of tax reform. We determined that there was no incremental cost to the Company under FASB ASC 718 a as result of updating the NOEPS performance goals.
(2)The information in the “Threshold,” “Target,” and “Maximum” columns reflects potential payouts based on the performance targets set under the 2014Cash Incentive Plan. The amounts actually paid appear inAs noted above, the “Non-EquityNamed Executive Officers did not receive any payouts under the 2018 Cash Incentive Plan Compensation” columnPlan. For a description of the 2014 Summary Compensation Table. For a description,Cash Incentive Plan, please see the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section under the caption “ONC— “Annual Performance-Based Cash Incentive Plan” and “Compensation Committee Actions Related to 20142018 Executive Compensation — Annual Performance-Based2018 Cash Incentives.Incentive Plan.

(2)

(3)

The information in the “Threshold,” “Target,” and “Maximum” columns reflects the potential share payouts under the 2014 performance share awards.portion of the 2018 LTIP award granted in the form of PSUs (80% of the LTIP award). The actual number of performance sharesPSUs earned is determined based on Company (80% of the PSU grant) and individual performance (20% of the PSU grant) over the three-year performance period from 20142018 through 2016.2020. In order foraddition, the PSUs are subject to a participant to receive shares, the Company must attain specific performance goals and the participant must satisfy the applicable service condition.service-based vesting condition until February 26, 2021. For a description, please see the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section

under the caption “Compensation Discussion and AnalysisCommittee Actions Related to 2018 Executive Compensation 2018 LTIP Awards.” If the target level of performance is met, the individual would receive 100% of the target value of the grant, as designated by the ONCCompensation Committee. The ONCCompensation Committee also set threshold and maximum performance goals. If the threshold performance level is not met, then the executive would not receivevest in any value of that portion of the grant.award. At the threshold performance level, the executive would receive 50% of the value of the target value of the grant, and at the maximum performance level, the executive would receive 200% of the target value of the grant. All 2018 PSUs were granted in January 2018. For further information regarding these awards, please see Compensation Discussion and Analysis — “Compensation Committee Actions Related to 2018 Executive Compensation — 2018 LTIP Awards.”

(3)The information(4)Represents the portion of the 2018 LTIP award granted in the form of RSUs (20% of the LTIP award). These awards will vest on February 26, 2021, provided the executive continues to be employed by us through that date, as described in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — “Compensation Committee Actions Related to 2018 Executive Compensation- 2018 LTIP Awards.”
(5)Amounts reported in this column reflects time-based restricted stock units granted to Mr. Kettering on January 30, 2014, all of which will vest on January 30, 2017.

(4)This column showsrepresent the aggregate grant date fair value, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, with respect to 80% of the restricted stock, restricted stock units,PSUs and performance sharesall RSUs granted in 20142018, calculated based on the average market price of our common stock on the NYSE on the grant date, discounted forless the present value of any dividends not received induring the vesting period. SinceWith respect to 20% of the performance share awardsPSUs, amounts reported in this column represent the aggregate service inception date fair value, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, calculated based on the closing market price of our common stock on the service inception date. All of the PSUs are subject to performance conditions, therefore, the grant date value reported in this column for these awards is based upon the probable outcome of such conditions.

40

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Outstanding Equity Awards at 2018 Fiscal Year-End

The following table sets forth information at fiscal year-end concerning outstanding grants of equity awards to the Named Executive Officers, including awards of restricted stock, restricted stock units, and performance shares to the Named Executive Officers.

 
Option Awards
Stock Awards
Name
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Exercisable
(#)
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Unexercisable
(#)
Option
Exercise
Price
($)
Option
Expiration
Date
Number of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested
(#)
Market
Value of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested
($)(1)
Equity Incentive
Plan Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other Rights
That Have
Not Vested
(#)
Equity
Incentive
Plan Awards:
Market or
Payout Value of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other Rights
That Have
Not Vested
($)(2)
Joseph Hamrock
 
111,235
(3) 
 
2,819,807
 
 
74,087
(4) 
 
1,878,105
 
 
62,972
(5) 
 
1,596,340
 
 
58,858
(6) 
 
1,492,050
 
 
35,102
(7) 
 
889,836
 
 
142,790
(8) 
 
3,619,727
 
 
136,178
(9) 
 
3,452,112
 
 
140,408
(10) 
 
3,559,343
 
Donald E. Brown
 
7,781
(7) 
 
197,248
 
 
48,549
(8) 
 
1,230,717
 
 
40,504
(9) 
 
1,026,776
 
 
31,122
(10) 
 
788,943
 
Pablo A. Vegas
 
7,781
(7) 
 
197,248
 
 
33,752
(8) 
 
855,613
 
 
37,904
(9) 
 
960,866
 
 
31,122
(10) 
 
788,943
 
Violet G. Sistovaris
 
14,563
(4) 
 
369,172
 
 
21,068
(5) 
 
534,074
 
 
14,715
(6) 
 
373,025
 
 
5,733
(7) 
 
145,332
 
 
34,270
(8) 
 
868,745
 
 
29,253
(9) 
 
741,564
 
 
22,932
(10) 
 
581,326
 
Carrie J. Hightman
 
123,216
(3) 
 
3,123,526
 
 
60,442
(4) 
 
1,532,205
 
 
45,365
(5) 
 
1,150,003
 
 
5,733
(7) 
 
145,332
 
 
42,837
(8) 
 
1,085,918
 
 
33,753
(9) 
 
885,639
 
 
22,932
(10) 
 
581,326
 
Option AwardsStock Awards
Name

Number of
Securities
Underlying
 Unexercised 
Options
Exercisable

(#)(1)

Option
 Exercise 
Price

($)

Option
 Expiration 
Date

Number of

Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested

(#)

Market
Value of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested

($)(2)

Equity Incentive
Plan Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other Rights
That Have
Not Vested

(#)

Equity
Incentive
Plan Awards
Market or
Payout Value of
Unearned
Shares,
Units  or
Other Rights
That Have
Not Vested

($)(3)

Robert C. Skaggs, Jr.

64,043(4)2,716,704
46,685(5)1,980,378
29,126(6)1,235,525
234,917(7)9,965,179
113,208(8)4,802,283
109,457(9)4,643,166

Stephen P. Smith

97,881(7)4,152,112
47,170(8)2,000,951
39,405(9)1,671,560

Glen L. Kettering

39,153(7)1,660,870
18,868(8)800,381
14,594(9)619,077
14,594(10)619,077

Carrie J. Hightman

58,728(7)2,491,242
28,302(8)1,200,571
21,891(9)928,616

Joseph Hamrock

43,710(11)1,854,178
22,642(8)960,474
20,432(9)866,725

(1)There are no outstanding options held by the Named Executive Officers.

(2)This column showsAmounts shown represent the market value of the unvested restricted stock units and restricted stock awardsRSUs held by the Named Executive Officers based on $42.42 per share,calculated using the closing sale price of our common stock on the NYSE on December 31, 2014.2018, the last trading day of fiscal 2018, which was $25.35 per share.

(3)This column shows(2)Amounts shown represent the market value of the unvested PSUs and performance shares held by the Named Executive Officers payable at target levels, based on $42.42 per share,calculated using the closing sale price of our common stock on the NYSE on December 31, 2014.2018, the last trading day of fiscal 2018, which was $25.35 per share.

41

TABLE OF CONTENTS

(4)(3)The awards shown represent restricted stock unitsRSUs granted on March 24, 2009. VestingJuly 13, 2015, following the conversion of these restricted stock unitsthe 2013 performance shares in connection with the Separation. The amounts shown represent the portion of the award the vesting of which has been delayed in accordance with the terms of Mr. Skaggs’the award agreementagreements due to the limitations on deductibility under Section 162(m). of the Code. These units will vest and beare payable in shares of our common stock on the earlier to occur of: histhe executive’s termination of employment, the date hethe executive is no longer subject to Section 162(m) of the Code, or the date that such shares couldthe RSUs can be paid to himthe executive and be deductible under Section 162(m). of the Code.

(5)(4)The awardawards shown represents restricted stock unitsrepresent RSUs granted on January 22, 2010. VestingJuly 13, 2015, following the conversion of these restricted stock unitsthe 2014 performance shares in connection with the Separation. The amounts shown represent the portion of the award the vesting of which has been delayed in accordance with the terms of Mr. Skaggs’the award agreementagreements due to the limitations on deductibility under Section 162(m). of the Code. These units will vest and beare payable in shares of our common stock on the earlier to occur of: histhe executive’s termination of employment,employment; the date hethe executive is no longer subject to Section 162(m) of the Code; or the date that the restricted stock unitsRSUs can be paid to himthe executive and be deductible under Section 162(m). of the Code.

(6)(5)The awardawards shown represents restricted stockrepresent the 2015 annual long-term equity awards granted in the form of RSUs in connection with the Separation. These units were granted on March 23, 2010. VestingJanuary 29, 2015. The amounts shown represent the portion of these restricted stock unitsthe award the vesting of which has been delayed in accordance with the terms of Mr. Skaggs’the award agreementagreements due to the limitations on deductibility under Section 162(m). of the Code. These units will vest and beare payable in shares of our common stock on the earlier to occur of: histhe executive’s termination of employment, the date hethe executive is no longer subject to Section 162(m) of the Code, or the date that the restricted stock unitsRSUs can be paid to himthe executive and be deductible under Section 162(m). of the Code.

(6)These awards shown represent RSUs granted on July 13, 2015, in connection with the assumption of additional responsibilities in connection with the Separation. The vesting date for these awards was February 2, 2018. The amounts shown represent the portion of the award the vesting of which has been delayed in accordance with the terms of the award agreements due to the limitation on deductibility under Section 162(m) of the Code. These units are payable in shares of our common stock on the earlier to occur of: the executive’s termination of employment; the date the executive is not subject to Section 162(m) of the Code; or the date the RSUs can be paid to the executive and be deductible under Section162(m) of the Code.
(7)The awards shown represent RSUs granted on January 25, 2018, except for Mr. Hamrock’s award, which was granted on January 26, 2018. These shares will vest on February 26, 2021, provided he continues to be employed by us on that date.
(8)The awards shown represent 2016 performance shares granted on January 26, 2012.29, 2016, except for Mr. Vegas’ award which was granted on May 3, 2016, the date he joined us. These awardsshares vested on February 18, 2015, immediately following the certification of Company performance after satisfaction ofbased on the service condition onCompany’s performance relative to performance goals during the performance period beginning January 30, 2015. The performance measures, their weightings1, 2016 and results are set forth inending December 31, 2018, and the Compensation Discussion and Analysis under the Section entitled “ONC Committee Actions Related to 2014 Compensation — 2012 Performance Share Awards.”executive’s continued employment through February 28, 2019.

(8)(9)The awards shown represent 2017 performance shares granted on January 24, 201326, 2017, at target levels.levels, except for Mr. Hamrock’s award that was granted on January 27, 2017. Mr. Vegas’ award also includes 4,151 performance shares that were awarded to him on May 1, 2017, in connection with the assumption of additional responsibilities. The number of shares that will actually vest is dependent upon the Company meeting multi-year performance measures,relative to three-year performance goals over the 2013 — 20152017-2019 performance period and the executive’s continued employment through February 29, 2016.28, 2020.

(9)(10)The awards shown represent performance shares2018 PSUs granted on January 30, 2014 at target levels.25, 2018, except for Mr. Hamrock’s award, which was granted on January 26, 2018. The number of shares that will actually vest is dependent upon Company (80% of the Company meeting multi-yearPSU grant) and individual performance measures,(20% of the PSU grant) relative to three-year performance goals over the 2014 — 20162018-2020 performance period and the executive’s continued employment through February 28, 2017. The performance measures and target number of shares awarded to each of the Named Executive Officers are set forth in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis under the Section entitled “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — LTIP Awards.”26, 2021.

42

(10)The award shown represents shares of restricted stock granted on January 30, 2014. The award vests on January 30, 2017.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

(11)The award shown represents performance shares granted May 14, 2012. This award vested on February 17, 2015, upon certification of Company performance following satisfaction of the service condition on January 30, 2015. The performance measures, their weightings and results are set forth in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis under the Section entitled “ONC Committee Actions Related to 2014 Compensation — 2012 Performance Share Awards.”

2018 Option Exercises and Stock Vested

The following table sets forth information on the number of shares that vested and the value each Named Executive Officer received upon vesting during 2018.

 
Option Awards
Stock Awards
Name
Number of Shares
Acquired on Exercise
(#)
Value Realized on
Exercise
($)
Number of Shares
Acquired on Vesting
(#)
Value Realized on
Vesting(6)
($)
Joseph Hamrock
 
 
 
 
 
—  
(1) 
Donald E. Brown
 
 
 
 
 
46,183
(2) 
 
1,107,007
 
Pablo A. Vegas
 
 
 
 
 
21,636
(3) 
 
553,233
 
Violet G. Sistovaris
 
 
 
 
 
973
(4) 
 
23,323
 
Carrie J. Hightman
 
 
 
 
 
1,863
(5) 
 
44,656
 
Option AwardsStock Awards
Name

Number of Shares
Acquired on Exercise

(#)

Value Realized on
Exercise

($)(1)

Number of Shares
Acquired on Vesting

(#)

Value Realized on
Vesting

($)(5)

Robert C. Skaggs, Jr.

33,476(2)1,144,210
150,643(3)5,317,698

Stephen P. Smith

57,245(3)2,020,749

Glen L. Kettering

27,116(3)957,195

Carrie J. Hightman

42,180(3)1,488,954

Joseph Hamrock

7,962(4)288,543

(1)During 2014,There were no stock options were exercised by anyshares distributed to Mr. Hamrock on February 2, 2018, the vesting date of the Named Executive Officers.

(2)Mr. Skaggs’ restricted stock award vested in its entirety62,972 RSUs granted on January 28, 2014.29, 2015 under the 2015 annual incentive award and 58,858 RSUs granted on July 13, 2015 in connection with his assumption of additional responsibilities following the Separation. Distribution of these awards have been delayed in accordance with the terms of Mr. Skaggs had made an election under Section 83(b) of the Code (“Section 83(b)”) on the grant date and consequently no shares were subject to delayed vestingHamrock’s award agreement due to the limitations on deductibility under Section 162(m). of the Code. These shares become payable on the earlier to occur of: Mr. Hamrock’s termination of employment; the date he is no longer subject to Section 162(m) of the Code; or the date the RSUs can be paid to him and be deductible under Section 162(m) of the Code.

(3)Award shown represents performance shares(2)Represents an award of RSUs granted January 28, 2011 thaton April 6, 2015, which vested on February 18, 2014, immediately2, 2018.
(3)Represents an award of RSUs granted on May 3, 2016, which vested on May 3, 2018.
(4)The number of shares vested for Ms. Sistovaris consists of 973 shares that were distributed to her from the RSUs granted on January 29, 2015 under the 2015 annual incentive award which vested on February 2, 2018. Vesting of 21,068 of this award has been delayed in accordance with the terms of Ms. Sistovaris’ award agreement due to limitations on deductibility under Section 162(m) of the Code. In addition, there were no shares distributed to Ms. Sistovaris on February 2, 2018, the vesting date of the 14,715 RSUs granted on July 13, 2015 in connection with the assumption of additional responsibilities following the certificationSeparation. Distribution of Company performance after satisfactionthese awards has been delayed in accordance with the terms of Ms. Sistovaris’ award agreement due to the limitations on deductibility under Section 162(m) of the service conditionCode. These shares become payable on January 28, 2014.the earlier to occur of: Ms. Sistovaris’ termination of employment; the date she is no longer subject to Section 162(m) of the Code; or the date the RSUs can be paid to her and be deductible under Section 162(m) of the Code.

(4)Award shown represents restricted stock units granted May 14, 2012 of which 7,962 shares vested May 2, 2014.

(5)The amountsnumber of shares vested for Ms. Hightman consists of 1,863 shares that were distributed to her from the RSUs granted on January 29, 2015 under the 2015 annual incentive award which vested on February 2, 2018. Vesting of 45,365 shares of this award has been delayed in this columnaccordance with the terms of Ms. Hightman’s award agreement due to the limitations on deductibility under Section 162(m) of the Code. These shares become payable on the earlier to occur of: Ms. Hightman’s termination of employment; the date she is no longer subject to Section 162(m) of the Code; or the date the RSUs can be paid to her and be deductible under Section 162(m) of the Code.
(6)Amounts shown reflect the value realized by the Named Executive Officer upon the vestingdistribution of vested stock which is computed by multiplying the number of shares that vested and were distributed by the market value of our common stock on the vesting date.

43

TABLE OF CONTENTS

2018 Pension Benefits

Name Plan Name Number of Years
Credited Service
(#)
  Present Value of
Accumulated Benefit
($)
 

Robert C. Skaggs, Jr.

 Columbia Energy Group Pension Plan  33.5    1,471,116  
  Pension Restoration Plan  33.5    4,040,992  

Stephen P. Smith

 Columbia Energy Group Pension Plan  6.6    109,705  
  Pension Restoration Plan  6.6    302,311  

Glen L. Kettering

 Columbia Energy Group Pension Plan  35.5    838,927  
  Pension Restoration Plan  35.5    551,140  

Carrie J. Hightman

 NiSource Inc. Pension Plan  7.1    114,848  
  Pension Restoration Plan  7.1    219,296  

Joseph Hamrock(1)

 NiSource Inc. Pension Plan        
  Pension Restriction Plan        

Name
Plan Name
Number of Years
Credited Service
(#)
Present Value of
Accumulated Benefit
($)
Joseph Hamrock(1)
NiSource Inc. Pension Plan
Pension Restoration Plan
Donald E. Brown(1)
NiSource Inc. Pension Plan
Pension Restoration Plan
Pablo A. Vegas(1)
NiSource Inc. Pension Plan
Pension Restoration Plan
Violet G. Sistovaris
NiSource Inc. Pension Plan
 
24.0
 
 
1,020,528
 
Pension Restoration Plan
 
24.0
 
 
431,552
 
Carrie J. Hightman
NiSource Inc. Pension Plan
 
11.1
 
 
205,734
 
Pension Restoration Plan
 
11.1
 
 
444,154
 
(1)Because Mr.Messrs. Hamrock, wasBrown and Vegas were hired after January 1, 2010, he isthey are not eligible to participate in any defined benefit pension planplans sponsored by the Company or its affiliates.

Tax Qualified Pension Plans    Plans.The Company and its affiliates sponsor   Our pension plans consist of several qualified defined benefit pension plans sponsored by the Company and its affiliates for their respective exempt salaried employees hired before January 1, 2010, including two of the Named Executive Officers identified in the Pension Benefits Table. Benefits under these plans are funded through and are payable out of a trust fund, which consists of contributions made by the Company and the earnings of the fund.

Officers. The specific defined benefit pension plan in which an employee participates generally depends upon the affiliate into which the employee was hired. Messrs. SkaggsBenefits under these plans are funded through and Ketteringare payable from a trust fund, which consists of contributions we made and the earnings of the fund.

Mses. Hightman and Sistovaris are the only Named Executive Officers eligible to participate in the Columbia Energy Group Pension Plan (the “CEG Plan”) because they were participants in this plan at the time of the acquisition of Columbia Energy Group by the Company. Mr. Smith participates in the CEG Plan because he was hired into Columbia Energy Group. Ms.our pension plans. Mses. Hightman participatesand Sistovaris each participate in the NiSource Inc. Pension Plan (the “NiSource Plan”) because she wasthey were hired into NiSource Corporate Services Company. Both the CEG Plan and theprior to January 1, 2010. The NiSource Plan previously provided for a “final average pay” benefit (“FAP benefit”) for exempt employees and, alternatively, a cash balance benefit feature (described below). As of January 1, 2011, allAll active exempt employees participating in our qualified defined benefit pension plans, including the CEG Plan and the NiSource Plan, who had accrued a benefit under a FAP benefit formula or, alternatively, under the prior cash balance formula, were converted to each plan’s respectivethe current cash balance formula. Mr. Skaggs was the only Named Executive Officer participating in the FAP benefit at the time of the January 1, 2011 conversion. Mr. Kettering also previously participated in the FAP benefit but was converted to the prior cash balance formula during an earlier choice program. As such, both Mr. Skaggs’ and Mr. Kettering’s accrued benefit under the CEG plan is equal to his cash balance account, calculated as described below, or, if greater at the time of retirement, his “protected benefit” which is a calculation taking into consideration the accrued benefit under the FAP benefit formula as of the day immediately preceding conversion of the participant’s benefit to the cash balance formula (using only service and compensation earned prior to the benefit conversion).January 1, 2011. Ms. Hightman and Mr. Smith werewas participating in the applicable current cash balance benefit formula and Ms. Sistovaris was participating in the FAP benefit formula at the time of the above-referenced2011 conversion.

Pursuant to the above-described2011 conversion of all exempt employees of the Company, including Mr. Skaggs, to the applicable current cash balance feature, each eligible exempt employee who transitioned to the current cash balance feature has an accounta benefit consisting of: (1) an “opening account balance” equal to either (a) in the case of an exempt employee transitioning from a FAP benefit formula, the lump sum actuarial equivalent of histhe participant’s accrued FAP benefit as of December 31, 2010,the conversion date, or (b) in the case of an exempt employee transitioning from the prior cash balance formula, equal to the account balance in such prior cash balance formula as of December 31, 2010;the conversion date; plus (2) annual pay and interest credits to the cash balance account.account from and after the conversion date. Annual pay credits to a participant’s account under the current cash balance formula equal a percentage of compensation, taking into account the Social Security Taxable Wage Base, based on the participant’s combined age and service for the plan year. The applicable pay credits are listed in the following table:

Sum of Age Plus

Years of Service

  Percentage of Total
Compensation
   Percentage of Compensation Above  1/2
of the Taxable Wage Base
 
Percentage of Total
Compensation
Percentage of Compensation Above 1/2
of the Taxable Wage Base

Less than 50

   4.0%��   1.0
 
4.0
%
 
1.0
%

50-69

   5.0   1.0
 
5.0
%
 
1.0
%

70 or more

   6.0   1.0
 
6.0
%
 
1.0
%

Compensation for purposes of annual pay credits means base pay, any performance-based pay, any “banked” vacation (in the year of vacation payout) and any salary reduction contributions made for the employee pursuant to a plan maintained by the Company or an affiliate under Code Sections 125 or 401(k), of the Code, but excluding any amounts deferred to a non-qualified plan maintained by the Company.we maintain. In accordance with Code limits, the maximum compensation taken into account in determining benefits under the plans with respect to all participants, including theeligible Named Executive Officers, in 20142018 was limited to $260,000.$275,000. Interest is credited each year to the account based on the interest rate on 30-year30 year Treasury securities, as determined by the IRS, for the September immediately preceding the first day of each year, subject to a minimum interest credit of 4%.

The automatic form of benefit under the cash balance featuresfeature of both the CEG Plan and the NiSource Plan is a single life annuity in the case of an unmarried participant and a 50% joint and survivor pop-up annuity in the case of a married participant (unreduced for the value of the pop-up feature). Optional forms of payment are available under the pension plans, depending on the participant’s marital status and benefit feature.status. Each optional form of benefit is defined in the applicable plan to be the actuarial equivalent of the normal form of benefit defined in the plan.NiSource Plan.

Under the cash balance featuresfeature of the applicable plans,NiSource Plan, any participant may take a distribution of his or her vested cash balance account benefit upon termination of employment, without any reduction. Alternatively, if the

participant’s accrued benefit is determined by the protected benefit calculation referenced above (i.e., the protected benefit calculation is greater than the participant’s cash balance account), the participant would receive the protected

44

TABLE OF CONTENTS

benefit amount (which may reflect an actuarial or early retirement reduction if the participant elects to receive it prior to the normal retirement date as provided in the applicable plan)NiSource Plan). Because each of the Named Executive Officers now participatesMses. Hightman and Sistovaris participate in the current cash balance feature of the applicable plan,NiSource Plan, each such Named Executive Officer is eligible to take an unreduced distribution of hisher cash balance account upon termination of employment regardless of age and service, or, if greater, the Named Executive Officer could take a distributionservice. As of the accrued benefit using the protected benefit calculation. Currently, Mr. SkaggsDecember 31, 2018, Mses. Hightman and Mr. Kettering are the only Named Executive Officers who areSistovaris were eligible for early retirement (which impacts the protected benefit calculation), with early retirementcalculation and is generally defined under the CEG Plan as the earlierattainment of age 55 with 10 years of eligible service or age 60 with 5 years of eligible service.service) under the NiSource Plan.

Assumptions.   The present value of the accumulated benefit for each Named Executive Officer identified above is theirMs. Hightman consists of the account balance payable under the applicable plan. For Mr. Skaggs and Mr. Kettering, thisNiSource Plan. The present value is greater thanof the accumulated benefit for Ms. Sistovaris consists of the present value of theirthe protected benefit usingunder the NiSource Plan (i.e., the present value of the FAP benefit payable as of the conversion date) plus annual pay and interest credits to the cash balance account after the conversion date. The assumptions used in calculating the present value of the accumulated benefit for Ms. Sistovaris are set forth in Note 10 — Pension11-Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits in the footnotes to the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in ourthe Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014.2018. The Company has not granted any extra years of credited service under the plansNiSource Plan identified above.

Non-qualified Pension Benefit PlanPlan..    The Company   We also sponsors thesponsor a Pension Restoration Plan for NiSource Inc. and Affiliates (the “Pension Restoration Plan”). The Pension Restoration Plan is a non-qualified, unfunded defined benefit plan. The plan includes employees of the Company and its affiliates whose benefits under the applicable tax-qualified pension plan are limited by sectionsSections 415 (a limitation on annual accruals and payments under a defined benefit plan of $220,000 for 2018) and 401(a)(17) (a limitation on annual compensation of $275,000 for 2018) of the Code, including each of theany eligible Named Executive Officers.Officer. The Pension Restoration Plan provides for a supplemental retirement benefit equal to the difference between (i) the benefit a participant would have received under the qualified pension plan had such benefit not been limited by sectionsSections 415 and 401(a)(17) of the Code, or any other applicable section, and reduced by deferrals into our Deferred Compensation Plan, minus (ii) the actual benefit received under the qualified pension plan after applying any limits and considering deferrals into our Deferred Compensation Plan. Participants are providedhave the opportunity to elect any form of payment available under the qualified pension plan prior to accruing a benefit under the plan. If no election is made, the benefit is payable as a lump sum. The timing of payment under the Pension Restoration Plan generally is 45 days after one of the following: (1) if the participant qualifies for early retirement under the applicable qualified pension plan, following separation from service; or (2) if the participant does not qualify for early retirement at the time of separation from service, the later of separation from service or age 65. Key65, subject to a six-month delay for key employees for purposes of sectionunder Section 409A of the Code however, may not receivefor payments triggered by separation from service until 6 months after the termination date.

service. No plan benefits were paid to any Named Executive OfficerMs. Hightman or Ms. Sistovaris under the CEG Plan, the NiSource Pension Plan or the Pension Restoration Plan in 2014.

2018.

2018 Non-qualified Deferred Compensation

Name Plan Name 

Executive
 Contributions 
in Last FY

($)(1)

  

Registrant
Contributions
in Last FY

($)(5)

  

Aggregate
Earnings in
Last FY

($)(6)

  Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distributions
($)
  

Aggregate
Balance
at Last
FYE

($)(7)

 

Robert C. Skaggs, Jr.

 Deferred
Compensation
Plan(2)
          246,016        3,540,023  
  Savings
Restoration
Plan(3)
      57,442    57,887        1,846,013  
  Phantom
Stock Units(4)
          1,711,449        6,932,745  

Stephen P. Smith

 Savings
Restoration
Plan(3)
      22,400    41,327        338,326  

Glen L. Kettering

 Savings
Restoration
Plan(3)
      5,950    96,810        1,075,471  
  Phantom
Stock(4)
          467,206    45,128    1,876,788  

Carrie J. Hightman

 Savings
Restoration

Plan(3)

      15,400    4,878        156,513  

Joseph Hamrock

 Deferred
Compensation
Plan(2)
  209,268        7,549        267,537  
  Savings

Restoration

Plan(3)

      14,467    1,960        18,846  

Name
Plan Name
Executive
Contributions
in Last FY
($)(1)
Registrant
Contributions
in Last FY
($)(2)
Aggregate
Earnings in
Last FY
($)(3)
Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distributions
($)
Aggregate
Balance
at Last
FYE
($)(4)
Joseph Hamrock
Deferred Compensation Plan(5)
 
(32,066
)
 
316,493
 
Savings Restoration Plan(6)
 
50,021
 
 
(15,935
)
 
226,102
 
Donald E. Brown
Deferred Compensation Plan(5)
 
52,690
 
Savings Restoration Plan(6)
 
19,542
 
 
(3,061
)
 
59,162
 
Pablo A. Vegas
Deferred Compensation Plan(5)
Savings Restoration Plan(6)
 
16,771
 
 
89
 
 
36,088
 
Violet G. Sistovaris
Deferred Compensation Plan(5)
 
588,551
 
Savings Restoration Plan(6)
 
13,271
 
 
3,391
 
 
87,439
 
Carrie J. Hightman
Deferred Compensation Plan(5)
Savings Restoration Plan(6)
 
15,050
 
 
(12,034
)
 
251,301
 
(1)Amounts shown as “Executive Contributions in Last FY,” if any, were deferred under our Deferred Compensation Plan. The Named Executive Officers may elect to defer and invest between 5% and 80% of their base compensation and between 5% and 100%80% of their bonus on a pre-tax basis. These contributionsParticipant deferrals are fully vested.

(2)For a description of the Deferred Compensation Plan, please see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Other Compensation and Benefits — Deferred Compensation Plan” and the narrative accompanying this table.

(3)For a description of the Savings Restoration Plan, please see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Other Compensation and Benefits — Savings Programs” and the narrative accompanying this table. These contributions are fully vested.

(4)For a description of the phantom stock units, see the narrative accompanying this table. All phantom stock units are vested. Dividend equivalent rights payable with respect to the phantom units are reinvested as additional phantom units at the election of Mr. Skaggs and are paid in cash at the election of Mr. Kettering. Dividend equivalent rights are shown in the aggregate earnings in last fiscal year column and when taken in cash are also shown as a distribution.

(5)(2)The amount of Company contributions for each Named Executive Officer in this column is included in each Named Executive Officer’s compensation reported onin the 2018 Summary Compensation Table as Table-“All Other Compensation.

(6)(3)The aggregate earnings in this column are not reported in the 2018 Summary Compensation Table. For a discussion of investment options under these plans, see the narrative accompanying this table.

(7)(4)The aggregate balance reflectsincludes amounts for each Named Executive Officer that would have been previously reported as compensation in the Summary Compensation Table for prior years had he or she been a Named Executive Officer in those prior years with the exception of the phantom stock units andany amounts shown for the aggregate earnings on deferred compensation.
(5)For a description of the Deferred Compensation Plan, please see the Compensation Discussion and Analysis-“Other Compensation and Benefits-Deferred Compensation Plan” and the narrative accompanying this table.

The Company sponsors45

TABLE OF CONTENTS

(6)For a description of the Savings Restoration Plan, please see the Compensation Discussion and Analysis-“Other Compensation and Benefits-Savings Programs” and the narrative accompanying this table. These contributions are fully vested.

We sponsor the Savings Restoration Plan and the Deferred Compensation Plan, two non-qualified defined contribution plans, neither of which credits above-market or preferential earnings. They are the Savings Restoration Plan and the Deferred Compensation Plan. Participants in both plans have an unsecured contractual right to be paid the amounts due under the plans from the Company’s general assets.

Savings Restoration PlanPlan..    The Company sponsors   We sponsor the Savings Restoration Plan to provide a supplemental benefit to eligible employees, including the Named Executive Officers, equal to the difference between: (i) the employer contributions (including matching and profit sharing contributions) an employee would have received under our Retirement Savings Plan had such benefit not been limited by sectionsSections 415 (a limitation on annual contributions under a defined contribution plan of $52,000$55,000 for 2014)2018) and 401(a)(17) (a limitation on annual compensation of $260,000$275,000 for 2014)2018) of the Code, and the Retirement Savings Plan’s definition of compensation, which excludes deferrals into our Deferred Compensation Plan for purposes of calculating certain employer contributions, minus (ii) the actual employer contributions the employee received under the Retirement Savings Plan. Amounts credited under the Savings Restoration Plan are deferred on a pre-tax basis. All of the Named Executive Officers are eligible to participate in the Savings Restoration Plan. Participants’ accounts under the Savings Restoration Plan are 100% vested. Employees designate how these contributions will be invested; the investment options generally are the same as those available under our Retirement Savings Plan.

The timing of payment under the Savings Restoration Plan differs depending on whether the amounts were earned and vested before January 1, 2005, (“Pre-409A Amounts”) or after December 31, 2004 (“Post-409A Amounts”). Pre-409A Amounts generally are payable at the time when amounts under the Retirement Savings Plan are paid. Participants may elect in any year to withdraw Pre-409A Amounts, but that withdrawal is subject to a 10% reduction to the extent the payment is before the amount was otherwise payable under the Retirement Savings Plan. Post-409A Amounts generally are paid within 45 days after separation from service, although key employees generally must not be paid until 6 months after their separation date.are subject to a six-month payment delay in accordance with Section 409A of the Code. Participants may not elect to receive early in-service distributions of Post-409A amounts.Amounts. Both Pre-409A Amounts and Post-409A Amounts may be distributed upon an unforeseeable emergency.emergency, as determined in accordance with the terms of the Savings Restoration Plan. The form of payment for both amounts is the form elected by the participant among the choices available under the Retirement Savings Plan.

Deferred Compensation Plan.The Company sponsors   We sponsor the Deferred Compensation Plan in which employees at certain job levels and other key employees designated by the ONCCompensation Committee, including the Named Executive Officers, are eligible to participate to allow deferral on a pre-tax basis of compensation, including compensation that would otherwise be limited by the Code. Participants may elect to defer and invest between 5% and 80% of their base compensation and between 5% and 80% of their non-equity incentive payment on a pre-tax basis. Employees designate how their contributions will be invested; the investment options generally are the same as those available under our Retirement Savings Plan. Employee contributions and any earnings thereon are 100% vested. The timing of payment under the Deferred Compensation Plan generally is the March 31st after the date of the participant’s separation from service. This timing applies both to the Pre-409A Amounts and Post-409A Amounts. In the case of Post-409A Amounts payable to key employees within the meaning of Code Section 409A of the Code, payments generally will not be payable until 6six months after the date of separation from service. Participants also may elect to receive in-service distributions of both Pre-409A Amounts and Post-409A Amounts. If a participant requests an in-service distribution of a Pre-409A Amount with less than 12 months’ advance notice, however, the distribution is subject to a 10% reduction. Participants may delay the commencement of distributions for five years after their originally scheduled payment date, in accordance with the subsequent deferral timing procedures under Code Section 409A.409A of the Code. Both Pre-409A Amounts and Post-409A Amounts also may be paid upon an unforeseeable emergency.emergency, as determined in accordance with the terms of the plan. The form of payment for both amounts may be either a lump sum or annual installments of up to 15 years, as elected by the participant.

Phantom Units.    Messrs. Skaggs and Kettering were granted fully vested phantom stock units following the acquisition by the Company of Columbia Energy Group, as part of an agreement entered into as of February 1,

2001. Under this agreement, Mr. Skaggs and Mr. Kettering agreed to terminate their rights under a Columbia

Energy Group Change-in-Control Agreement. In exchange, they accepted employment with the Company and agreed to non-competition and non-solicitation provisions. These phantom stock units are recorded as a bookkeeping entry in our books and records and represent an unsecured contractual right to receive cash in the future. They are unfunded and subject to the rights of the Company’s general creditors. One phantom stock unit is equal in value to one share of our common stock. The phantom stock units also are credited with dividend equivalents, which are equal in value to dividends declared on shares of our common stock and payable, at Mr. Skaggs’ and Mr. Kettering’s election, in cash or credited to his account as additional phantom stock units. Their elections must be made in the calendar year prior to the year in which the dividend equivalents are credited. These Units are payable in cash upon termination of employment from the Company subject to execution of a general release of claims.

Potential Payments upon Termination of Employment or a Change-in-Control


of the Company

The Company providesWe provide certain benefits to eligible employees, including the Named Executive Officers, upon certain types of terminationterminations of employment, including a termination of employment involving a Change-in-Control of the Company. These benefits are in addition to the benefits to which the employees would be entitled upon a termination of employment generally (i.e.(i.e., (i) vested retirement benefits accrued as of the date of termination, (ii) stock-based awards that are vested as of the date of termination, and (iii) the right to continue medical coverage pursuant to COBRA). The incremental benefits that pertain to the Named Executive Officers are described below.

NiSource Executive Severance Policy.   The NiSourceOur Executive Severance Policy was established to provide severance pay and other benefits to terminated executive-level employees who satisfy the terms of the policy. No employee is eligible to receive benefits under the policy if termination of employment results in the employee being eligible for a payment under a Change-in-Control and Termination Agreement or employment agreement.

A participant becomes entitled to receive benefits under the policy only if he or she is terminated for any of the following reasons: (a) the employee’s position is eliminated due to a reduction in force or other restructuring; (b) we require the employee’s position is required by the Company to relocate more than 50 miles from its current location and it results in the employee having a longer commute of at least 20 miles and the employee chooses not to relocate; or (c) the employee is constructively terminated. Constructive termination meansmeans: (1) the scope of the participant’s position is changed materially,materially; (2) the participant’s base pay is reduced by a material amountamount; or (3) the participant’s opportunity to earn a bonus under aany of our corporate incentive plan of the Companyplans is materially reduced or is eliminated, and, in any such event, the participant chooses not to remain employed in such position.

Under the NiSourceour Executive Severance Policy, an eligible employee receives severance pay in the amount of 52 weeks of base salary at the rate in effect on the date of termination. The employee also receives:receives a lump sum payment equivalent to 130% of 52-weeks52 weeks of COBRA (as defined in the Code and the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”))1974) continuation coverage premiums and outplacement services.

AllEach of the Named Executive Officers are eligible to receive benefits under the NiSourceour Executive Severance Policy.

46

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Change-in-Control and Termination Agreements and Employment Agreements.   As of December 31, 2014, the Company2018, we had Change-in-Control and Termination Agreements with each of the Named Executive Officers. The CompanyWe entered into these agreements based upon its belief that they are in the best interests of the stockholders, theystockholders. They are designed to help ensure that in the event of extraordinary events, a thoroughly objective judgment is made on any potential corporate transaction, so that stockholder value is appropriately safeguarded and maximized. The Change-in-Control and Termination Agreements provide for cash severance benefits if the executive terminates employment for “Good Reason” (as defined below) or is terminated by the Companyus for any reason other than “Good Cause” (as defined below) within 24 months following certain Change-in-Control events (referred to as a “double trigger”). In addition, pursuant to the terms of the Omnibus Plan, the executives’ equity awards granted after October 2015 are subject to double trigger).trigger accelerated vesting in the event of a Change-in-Control unless an acquiring company does not assume or replace such awards upon the Change-in-Control. Equity awards granted prior to October 2015 would vest immediately upon a Change-in-Control. None of the agreements contain a “gross-up” provision to reimburse executives for excise taxes incurred with respect to benefits received under a Change-in-Control and Termination Agreement. The Change-in-Control and Termination Agreements can be terminated on twelve months’ notice.

For purposes of the Change-in-Control and Termination Agreements:

“Change-in-Control”shall be deemed to take place on the occurrence of any of the following events: (1) the acquisition by an entity, person or group (including all affiliates or associates of such entity, person or group) of beneficial ownership, as that term is defined in Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act, of our capital stock of the Company entitled to exercise more than 30% of the outstanding voting power of allour capital stock of the Company entitled to vote in elections of directors (“Voting Power”); (2) the effective time of: (i) a merger or consolidation of the Company with one or more other corporations unless the holders of the outstanding Voting Power of the Company immediately prior to such merger or consolidation (other than the surviving or resulting corporation or any affiliate or associate thereof) hold at least 50% of the Voting Power of the surviving or resulting corporation (in substantially the same proportion as theour Voting Power of the Company immediately prior to such merger or consolidation),; or (ii) a transfer of a substantial portion of theCompany property, of the Company, other than to an entity of which the Company ownswe own at least 50% of the Voting Power; or (3) the election to the Board of the Company of candidates who were not recommended for election by the Board, if such candidates constitute a majority of those elected in that particular election (for this purpose, recommended directors will not include any candidate who becomes a member of the Board as a result of an actual or threatened election contest or proxy or consent solicitation on behalf of anyone other than the Board or as a result of any appointment, nomination, or other agreement intended to avoid or settle a contest or solicitation). Notwithstanding the foregoing, a Change-in-Control shall not be deemed to take place by virtue of any transaction in which the executive is a participant in a group effecting an acquisition of the Company and, after such acquisition, the executive holds an equity interest in the acquiring entity.

“Good Cause”shall be deemed to exist if, and only if, the Company notifieswe notify the executive, in writing, within 60 days of its knowledge that one of the following events occurred: (1) the executive has engaged in acts or omissions constituting dishonesty, intentional breach of fiduciary obligation or intentional wrongdoing or malfeasance, in each case that results in substantial harm to the Company; or (2) the executive has been convicted of a criminal violation involving fraud or dishonesty.

“Good Reason”shall be deemed to exist if, and only if: (1) there is a significant diminution in the nature or the scope of the executive’s authorities or duties; (2) there is a significant reduction in the executive’s monthly rate of base salary and the executive’s opportunity to earn a bonus under an incentive bonus compensation plan maintained by the Companywe maintain or the executive’s benefits; (3) the Company changeswe change by 50 miles or more the principal location at which the executive is required to perform services as of the date of a Change-in-Control; or (4) there is a material breach of the Change-in-Control and Termination Agreement.

The Change-in-Control and Termination Agreements provide for a lump sum payment of two (three in the case of Mr. Skaggs)Hamrock) times the executive’s current annual base salary and target incentive bonus compensation. The executive will also receive a pro rata portion of the executive’s targeted incentive bonus for the year of termination. The Change-in-Control and Termination Agreements also provide that in the event of a Change-in-Control, the executive’s total Change-in-Control payments will be equal one dollar less thanto the best “net benefit” which is equal to the greater of: (i) the after-tax value of the executive’s total severance amount reduced by the 20% excise tax and other federal, state, local and other taxes; and (ii) the after-tax value of the executive’s severance amount that has been reduced to the extent necessary so that it would not trigger an excise tax, gross up; provided, however, that if the total payment due, after being reduced for federal, state, local and other taxes is greater than the reduced amount, the executive will receive the total Change-in-Control payments due (without(in each case, without a gross-up).

47

TABLE OF CONTENTS

In addition, the Change-in-Control and Termination Agreements provide for the executives to receive 130% of the COBRA continuation premiums due for the two-year period (three in the case of Mr. Skaggs)Hamrock) following termination. In the event of a Change-in-Control, all performance shareequity awards which have been granted to each of the Named Executive Officers under the Omnibus Plan and are outstanding as of December 31, 20142018, will immediately vest. Restricted stock unit awards granted before January 1, 2014 and outstanding as of December 31, 2014 will immediately vest and restricted stock unit awards granted during 2014 and outstanding as of December 31, 2014 vest only upon a termination of employment in connection with a Change-in-Control.

Pursuant to a letter agreement dated May 14, 2008 between the Company and Mr. Smith, if the Company terminates his employment other than for cause or if he terminates his employment for good reason, he is entitled to receive the following severance benefits in lieu of severance benefits under the NiSource Executive Severance Policy: (1) a lump sum payment equal to his annual base salary; (2) a lump sum payment equal to his prorated target incentive for the year in which termination occurs; (3) a lump sum payment equal to 130% of COBRA continuation coverage premiums for one year; and (4) reasonable outplacement services.

Potential Payments Upon Termination of Employment.    The table below represents amounts payable at, following, or in connection with the events described below, assuming that such events occurred on December 31, 2014 for each of the Named Executive Officers.

   Severance
($)
  

Pro Rata

Target

Bonus

Payment
($)

  

Equity

Grants
($)

  

Welfare

Benefits
($)

  Outplacement
($)
  

Total

Payment
($)

 

Robert C. Skaggs, Jr.

                        

Voluntary Termination(1)

          5,932,607            5,932,607  

Retirement(2)

          9,797,578            9,797,578  

Disability(2)

          9,797,578            9,797,578  

Death(2)

          9,797,578            9,797,578  

Involuntary Termination(3)

  980,000            11,887    25,000    1,016,887  

Change-in-Control(4)

  6,615,000    1,225,000    5,093,327    43,665    25,000    13,001,992  

Stephen P. Smith

                        

Voluntary Termination(1)

                        

Retirement(2)

                        

Disability(2)

          3,999,230            3,999,230  

Death(2)

          3,999,230            3,999,230  

Involuntary Termination(3)

  600,000    420,000        19,233    25,000    1,064,233  

Change-in-Control(4)

  2,040,000    420,000    5,941,430    42,735    25,000    8,469,165  

Glen L. Kettering

                        

Voluntary Termination(1)

                        

Retirement(2)

          1,784,864            1,784,864  

Disability(2)

          1,784,864            1,784,864  

Death(2)

          1,784,864            1,784,864  

Involuntary Termination(3)

  500,000            19,268    25,000    544,268  

Change-in-Control(4)

  1,600,000    300,000    1,362,021    42,094    25,000    3,329,115  

Carrie J. Hightman

                        

Voluntary Termination(1)

                        

Retirement(2)

                        

Disability(2)

          2,376,071            2,376,071  

Death(2)

          2,376,071            2,376,071  

Involuntary Termination(3)

  490,000            19,572    25,000    534,572  

Change-in-Control(4)(5)

  1,568,000    294,000    3,490,530    42,630    25,000    4,280,340  

Joseph Hamrock

                        

Voluntary Termination(1)

                        

Retirement(2)

                        

Disability(2)

          1,866,098            1,866,098  

Death(2)

          1,866,098            1,866,098  

Involuntary Termination(3)

  500,000            19,268    25,000    544,268  

Change-in-Control(4)

  1,650,000    325,000    2,840,401    42,094    25,000    4,882,495  

 
Severance
($)
Pro Rata
Target
Bonus
Payment
($)
Equity
Grants
($)
Welfare
Benefits
($)
Outplacement
($)
Total
Payment
($)
Joseph Hamrock
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Voluntary Termination(1)
 
7,786,302
 
 
7,786,302
 
Retirement(2)
Disability(2)
 
6,442,931
 
 
6,442,931
 
Death(2)
 
6,442,931
 
 
6,442,931
 
Involuntary Termination(3)
 
1,000,000
 
 
26,552
 
 
25,000
 
 
1,051,552
 
Change-in-Control(4)(5)
 
6,600,000
 
 
1,200,000
 
 
10,917,713
 
 
86,513
 
 
25,000
 
 
18,829,226
 
Donald E. Brown
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Voluntary Termination(1)
Retirement(2)
Disability(2)
 
1,931,518
 
 
1,931,518
 
Death(2)
 
1,931,518
 
 
1,931,518
 
Involuntary Termination(3)
 
575,000
 
 
24,088
 
 
25,000
 
 
624,088
 
Change-in-Control(4)(5)
 
2,012,500
 
 
431,250
 
 
3,038,552
 
 
51,682
 
 
25,000
 
 
5,558,984
 
Pablo A. Vegas
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Voluntary Termination(1)
Retirement(2)
Disability(2)
 
1,584,806
 
 
1,584,806
 
Death(2)
 
1,584,806
 
 
1,584,806
 
Involuntary Termination(3)
 
525,000
 
 
 
 
 
26,865
 
 
25,000
 
 
576,865
 
Change-in-Control(4)(5)
 
1,837,500
 
 
393,750
 
 
2,660,052
 
 
56,929
 
 
25,000
 
 
4,973,231
 
Violet G. Sistovaris
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Voluntary Termination(1)
 
1,276,271
 
 
1,276,271
 
Retirement(2)
 
1,383,680
 
 
1,383,680
 
Disability(2)
 
1,383,680
 
 
1,383,680
 
Death(2)
 
1,383,680
 
 
1,383,680
 
Involuntary Termination(3)
 
475,000
 
 
17,851
 
 
25,000
 
 
517,851
 
Change-in-Control(4)(5)
 
1,615,000
 
 
332,500
 
 
2,192,167
 
 
38,599
 
 
25,000
 
 
4,203,266
 
Carrie J. Hightman
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Voluntary Termination(1)
 
5,805,734
 
 
5,805,734
 
Retirement(2)
 
1,627,166
 
 
1,627,166
 
Disability(2)
 
1,627,166
 
 
1,627,166
 
Death(2)
 
1,627,166
 
 
1,627,166
 
Involuntary Termination(3)
 
490,000
 
 
18,044
 
 
25,000
 
 
533,044
 
Change-in-Control(4)(5)
 
1,568,000
 
 
294,000
 
 
2,487,215
 
 
39,076
 
 
25,000
 
 
4,413,291
 
(1)

Amounts payable to each of the Named Executive Officers as shown in the Pension Benefits Table and the NonqualifiedNon-qualified Deferred Compensation Table and under the tax-qualified, nondiscriminatory 401(k) Plan are not included. Upon voluntary termination on December 31, 2018, Mr. SkaggsHamrock would be eligible to receive 64,043111,235 shares under his 2009 Restricted Stock Unit Award, 46,685the RSUs granted on July 13, 2015, due to conversion of the 2013 performance shares in connection with the Separation, 74,087 shares under his special 2010 Restricted Stock Unit Award, and 29,126the RSUs granted on July 13, 2015, due to the conversion of the 2014 performance shares in connection with the Separation, 62,972 shares under the RSUs granted on January 29, 2015 due to the 2015 annual incentive award and 58,858 shares under the RSUs granted on July 13, 2015 due to his 2010 annual Restricted Stock Unit Award. The original vesting date for these shares has passed.

However, these shares were subject to delayed vestingassumption of additional responsibilities in accordanceconnection with the terms of the award agreements due to limitations on deductibility under Section 162(m). These shares are payable to Mr. Skaggs on the earlier to occur of his termination of employment, the date he is no longer subject to Section 162(m) or the date that such shares could be paid to him and be deductible under Section 162(m). In addition, Messrs. Skaggs and Kettering would receive the pro-rated equity amounts reflected below in note 2 because they are retirement eligible at termination.Separation.

48

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Ms. Sistovaris would be eligible to receive 14,563 shares under the RSUs granted on July 13, 2015, due to the conversion of the 2014 performance shares in connection with the Separation, 21,068 shares under the RSUs granted on January 29, 2015 due to the 2015 annual incentive award, and 14,715 shares under the RSUs granted on July 13, 2015 due to her assumption of additional responsibilities in connection with the Separation. Ms. Hightman would be eligible to receive 123,216 shares under the RSUs granted on July 13, 2015, due to the conversion of the 2013 performance shares in connection with the Separation, 60,442 shares under the RSUs granted on July 13, 2015, due to the conversion of the 2014 performance shares in connection with the Separation, and 45,365 shares under the RSUs granted on January 29, 2015 due to the 2015 annual incentive award. These shares were subject to delayed vesting in accordance with the terms of the award agreements due to limitations on deductibility under Section 162(m) of the Code. The value of these shares was determined by multiplying the closing price of our common stock on December 31, 2018, which was $25.35 per share, by the number of shares that were subject to delayed payout.

(2)Special vesting rules apply in the event of Retirement, Disability or death pursuant to the terms and conditions of our equity award agreements as discussed above under “Compensation Disclosurein the Compensation Discussion and Analysis — LTIPAnalysis-“Compensation Committee Actions Related to 2018 Compensation-LTIP Awards.” Only Mr. SkaggsAs of December 31, 2018, Mses. Hightman and Mr. KetteringSistovaris were eligible for Retirement, asno other Named Executive Officer was eligible. The number of December 31, 2014. For Mr. Skaggs, 230,966 shares that would have pro-rata vested as a resultin the event of hiseach executive’s Retirement, Disability or death.death is as follows: Ms. Hightman, 64,188 shares and Ms. Sistovaris 54,583 shares. For Mr. Kettering, 42,076 shares would have pro-rata vested as a resultthe balance of his Retirement, Disability or death. For each of the other Named Executive Officers, the number of shares that would have vested in the event of the executive’s Retirement, Disability or death is as follows: Mr. Smith, 94,277Hamrock, 254,159 shares; Ms. Hightman, 56,013 sharesMr. Brown, 76,194 shares; and Mr. Hamrock, 43,991Vegas, 62,517 shares. The value of the equity grants was determined by multiplying the closing price of the Company’sour common stock on the NYSE on December 31, 2014 of $42.422018, which was $25.35 per share, by the number of shares that would have vested upon the Retirement, Disability or death, as applicable, of the Named Executive Officer and, with respectOfficer. These amounts do not include the value of shares subject to performance shares, assumes a payout at the target level. No performance shares are actually payable until such time as the ONC Committee certifies attainmentdelayed vesting due to limitations on deductibility under Section 162(m) of the applicable performance goals, exceptCode referred to in the case of death with more than 12 months remaining in the performance period, infootnote (1) above, which case the performance shares are payable at target levels regardlesson the earlier to occur of ONC Committee certification.the Named Executive Officer’s termination of employment, the date the Named Executive Officer is no longer subject to Section 162(m) of the Code, or the date the shares could be paid and be deductible under Section 162(m) of the Code.

(3)Amounts shown reflect payments to be made upon the involuntary termination of theeach Named Executive Officer eligible under the Company’sour Executive Severance Policy described above, or in the case of Mr. Smith, pursuant to the terms of his employment agreement. Theabove. These amounts shown for Mr. Skaggs and Mr. Kettering do not include equity grants that would pro-rata vest solely as a resultthe value of their eligibility for retirement. In addition, the amount shown for Mr. Skaggs’ does not include the shares subject to delayed vesting due to limitations on deductibility under Section 162(m) of the Code referred to in notefootnote (1) above, which are payable to him in on the earlier to occur of histhe Named Executive Officer’s termination of employment, the date hethe Named Executive Officer is no longer subject to Section 162(m) of the Code, or the date that suchthe shares could be paid to him and be deductible under Section 162(m). of the Code.

(4)Amounts shown reflect payments to be made upon termination of employment in the event of a Change-in-Control of the Company under the Change-in-Control and Termination Agreements described above which have been reduced by excise tax payments, if applicable. These amounts do not include the value of shares subject to delayed vesting due to limitations on deductibility under Section 162(m) of the Code referred to in footnote (1) above, which are payable on the earlier to occur of the Named Executive Officer’s termination of employment, the date the Named Executive Officer is no longer subject to Section 162(m) of the Code or the date the shares could be paid and be deductible under Section 162(m) of the Code. As described above, the Change-in-Control and Termination Agreements do not provide for any “gross-up” payments to executives for excise taxes incurred with respect to benefits received under a Change-in-Control and Termination Agreement. The Change-in-Control and Termination Agreements provide that in the event of a Change-in-Control, the executive’s total Change-in-Control payments will be equal one dollar less thanto the best “net benefit” which is equal to the greater of: (i) the after-tax value of the executive’s total severance amount (reduced by the 20% excise tax and other federal, state, local and other taxes); and (ii) the after-tax value of the executive’s severance amount that has been reduced to the extent necessary so that it would not trigger an excise tax, gross up; provided, however, that if the total payment due, after being reduced for federal, state, local and other taxes is greater than the reduced amount, the executive will receive the total Change-in-Control payments due (without(in each case, without a gross-up). In addition, the amounts
(5)Amounts shown for Mr. Skaggs’ and Mr. Kettering’s equity grants dothe Named Executive Officers have not includebeen reduced under the shares referred tobest “net benefit” provision in note (2) above, which would automatically pro-rata vest in the event of their termination of employment regardless of a Change-in-Control; and, the amount shown for Mr. Skaggs does not include the shares subject to delayed vesting due to limitations on deductibility under Section 162(m) referred to in note (1) above, which are payable to him in the event of his termination of employment regardless of a Change-in-Control.

(5)In accordance with the terms of her Change-in-Control and Termination AgreementAgreements as described above the amount shown for Ms. Hightman reflects a benefit reduction of $1,139,820 as it results in a better after-tax position than her receiptbecause none of the full benefit and payment of the excise tax. Ms. Hightman was the only Named Executive Officer who wasOfficers would have been in a better after-tax position as athe result of a benefit reduction.

49

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Pay Ratio

As required by Section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, we are providing the following disclosure about the relationship of the annual total compensation of our employees to the annual total compensation of our CEO.

For 2018, our last completed fiscal year:

The median annual total compensation of all employees (other than our CEO) was $97,754; and
The annual total compensation of our CEO, as reported in the 2018 Summary Compensation Table, was $5,778,515.

Based on this information, for 2018, the ratio of the annual total compensation of Mr. Hamrock, our CEO, to the annual total compensation of the median employee is estimated to be 59 to 1. Because there were no significant changes to the employee population or compensation arrangements we did not re-identify a new median employee for purposes of the 2018 pay ratio disclosure. To determine the annual total compensation of our median employee and our CEO, we took the following steps consistent with Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K:

1.We reviewed the composition of roles and total number of employees as of October 31, 2018, and determined that our employee population, all of whom continue to be located in the United States, was substantially similar to 2017. This population consisted of our full-time, part-time and temporary employees, as determined for employment law purposes.
2.To identify the 2017 “median employee” from our employee population, we prepared a full census of all our employees (except our CEO) using our existing centralized payroll database of base cash compensation (base salary plus overtime and shift premiums, calculated based on the hours worked during the relevant period) that is used internally to calculate annual cash incentive compensation and profit sharing eligibility. We used base cash compensation as our compensation measure as it is the principal form of compensation delivered to all of our employees and annualized compensation for any employee hired during 2017 who did not work an entire year.
3.We reviewed the 2017 median employee’s circumstances and determined that that there had been no significant change.
4.Once we confirmed that our median employee need not be re-identified, we combined all of the elements of such employee’s compensation for 2018 in accordance with the requirements of Item 402(c)(2)(x) of Regulation S-K, resulting in annual total compensation of $97,754. Once calculated, we noted that the decline in the median employee’s annual total compensation was consistent with that of the employee population, and confirmed that the median employee need not be re-identified.
5.With respect to the annual total compensation of our CEO, we used the amount reported in the “Total” column (column (j) of our 2018 Summary Compensation Table) included in this Proxy Statement.

SEC rules for identifying the median employee and calculating the pay ratio allow companies to use various methodologies and assumptions, which may lead to a lack of comparability across companies.

50

TABLE OF CONTENTS

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

The following table sets forth certain information for all equity compensation plans and individual compensation arrangements (whether with employees or non-employees, such as directors), in effect as of December 31, 2014.2018.

Plan Category  

Number of

Securities to
be Issued Upon

Exercise

of Outstanding

Options,

Warrants and

Rights

(#)(a)

   

Weighted-
Average

Exercise
Price of

Outstanding

Options,

Warrants
and

Rights

($)(2)(b)

   

Number of

Securities
Remaining Available
for

Future Issuance

Under

Equity

Compensation

Plans (Excluding

Securities

Reflected in

Column (a)

(#)(c)

 

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders(1)

   2,424,851     22.62     6,491,322  

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders

               

Total

   2,424,851     22.62     6,491,322  

Plan Category
Number of
Securities to
be Issued Upon
Exercise
of Outstanding
Options,
Warrants and
Rights
(#)(a)
Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price of
Outstanding
Options,
Warrants
and
Rights
($)(b)(2)
Number of
Securities
Remaining Available
for
Future Issuance
Under
Equity
Compensation
Plans (Excluding
Securities
Reflected in
Column (a))
(#)(c)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders(1)
 
2,595,752
 
 
4,086,365
 
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders
Total
 
2,595,752
 
 
4,086,365
 
(1)The Plans approved by security holders include the following plans: the 1994 Long Term Incentive Plan, approved by the stockholders on May 10, 2005 (no shares remain available for future issuance under the plan),following: the Non-Employee Director Stock Incentive Plan, approved by the stockholders on May 20, 2003 (no shares remain available for future issuance under the plan), the Omnibus Plan approved by the stockholders on May 11, 2010 (and re-approved for Code Section 162(m) purposes on May 12, 2015), and the Company’s Employee Stock Purchase Plan, approved by the stockholders on May 15, 2012.12, 2015. As of December 31, 2014, 6,264,2232018, 3,793,557 shares remained available for issuance under the Omnibus Plan and 227,099292,808 shares remained available for purchase under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan. For purposes of this table, we have included the number of shares issuable under outstanding performance stock unit awards assuming performance targets are achieved.

(2)In calculating the weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, shown in column (b), restricted stock units and performance stock units (if applicable) which can convert into shares of common stock upon vesting, have beenare excluded. Restricted stock units and performance stock units are payable at no cost to the grantee on a one-for-one basis.

PROPOSAL 2 — ADVISORY APPROVAL OF NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION

In accordance withPursuant to Section 14A of the federal securities laws,Exchange Act, we are asking stockholders to approve, in an advisory vote, the compensation paid to the Company’sour Named Executive Officers, as disclosed under the heading “Executive Compensation” above, including the “Compensation DisclosureDiscussion and Analysis.Analysis,We currently hold an annual advisory vote on our Named Executive Officers’ compensation. Accordingly,commonly known as a vote will take place at the Annual Meeting and the next such vote will take place at the 2016 Annual Meeting.“Say-on-Pay” proposal.

The Board of Directors encourages stockholders to carefully review the Executive Compensation section of this Proxy Statement,proxy statement, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, section, for a thorough discussion of our executive compensation program and philosophy. Our compensation program is designed to be significantly performance-based and to attract and retain highly qualifiedhighly-qualified individuals who enhance long-term stockholder value by contributing to the Company’sour ongoing success. All facets of our compensation program are regularly monitored by the ONCCompensation Committee to ensure that the program is well-tailored to fulfill the Company’sour compensation philosophy and objectives.

In considering this proposal, stockholders may wish to consider the following factors that demonstrate our commitment to maintaining a robust compensation program:

Compensation is closely tied to both corporate and individual performance;

Annual and long-term incentive compensation opportunities are contingent on the Company achieving pre-established goals;

Total compensation packages are competitive with those offered by members of the Company’sour Comparative Group;

Perquisites are appropriately limited in number and modest in dollar value; and

Our compensation program does not create incentives for behaviors that create material risk to the Company.

As discussed in the Executive Compensation section of this Proxy Statement,proxy statement, the ONCCompensation Committee and the Board believe that the Company’sour executive compensation program fulfills the objectives of itsour compensation philosophy in a prudent and effective manner.

Accordingly, the following resolution is submitted for an advisory stockholder vote at the Annual Meeting:

RESOLVED, that the compensation paid to the Company’sour Named Executive Officers, as disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and narrative discussion, is hereby approved on an advisory basis.

As this is an advisory vote, the result will not be binding on the Company, the Board or the ONCCompensation Committee, although the Compensation Committee and the Board will carefully consider the outcome of the vote when evaluating our compensation program and philosophy.

51

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Vote Required

The affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote is needed to approve the advisory vote on the compensation of the Named Executive Officers. Proxies submitted without direction pursuant to this solicitation will be voted “FOR” the advisory approval of executive compensation of the Company’sour Named Executive Officers. Abstentions by those present or represented by proxy will have the same effect as a vote against the Say-on-Pay proposal. Brokers will not have discretionary authority to vote on this proposal, sothe Say-on-Pay proposal. Accordingly, there could be broker non-votes. Broker non-votes, which will have no effect on the outcome.vote.

THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE ADVISORY APPROVAL OF EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PAID TO THE NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS.OFFICER COMPENSATION ON AN ADVISORY BASIS.

PROPOSAL 3 — RATIFICATION OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTSACCOUNTING FIRM

The Audit Committee of the Board is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of the independent registered public accounting firm retained to audit our financial statements. The Audit Committee appointed Deloitte & Touche LLP (“Deloitte”), 111 South Wacker Drive, Chicago, IL 60606, as the Company’sour independent registered public accountantsaccounting firm for 2019. As part of its oversight of our relationship with our independent registered public accounting firm and to assure continuing independence of such firm, the year 2015. A representativeAudit Committee considers whether it is appropriate to adopt a policy of rotating its independent registered public accounting firm on a regular basis. Further, in conjunction with ensuring the rotation of such firm’s lead engagement partner, the Audit Committee and its Chair are directly involved with the selection of Deloitte’s lead engagement partner. The Audit Committee also reviews proposals for all auditing services (including fees and terms thereof) of our independent registered public accounting firm and approves all such proposals prior to the commencement or performance of such services, subject to the pre-approval policies and procedures described under “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Fees.”

Deloitte will be present athas served as our independent registered public accounting firm since 2002 and has the meeting, will be given an opportunityrequisite understanding of our business, accounting policies and practices, and internal control over financial reporting to makedrive audit quality and efficient fee structures. As a statement if he or she so desires,result of this expertise, and, will be availableas noted above, the Audit Committee’s oversight designed to respond to appropriate questions.

Theassure continuing independence, the Board of Directors and its Audit Committee consider Deloitte well qualified to serve as our independent registered public accountants. Theaccounting firm. Further, the Board believes that the continued retention of Directors recommends ratificationDeloitte is in our best interest and the best interest of such appointment by theour stockholders.

Although action by stockholders for this matter is not required, the Board of Directors and the Audit Committee believe that it is appropriate to seek stockholder ratification of this appointment in order to provide stockholders a means of communicating the stockholders’ level of satisfaction with the performance of the independent registered public accountantsaccounting firm and their level of independence from management. If the proposal is not approved and the appointment of Deloitte is not ratified by the stockholders, the Audit Committee will take this into consideration and will reconsider the appointment. A representative of Deloitte will be present at the meeting, will be given an opportunity to make a statement if he or she so desires and will be available to respond to appropriate questions.

Vote Required

The affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote is needed to ratify the appointment of Deloitte.Deloitte as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2019. Proxies submitted without direction pursuant to this solicitation will be voted “FOR” the ratification of the appointment of Deloitte. Abstentions by those present or represented by proxy will have the same effect as a vote against the proposal. Brokers will have discretionary authority to vote on this proposal, soand, accordingly, there will not be any broker non-votes.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDSAND ITS AUDIT COMMITTEE UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMEND A VOTE “FOR” THE RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF DELOITTE AS THE COMPANY’SOUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTSACCOUNTING FIRM FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015.

2019.

AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

Our Audit Committee consists of Messrs. Candris, Cornelius,Bunting, Butler, DeVeydt, Kabat and Jesanis and Kittrell and Ms. Parker.Dr. Woo. Each of the membersmember of the Audit Committee is independent as defined by the applicable NYSE and SEC rules and meets the additional independence standard set forth by the Board of Directors in the Corporate Governance Guidelines. Each of the membersmember of the Audit Committee also is “financially literate” for purposes of applicable NYSE rules. The Board of Directors has designated Marty R. Kittrell,determined that Michael E. Jesanis, the Chair of the Audit Committee, as theand Theodore H. Bunting, Jr. are “audit committee financial expert.”experts” as defined by SEC rules.

The Audit Committee is responsible for, among other things, assisting the Board in monitoring the integrity of our financial statements; reviewing the qualifications and independence of our independent registered public accounting firm; overseeing the performance of our internal audit function and independent registered public accounting firm; and reviewing our risk assessment process. The Audit Committee has the sole authority to appoint, retain or replace the independent registered public accounting firm and is directly responsible for the compensation and oversight of the work of the independent registered public accounting firm for the purpose of preparing or issuing an audit report or performing other audit, review or attest services for us. The independent registered public accounting firm reports directly to the Audit Committee.

In the performance of its responsibilities, the Audit Committee met regularly with the members of our internal audit function and Deloitte, our independent registered public accounting firm, with and without management present, to discuss the results of its examinations, evaluations of our internal controls, and the overall quality of our financial reporting. The Audit Committee also met regularly with management to discuss accounting, auditing, internal control, financial reporting, earnings and risk management matters. During these meetings, the Audit Committee reviewed and discussed, among other items, the audited consolidated financial statements, the unaudited interim financial statements and significant accounting policies applied by us in our financial statements, with management and Deloitte. The Audit Committee also discussed with, and received regular status reports from, our internal audit function and Deloitte on the overall scope and plans for their audits, including the scope and plans for evaluating the effectiveness of internal controls over financial reporting.

52

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Audit Committee has discussed with Deloitte the Company’s independent registered public accountants, the matters required to be discussed by Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”), Auditing Standard No. 16, “Communications with Audit Committees”; SEC regulation S-X Rule 2-07;the applicable requirements of the PCAOB Auditing Standard No. 5 and the NYSE Corporate Governance Rules.SEC. The Audit Committee also has received the written disclosures and the letter from Deloitte required by the applicable requirements of the PCAOB Ethics and Independence Rule 3526, “Communicationregarding the independent registered public accounting firm’s communications with Audit Committees Concerning Independence,”audit committees concerning independence and has discussed with Deloitte its independence. The Audit Committee has considered whether Deloitte’s provision of non-audit services to the Companyus is compatible with maintaining Deloitte’s independence.

In reliance on the review and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited consolidated financial statements be included in the Company’sour Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014.2018.

Upon recommendation of theThe Audit Committee the Company has appointed Deloitte to serve as the Company’sour independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2015.

2019. In determining whether to reappoint Deloitte, the Audit Committee took into consideration various factors, including the historical and recent performance of Deloitte on the audit; the professional qualifications of the firm and the lead audit partner; the quality of ongoing discussions with Deloitte; the results of an internal survey of Deloitte’s service and quality; the appropriateness of fees; and evidence supporting the firm’s independence, objectivity and professional skepticism. Although the Audit Committee has sole authority to appoint the independent registered public accounting firm, the Audit Committee has recommended that the Board seek stockholder ratification of the appointment at the Annual Meeting as a matter of good corporate governance.

Audit Committee
Michael E. Jesanis, Chair
Theodore H. Bunting, Jr.
Eric L. Butler
Wayne S. DeVeydt
Kevin T. Kabat
Carolyn Y. Woo

Marty R. Kittrell, Chair

Aristides S. Candris

Sigmund L. Cornelius

Michael E. Jesanis

Deborah S. Parker

February 17, 2015

INDEPENDENT AUDITORREGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FEES

The following table represents the aggregate fees for professional services billed by Deloitte for the fiscal years ended December 31, 20132018 and 2014.2017.

    2013   2014 

Audit Fees(1)

  $6,029,000    $6,279,000  

Audit-Related Fees(2)

   829,495     2,566,582  

Tax Fees(3)

   533,387     533,132  

All Other Fees(4)

   18,862     14,140  

 
2018
2017
Audit Fees(1)
$
4,796,000
 
$
4,604,000
 
Audit-Related Fees(2)
 
581,871
 
 
608,129
 
Tax Compliance(3)
Tax Advice and Tax Planning(4)
All Other Fees(5)
 
17,006
 
 
22,514
 
(1)Audit Fees— These are fees for professional services performed by Deloitte for the audit of the Company’sour annual financial statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K and review of financial statements included in the Company’sour Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filings and services that are normally provided in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements.

(2)Audit-Related Fees— These are fees for the assurance and related services performed by Deloitte that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the Company’sour financial statements. In 2014, theseThese fees includeincluded services provided by Deloitte in connection with the Proposed Separation and Columbia Pipeline Partners LP’s initial public offeringaudit of its outstanding limited partnership interests.our benefit plans.

(3)Tax FeesCompliance— These are fees for professional services performed by Deloitte with respect to tax compliance,compliance.
(4)Tax Advice and Tax Planning — These are fees for professional services performed by Deloitte with respect to tax advice and tax planning.

(4)(5)All Other Fees— These are fees for permissible work performed by Deloitte that does not meetfit within the above categories.

Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures.   During fiscal year 2014,2018, the Audit Committee approved all audit, audit relatedaudit-related and non-audit services provided to the Companyus by Deloitte prior to management engaging the auditorindependent registered public accounting firm for those purposes. The Audit Committee’s current practice is to consider for pre-approval annually all audit, audit relatedaudit-related and non-audit services proposed to be provided by our independent auditorsregistered public accounting firm for the fiscal year. Additional fees for other proposed audit-related or non-audit services (not within the scope of the approved audit engagement) which have been properly presented to the Pre-Approval Subcommittee of the Audit Committee (consisting of Marty R. Kittrell)Michael E. Jesanis) by theour Vice President Controller and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company may be considered and, if appropriate, approved by the Pre-Approval Subcommittee of the Audit Committee, subject to later ratification by the full Audit Committee. In no event, however, will any non-audit related service be approved by the Pre-Approval Subcommittee that would result in the independent auditorregistered public accounting firm no longer being considered independent under the applicable SEC rules. In making its recommendation to appointappointing Deloitte as our independent auditor,registered public accounting firm, the Audit Committee has considered whether the provision of the non-audit services rendered by Deloitte is compatible with maintaining thatthe firm’s independence.

53

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROPOSAL 4 - AMENDMENT TO THE COMPANY’S AMENDED AND RESTATEDOUR CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION TO GIVE STOCKHOLDERSINCREASE THE POWER TO REQUEST SPECIAL MEETINGSNUMBER OF THE STOCKHOLDERSAUTHORIZED SHARES OF COMMON STOCK

Currently, the Company’sThe Board has approved, and is recommending to stockholders for approval, an amendment to our Certificate of Incorporation providesto increase the number of authorized shares of common stock from 400 million to 600 million and a corresponding increase to the number of authorized shares of all classes of capital stock from 420 million to 620 million. The proposed amendment would not increase the number of authorized shares of preferred stock.

Under our Certificate of Incorporation, the total number of shares of all classes of stock which the Company has the authority to issue is 420 million. Of these authorized shares, common stock comprises 400 million shares and preferred stock comprises 20 million shares. As of December 31, 2018, approximately 376.3 million shares of common stock were issued, including approximately 4.0 million treasury shares, with approximately 23.4 million shares of common stock reserved for possible future issuance under our stock plans and our at-the-market equity offering (“ATM”) program. Of these reserved shares, approximately 4.7 million shares are committed to be issued in December 2019 to complete a forward equity sale executed under the ATM program in December 2018. As a result, approximately 140,000 authorized shares of common stock remain available for issuance for future purposes and the Board deems it advisable to increase our authorized shares of common stock. The adoption of the proposed amendment would provide for an additional 200 million shares of common stock for future issuance. As of December 31, 2018, we also had approximately 420,000 shares of preferred stock issued.

Our business is capital intensive, requiring significant resources to fund operating expenses, capital project expenditures, scheduled debt maturities and interest payments, and dividend payments on our common stock and preferred stock. In addition to internal sources to fund liquidity and capital requirements for 2019 and beyond, we expect to rely on external sources of funds, including, but not limited to, equity financings such as the previously announced expected yearly issuance of $200 million to $300 million of equity each year in 2019 and 2020, subject to market and other conditions, to meet long-term cash needs, including cash requirements to fund the capital requirements of our capital programs and for other general corporate purposes. In connection with such equity financings, we announced in November 2018 our ATM equity offering program under which we may sell shares of our common stock having an aggregate sales price of up to $500 million.

We also plan to issue additional shares of common stock pursuant to our Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as further described in Proposal 6 (approval of Amended and Restated Employee Stock Purchase Plan to increase the number of shares available under the plan), which we believe is an important component of our efforts to attract and retain qualified employees.

The Board believes that exceptit is advisable and in the best interests of our stockholders to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock to provide us with greater flexibility in considering and planning for future business needs, such as raising additional capital through the sale of equity securities, convertible debt securities or other equity-linked securities, purchases under our employee stock plans, grants of equity incentive awards to employees (subject to any required future stockholder approvals under equity plans), potential strategic transactions, stock dividends, stock splits, and other general corporate purposes. Approval of this amendment by lawstockholders at the Annual Meeting will enable us to take timely advantage of market conditions and subjectother opportunities that may become available to us without the expense and delay of arranging a special meeting of stockholders in the future. Other than the planned annual equity financings described above and the routine practices of issuing shares pursuant to employee stock plans and employee equity incentive awards, we have no present plans, proposals, or arrangements with respect to the issuance of any additional shares of common stock authorized upon approval of the proposed amendment.

Existing holders of shares of our common stock have no preemptive rights under our Certificate of Incorporation to purchase any additional shares of common stock issued by the Company. The additional shares of common stock, if and when issued, would have the same rights and privileges as the shares of common stock currently authorized. Approval of this proposal and the issuance of additional authorized shares of common stock would not affect the rights of the holders of any seriescurrently outstanding shares of preferredour common stock, except for the effects incidental to increasing the number of shares outstanding. The effects include dilution of voting power of existing stockholders, decreasing earnings per share, and, depending on the price at which they are issued, could be dilutive to our existing stockholders.

We have not proposed the increase in the authorized number of shares of common stock with the intention of using the additional shares for anti-takeover purposes, although an issuance of additional shares could, in certain circumstances, make an attempt to acquire control of the Company that may be issuedmore difficult. We are not at this time aware of any such attempts and we are not proposing this increase in the future, only the Board may call special meetingsresponse to any third-party effort to acquire control of the stockholders of the Company.

The Board has adopted,approved, and is now submitting for approval by the Company’sour stockholders, an amendment to Section A.4 of Article IV of the Certificate of Incorporation to add a provision permitting stockholders of the Company holding not less than twenty-five percent (25%) of the shares of Company common stock issued and outstanding to request a special meeting of the Company’s stockholders, subject to the provisions of the Company’s Amended and Restated Bylaws (the “Bylaws”). The complete text of the proposed amendment isas set forth in Exhibit A.

In determiningA to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock from 400 million to 600 million and a corresponding increase to the number of authorized shares of capital stock from 420 million to 620 million. The Board has determined that the proposalamendment is advisable and in the best interest of the Company’s stockholders, the Corporate Governance Committee and the Board noted that the Bylaws were amended on May 11, 2010 to permit stockholders of the Company holding not less than twenty-five percent (25%) of the shares of Company common stock issued and outstanding to request a special meeting of the Company’s stockholders in accordance with the terms of the Bylaws. The Board decided to propose to the Company’s stockholders the amendment of the Certificate of Incorporation reflected in Exhibit A in order to ensure that the Certificate of Incorporation is consistent with the Bylaws.our stockholders.

If the Company’sour stockholders approve this proposal, the text of the proposed amendment will become effective immediately upon the filing of the proposed amendment with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware. We expect to file the proposed amendment with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware promptly upon approval of this Proposal 4 by our stockholders.

Vote Required

The affirmative vote of a majority of the outstanding shares outstandingof our common stock is needed to approve the amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation. Proxies submitted without direction pursuant to this solicitation will be voted “FOR” approval of the amendment. Brokers will not have discretionary authority to vote on this proposal, so there could be broker non-votes. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have the same effect as a vote against the proposal.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” APPROVAL OF THE AMENDMENT TO OUR CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION TO INCREASE THE NUMBER OF AUTHORIZED SHARES OF COMMON STOCK.

54

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROPOSAL 5 - APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO OUR CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION TO GIVE STOCKHOLDERSELIMINATE THE POWER TO REQUEST SPECIAL MEETINGSREQUIREMENT OF THE STOCKHOLDERS.

PROPOSAL 5 — AMENDMENT TO THE COMPANY’S AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION TO REDUCE THE MINIMUM NUMBER“CAUSE” FOR REMOVAL OF DIRECTORS OF THE COMPANY FROM NINE TO SEVEN

On December 21, 2015, in In re VAALCO Energy, Inc.Stockholder Litigation, Consol. C.A. No. 11775-VCL (Del. Ch. Dec. 21, 2015), the Delaware Court of Chancery issued an opinion invalidating as a matter of law provisions of the certificate of incorporation and bylaws of VAALCO Energy, Inc., a Delaware corporation, that permitted removal of VAALCO’s directors by its stockholders only for cause. The Court of Chancery held that, in the absence of a classified board or cumulative voting, VAALCO’s “only for cause” director removal provisions conflicted with Section 141(k) of the Delaware General Corporation Law and were therefore invalid.

We do not have a classified board or provide for cumulative voting. Currently, theSection A.4 of Article V of our Certificate of Incorporation provides that, subject to the Board shall consistrights of not less than nine (9)the holders of any series of preferred stock to elect directors under specified circumstances, directors may be removed from office only for cause and not more than twelve (12) directors. only by the affirmative vote of a majority of the combined voting power of our then-outstanding shares of stock entitled to vote generally, voting together as a single class.

The Board has adopted,approved, and is now submitting for approval by the Company’sour stockholders, an amendment to Section A.1A.4 of Article VIV of the Certificate of Incorporation to reducedelete the minimum numberprovision specifying that directors are removable only with cause. The proposed change to the Certificate of directorsIncorporation is attached hereto as Exhibit B (marked to show the effect of the Company from nine (9) to seven (7)amendment). The maximum number of directors of the Company will remain twelve (12). The proposed text of the amendment is set forth in Exhibit B.

In determiningBoard has determined that the proposalamendment is advisable and in the best interest of the Company’s stockholders, the Corporate Governance Committee and the Board considered that the Company has announced plans to separate CPG, Inc. from the Company and that if the Separation occurs as planned in mid-2015, six of the Company’s directors, including our current President and CEO, are expected to resign from the Board and to become directors of CPG, Inc. The Board decided to propose to stockholders an amendment of the Certificate of Incorporation as reflected in Exhibit B in the interest of giving the Board greater flexibility in filling vacancies on the Board in light of such expected resignations.stockholders.

If the Company’sour stockholders approve this proposal, the text of the proposed amendment will become effective immediately upon the filing of the proposed amendment with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware. We expect to file the proposed amendment with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware promptly upon approval of this Proposal 5 by our stockholders.

Vote Required

The affirmative vote of a majority of the outstanding shares outstandingof common stock is needed to approve the amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation. Proxies submitted without direction pursuant to this solicitation will be voted “FOR” approval of the amendment. Brokers will not have discretionary authority to vote on this proposal, so there could be broker non-votes. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have the same effect as a vote against the proposal.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” APPROVAL OF THE AMENDMENT TO THE CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION TO REDUCE THE MINIMUM NUMBERPROVIDE THAT DIRECTORS ARE REMOVABLE WITH OR WITHOUT CAUSE.

55

TABLE OF DIRECTORS OF THE COMPANY FROM NINE TO SEVEN.CONTENTS

PROPOSAL 6 — RE-APPROVAL OF THE COMPANY’S 2010 OMNIBUS PLAN PURSUANT TO SECTION 162(m) OF THE INTERNAL REVENUE CODE

The Board of Directors recommends that you vote “FOR” the re-approval of the Omnibus Plan for purposes of preserving the ability to grant awards to certain executives under the Plan that are intended to qualify as performance-based compensation that is deductible under Section 162(m). This proposal does not seek to increase the number of shares of the Company’s Common Stock that can be issued pursuant to awards granted under the Omnibus Plan, and approval of this proposal will not result in any additional cost to the Company.

Section 162(m) limits to $1 million per year the deductibility of compensation paid to the CEO and the next three most highly compensated executive officers other than the CFO (“covered executives”). This limit on deductibility does not apply to compensation defined in Section 162(m) as “qualified performance-based compensation.”

One of the requirements of the qualified performance-based compensation exception under Section 162(m) is that the material terms of the performance goals under which the compensation may be paid be disclosed to and approved by stockholders at least once every five years. For purposes of Section 162(m), the material terms include (i) the individuals eligible to receive compensation, (ii) a description of the business criteria on which the performance goal is based, and (iii) the maximum amount of compensation that can be paid to an individual under the performance goal.

Our stockholders approved the Omnibus Plan at the 2010 Annual Meeting on May 11, 2010, and the ONC Committee amended the Omnibus Plan in October 2013 to allow the ONC Committee the authority to grant equity awards authorized under the Omnibus Plan to provide for double-trigger vesting in the event of a change in control. Previously, the terms of the Omnibus Plan provided forsingle-trigger vesting only. A copy of the

Omnibus Plan is attached as Exhibit C to this Proxy Statement, and this discussion is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the Omnibus Plan.

If the Omnibus Plan is approved by the Company’s stockholders, the Company will be able to continue to structure performance-based awards in a manner that should qualify for the performance-based compensation exception from the deduction limitations of Section 162(m). If the Company’s stockholders fail tore-approve the Omnibus Plan, the Omnibus Plan will not be available for grants of certain performance-based awards to the covered executives, and the Company may not be entitled to a tax deduction for some or all of the compensation paid to the covered executives. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Omnibus Plan will continue to provide the ONC Committee the ability to grant awards that do not qualify as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m), if the ONC Committee believes that such awards are in the best interest of the Company.

The basic features of the Omnibus Plan are as follows.

Administration

The Omnibus Plan will be administered by the ONC Committee, or such other committee as the Board of Directors shall appoint from time to time, which shall consist of two or more directors all of whom are intended to satisfy the requirements for an “outside director” under Section 162(m), a “non-employee director” within the meaning of Rule 16b-3 of the Exchange Act, and an “independent director” under the rules of the NYSE. The ONC Committee has the discretion to interpret the Omnibus Plan and any award or other agreement employed by the Company in the administration of the Omnibus Plan. Subject to the provisions of the Omnibus Plan, the ONC Committee has the power to:

determine when and to whom awards will be granted;

make awards under the Omnibus Plan;

determine the fair market value of shares or other property, where applicable;

determine the terms, conditions, and restrictions applicable to each award and any shares acquired pursuant to such awards;

determine how an award will be settled;

approve one or more forms of award agreements;

amend, modify, extend, cancel, or renew any award or waive any restrictions or conditions applicable to any award or any shares acquired upon the exercise of an award;

accelerate, continue, extend, or defer the exercisability of any award or the vesting of any shares acquired upon the exercise of an award;

prescribe, amend, or rescind any rules and regulations relating to the administration of the Omnibus Plan; and

make all other determinations necessary or advisable for the administration of the Omnibus Plan.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Board of Directors shall perform the functions of the ONC Committee for purposes of granting awards to non-employee directors.

Eligibility

The Omnibus Plan gives the ONC Committee full discretion to designate any non-employee director of the Company or any employee of the Company or an affiliate as a participant in the Omnibus Plan. The Company currently has ten non-employee directors, and the Company and its affiliates currently have approximately 8,000 employees eligible to participate in the Omnibus Plan.

Number of Shares and Limitations

The original share reserve available for awards under the Omnibus Plan was 8,000,000 shares, plus any shares subject to outstanding awards granted under either the NiSource Inc. 1994Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “LTIP”) or the NiSource Inc. Non-employee Director Stock Incentive Plan (the “Director Plan”) that expire or terminate for any reason (subject to adjustment for future stock splits, stock dividends, and similar changes in the capitalization of the Company). After giving effect to awards previously made under the Omnibus Plan, the

aggregate number of shares that are available for issuance is approximately [] shares as of March 16, 2015, the record date for the 2015 Annual Meeting. This number does not include the effect of forfeitures, if any, of outstanding awards.

The following shares related to awards will be available for issuance again under the Omnibus Plan:

shares related to awards paid in cash and

shares related to awards that expire, are forfeited, are cancelled, or terminate for any other reason without the delivery of the shares.

In addition, the following shares related to awards also will be available for issuance again under the Omnibus Plan:

shares equal in number to the shares withheld, surrendered or tendered in payment of the exercise price of an award, including an award granted under the LTIP or Director Plan;

shares tendered or withheld in order to satisfy tax withholding obligations; and

shares reacquired by the Company on the open market or otherwise using cash proceeds from the exercise of awards, including awards granted under the LTIP or Director Plan.

No participant may receive in any fiscal year of the Company awards under the Omnibus Plan that exceed the following limitations:

no more than $12,000,000 subject to stock options or stock appreciation rights;

no more than $7,000,000 subject to restricted stock or restricted stock units; and

no more than $10,000,000 subject to performance shares, performance units, cash-based awards, or other stock-based awards.

Performance Targets and Section 162(m)

Awards under the Omnibus Plan may be conditioned upon the attainment of performance targets awards may be based on any number and type of performance targets that the ONC Committee determines are desirable. The performance measured may be that of the Company, its affiliates, or business units within the Company or affiliates. In setting performance targets, the ONC Committee may assign payout percentages to various levels of performance that will be applied to reduce or increase the payout connected to the award when performance over a performance period either falls short of or exceeds the performance target.

With respect to awards intended to qualify as “performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m), such performance targets will be based on one or any combination of two or more performance measures listed in Section 13.1(b) of the Omnibus Plan. The ONC Committee may provide in any such award that any evaluation of performance may include or exclude any extraordinary events described in Section 13.1(c) of the Omnibus Plan. To the extent such inclusions or exclusions affect awards to covered employees under Section 162(m), they shall be prescribed in a form that meets the requirements of Section 162(m) for deductibility except as otherwise determined by the ONC Committee in its sole discretion. Awards that are intended to qualify as “performance- based compensation” under Section 162(m) may not be adjusted upward. The ONC Committee shall retain the discretion to adjust such awards downward, either on a formula or discretionary basis or a combination of the two, as the ONC Committee determines.

Awards that are not intended to qualify as “performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m) may be based on these or other performance measures, as determined by the ONC Committee.

Types of Awards

The types of awards that may be granted under the Omnibus Plan include incentive and nonqualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance shares, performance units, cash-based awards, and other stock-based awards.

Subject to certain restrictions applicable to incentive stock options, awards granted under the Omnibus Plan will be exercisable by the participants at such times as are determined by the ONC Committee, but in no event may the term of an award be longer than ten years after the grant date. In addition to the general characteristics of

all of the awards described in this Proxy Statement, the basic characteristics of awards that may be granted under the Omnibus Plan are as follows:

Incentive and Nonqualified Stock Options (“ISOs” and “NSOs”)

Both incentive and nonqualified stock options may be granted to participants at such exercise prices as the ONC Committee may determine, but the exercise price for any option may not be less than 100% of the fair market value (as defined in the Omnibus Plan) of a share of the Company’s common stock on the grant date. Stock options may be granted and exercised at such times as the ONC Committee may determine, except that (a) ISOs may be granted only to employees, (b) no ISOs may be granted more than ten years after the effective date of the Omnibus Plan, (c) an option shall not be exercisable more than ten years after the date of grant, and (d) the aggregate fair market value of the shares of common stock of the Company with respect to which ISOs granted under the Omnibus Plan and any other plan of the Company first become exercisable in any calendar year for any employee may not exceed the $100,000 maximum amount permitted under Code Section 422(d). Additional restrictions apply to an ISO granted to an individual who beneficially owns more than 10% of the combined voting power of all classes of stock of the Company.

The purchase price payable upon exercise of options generally may be paid in any of the following methods:

in cash;

by authorizing a third party with which the optionee has a brokerage or similar account to sell the shares (or a sufficient portion of such shares) acquired upon the exercise of the option and remit to the Company a portion of the sale proceeds sufficient to pay the entire option exercise price to the Company;

by delivering shares that have an aggregate fair market value on the date of exercise equal to the option exercise price;

by authorizing the Company to withhold from the total number of shares as to which the option is being exercised the number of shares having a fair market value on the date of exercise equal to the aggregate option exercise price for the total number of shares as to which the option is being exercised;

by such other means by which the ONC Committee determines to be consistent with the purpose of the Omnibus Plan and applicable law; or

by any combination of items listed above.

Stock Appreciation Rights (“SARs”)

The value of an SAR granted to a participant is determined by the appreciation in the number of shares the Company’s common stock subject to the SAR during its term, subject to any limitations upon the amount or percentage of total appreciation that the ONC Committee may determine at the time the right is granted. The participant receives all or a portion of the amount by which the fair market value of a specified number of shares, as of the date the SAR is exercised, exceeds a price specified by the ONC Committee at the time the right is granted. The price specified by the ONC Committee must be at least 100% of the fair market value of the specified number of shares of the Company’s common stock to which the right relates, determined as of the date the SAR is granted. An SAR may be granted in connection with a previously or contemporaneously granted option, or independent of any option. An SAR may be paid in cash, shares the Company’s common stock or a combination of cash and shares as determined by the ONC Committee. No SAR may be exercised more than ten years after its date of grant.

Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units (“RSUs”)

The ONC Committee may grant participants awards of restricted stock and RSUs. Restricted stock involves the granting of shares to participants subject to restrictions on transferability and any other restrictions the ONC Committee may impose. The restrictions lapse if either the holder continues to perform services to the Company or its affiliates for a specified period of time established by the ONC Committee under the applicable award agreement or satisfies other restrictions, including performance-based restrictions, during the period of time established by the ONC Committee. RSUs are similar to restricted stock except that no shares actually are awarded to the participant on the grant date, and the holder typically does not enjoy any shareholder rights with

respect to the units. Restricted stock awards are settled in shares. RSU awards may be settled in cash, shares, or a combination of cash and shares, as determined by the ONC Committee and provided in the applicable award agreement.

Performance Shares

The ONC Committee may grant participants awards of performance shares. The period of time over which performance targets are measured will be of such duration as the ONC Committee shall determine in an award agreement. Upon satisfaction of the applicable performance targets during the performance period, the participant will be entitled to receive shares of common stock of the Company.

Performance Units

The ONC Committee may grant participants awards of performance units. The period of time over which the performance goals are measured will be no less than two years, unless otherwise determined by the ONC Committee in an award agreement. Upon satisfaction of the applicable performance targets during the performance period, the participant will be entitled to receive either shares, cash, or a combination of shares and cash as determined by the ONC Committee in an award agreement.

Cash-Based Awards

Cash-based awards entitle the participant to payment in amounts of cash determined by the ONC Committee based upon the achievement of specified performance targets during a specified performance period, which typically will be one year unless otherwise determined by the ONC Committee. Each cash-based award will have its value determined by the ONC Committee.

Other Stock-Based Awards

The ONC Committee may also grant other awards that are valued in whole or in part by reference to, or are otherwise based on and/or payable in, shares of common stock of the Company. Other stock-based awards are a catch-all category to provide for awards of stock-based compensation that do not fit within the scope of the other specifically described types of awards. Payments with respect to other stock-based awards may be made in cash, shares, or a combination of cash and shares as determined by the ONC Committee. The ONC Committee has the discretion to determine the terms and conditions of these other stock-based awards.

Termination of Service

If a participant ceases to be an employee or director of the Company or its affiliates, the ONC Committee may provide for special vesting and payment conditions upon such termination in an applicable award agreement. If a participant’s employment or directorship is terminated for cause, however, the participant’s right to receive the benefits of an award is forfeited.

Transferability

In general, awards may not be sold, transferred, pledged, assigned, or otherwise alienated or hypothecated, other than by will or the laws of descent and distribution or pursuant to a qualified domestic relations order as defined in the Code or Title 1 of ERISA or the rules thereunder. Except as otherwise provided in the Omnibus Plan, all rights with respect to an award granted to a participant shall be available during his or her lifetime only to such participant. Notwithstanding the foregoing, a participant, at any time prior to his death, may assign all or any portion of an NSO or SAR to:

his spouse or lineal descendant;

the trustee of a trust for the primary benefit of his spouse or lineal descendant; or

atax-exempt organization as described in Code Section 501(c)(3).

Notwithstanding the foregoing, non-employee directors may assign all or any portion of any award granted to them to assignees described above. In the event of an assignment, the spouse, lineal descendant, trustee ortax-exempt organization shall be entitled to all of the rights of the participant with respect to the assigned portion of such award, and such portion of the award shall continue to be subject to all of the terms, conditions and

restrictions applicable to the award as set forth in the Omnibus Plan and in the related award agreement, immediately prior to the effective date of the assignment. Any such assignment shall be permitted only if (i) the participant does not receive any consideration therefore, and (ii) the assignment is expressly approved by the ONC Committee or its delegate. Further notwithstanding the foregoing, no incentive stock option may be sold, transferred, pledged, assigned, or otherwise alienated or hypothecated, other than by will or the laws of descent or distribution.

Duration, Adjustments, Modifications, Terminations

The Omnibus Plan will remain in effect until all shares of the Company subject to the Omnibus Plan are distributed, or the Omnibus Plan is terminated as described below.

In the event of a recapitalization, stock split, reverse stock split, spin-off, spin-out or other distribution of assets to stockholders, stock distributions or combinations of shares, payment of stock dividends, other increase or decrease in the number of such shares outstanding effected without receipt of consideration by the Company, or any other occurrence for which the ONC Committee determines an adjustment is appropriate, the ONC Committee shall equitably adjust the number and type of shares available for awards or the number and type of shares and amount of cash subject to outstanding awards, the option exercise price of outstanding options, and provisions regarding payment with respect to outstanding awards. The ONC Committee has the discretion to make similar adjustments in connection with other changes in the Company’s capitalization, including due to a merger, reorganization, or consolidation.

The Omnibus Plan also gives the Board and ONC Committee the right to terminate, suspend or amend the Omnibus Plan without the authorization of stockholders to the extent allowed by law, including without limitation any rules issued by the SEC under Section 16 of the Exchange Act, insofar as stockholder approval thereof is required in order for the Omnibus Plan to continue to satisfy the requirements of Rule16b-3 under the Exchange Act, or the rules of any applicable stock exchange. No termination, suspension or amendment of the Omnibus Plan shall adversely affect any right acquired by any participant under an award granted before the date of such termination, suspension or amendment, unless such participant shall consent; but it shall be conclusively presumed that any adjustment for changes in capitalization as provided for herein does not adversely affect any such right.

Upon a change in control, all outstanding awards shall become fully exercisable and all restrictions thereon shall terminate; provided, however, that notwithstanding the above, the ONC Committee, as constituted before such change in control, is authorized, and has sole discretion, as to any award, either at the time such award is granted or any time thereafter, to provide for the extent of vesting and the treatment of partially completed performance periods (if any) for any awards outstanding upon a change in control.

Federal Tax Considerations

The Company has been advised by its counsel that awards made under the Omnibus Plan generally will result in the following tax events for United States citizens under current United States federal income tax laws.

Nonqualified Stock Options

A participant will have no taxable income, and the Company will not be entitled to any related deduction, at the time a NSO is granted under the Plan. At the time of exercise of NSOs, the participant will realize ordinary income, and the Company will be entitled to a deduction equal to the excess of the fair market value of the stock on the date of exercise over the option exercise price. Upon disposition of the shares, any additional gain or loss realized by the participant will be taxed as a capital gain or loss.

Incentive Stock Options

A participant will have no taxable income, and the Company will not be entitled to any related deduction, at the time an ISO is granted under the Plan. If a participant disposes of shares acquired from the exercise of an ISO no earlier than (a) two years after the grant of the option and (b) one year after the exercise of the option (both (a) and (b) collectively referred to as the “Holding Periods”), then no taxable income will result upon the exercise of such ISO, and the Company will not be entitled to any deduction in connection with such exercise. Upon dis-

position of the shares after expiration of the Holding Periods, any gain or loss realized by a participant will be a capital gain or loss. The Company will not be entitled to a deduction with respect to a disposition of the shares by a participant after the expiration of the Holding Periods.

Except in the event of death, if the participant disposes of the shares before the end of the Holding Periods (a “Disqualifying Disposition”), such participant will recognize a gain (taxable at ordinary income tax rates) which equals the lesser of (a) the difference between the fair market value on the exercise date and the option exercise price, or (b) the difference between the sale price of the shares and the option exercise price on the date of sale. The balance, if any, will be taxed as short-term or long-term capital gain, depending upon how long the participant held the shares. The Company will be entitled to a deduction at the same time and in the same amount as the participant is deemed to have realized ordinary income. If the participant pays the option exercise price with shares that were originally acquired pursuant to the exercise of an ISO and the Holding Periods for such shares have not been met, the participant will be treated as having made a Disqualifying Disposition of such shares, and the tax consequence of such Disqualifying Disposition will be as described above.

For alternative minimum tax purposes, an ISO will be treated as if it were a nonqualified stock option, the tax consequences of which are discussed previously.

Stock Appreciation Rights

There will be no federal income tax consequences to either the participant or the Company upon the grant of an SAR. The participant, however, generally must recognize ordinary taxable income upon the exercise or surrender of an SAR in an amount equal to the fair market value (on the date of exercise) of the shares exercised, less the exercise price. Gain or loss recognized upon any later sale or other disposition of the acquired shares generally will be a capital gain or loss.

Restricted Stock

Unless the participant files an election to be taxed under Code Section 83(b), the participant will not realize income upon the grant of restricted stock. Instead, the participant will realize ordinary income, and the Company will be entitled to a corresponding deduction, when the restrictions lapse. The amount of such ordinary income and deduction will be the fair market value of the restricted stock on the date the restrictions lapse. If the participant files an election to be taxed under Code Section 83(b), the tax consequences to the participant and the Company will be determined as of the date of the grant of the restricted stock rather than as of the date of the lapse of the restrictions.

When the participant disposes of restricted stock, the difference between the amount received upon such disposition and the fair market value of such shares on the date the participant realizes ordinary income will be treated as a capital gain or loss.

Restricted Stock Units

A recipient of RSUs will not recognize taxable income upon the award of RSUs, and the Company will not be entitled to a deduction at such time. Upon payment or settlement of a RSU award, the participant will recognize ordinary income equal to the value of the shares or cash received and the Company will be entitled to a corresponding deduction. Upon disposition of shares received by a participant in payment of an award, the participant will recognize capital gain or loss equal to the difference between the amount received upon such disposition and the fair market value of the shares on the date they were originally received by the participant.

Performance Shares, Performance Units, and Cash-Based Awards

Generally, the participant will not realize taxable income on the date of grant of a performance share, performance unit, or cash-based award. Instead, the participant will realize ordinary income, and the Company will be entitled to a corresponding deduction, in the year cash, shares, or a combination of cash and shares are delivered to the participant in payment of the award. The amount of such ordinary income and deduction will be the amount of cash received plus the fair market value of the shares received, if any, on the date of issuance. Upon disposition of shares received by a participant in payment of an award, the participant will recognize capital gain or loss equal to the difference between the amount received upon such disposition and the fair market value of the shares on the date they were originally received by the participant.

Section 162(m)

Compensation of the Company’s CEO and its three most highly compensated executive officers (not including the CEO and CFO) is subject to the tax deduction limits of 162(m). Awards that qualify as “performance-based compensation,” however, will be exempt from Section 162(m), thus allowing the Company the full tax deduction otherwise permitted for such awards. If approved by the Company’s stockholders, the Omnibus Plan will enable the ONC Committee to grant awards that will be exempt from the deduction limits of Section 162(m).

Code Section 409A

Code Section 409A provides that covered amounts deferred under a nonqualified deferred compensation plan are includable in the participant’s gross income to the extent not subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture and not previously included in income, unless certain requirements are met, including limitations on the timing of deferral elections and events that may trigger the distribution of deferred amounts. The Omnibus Plan has been designed so that awards should be exempt from coverage under Code Section 409A. Certain terms have been defined in a manner so that if awards are subject to Code Section 409A, they should comply with Code Section 409A.

Forfeiture and Over/Under Payments

The ONC Committee may specify in an award agreement that the participant’s rights, payments, and benefits with respect to an award shall be subject to reduction, cancellation, forfeiture, or recoupment upon the occurrence of specified events, in addition to any otherwise applicable vesting or performance conditions of an award. Such events may include, but shall not be limited to, termination of service for cause or any act by a participant, whether before or after termination of service, that would constitute cause for termination of service.

If any participant or beneficiary receives an underpayment of shares or cash payable under the terms of any award, payment of any such shortfall shall be made as soon as administratively practicable. If any participant or beneficiary receives an overpayment of shares or cash payable under the terms of any award for any reason, the ONC Committee or its delegate shall have the right, in its sole discretion, to take whatever action it deems appropriate, including but not limited to the right to require repayment of such amount or to reduce future payments under this Plan, to recover any such overpayment. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the Company is required to prepare an accounting restatement due to the material noncompliance of the Company, as a result of misconduct, with any financial reporting requirement under the securities laws, and if the participant knowingly or through gross negligence engaged in the misconduct, or knowingly or through gross negligence failed to prevent the misconduct, or if the participant is one of the individuals subject to automatic forfeiture under Section 304 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the participant shall reimburse the Company the amount of any payment in settlement of an award earned or accrued during the twelve-month period following the first public issuance or filing with the SEC of the financial document embodying such financial reporting requirement.

Withholding

The Omnibus Plan permits the Company to withhold from awards an amount sufficient to cover any required withholding taxes. The Omnibus Plan also permits the Company to require a participant to remit to the Company an amount sufficient to satisfy any required withholding taxes. In lieu of cash, the ONC Committee may permit a participant to cover withholding obligations through a reduction in the number of shares to be delivered to such participant or by delivery of shares already owned by the participant.

New Plan Benefits

The ONC Committee has not yet made any determination with respect to awards that may be granted in the future pursuant to the Omnibus Plan.

Vote Required

Re-approval of the Company’s Omnibus Plan requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present in person or by proxy and entitled to vote on this item at the meeting. Proxies solicited by the Board of Directors will be voted “FOR” approval of the Omnibus Plan unless stockholders specify otherwise in their proxies. For this purpose, a stockholder voting through a proxy who abstains with respect to approval of the Omnibus

Plan is considered to be present and entitled to vote on the approval of the Omnibus Plan at the meeting, and is in effect a negative vote, but a stockholder (including a broker) who does not give authority to a proxy to vote or withholds authority to vote on the approval of the Omnibus Plan shall not be considered present and entitled to vote on the proposal. Brokers will not have discretionary authority to vote on this proposal, so there could be broker non-votes; broker non-votes will have no effect on the vote.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” RE-APPROVAL OF THE COMPANY’S OMNIBUS PLAN PURSUANT TO SECTION 162(m) OF THE INTERNAL REVENUE CODE.

PROPOSAL 7 —- APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE COMPANY’SAMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN TO INCREASE THE MAXIMUM NUMBER OF SHARES AVAILABLE UNDER THE PLAN

We maintain the NiSource Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan, aswhich was most recently amended and restated effective August 1, 2012 (the “ESPP”). The ESPP, or a predecessor plan, has been maintained by the Companyus and itsour predecessors since 1964. TheWe believe that the ESPP is an important component of our efforts to attract and retain qualified employees. ItWe believe it also encourages employees to become Companyour stockholders, which we believe assists in aligning their long-term interests with those of the Company’sour stockholders.

Proposed AmendmentsAmendment and Restatement

The proposed amendment and restatement would (i) increase the maximum number of shares of our common stock remaining available for future purchase under the ESPP by 900,000 shares.1 million shares and (ii) make certain other administrative changes. The purpose of the amendment and restatement is to ensure that we are able to continue to provide all current and new employees interested in participating in the ESPP with sufficient shares available for purchase in light of strong employee interest in ESPP participation.

Description of the ESPP

The following is a description of the terms of the ESPP, as proposed to be amended and restated. This description is qualified in its entirety by reference to the plan document, as proposed to be amended and restated, a copy of which is attached to this proxy statement as Exhibit C and incorporated herein by reference.

General. The ESPP provides eligible employees of the Company and its participating subsidiaries with the opportunity to purchase our common stock at a discount from market value through payroll deductions. The primary purposes of the ESPP are to provide employees of the Company and certain of its participating subsidiaries an additional means of saving a portion of their earnings and to encourage employee ownership of Companyour common stock.

Shares Subject to Award. Under the proposed amendment, the maximum number of shares of our common stock that may be purchased in the future under the ESPP will be increased from 199,496243,244 as of February 27, 201528, 2019 to 1,099,4961,243,244 shares of common stock, less shares purchased under the ESPP on March 31, 2015. 2019. The number of shares that can be purchased may increase in the future with additional stockholder approval. This number may also increase or decrease proportionately, as appropriate, in the event of a future stock dividend, stock split or combination of our common stock, spin-off, reorganization or recapitalization. If at any time the number of shares remaining available for purchase under the ESPP is not sufficient to satisfy all then outstanding purchase rights, the available shares will be apportioned among all participants on an equitable basis. The closing price of our common stock as reported on the NYSE on February 27, 201528, 2019 was $42.91.$26.98.

Administration. The ESPP is administered by the Company’s Corporate Secretary. Fidelity is the directed trusteeCompensation Committee of the ESPP.our Board of Directors (the “ESPP Administrator”). The ESPP Administrator has the right to interpret the provisions of the ESPP and to make all rulings or interpretations regarding the ESPP and the directed trustee provides services to employees.ESPP.

Eligibility. The ESPP is open to each active employee of the Company and its participating subsidiaries who either (a) is a (i) full-time employee or (ii) part-time employee who customarily works for the Company or any subsidiary more than 20 hours per week for more than five months in any calendar year; or (b) in the case of a part-time employee whose customary employment is 20 hours or less per week, is customarily employed by the Company or a participating subsidiary for at least six months in any calendar year. However, noAll of our subsidiaries are eligible to participate in the ESPP if approved by the NiSource Benefits Committee.

No employee is eligible to participate in the ESPP if, immediately after participating, the employee would own, directly or indirectly, stock possessing 5% or more of the total combined voting power or value of all classes of our stock, including any stock which the employee may purchase under outstanding rights and options. In addition, no employee may accrue the right to purchase shares under the ESPP (and any other employee stock purchase plan of the Company and its affiliates) with a fair market of more than $25,000 for each calendar year. As of February 28, 2019, approximately 8,095 employees were eligible to participate in the ESPP.

Participation. The ESPP provides for four savings periods during each calendar year. Savings accumulated by an employee through payroll deductions will be used at the end of each savings period to purchase as many full and fractional shares of our common stock as possible at the purchase price determined for that savings

period. Savings periods are the three-month periods from January 1 to March 31, April 1 to June 30, July 1 to September 30 and October 1 to December 31.

Each savings period includes all paydays within that period. The purchase price per share assigned to our common stock for any savings period will be 90% of the closing price of our common stock on the NYSE on the last trading day of the savings period. Shares of our common stock purchased under the ESPP will come from treasury shares, authorized but unissued shares or open market purchases of our common stock. The shares purchased will be credited and outstanding to an employee as of the close of business on the last day of each savings period.

An employee is eligible to participate in the ESPP on the first day of the month in which such employee first meets the eligibility criteria. As partAt the time of the enrollment, process, Fidelity establishes an individual brokerage account for the employee. Employeesemployees must also elect an amount that will be deducted from their paychecks for the purchase of our common stock. Payroll deduction elections will be sent by Fidelity to our payroll department. Payroll deductions will begin as quickly as administratively possible. Payroll deductions can be in any full dollar amounts, not less than $10 per regular pay period, and not more than $20,000 per calendar year. An employee may increase, decrease or stop payroll deduction at any time. An employee’s death, retirement or termination of employment with the Company or its affiliates will be considered an automatic termination from participation in the ESPP.

Employees do not pay any brokerage commissions, fees or service charges in connection with purchases of stock under the ESPP. These costs are paid by us. Any shares of stock held in an employee’s individual brokerage account at Fidelity can be sold at the employees’ direction. Employees are responsible for all costs incurred in the sale of shares within their individual brokerage account at Fidelity.

To terminate participation in the ESPP, an employee may change theirhis or her contribution to $0 on Fidelity’s website or by contacting Fidelity by phone. Fidelity will inform us to stop any futureand payroll deductions and to refund any payroll deductionsdeduction amounts that have not been used to purchase any of our common stock and remain in the employee’s individual brokerage account. Payroll deduction and refundsaccount will be maderefunded to the employee as soon as administratively possible.

56

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Effect of Certain Corporate Events. In the event of a dissolution or liquidation of the Company, all offerings will terminate prior to the consummation of the proposed transaction or, at the Board’s discretion, the purchase date of any offering will be accelerated so that the outstanding rights may be exercised before or concurrent with the proposed transaction. In the event of a proposed sale of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company, or the merger of the Company with or into another corporation where the Company is not the surviving corporation, all offerings will terminate prior to the consummation of the proposed event, unless the surviving corporation assumes the rights under the ESPP or substitutes similar rights, or the Board, at its discretion, provides that participants may exercise outstanding rights.

Duration, Termination and Amendment. Unless earlier terminated by the Board, the ESPP will terminate when the maximum number of shares of our common stock available for sale under the ESPP has been purchased. We reserve the right to modify, suspend or terminate the ESPP, by action of the Board of Directors or the ONC Committee,ESPP Administrator, as of the beginning of any savings period. Notice of suspension, modification or termination will be given to all participants. Upon termination of the ESPP for any reason, the cash then credited to an employee’s account will be refunded by our payroll department. All full and fractional shares of Companyour common stock held in individual employee’s brokerage account will be available to the employee.

The Board or the ONC CommitteeESPP Administrator may also amend the ESPP from time to time to meet changes in legal requirements or for any other reason. In no event, however, may the Board or the ONC CommitteeESPP Administrator amend the ESPP to (i) materially adversely affect any rights outstanding under the ESPP during the savings period in which such amendment is to be effected, (ii) increase the maximum number of shares of common stock which may be purchased under the ESPP without stockholder approval, (iii) decrease the purchase price of the common stock below 90% of the fair market value of the closing price of our common stock on the NYSE on the last trading day of the savings period, or (iv) adversely affect the qualification of the Plan under Section 423 of the Code.

Certain Federal Income Tax Consequences. The following discussion briefly summarizes certain U.S. federal income tax consequences to participants under the ESPP. The discussion is based upon current interpretations of the Code, and the regulations promulgated thereunder. This summary describes the general tax principles that apply and is provided only for general information. Certain types of taxes, such as state, local and non-U.S. taxes, are not discussed. Tax laws are complex and subject to change and may vary depending on individual circumstances and from locality to locality. The summary does not discuss all aspects of income taxation that may be relevant to a participant in light of his or her personal investment circumstances. This summarized tax information is not tax advice.

The ESPP is intended to qualify as an “employee stock purchase plan” under Section 423 of the Code. An employee will not realize taxable income at the time he or she purchases shares of common stock under the ESPP. Employees will be taxed on dividends on shares as they are paid. The length of time an employee holds shares of common stock before disposing of them is an important variable in determining federal income tax consequences. A holding period starts the day after the day shares are purchased (i.e., the last day the common stock was traded on the NYSE in the applicable savings period).

For an employee who sells or otherwise disposes of shares of common stock purchased under the ESPP, federal income tax considerations will differ, depending upon how long he or she has held the shares. Under present law, if the employee holds the shares at least two years before disposing of them, (1) any profit upthe employee will recognize ordinary income at the time of sale or disposition equal to the lesser of (1) the excess of the fair market value of the shares at the time of disposition over the purchase price, or (2) 10% discount will be taxableof the fair market value of the shares on the date of grant (i.e., the last day of the savings period). Any gain on the disposition in excess of the amount treated as ordinary income (2) any further profit will be taxable aslong-term capital gain. We are not entitled to take a deduction for the amount of the discount in the circumstances described above. If the sale price is less than the purchase price, then there is no ordinary income, and the employee will have a capital gain,loss equal to the difference between the sale price and

the purchase price.

(3) any loss will be treated as a capital loss. Under present law, if the employee holds shares less than two years before disposing of them (1) the full 10% discount will be taxable as ordinary income, (2) any further profit also will be taxable as a capital gain, and (3) any loss, after considering the full 10% discount as income, will be treated as capital loss. Under present law, upon the death of an employee, whenever it occurs, there shall be included in the employee’s ordinary taxable income, in the year in which death occurs, the amount by which the market price at date of death exceeds the amount paid for the shares; however, this amount shall not exceed the original 10% discount.

An employee does not have any tax consequences so long as he or she retains the shares. Under present law, if an employee holds shares less than two years before disposing of them, the Companyemployee will recognize ordinary income on the excess of the fair market value of the stock on the purchase date over the purchase price. Any difference between the sale price of the shares and the fair market value on the purchase date will be capital gain or loss. We will be allowed a deduction in the year of disposal equal to the 10% discount in computing its taxableamount recognized as ordinary income. If an employee disposes of his or her shares other than by selling them at market value, different U.S. tax considerations may apply. State and local income tax considerations may also apply.

Specific Benefits. The benefits that will be received by or allocated to persons eligible to participate in the ESPP in the future cannot be determined at this time because the amount of contributions set aside to purchase shares of our common stock under the ESPP (subject to the limits of the plan) are entirely within the discretion of each participant.

Requires Increase in Authorized Shares of the Company. The proposed increase in authorized shares under the Amended and Restated ESPP will require an increase in total authorized shares of common stock under our Certificate of Incorporation. Stockholders are being asked to approve such an increase in authorized shares in Proposal 4 of this proxy statement. The proposed amendments to the Amended and Restated ESPP will not be effectuated unless stockholders approve this Proposal 6 as well as Proposal 4 to increase the total authorized shares of common stock under our Certificate of Incorporation.

Vote Required

Approval of our Amended and Restated ESPP to increase the amendment tonumber of shares available under the Company’s ESPPplan requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote. Proxies submitted without direction pursuant to this solicitation will be voted “FOR” approval of the amendment. Abstentions will have the same effect as a vote against the proposal. Brokers will not have discretionary authority to vote on this proposal, so there could be broker non-votes; broker non-votes will have no effect on the vote.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” APPROVAL OF THE AMENDMENT TO THE COMPANY’SOUR AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN TO INCREASE THE MAXIMUM NUMBER OF SHARES AVAILABLE UNDER THE PLAN.

57

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROPOSAL 87 — STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL REGARDING REPORTS ON POLITICAL CONTRIBUTIONSREDUCING THE THRESHOLD STOCK OWNERSHIP REQUIREMENT FOR STOCKHOLDERS TO CALL A SPECIAL STOCKHOLDER MEETING FROM 25% TO 10%

The ComptrollerMr. John Chevedden of the State of New York, as the sole Trustee of the New York State Common Retirement Fund, which2215 Nelson Avenue, No. 205, Redondo Beach, California 90278, who beneficially heldowns at least $2,000 in market value200 shares of common stock, has informed the Companyus that ithe plans to present the following proposal at the meeting:meeting.

Proposal 7 - Special Shareholder Meeting Improvement

Resolved,, that Shareowners ask our board to take the shareholders ofNiSource Inc., (“Company”) hereby request that the Company provide a report, updated semiannually, disclosing the Company’s:

1. Policiessteps necessary (unilaterally if possible) to amend our bylaws and procedures for making, with corporate funds or assets, contributions and expenditures (direct or indirect)each appropriate governing document to (a) participate or intervene in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for public office, or (b) influence the general public, or any segment thereof, with respect to an election or referendum.

2. Monetary and non-monetary contributions and expenditures (direct and indirect) usedgive holders in the manner describedaggregate of 10% of our outstanding common stock the power to call a special shareowner meeting (or the closest percentage to 10% according to state law). This proposal does not impact our board’s current power to call a special meeting.

Special meetings allow shareowners to vote on important matters, such as electing new directors that can arise between annual meetings. This proposal topic won more than 70%-support at Edwards Lifesciences and SunEdison in section 1 above, including:2013. The 70% support would have been higher if all shareholders had access to independent proxy voting advice.

a.The identity of the recipient as well as the amount paid to each; and

b.The title(s) of the person(s) in the Company responsible for decision-making.

The report shall be presentedScores of Fortune 500 companies allow a more practical percentage of shares to call a special meeting compared to the boardhigher requirement of directors or relevant board committeeNiSource. Our higher 25%-threshold for shareholders to call a special meeting may be unreachable due to time constraints and posted on the Company’s website within 12 monthsdetailed technical requirements that can disqualify many shareholders from the dateparticipation. NiSource shareholders previously voted 65% in favor of the annual meeting.owners of 10% of shares to have the right to call a special meeting, sponsored by Ray T. Chevedden - the very topic of this proposal.

Stockholder Supporting Statement

As long-term shareholders of NiSource, we support transparency and accountability in corporate spending on political activities. These include any activities considered intervention in any political campaign under the Internal Revenue Code,proposals such as directthis have had an important role in improving the governance rules of our company. For instance, NiSource adopted annual election of each director and indirect contributionsa rudimentary version of a shareholder right to political candidates, parties, or organizations; independent expenditures; or electioneering communicationscall a special meeting after shareholder proposals on behalf of federal, state or local candidates.

these topics were received.

Disclosure is in the best interest of the company and its shareholders. The Supreme Court said in itsCitizens Uniteddecision: “[D]isclosure permits citizens andA more practical rule to enable shareholders to react to the speech of corporate entitiescall a special meeting would also put shareholders in a proper way. This transparency enablesbetter position to give input on improving the electoratequalifications of our directors.

Deborah Henretta, a director assigned to make informed decisions2 important Board committees, owned only $4000 of stock and give proper weightwas paid $230,000 for perhaps 300 hours of work a year. Carolyn Woo had 20-years long tenure. Long-tenure can impair the independence of a director. Independence is of greater importance for directors serving on our most important board committees. And Ms. Woo served on both our Audit and Nomination Committees.

Richard Thompson was age 78 and had additional oversight duties as Chairman. Mr. Thompson did not serve on any other major Board of Directors to different speakers and messages.”keep his skills up-to-date. Richard Abdoo was age 75.

Publicly available records showAny claim that NiSource contributed at least $2.7 million in corporate funds since the 2004 election cycle. (CQ: http://moneyline.cq.com and National Institute on Money in State Politics:http://www.followthemoney.org)

Gaps in transparency and accountability may expose the companya shareholder right to reputational and business risks that could threaten long-term shareholder value. Thiscall a special meeting can be costly - may be especially true for NiSource, which the non-profit organization Public Campaign criticized inmoot. When shareholders have a December 2011 report,For Hire: Lobbyists or the 99%? The report alleged thatgood reason to call a group of companies, including NiSource, paid no federal income taxes between 2008 and 2010 while spending millions on campaign contributions and lobbying and increasing their executive compensation.

Relying on publicly available data does not provide a complete picture of the Company’s political spending. The proposal asks NiSource to disclose all of its political spending, including payments to trade associations and other tax exempt organizations used for political purposes. This would bringspecial meeting - our Company in line with a growing number of its peers, includingExelon Corp., Edison International, andPG&E Corp., that support political disclosure and accountability and present this information on their websites.

The Company’s Board and its shareholders need comprehensive disclosure toboard should be able to fully evaluate the political use of corporate assets. We urge your support for this critical governance reform.take positive responding action to make a special meeting unnecessary.

Please vote yes:

Special Shareholder Meeting Improvement- Proposal 7

Board of Directors’ Statement in Opposition


Your Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote AGAINST this proposal.

The Board of Directors hasand its Nominating and Governance Committee have considered this proposal and as discussed below, concluded that it is unnecessary and not in the best interests of our stockholders.

Our Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws include a stockholder right to call special meetings that the Board believes strikes the appropriate balance between enhancing stockholder rights and adequately protecting the best interests of all of our stockholders.

Under our Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws, stockholders holding at least 25% of the shares of common stock issued and outstanding may call a special meeting, which is consistent with the majority practice of S&P 500 companies that provide stockholders with this right. According to a recent survey, approximately 61% of S&P 500 companies provide stockholders with the right to call a special meeting. Of those companies that have this right, approximately 62% have an ownership threshold equal to or greater than 25%, while only approximately 18% of S&P 500 companies with such right have a 10% or less ownership threshold.

In its consideration of this proposal, the Board evaluated a number of factors, including the interests of our stockholders, the resources required to convene a special meeting, the existing opportunities for stockholders to engage with the Board and management between annual meetings, and the characteristics and composition of our stockholder base. The Board continues to believe that the current 25% ownership threshold provides an appropriate balance between providing accountability to stockholders and enabling the Board and management to focus on meeting our business objectives and enhancing stockholder value.

The Board believes that special meetings should only be called to consider extraordinary events that are of interest to a broad base of stockholders and that cannot be delayed until the next annual meeting. Implementation of the 10% ownership threshold could significantly disrupt our operations and increase our costs. For every special meeting, we are required to provide each stockholder a notice of meeting and proxy materials, which results in significant legal, printing and mailing and administrative expenses, as well as other costs normally associated with holding a stockholder meeting. Additionally, preparing for stockholder meetings requires significant attention of our directors, officers and employees, diverting their attention away

58

TABLE OF CONTENTS

from performing their primary function, which is to operate our business in the best interests of our stockholders. The current 25% threshold prevents a small number of stockholders, which may be composed of stockholders with special interests, from calling a special meeting that may not be in the best interest of all of our stockholders. Accordingly, the current 25% ownership threshold is a more appropriate standard to ensure that special meetings are held only for matters important to a larger group of stockholders.

We have strong corporate governance practices that provide Board accountability to stockholder concerns.

The Board further believes that our strong corporate governance framework makes the adoption of this proposal unnecessary. In addition to giving stockholders a meaningful right to call a special meeting in our bylaws, our corporate governance practices and policies ensure the Board remains accountable to stockholders. These extensive strong governance practices include:

Annual election of directors;
Majority voting for all directors with resignation policy;
Stockholder right to call special meetings;
No supermajority voting provisions;
Proxy access bylaw (3% ownership / 3 years / 20%);
Separate independent chairman and CEO;
All directors independent except CEO; and
Annual “Say-on-Pay” advisory votes.

In addition, stockholders may communicate directly with the Board at any time. For further information on how our stockholders may communicate with any director, any Board committee or the full Board, see the section titled “Communications with the Board and Non-Management Directors” on page 15.

We believe that this comprehensive package of governance practices and policies, including our existing special meeting bylaw, protects stockholder rights without the expense and risk associated with lowering the ownership threshold necessary to call a special meeting.

For the reasons set forth above, the Board believes that the implementation of this proposal is not in the best interests of the Company or ourand its stockholders.

We are committed to being a good corporate citizen in the communities in which we conduct our business. Consistent with this commitment, we support and encourage our employees to actively engage in community and civic activities. We also encourage employees to participate in the political process as private citizens should they desire to do so. Our commitment to corporate citizenship is set forth in our Code of Business Ethics under a section entitled “Committed to Fair and Ethical Dealings with Others — Corporate Citizenship”, and is available on our website at:www.nisource.com/ethics.

We do not — and under federal law we cannot — use corporate funds for direct contributions to federal candidates. Such contributions may be made only by NiSource Inc. PAC (NiPAC), a non-profit entity that solicits voluntary contributions from eligible administrative and management employees in compliance with federal election laws. NiPAC contributes to the campaigns of federal and state candidates, where permissible, and files required reports with the Federal Election Commission and various state and local election commissions. These reports are publicly available. Reports filed with the Federal Election Commission are available at www.fec.gov.

We also do not make independent expenditures, as authorized by theCitizens United decision, and do not currently have any plans to do so.

We participate in trade and industry associations to benchmark best practices and share knowledge. While some of these trade organizations may engage in legislative or other political activity, we do not necessarily support all of their political goals. Because these associations operate independently of their members, disclosure of our regular dues made to them would not provide our stockholders with greater understanding of our business strategies, sustainability initiatives or values. Furthermore, compiling information regarding every trade association to which any of our business units may have made a dues or other payment would be unreasonably burdensome and an inefficient use of Company resources.

Nevertheless, in an effort to be responsive to some of the recommendations made in the stockholder proposal, we implemented procedures to heighten oversight and review of political contributions in 2014. Our corporate political activities are conducted under the oversight of the Corporate Governance Committee of the Board. In addition, all legally permissible direct and indirect corporate political spending is reviewed centrally by

the head of the Company’s Corporate Affairs Group, and is periodically reported to and reviewed by the Corporate Governance Committee of the Board.

The Board of Directors believes that the Company’s heightened oversight and review procedures are sufficient to ensure accountability. We also believe that much of what the proposal advocates is already publicly available, and that adopting a policy as set forth in the proposal is unnecessary and would result in an unproductive use of Company resources.

Vote Required

If this proposal is properly presented at the meeting, approval requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present at the meeting in person or represented by proxy, and entitled to vote. Proxies submitted without direction pursuant to this solicitation will be voted AGAINST the stockholder proposal. Abstentions will have the same effect as a vote against the proposal. BrokersWe believe brokers will not have discretionary authority to vote on this proposal, so there could be broker non-votes. Broker non-votes will have no effect on the vote.

THE BOARD BELIEVES THAT THETHIS PROPOSAL IS NOT IN YOURTHE BEST INTERESTS OF OUR STOCKHOLDERS AND RECOMMENDS THAT YOUA VOTE “AGAINST” THIS PROPOSAL.

59

TABLE OF CONTENTS

STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS AND NOMINATIONS FOR 20162020 ANNUAL MEETING

Any of our stockholders who wish to bring any business beforeStockholders may submit proposals appropriate for stockholder action at the 20162020 Annual Meeting must file a notice of the holder’s intent to do so no earlier than January 11, 2016, and no later than February 10, 2016. The notice must include a brief description of the business desired to be brought before the meeting, the reasons for conducting such business at the meeting and any material interest in such business of such stockholder and the beneficial owner, if any, on whose behalf the proposal is made. Any holder of common stock who wishes to submit a proposal to be included in the Company’s proxy materials in connectionconsistent with the 2016 Annual Meeting must submit the proposal to the Company’s Corporate Secretary no later than December 8, 2015. The holder submitting the proposal must have owned common stock having a market value of at least $2,000 for at least one year prior to submitting the proposal and represent to the Company that the holder intends to hold those shares of common stock through the date of the 2016 Annual Meeting. Any such proposal must meet the requirements of Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act, and all other rules of the SEC relating to stockholder proposals.

Any holderproposals and our Bylaws. Written notice containing the required information should be addressed to the attention of common stock who wishesour Corporate Secretary at NiSource Inc., 801 E. 86th Avenue, Merrillville, Indiana 46410. For your proposal to nominate a director atbe considered for inclusion in our proxy statement in connection with the 20162020 Annual Meeting, we must filereceive your written proposal no later than December 3, 2019.

Stockholder proposals not intended to be included in our proxy statement (including director nominations) may be brought before the 2020 Annual Meeting by filing a notice of the nominationstockholder’s intent to do so no earlier than January 11, 2016,8, 2020, and no later than February 10, 2016. Our Bylaws require that a7, 2020. The notice to nominate an individual as a directormust include the name of each nominee proposed, the number and class of shares of each class of Company stock beneficially owned by the nominee, such other information concerning the nominee as would be required under the rulesall of the SECinformation required to be set forth in aany such notice by our Bylaws.

Stockholders who intend to submit director nominees for inclusion in our proxy statement soliciting proxiesmaterials for the election2020 Annual Meeting must comply with the requirements of proxy access as set forth in our Bylaws. The stockholder or group of stockholders who wish to submit director nominees pursuant to proxy access must deliver the required materials to us no earlier than November 3, 2019, and no later than December 3, 2019.

If you would like a copy of our Bylaws, please contact our Corporate Secretary at the above address or access our Bylaws filed with the SEC as Exhibit 3.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 26, 2018. Failure to comply with our Bylaw procedure and deadlines may preclude presentation and consideration of the nominee, the nominee’s signed consent to serve as a directormatter or of the Company if elected,proposed nominee for election at the nominating stockholder’s name and address, and the number and class of shares of each class of stock beneficially owned by the nominating stockholder.2020 Annual Meeting.

SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

Based solely upon ouron a review of reports filed with the Forms 3, 4SEC and 5 furnished to the Company pursuant towritten representations that no other reports were required under Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act, we believe that all of our directors, officers and beneficial owners of more than 10% of the Company’sour common stock filedwho are required to file such reports did file all such reports on a timely basis during 2014.2018.

ANNUAL REPORT AND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Attention is directed to the financial statements contained in the Company’sour Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2014. A2018. As of the mail date of this Proxy Statement, a copy of the Annual Report has been sent, or is concurrently being sent, to all stockholders of record as of March 16, 2015.12, 2019. These statements and other reports filed with the SEC are available through our website athttps://www.nisource.com/financials.cfm.filings.

AVAILABILITY OF FORM 10-K

A copy of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014,2018, including the financial statements and the financial statement schedules, but without exhibits, is contained within the Company’sour Annual Report which has been sent, or is concurrently being sent, to you and is available free of charge to any stockholder upon written request to Robert E. Smith,NiSource Inc., c/o Corporate Secretary, NiSource Inc., 801 E.East 86th Avenue, Merrillville, Indiana 46410 and is also available on our website athttps://www.nisource.com/annuals.cfm.filings.

MULTIPLE STOCKHOLDERS SHARING THE SAME ADDRESS — “HOUSEHOLDING”

The SEC has adopted rules that permit companies and intermediaries (e.g., brokers) to satisfy the delivery requirements for proxy statements with respect to two or more stockholders sharing the same address by delivering a single set of proxy materials addressed to those stockholders. This process, which is commonly referred to as “householding,” may potentially provide extra convenience for stockholders and cost savings for companies or the intermediary.

You may receive proxy materials through an intermediary who uses householding to deliver proxy materials. If so, a single copy of the proxy materials may be delivered to multiple stockholders sharing an address unless the affected stockholder provides contrary instructions. Once you have received notice from your broker that they will be householding communications to your address, householding will continue until you are notified otherwise or until you revoke your consent. If this applies to you and you would prefer to receive separate copies of the proxy materials, please notify your broker that you no longer wish to participate in householding. Additionally, you may direct your written request for a copy of the proxy materials to NiSource Inc., c/o Corporate Secretary, 801 East 86th Avenue, Merrillville, Indiana 46410, or you may request a copy by telephone at (877) 647-5990. If your broker is not currently householding (i.e., you received multiple copies of our proxy statement), and you would like to request delivery of a single copy, you should contact your broker and find out if this option is available to you.

60

TABLE OF CONTENTS

OTHER BUSINESS

The Board of Directors does not intend to bring any other matters before the Annual Meeting and does not know of any matters that will be brought before the meeting by others.other than those described in this proxy statement. If any other matters do properly come before the meeting, it is the intention of the persons named in the enclosed form of proxy to vote the proxy in accordance with their judgment on such matters.

Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, you can be sure your shares are represented at the meeting by submitting your completed proxy by telephone, through the Internet or by promptly marking, dating, signing and returning the enclosed proxy card.

BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
John G. Nassos
Corporate Secretary
Dated: April 1, 2019

61

TABLE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORSCONTENTS

Exhibit A

LOGO

Robert E. Smith

Corporate Secretary

Dated: April 7, 2015

EXHIBIT A

Proposed Amendment to Section A.4Our Certificate of Incorporation to Increase the Number of Authorized Shares of Common Stock

(additions are underlined; deletions are struck-out)

Article IV of the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to be amended as follows:

The total number of NiSource Inc.

Section A.4shares of Article IVall classes of stock which the Corporation shall have authority to issue is Four hundred twenty Six hundred twenty million (420,000,000 620,000,000), of which Twenty million (20,000,000) shares of the Company’s Amendedpar value $.01 each are to be of a class designated Preferred Stock and RestatedFour hundred Six hundred million (400,000,000 600,000,000) shares of the par value of $.01 each are to be of a class designated Common Stock.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Exhibit B

Amendment to Our Certificate of Incorporation will be replaced in its entirety byto Eliminate the following revised Section A.4Requirement of “Cause” for Removal of Directors

(additions are underlined; deletions are struck-out)

Article IV:

Any action required or permittedV.A.4 of the Certificate of Incorporation to be taken by the stockholders of the Corporation must be effected at an annual or special meeting of stockholders of the Corporation and may not be effected by any consent in writing by such stockholders. Exceptamended as otherwise required by law and subjectfollows:

4. Subject to the rights of the holders of any class or any series of Preferred Stock special meetings of stockholders of the Corporationto elect directors under specified circumstances, any director or directors may be calledremoved from office at any time, but only for cause and only by the Boardaffirmative vote of Directors pursuant to a resolution adopted by a majority of the total numbercombined voting power of authorized directors (whether or not there exist any vacancies in previously authorized directorships at the time any such resolution is presented to the Board for adoption) or, subject to the provisionsall of the Bylawsthen-outstanding shares of stock of the Corporation upon the written requestentitled to vote generally, voting together as a single class (it being understood that for all purposes of stockholders of the Corporation holding no less than twenty-five percent of the shares of Common Stock issued and outstanding.

EXHIBIT B

Proposed Amendment to Section A.1 ofthis Article V, each share of Preferred Stock shall have the number of votes, if any, granted to it pursuant to this Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of NiSource Inc.any resolution adopted pursuant to Article IV).

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Exhibit C

Section A.1 of Article V of the Company’sAMENDED AND RESTATED NISOURCE INC.

EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN

This Amended and Restated CertificateNiSource Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP” or “Plan”), adopted by the Board as of IncorporationFebruary 1, 2019, provides eligible employees (referred to herein as “you”) of NiSource Inc. (“NiSource”) and its participating subsidiaries (as described below) with the opportunity to purchase shares of common stock of NiSource, $.01 par value (“Common Stock”), at a discount from market value through payroll deductions. The primary purposes of the Plan are to provide employees of NiSource and its participating subsidiaries an additional means of saving a portion of their earnings and to encourage employee ownership of Common Stock. Further information concerning the Plan, including the number of shares of Common Stock to be offered pursuant to the Plan, is set forth herein. The Plan, as amended and restated herein, will become effective upon stockholder approval of the Plan within 12 months following the date on which it was adopted by the Board.

1. WHAT IS THE PLAN?

The Plan offers a convenient and economical way for eligible employees of NiSource to initiate or increase their ownership of Common Stock. Once you are enrolled in the Plan, your payroll deductions will be replacedused by Fidelity Investments to purchase Common Stock (both full and fractional shares) for you.

2. WHO MAY PARTICIPATE?

Participating companies are:

(1) NiSource; and

(2) those subsidiaries of NiSource whose Boards of Directors have adopted resolutions requesting participation in its entiretythe Plan for their employees and whose requests are approved by the following revised Section A.1NiSource Benefits Committee.

You may participate if:

(1) you are an active employee of Article V:NiSource or a participating subsidiary; and

(2) you are either: (a) a (i) full-time employee, or (ii) a part-time employee whose customary employment is more than 20 hours per week and more than five months in any calendar year; or (b) if you are part-time employee whose customary employment is 20 hours or less per week, you are customarily employed by NiSource or a participating subsidiary for at least six months in any calendar year.

However, even if you qualify under these rules, you may not acquire any right to purchase Common Stock under the Plan if:

(1) immediately after participating, you would own at least 5% of the total combined voting power or value of all classes of stock of NiSource or any subsidiary including any stock which the employee may purchase under outstanding rights and options; or

(2) such right would permit you to purchase stock under this Plan or any similar employee stock purchase plan of NiSource with a fair market value of more than $25,000 in a calendar year.

3. HOW DOES THE PLAN OPERATE?

The BoardPlan provides for four Savings Periods during each calendar year. Savings accumulated by you through payroll deductions will be used at the end of Directors shall consisteach Savings Period to purchase as many full and fractional shares of Common Stock as possible at the purchase price determined for that Savings Period.

4. WHAT ARE THE SAVINGS PERIODS?

Savings Periods are the three-month periods from January 1 to March 31, April 1 to June 30, July 1 to September 30 and October 1 to December 31. Each Savings Period includes all paydays within that period.

5. WHEN CAN I START MY PARTICIPATION IN THE PLAN?

You become eligible to participate in the Plan with respect to the first Savings Period commencing on or after the day on which you first meet the criteria listed in response to question 2. Whether or not you participate in the Plan is your decision.

6. IF I AM ELIGIBLE, HOW DO I ENROLL IN THE PLAN?

You may enroll at netbenefits.fidelity.com or by contacting a Fidelity Stock Plan Services Representative. As part of the enrollment process, you will establish a Fidelity Account® - an individual brokerage account, in order to manage your ESPP. You must also elect an amount that will be deducted from your paycheck to contribute towards the purchase of Common Stock. Fidelity will send your payroll deduction election to the NiSource Payroll Department so that your payroll deduction can be added to your

TABLE OF CONTENTS

payroll record. Your payroll deduction will begin as quickly as administratively possible. At the time that you enroll, or anytime thereafter, you can designate a beneficiary on your Fidelity Account. If you are a Plan participant at the time of your death, your Fidelity Account will be distributed to the beneficiaries designated by you. You can complete the beneficiary designation online at fidelity.com. Once you have successfully completed your beneficiary designation, you should receive confirmation by postal mail. Any payroll deductions that have not been used to purchase shares of Common Stock at the time of death will be paid to your estate in cash.

7. WHAT IS A PAYROLL ELECTION?

A payroll election directs your employer to deduct money from your pay in a specified amount while you are a participant in the Plan. The payroll election remains effective until you change your payroll election at netbenefits.fidelity.com or by calling a Fidelity Stock Plan Services Representative.

8. WHEN WILL THE PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS START AND IN WHAT AMOUNT MAY THEY BE MADE?

Your payroll deductions will begin as soon as administratively possible. Payroll deductions can be in any full dollar amounts, not less than seven (7) or$10 per regular pay period, and not more than twelve (12) persons,$20,000 per calendar year.

9. WHAT IF I DECIDE TO CHANGE OR STOP MY PAYROLL DEDUCTION?

You may change or stop your payroll deduction at any time. To make this change, you must complete a new payroll election at netbenefits.fidelity.com or by calling a Fidelity Stock Plan Services Representative.

10. WHAT HAPPENS TO THE MONEY DEDUCTED FROM MY PAY?

Your payroll deductions will be credited to your NiSource Inc. Purchase Account (“Purchase Account”) under the exact numberPlan. On the last trading day of each Savings Period, the balance in your Purchase Account will be applied to purchase full and fractional shares of Common Stock as described in response to question 13. No interest is paid to any employee on the amounts accumulated in his or her Purchase Account under the Plan.

11. WHAT WILL BE THE PRICE OF SHARES PURCHASED UNDER THE PLAN?

The purchase price per share assigned to the Common Stock for any Savings Period will be fixed from time to time exclusively by the Board of Directors pursuant to a resolution adopted by a majority90% of the total numberfair market value on the purchase date. For purposes of the Plan, fair market value is the closing price of the Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) on the last trading day of the Savings Period.

Shares of Common Stock purchased under the Plan will come from treasury shares, authorized directors (whetherbut unissued shares or not there exist any vacancies in previously authorized directorships at the time any such resolution is presented to the Board for adoption), provided, however, this provision shall not act to limit Board size in the event the holders of one or more series of Preferred Stock are entitled to elect directors to the exclusion of holdersopen market purchases of Common Stock. Each director who is serving as a director onYou will pay no brokerage commissions, fees or service charges in connection with purchases of Common Stock under the date ofPlan.

12. HOW MANY SHARES MAY BE PURCHASED BY PARTICIPANTS UNDER THE PLAN?

Under this Amended and Restated CertificateESPP, the maximum number of Incorporation shall hold office untilshares of Common Stock that may be purchased in the next annual meeting of stockholders following such date and until his or her successor has been duly elected and qualified, notwithstanding that such director may have been elected for a term that extended beyond the date of such next annual meeting of stockholders. At each annual meeting of the stockholders of the Corporation after the date of this Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, directors elected at such annual meeting shall hold office until the next annual meeting of stockholders and until their successors have been duly elected and qualified.

EXHIBIT C

NISOURCE INC.

2010 OMNIBUS INCENTIVE PLAN


NISOURCE INC.

2010 OMNIBUS INCENTIVE PLAN

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

I.

Establishment, Purpose, DurationC-1

II.

DefinitionsC-1

III.

AdministrationC-5

IV.

Stock Subject to the PlanC-7

V.

Eligibility and ParticipationC-8

VI.

OptionsC-8

VII.

Stock Appreciation RightsC-9

VIII.

Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock UnitsC-10

IX.

Performance SharesC-11

X.

Performance UnitsC-11

XI.

Cash-Based AwardsC-12

XII.

Other Stock-Based AwardsC-13

XIII.

Awards Under the Plan; Code Section 162(m)C-13

XIV.

Dividend EquivalentsC-14

XV.

Beneficiary DesignationC-14

XVI.

Change in ControlC-15

XVII.

DeferralsC-15

XVIII

WithholdingC-16

XIX

Compliance With Code Section 409AC-16

XX.

Amendment and TerminationC-17

XXI

MiscellaneousC-17

C-i


NISOURCE INC.

2010 Omnibus Incentive Plan

Article I

Establishment, Purpose, Duration

Section 1.1Establishment offuture under the Plan.    NiSource Inc. (formerly NIPSCO Industries, Inc.) (the “Company”) adopted the NIPSCO Industries, Inc. 1994Long-Term Incentive Plan effective April 13, 1994, which was later amended and restated effective April 14, 1999, and renamed the NiSource Inc. 1994Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “LTIP”). The LTIP has been amended from time to time, with the most recent amendment and restatement effective January 14, 2009.

In addition, the Company adopted the NiSource Inc. Nonemployee Director Stock Incentive Plan (formerly the NIPSCO Industries, Inc. Nonemployee Director Stock Incentive Plan), effective is 1,243,244 as of February 1, 1992,2019, pending approval of 1,000,000 of these shares by stockholders. This number may increase again in the future with stockholder approval. This number may also increase or decrease proportionately, as amended effective December 16, 1997 and February 1, 1998 (the “Director Stock Plan”). The Company also adopted the NiSource Inc. Nonemployee Director Restricted Stock Unit Plan (formerly the NIPSCO Industries, Inc. Nonemployee Director Restricted Stock Unit Plan) effective January 1, 1999 (the “Director Stock Unit Plan”). The Company merged the Director Stock Plan and the Director Stock Unit Plan into a single document, effective July 1, 2002 (the “Director Incentive Plan”). The Director Incentive Plan has been amended from time to time, with the most recent amendment and restatement effective May 13, 2008.

Finally, the Company adopted the NiSource Inc. Corporate Incentive Plan (the “Corporate Incentive Plan”) to provide annual cash awards to employees of the Company.

The Company replaced the Prior Plans with one incentive plan document called the NiSource Inc. 2010 Omnibus Incentive Plan upon stockholder approval at the 2010 annual meeting. On October 21, 2013, the Committee amended the Plan to provide authority to grant Awards that contain eithersingle-trigger or double-trigger vestingappropriate, in the event of a Change in Control, asfuture stock dividend, stock split or combination of Common Stock, spin-off, reorganization or recapitalization. If the Committee deems appropriate, insteadnumber of requiring only single trigger vesting. Each of the Prior Plans will continue to remain effective with respect to awards granted under each Prior Plan. Since stockholder approval of this Plan, no new awards have been granted under the Prior Plans, and no new awards will be granted under the Prior Plan. New Awards will continue to be granted under this Plan.

Section 1.2Purpose.    The Plan is designed to promote the achievement of both short-term and long-term objectives of the Company by (a) aligning compensation of Participants with the interests of Company stockholders, (b) enhancing the interest of Participants in the growth and success of the Company, and (c) attracting and retaining Participants of outstanding competence.

Section 1.3Effective Date and Duration.    This Plan, if reapproved by a majority of the votes cast by Company stockholders at the May 2015 annual meeting shall be renewed effective at such date and shall remain in effect, subject to the right of the Board or the Committee to amend and terminate the Plan at any time as provided in this Plan, until all Shares subject to it shall have been purchased or acquired according to the Plan’s provisions. In no event, however, may an Award be grantedshares remaining available for purchase under the Plan more than tenis not sufficient to satisfy all then outstanding purchase rights, the available shares will be apportioned among all participants on an equitable basis.

13. HOW MANY SHARES CAN I BUY IN EACH SAVINGS PERIOD?

The number of shares of Common Stock purchased by you during each Savings Period will be determined by dividing your Purchase Account balance by the purchase price per share for that Savings Period (the last trading day of the Savings Period). Shares will be allocated to four decimal places. The number of shares you can purchase will depend on the size of your payroll deductions and the fair market value of the Common Stock as of each purchase date. For example, if you have authorized deductions of $200.00 for the Savings Period and the fair market value of a share of Common Stock on the purchase date is $20.00, then your purchase price would be 90% of $20.00 or $18.00, and you would purchase 11.1111 shares of Common Stock ($200/$18.00). The number of shares purchased is also subject to an annual limit as indicated in question 14. You can estimate the number of shares that will be purchased with your contributions at netbenefits.fidelity.com. See answer to question 27.

14. IS THERE AN ANNUAL CONTRIBUTION LIMIT ON THE NUMBER OF SHARES PURCHASED?

The Internal Revenue Service limits purchases under an Employee Stock Purchase Plan to $25,000 worth of stock in any one calendar year, valued as of the first day of the Savings Period. Therefore, the Plan will multiply the value of the Common Stock on the first trading date of the Savings Period by the number of shares purchased at the end of the Savings Period and limit the total value of shares purchased for all Savings Periods in the calendar year to $25,000. Any payroll deduction amounts not used to purchase shares as a result of the contribution limit will be refunded.

15. CAN COMMON STOCK BE PURCHASED UNDER THE PLAN FOR CASH?

No. Common Stock can be purchased only through payroll deductions.

16. WHAT HAPPENS TO THE SHARES I PURCHASE?

The shares you purchase will be considered credited to you as of the close of business on the last day of each Savings Period. Your shares will be deposited into your Fidelity Account as soon as administratively possible following the purchase date.

C-2

TABLE OF CONTENTS

17. HOW WILL SHARES PURCHASED UNDER THE PLAN BE REGISTERED?

The shares will be registered in “street name” at Fidelity. This means that your shares will be registered in the name of Fidelity and you will be designated as the beneficial owner.

18. HOW DO I SELL SHARES THAT I HAVE PURCHASED THROUGH THE PLAN?

Any shares held in your Fidelity Account can be sold by Fidelity at your direction. You will have the ability to place “real time” orders to sell your Common Stock (or any other brokerage order) during regular market hours. The proceeds from the sale of your shares will be deposited into your Fidelity Account. Any sale of shares in your Fidelity Account will be subject to commissions and fees governing that account, as outlined in the Brokerage Commission Schedule contained within the Customer Agreement that you will complete when you enroll. Please refer to the answer to question 20 or the Brokerage Commission Schedule contained within your Customer Agreement on Fidelity.com for further details. Commissions and fees are subject to change.

Fidelity also provides you the ability to place an order to sell your Common Stock, when and how you prefer. You can trade 24 hours a day online or using Fidelity’s Automated Service Telephone (FAST®). You can also place your trade with a Fidelity Stock Plan Services Representative, excluding holidays of the New York Stock Exchange.

Certain restrictions are imposed by the Federal securities laws and NiSource policy on sales of Common Stock by officers and certain other employees. All other employees may sell Common Stock purchased under the Plan without any restrictions.

19. ARE THERE ANY RESTRICTIONS ON THE TRANSFER OF SHARES PURCHASED UNDER THE PLAN?

Any shares purchased under the Plan are restricted from transfer to another financial institution for a two-year period. However, in light of certain Federal tax requirements, each employee on entering the Plan agrees to notify NiSource if he or she disposes of any shares of Common Stock purchased under the Plan within two years after the purchase date. You are still eligible to sell shares during this two year holding period, however, under current law you will be subject to additional federal income tax. See answer to question 35.

20. WHAT IS THE COST TO PARTICIPATE IN THE PLAN?

There are no brokerage commissions, fees or service charges connected with Common Stock purchases. These costs are paid by NiSource. However, you will pay all costs incurred in the sale of shares in your Fidelity Account. All sales will be subject to commissions and fees governing your Fidelity Account, as outlined in the Brokerage Commission Schedule contained within the Customer Agreement. Please refer to your Customer Agreement on Fidelity.com for further details. Commissions and fees are subject to change.

You will also be charged a regulatory transaction fee per dollar of the total principal amount of the sale proceeds or a portion thereof. This regulatory fee is paid to the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) at the time of sale and is required for all equity trades. This regulatory transaction fee is subject to modification by the SEC.

21. CAN MY RIGHTS UNDER THE PLAN BE ASSIGNED OR TRANSFERRED TO ANOTHER PERSON?

No. Your rights under the Plan cannot be assigned or transferred to another person.

22. MAY I TERMINATE MY PARTICIPATION IN THE PLAN AT ANY TIME?

Yes. Further, your death, retirement or termination of employment with NiSource, or your cessation of eligibility as a participating employee, will be considered your automatic termination from participation in the Plan.

23. HOW DO I TERMINATE MY PARTICIPATION IN THE PLAN AND WHEN IS IT EFFECTIVE?

You can terminate your participation by changing your contribution to $0 on netbenefits.fidelity.com or by calling a Fidelity Stock Plan Services Representative. If you terminate your participation, Fidelity will inform NiSource to stop any future payroll deductions and to refund any payroll deductions in your Purchase Account that have not been used to purchase Common Stock. Your payroll deduction and refund will be made as soon as administratively possible on your payroll check.

24. WHAT HAPPENS WHEN I TERMINATE MY PARTICIPATION?

The shares of Common Stock will remain in your Fidelity Account until transferred or sold. You cannot transfer shares to another financial institution until two years after the date of purchase. You can sell shares at any time but the Plan was approved bysale will be subject to additional federal income tax as described in question 35. The cost to sell shares is described in the stockholders.answer to question 20.

Article II25. MAY I WITHDRAW THE CASH IN MY PURCHASE ACCOUNT OR SUSPEND MY PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS WITHOUT TERMINATING MY PARTICIPATION IN THE PLAN?

Withdrawing the cash balance credited to your Purchase Account does not terminate your participation in the Plan. However, it does discontinue your payroll deductions. To resume your payroll deductions, you will need to elect a new payroll deduction amount at netbenefits.fidelity.com.

C-3

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Definitions26. WHAT HAPPENS IF I DIE, RETIRE, TERMINATE MY EMPLOYMENT OR OTHERWISE CEASE TO BE ELIGIBLE TO PARTICIPATE?

Whenever usedUpon the occurrence of such event, your participation in the Plan will stop. The cash balance in your Purchase Account will be refunded to you, or your estate in the following terms shallevent of your death. The shares of Common Stock will remain in your Fidelity Account or in the event of your death will be transferred to your designated beneficiary

27. HOW DO I LEARN ABOUT THE STATUS OF MY PURCHASE AND FIDELITY ACCOUNTS?

Each payroll deduction will be shown on your pay stub. In addition, you will receive a monthly statement from Fidelity if you have the meanings set forth belowany activity (purchase, sale, transfer or dividend reinvestment) in your Fidelity Account. Should you have no activity in your Fidelity Account, you will receive a quarterly statement. You will also receive confirmations for transactions that are made in your account. If you would prefer to receive information online, you can sign up for e-delivery at Fidelity.com. Even if you do not elect to sign up for e-delivery, you can access your statements and when the meaning is intended, the initial letter of the word is capitalized:confirmation online at any time.

Section 2.1162(m) Award.    “162(m) Award” means an AwardThese statements contain information that is intended to be deductible as “performance-based compensation”helpful for tax reporting and cost basis purposes; therefore, you should keep the statements until all shares of Common Stock purchased under Code Section 162(m).

Section 2.21934 Act.    “1934 Act” means the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

Section 2.3Affiliate.    “Affiliate” means any entity that is a Subsidiary or a parent corporation, as defined in Code Section 424(e), of the Company, or any other entity designated by the Committee as covered by the Plan in which the Company has, directly or indirectly, at least a 20% voting interest.

Section 2.4Award.    “Award” means any Option, SAR, Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Unit, Performance Share, Performance Unit, Cash-Based Award, or other Article XII stock-based award granted to a Participant under the Plan.

Section 2.5Award Agreement.    “Award Agreement” means a written or electronic statement or agreement prepared by the Company that sets forth the terms, conditions and restrictions applicable to Awards granted under the Plan.

Section 2.6Board or BoardFidelity Account have been disposed of Directors.    “Board” or “Board of Directors” means the Board of Directors of the Company.

Section 2.7Cash-Based Award.    “Cash-Based Award” means an Award granted to a Participant, as described in Article XI herein.

Section 2.8Cause.    “Cause,” unless such term or an equivalent term is otherwise defined with respect to an Award by the Participant’s Award Agreement, shall be as defined in any employment agreement between the Company and a Participant; provided however, that if there is no such employment agreement, “Cause” shall mean any of the following: (a) the Participant’s conviction of any criminal violation involving dishonesty, fraud or breach of trust; (b) the Participant’s willful engagement in any misconduct in the performance of his or her duty that materially injures the Company; (c) the Participant’s performance of any act which would materially and adversely impact the business of the Company; or (d) the Participant’s willful and substantial nonperformance of assigned duties. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Committee shall have sole discretion with respect to the application of the provisions ofsubsections (a)-(d) above, and such exercise of discretion shall be conclusive and binding upon the Participant and all other persons.

Section 2.9CEO.    “CEO” meanstax obligations have been met. You can also access your Fidelity Account information at any time at netbenefits.fidelity.com. You will be able to view your accumulated contributions and estimate the Chief Executive Officernumber of shares that will be purchased with your contributions at any time. Once logged in, click on the Company.

Section 2.10CEO’s Pool.    “CEO’s Pool” means the portion of Shares available for Awards under this Plan that the Committee reserveslink for the CEO in accordanceNiSource ESPP and select Estimate Purchase. There, you will see your total accumulated contributions for the current savings period and the estimated number of shares that will be purchased with Article IVyour contributions. You will also receive all reports issued to stockholders of the Plan.NiSource, including annual reports and proxy solicitation material.

Section 2.11Change in Control.    “Change in Control” means the occurrence of either a “Change in Ownership,” “Change in Effective Control” or a “Change of Ownership of a Substantial Portion of Assets,” as defined below:28. WHO ADMINISTERS THE PLAN?

(a)Change in Ownership.    A Change in Ownership of the Company occurs on the date that any one person, or more than one Person Acting as a Group (as defined below), acquires ownership of stock of the Company that, together with stock held by such person or group, constitutes more than 50% of the total fair market value or total voting power of the stock of the Company. However, if any one person or more than one Person Acting as a Group, is considered to own more than 50% of the total fair market value or total voting power of the stock of the Company, the acquisition of additional stock by the same person or persons is not considered to cause a Change in Ownership of the Company (or to cause a Change in Effective Control of the Company). An increase in the percentage of stock owned by any one person, or Persons Acting as a Group, as a result of a transaction in which the Company acquires its stock in exchange for property will be treated as an acquisition of stock. This subsection (a) applies only when there is a transfer of stock of the Company (or issuance of stock of the Company) and stock in the Company remains outstanding after the transaction.

(b)Change in Effective Control.    A Change in Effective Control of the Company occurs on the date that either —

(i)any one person, or more than one Person Acting as a Group, acquires (or has acquired during the12-month period ending on the date of the most recent acquisition by such person or persons) ownership of stock of the Company possessing 30% or more of the total voting power of the stock of the Company; or

(ii)candidates are elected to the Board who were not recommended for election by the current Board, if such candidates constitute a majority of those elected in that particular election (for this purpose, recommended directors will not include any candidate who becomes a member of the Board as a result of an actual or threatened election contest or proxy or consent solicitation on behalf of anyone other than the Board or as a result of any appointment, nomination, or other agreement intended to avoid or settle a contest or solicitation).

In the absence of an event described in paragraph (i) or (ii), a Change in Effective Control of the Company shall not have occurred.

(c)Acquisition of additional control.    If any one person, or more than one Person Acting as a Group, is considered to effectively control the Company, the acquisition of additional control of the Company by the same person or persons is not considered to cause a Change in Effective Control of the Company (or to cause a Change in Ownership of the Company).

(d)Change of Ownership of a Substantial Portion of Assets.    A Change of Ownership of a Substantial Portion of Assets occurs on the date that any one person, or more than one Person Acting as a Group, acquires (or has acquired during the12-month period ending on the date of the most recent acquisition by such person or persons) assets from the Company that have a total gross fair market value equal to or more than 50% of the total gross fair market value of all of the assets of the Company immediately prior to such acquisition or acquisitions. For this purpose, gross fair market value means the value of the assets of the Company, or the value of the assets being disposed of, determined without regard to any liabilities associated with such assets.

(e)Transfers to a related person.    There is no Change in Control when there is a transfer to an entity that is controlled by the stockholders of the Company immediately after the transfer. A transfer of assets by the Company is not treated as a Change of Ownership of a Substantial Portion of Assets if the assets are transferred to —

(i)a stockholder of the Company (immediately before the asset transfer) in exchange for or with respect to its stock;

(ii)an entity, 50% or more of the total value or voting power of which is owned, directly or indirectly, by the Company;

(iii)a person, or more than one Person Acting as a Group, that owns, directly or indirectly, 50% or more of the total value or voting power of all the outstanding stock of the Company; or

(iv)an entity, at least 50% of the total value or voting power of which is owned, directly or indirectly, by a person described in paragraph (iii) next above.

A person’s status is determined immediately after the transfer of assets. For example, a transfer to a corporation in which the Company has no ownership interest before the transaction, but which is amajority-owned subsidiary of the Company after the transaction is not treated as a Change of Ownership of a Substantial Portion of Assets of the Company.

(f)Persons Acting as a Group.    Persons shall not be considered to be acting as a group solely because they purchase or own stock of the same corporation at the same time or as a result of the same public offering. However, persons will be considered to be acting as a group if they are owners of a corporation that enters into a merger, consolidation, purchase or acquisition of stock, or similar business transaction with the Company. If a person, including an entity, owns stock in both corporations that enter into a merger, consolidation, purchase or acquisition of stock, or similar transaction, such stockholder is considered to be acting as a group with other stockholders in a corporation prior to the transaction giving rise to the change and not with respect to the ownership interest in the other corporation.

Section 2.12Code.    “Code” means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended from time to time.

Section 2.13Committee.    “Committee” means the Officer Nomination andThe Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors or such other committee asof NiSource is the Board shall appoint from time to time, which shall consist of two or more directors all of whom are intended to satisfy the requirements for an “outside director” under Code Section 162(m), a “non-employee director” within the meaning of Rule 16b-3Administrator of the Exchange Act, and an “independent director” underPlan. However, should you have questions concerning the rules of the New York Stock Exchange (or any other national securities exchange which is the principal exchange on which the Shares may then be traded); provided, however, that as to any Award intended to be a 162(m) Award, if any member of the Officer Nomination and Compensation Committee shall not satisfy such “outside director” requirements, “Committee” means a subcommittee (of twoPlan or more persons) of the Officer Nomination and Compensation Committee consisting of all members thereof who satisfy such “outside director” requirement; and further provided that any action taken by the Committee shall be valid and effective whetheryour Fidelity Account, you should contact Fidelity or not members of the Committee at the time of such action are later determined not to have satisfied the requirements for membership specified above.

NiSource Stockholder Services.

Section 2.14Company.    “Company” means NiSource Inc., a Delaware corporation, or any successor thereto.29. WHAT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF NISOURCE AND THE ADMINISTRATOR UNDER THE PLAN?

Section 2.15Corporate Incentive Plan.    “Corporate Incentive Plan” means the NiSource Inc. Corporate Incentive Plan, as described in Article I.

Section 2.16Covered Officer.    “Covered Officer” means a Participant who, in the sole judgment of the Committee, may be treated as a “covered employee” under Code Section 162(m) at the time income is recognized by such Participant in connection with an Award that is intended to qualify as a 162(m) Award.

Section 2.17Director Incentive Plan.    “Director Incentive Plan” means the single plan document resulting from the merger of the Director Stock Plan and the Director Stock Unit Plan, effective July 1, 2002, as described in Article I.

Section 2.18Director Stock Plan.    “Director Stock Plan” means NiSource Inc. Nonemployee Director Stock Incentive Plan, as described in Article I.

Section 2.19Director Stock Unit Plan.    “Director Stock Unit Plan” means the NiSource Inc. Nonemployee Director Restricted Stock Unit Plan, as described in Article I.

Section 2.20Disability or Disabled.    “Disability” or “Disabled” means a condition that (a) causes the Participant to be unable to engage in any substantial gainful activity by reason of any medically determinable physical or mental impairment which can be expected to result in death or can be expected to last for a continuous period of not less than 12 months, (b) causes the Participant, by reason of any medically determinable physical or mental impairment that can be expected to result in death or can be expected to last for a continuous period of not less than 12 months, to receive income replacement benefits for a period of not less than three months under an accident and health plan covering employees of the Company or its Affiliates or (c) causes the Participant to be eligible to receive Social Security disability payments. The Committee, in its sole discretion, shall determine the date of any Disability.

Section 2.21Employee.    “Employee” means any person who is an employee of the Company or any Affiliate; provided, however, that with respect to ISOs, “Employee” means any person who is considered an employee of the Company or any Affiliate for purposes of Treasury Regulation Section 1.421-1(h).

Section 2.22Fair Market Value.    “Fair Market Value” means, on any given date and as may be specified in an Award Agreement, (a) the closing sales price per share (or, if otherwise specified by the Committee, a price that is based on the opening, actual, high, low, or average sales prices per Share) of the Company’s common stock as reported on the New York Stock Exchange or such other established securities market on which the Shares are traded, or, if there were no reported sales of Shares on such date, then, unless otherwise required under the Code, the business day immediately preceding such date; or (b) if (a) does not apply, the price that the Committee in good faith determines through any reasonable valuation method that a Share might change hands between a willing buyer and a willing seller, neither being under compulsion to buy or to sell and both having reasonable knowledge of the relevant facts. Notwithstanding the above, for purposes of broker-facilitated cashless exercises of Awards involving Shares under the Plan, “Fair Market Value” shall mean the real-time selling price of such Shares as reported by the broker facilitating such exercises.

Section 2.23Grant Price.    “Grant Price” means the price established at the time of grant of an SAR pursuant to Article VII (Stock Appreciation Rights), used to determine whether there is any payment due upon exercise of the SAR, which shall not be less than 100% of the Fair Market Value of the Shares at the time the SAR was granted.

Section 2.24Incentive Stock Option or ISO.    “Incentive Stock Option” or “ISO” means an Option that is an “incentive stock option” within the meaning of Code Section 422.

Section 2.25LTIP.    “LTIP” means the NiSource Inc. 1994 Long-Term Incentive Plan, as described in Article I.

Section 2.26Nonemployee Director.    “Nonemployee Director” means a member of the Board who is not an Employee.

Section 2.27Nonqualified Stock Option or NQSO.    “Nonqualified Stock Option” or “NQSO” means an option to purchase Shares that does not constitute an Incentive Stock Option under Code Section 422 (or any successor Code Section).

Section 2.28Option.    “Option” means a right to purchase Shares in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Plan.

Section 2.29Option Exercise Price.    “Option Exercise Price” means the price at which a Share may be purchased by a Participant pursuant to an Option.

Section 2.30Participant.    “Participant” means an Employee or Non-Employee Director who is selected to receive an Award or who has outstanding an outstanding Award granted under the Plan.

Section 2.31Performance Measure.    “Performance Measure” means one or more business criteria to be used by the Committee in establishing Performance Targets for 162(m) Awards under the Plan.

Section 2.32Performance Shares.    “Performance Shares” means an Award designated as Performance Shares and granted to a Participant in accordance with Article IX of the Plan.

Section 2.33Performance Target.    “Performance Target” means the specific, objective goal or goals that are timely set forth in writing by the Committee for grants of 162(m) Awards under the Plan with respect to any one or more Performance Measures.

Section 2.34Performance Unit.    “Performance Unit” means an Award designated as a Performance Unit and granted to a Participant in accordance with Article X of this Plan.

Section 2.35Period of Restriction.    “Period of Restriction” means the period during which the transfer of Shares underlying an Award is limited in some way, or the Shares are subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture.

Section 2.36Plan.    “Plan” means the NiSource Inc. 2010 Omnibus Incentive Plan, as may be amended from time to time.

Section 2.37Prior Plans.    “Prior Plans” means the LTIP, Director Incentive Plan, and the Corporate Incentive Plan.

Section 2.38Restricted Stock.    “Restricted Stock” means an Award that is a grant of Shares delivered to a Participant, subject to restrictions described in Article VIII of this Plan.

Section 2.39Restricted Stock Unit or RSU.    “Restricted Stock Unit” or “RSU” means an Award that is subject to the restrictions described in Article VIII of this Plan and is a promise of the Company to deliver at the end of a Period of Restrictions (a) one Share for each RSU, (b) cash in an amount equal to the Fair Market Value of one Share for each RSU, or (c) a combination of (a) and (b), as determined by the Committee.

Section 2.40Retirement.    “Retirement” means, with respect to Employees, retirement as defined in the Company’s tax-qualified pension plan, unless defined otherwise in an Award Agreement.

Section 2.41Service.    “Service” means a Participant’s work for the Company or an Affiliate, either as an Employee or Non-Employee Director.

Section 2.42Shares.    “Shares” means the shares of common stock of the Company, $0.01 par value per share.

Section 2.43Stock Appreciation Right or SAR.    “Stock Appreciation Right” or “SAR” means an Award designated as an SAR in accordance with the terms of Article VII of the Plan.

Section 2.44Subsidiary.    “Subsidiary” means any corporation, partnership, joint venture, or other entity in which the Company has a majority voting interest; provided, however, that with respect to ISOs, the term “Subsidiary” shall include only an entity that qualifies under Code Section 424(f) as a “subsidiary corporation” with respect to the Company.

Section 2.45Tandem SAR.    “Tandem SAR” means a SAR that is granted in connection with a related Option, the exercise of which shall require forfeiture of the right to purchase a Share under the related Option (with a similar cancellation of the Tandem SAR when a Share is purchased under the Option). Except for the medium of payment, the terms of a Tandem SAR shall be identical in all material respects to the terms of the related Option.

Article III

Administration

Section 3.1Administration by the Committee.    The Plan shall be administered by the Committee. All questions of interpretationAdministrator of the Plan of any Award Agreement or of any other form of agreement or other document employed by the Company in the administration of the Plan or of any Award shall be determined by

the Committee, and such determinations shall be final, binding and conclusive upon all persons having an interest in the Plan or such Award, unless fraudulent or made in bad faith. Any and all actions, decisions and determinations taken or made by the Committee in the exercise of its discretion pursuant to the Plan or Award Agreement or other agreement thereunder (other than determining questions of interpretation pursuant to the preceding sentence) shall be final, binding and conclusive upon all persons having an interest therein. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Board shall perform the functions of the Committee for purposes of granting Awards under the Plan to Nonemployee Directors.

Section 3.2Powers of the Committee.    In addition to any other powers set forth in the Plan and subject to the provisions of the Plan, the Committee shall have the full and final power and authority, in its discretion:

(a)to determine the persons to whom, and the time or times at which, Awards shall be granted and the number of Shares to be subject to each Award;

(b)to determine the type of Award granted;

(c)to determine the Fair Market Value of Shares or other property where applicable;

(d)to determine the terms, conditions and restrictions applicable to each Award (which needwill not be identical) and any Shares acquired pursuant thereto, including, without limitation, (i) the exercise or purchase price of Shares pursuant to any Award, (ii) the method of payment for Shares purchased pursuant to any Award, (iii) the method for satisfaction of any tax withholding obligation arising in connection with Award, including by the withholding or delivery of Shares, (iv) the timing, terms and conditions of the exercisability or vesting of any Award or any Shares acquired pursuant thereto, (v) the time of the expiration of any Award, (vi) the effect of the Participants termination of Service on any of the foregoing, and (vii) all other terms, conditions and restrictions applicable to any Award or Shares acquired pursuant thereto not inconsistent with the terms of the Plan;

(e)to determine how an Award will be settled, as provided under an Award Agreement;

(f)to approve one or more forms of Award Agreement;

(g)to amend, modify, extend, cancel or renew any Award or to waive any restrictions or conditions applicable to any Award or any Shares acquired upon the exercise thereof;

(h)to accelerate, continue, extend or defer the exercisability of any Award or the vesting of any Shares acquired upon the exercise thereof, including with respect to the period following a Participants termination of Service;

(i)to prescribe, amend or rescind rules, guidelines and policies relating to the Plan, or to adopt sub-plans or supplements to, or alternative versions of, the Plan, including, without limitation, as the Committee deems necessary or desirable to comply with the laws or regulations of or to accommodate the tax policy, accounting principles or custom of, foreign jurisdictions whose citizens may be granted Awards; and

(j)to correct any defect, supply any omission or reconcile any inconsistency in the Plan or any Award Agreement and to make all other determinations and take such other actions with respect to the Plan or any Award as the Committee may deem advisable to the extent not inconsistent with the provisions of the Plan or applicable law.

Section 3.3Action by the Committee.    A majority of the members of the Committee shall constitute a quorum for any meeting of the Committee, and the act of a majority of the members present at any meeting at which a quorum is present or the act approved in writing by a majority of all the members of the Committee shall be the act of the Committee. In the performance of their duties under this Plan, the Committee members shall be entitled to rely upon information and advice furnished by the Company’s officers, employees, accountants or counsel, or any executive compensation consultant or other professional retained by the Company or the Committee to assist in the administration of this Plan.

Section 3.4Indemnification.    No member of the Board or of the Committee shall be liable for any action taken, or determination made, hereunderact done in good faith. Service on the Committee shall constitute service as a Nonemployee Director of the company so that members of the Committee shall be entitled to indemnification and reimbursement as Nonemployee Directors of the Company, pursuant to the Company’s bylaws.

Article IV

Stock Subject to the Plan

Section 4.1Aggregate Shares.    Subject to adjustment as provided under the Plan, the total number of Shares that are available for Awards under the Plan shall not exceedfaith in the aggregate 8,000,000 Shares, plus any Shares subject to outstanding awards granted under a Prior Plan and that expire or terminate for any reason shall be available under this Plan. Any of the authorized Shares may be used for any type of Award under the Plan, and any or all of 8,000,000 Shares may be allocated to Incentive Stock Options. Such Shares may be authorized and unissued Shares, treasury Shares, or Shares acquired on the open market.

Section 4.2Individual Award Limitations.    Subject to adjustments as provided in herein, the following rules shall apply to grants of Awards under the Plan to Participants:

(a)Options:    The maximum aggregate face value (Fair Market Value of a Share of common stock on the date of grant times the number of Options granted) that may be covered by Awards of Options granted in any one fiscal year to any one Participant shall be $12,000,000 per year.

(b)SARs:    The maximum aggregate face value (Fair Market Value of a Share of common stock on the date of grant times the number of SARs granted) that may be covered by Awards of SARs granted in any one fiscal year to any one Participant shall be $12,000,000 per year.

(c)Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units:    The maximum aggregate face value (Fair Market Value of a Share of common stock on the date of grant times either the number of Shares of Restricted Stock granted or number of Shares underlying the RSUs granted) that may be covered by Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Unit Awards granted to any one Participant shall be $7,000,000 per year.

(d)Performance Shares:    The maximum aggregate face value (Fair Market Value of a Share of common stock on the date of grant times the maximum number of Shares that could be earned under the Award) that may be granted to any one Participant shall be $10,000,000 per year.

(e)Performance Units:    The maximum aggregate payout (determined as of the end of the applicable performance period) with respect to Performance Units that may be granted to any one Participant shall be $10,000,000 per year.

(f)Cash-Based Awards:    The maximum aggregate payout (determined as of the end of the applicable performance period) with respect to Cash-Based Awards to any one Participant shall be $10,000,000 per year.

(g)Other Article XII Stock-Based Awards:    The maximum aggregate Fair Market Value (as determined on the date of grant) of Shares subject to the Article XII stock-based Awards that may be granted to any one Participant shall be $10,000,000 per year.

Section 4.3Share Counting.    The following Shares related to Awards will be available for issuance again under the Plan: (a) Shares related to Awards paid in cash and (b) Shares related to Awards that expire, are forfeited, are cancelled, or terminate for any other reason without the delivery of the Shares. Notwithstanding any provision to the contrary, the following Shares related to Awards will be available for issuance again under the Plan: (a) Shares equal in number to the Shares withheld, surrendered or tendered in payment of the exercise price of an Award, including an award granted under the LTIP or Director Incentive Plan, (b) Shares tendered or withheld in order to satisfy tax withholding obligations, (c) Shares reacquired by the Company on the open market or otherwise using cash proceeds from the exercise of Awards, including awards granted under the LTIP or Director Incentive Plan.

Section 4.4Adjustment to Number of Shares.

(a)Appropriate adjustments in the aggregate number of Shares issuable pursuant to the Plan, the number of Shares subject to each outstanding award granted under the Plan, the Option price with respect to Options and Tandem SARs, the specified price of SARs not connected to Options, and the value for Performance Units, shall be made to give effect to any increase or decrease in the number of issued Shares resulting from a subdivision or consolidation of Shares, whether through recapitalization, stock split, reverse stock split,spin-off,spin-out or other distribution of assets to stockholders, stock distributions or combinations of Shares, payment of stock dividends, other increase or decrease in the number of such Shares outstanding effected without receipt of consideration by the Company, or any other occurrence for which the Committee determines an adjustment is appropriate.

(b)In the event of any merger, consolidation or reorganization of the Company with any other corporation or corporations, or an acquisition by the Company of the stock or assets of any other corporation or corporations, there shall be substituted on an equitable basis, as determined by the Committee in its sole discretion, for each Share then subject to the Plan, and for each Share then subject to an Award granted under the Plan, the number and kind of Shares of stock, other securities, cash or other property to which the holders of Shares of the Company are entitled pursuant to such transaction.

(c)Without limiting the generality of the foregoing provisions of this paragraph, any such adjustment shall be deemed to have prevented any dilution or enlargement of a Participant’s rights, if such Participant receives in any such adjustment, rights that are substantially similar (after taking into account the fact that the Participant has not paid the applicable option price) to the rights the Participant would have received had he exercised his outstanding Award and become a stockholder of the Company immediately prior to the event giving rise to such adjustment. Adjustments under this paragraph shall be made by the Committee, whose decision as to the amount and timing of any such adjustment shall be conclusive and binding on all persons.

Section 4.5CEO’s Pool of Shares.    A portion of the Shares available for Awards under this Plan, to be determined by the Committee, may be reserved for the CEO to make certain Awards (the “CEO’s Pool”). The CEO may grant any type of Award with shares from the CEO Pool; provided however, that the CEO may not grant any Award to any Covered Officers or other executive officers. Awards available for grant from the CEO Pool will be authorized in a Committee resolution. Unless otherwise determined by the Committee, any Shares not used for Awards under the CEO Pool in one year shall remain available under the CEO Pool in subsequent years.

Article V

Eligibility and Participation

Section 5.1Eligibility to Receive Awards.    Persons eligible to receive Awards under the Plan are Employees and Nonemployee Directors.

Section 5.2Participation in the Plan.    Subject to the other provisions of this Plan, the Committee has the full discretion to grant Awards to eligible persons described in Section 5.1. Eligible persons may be granted more than one Award. Eligibility in accordance with this Section, however, shall not entitle any person to be granted an Award, or, having been granted an Award, to be granted an additional Award.

Article VI

Options

Section 6.1Grant of Options.    Options shall be evidenced by Award Agreements in such form and not inconsistentconnection with the Plan, asor for any good faith omission to act, including, without limitation, any claim of liability arising out of failure to terminate a participant’s Purchase Account upon such participant’s death or retirement prior to the Committee shall approve from time to time. Award Agreements shall specify the Option Exercise Price, the durationreceipt of notice in writing of the Option,event.

30. WHO INTERPRETS THE PLAN?

The Administrator of the number of SharesPlan reserves the right to which the Option pertains, provisions for vesting and exercisability, whether the Option is an ISO or NSO, and such other provisions as the Committee shall determine. Award Agreements may incorporate all or any ofinterpret the terms of the Plan, in his or her sole discretion.

31. HOW LONG WILL THE PLAN BE IN EFFECT?

Unless earlier terminated by reference and shall comply with the following terms and conditions. Except in accordance with equitable adjustments as provided in Section 4.4Board of thisDirectors of NiSource, the Plan no Option grantedwill terminate when the maximum number of shares of Common Stock available for sale under the Plan shall at any time be repricedhave been purchased. (See response to question 12.)

32. MAY THE PLAN BE TERMINATED OR AMENDED?

NiSource reserves the right to modify, suspend or subject to cancellation and replacement without stockholder approval.

Section 6.2Option Exercise Price.    The Option Exercise Price shall not be less than 100% of the Fair Market Value of a Share on the day the Option is granted.

Section 6.3Exercise of Options.    Each Award Agreement shall state the period or periods of time within which the Option may be exercised by the optionee, in whole or in part, which shall be such period or periods of time as may be determined by the Committee, provided that the Option exercise period shall not end later than ten years after the date of the grant of the Option. The Committee shall have the power to permit in its discretion an acceleration of the previously determined exercise terms, within the terms of the Plan, under such circumstances and upon such terms and conditions as it deems appropriate.

Section 6.4Payment of Option Exercise Price.    Except as otherwise provided in the Plan, or in any Award Agreement, the optionee shall pay the Option Exercise Price upon the exercise of any Option (i) in cash,

(ii) by authorizing a third party with which the optionee has a brokerage or similar account to sell the Shares (or a sufficient portion of such Shares) acquired upon the exercise of the Option and remit to the Company a portion of the sale proceeds sufficient to pay the entire Option Exercise Price to the Company, (iii) by delivering Shares that have an aggregate Fair Market Value on the date of exercise equal to the Option Exercise Price; (iv) by authorizing the Company to withhold from the total number of Shares as to which the Option is being exercised the number of Shares having a Fair Market Value on the date of exercise equal to the aggregate Option Exercise Price for the total number of Shares as to which the Option is being exercised, (v) by such other means by which the Committee determines to be consistent with the purpose of the Plan and applicable law, or (vi) by any combination of (i), (ii), (iii), (iv), and (v). In the case of an election pursuant to (i) above, cash shall mean cash or check issued by a federally insured bank or savings and loan association and made payable to NiSource Inc. In the case of payment pursuant to (ii) or (iii) above, the optionee’s authorization must be made on or prior to the date of exercise and shall be irrevocable. In lieu of a separate election governing each exercise of an Option, an optionee may file a blanket election with the Committee, which shall govern all future exercises of Options until revoked by the optionee.

Section 6.5Transfer of Shares.    The Committee may impose such restrictions on any Shares acquired pursuant to the exercise of an Option as it may deem advisable, including, without limitation, restrictions under applicable federal securities laws, under the requirements of any stock exchange or market upon which such Shares are then listed and/or traded, and under any blue sky or state securities laws applicable to such Shares.

Section 6.6Additional Rules for Incentive Stock Options.

(a)Employees.    Incentive Stock Options may be granted only to Employees of the Company or a Subsidiary and not to Employees of any Affiliate unless such entity is classified as a “disregarded entity” of the Company or the applicable Subsidiary under the Code. Incentive Stock Options may not be granted to Nonemployee Directors.

(b)Exercise Limitations.    The Committee, in its sole discretion, may provide in each Award Agreement the period or periods of time within which the Option may be exercised by the optionee, in whole or in part, provided that the Option period shall not end later than ten years after the date of the grant of the Option. The aggregate Fair Market Value (determined with respect to each Incentive Stock Option at the time of grant) of the Shares with respect to which Incentive Stock Options are exercisable for the first time by an individual during any calendar year (under all incentive stock option plans of the Company and its Subsidiaries) shall not exceed $100,000. If the aggregate Fair Market Value (determined at the time of grant) of the Shares subject to an Option, which first becomes exercisable in any calendar year, exceeds this limitation, so much of the Option that does not exceed the applicable dollar limit shall be an Incentive Stock Option and the remainder shall be a Nonqualified Stock Option; but in all other respects, the original Award Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, if an Incentive Stock Option is granted to an individual who owns stock possessing more than ten percent (10%) of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock of the Company or of its parent or subsidiary corporations, within the meaning of Code Section 422(b)(6), (i) the purchase price of each Share subject to the Incentive Stock Option shall be not less than one hundred ten percent (110%) of the Fair Market Value of the Share on the date the Incentive Stock Option is granted, and (ii) the Incentive Stock Option shall expire, and all rights to purchase Shares thereunder shall cease, no later than the fifth anniversary of the date the Incentive Stock Option was granted.

(c)Rights Upon Termination of Service.    The rules under Section 6.6 of this Plan generally shall apply when an optionee holding an ISO terminates Service. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in accordance with Code Section 422, if an Incentive Stock Option is exercised more than ninety days after termination of Service, that portion of the Option exercised after such date shall automatically be a Nonqualified Stock Option, but, in all other respects, the original Award Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

Article VII

Stock Appreciation Rights

Section 7.1Grant of SARs.    Stock Appreciation Rights shall be evidenced by Award Agreements in such form and not inconsistent with the Plan as the Committee shall approve from time to time. Award Agreements

shall specify the Grant Price of the SAR, the duration of the SAR, the number of Shares to which the SAR pertains, provisions for vesting and exercisability, and such other provisions as the Committee shall determine. Award Agreements may incorporate all or any of the terms ofterminate the Plan, by reference and shall comply with the following terms and conditions.

Section 7.2Awards.    An SAR shall entitle the grantee to receive upon exercise the excess of (i) the Fair Market Value of a specified number of Shares at the time of exercise over (ii) the Grant Price, or, if connected with a previously issued Option, not less than 100% of the Fair Market Value of Shares at the time such Option was granted. An SAR may be a Tandem SAR or may not be granted in connection with an Option.

Section 7.3Term of SAR.    SARs shall be granted for a period of not more than ten years, and shall be exercisable in whole or in part, at such time or times and subject to such other terms and conditions, as shall be prescribed by the Committee at the time of grant, subject to the provisions of this Plan.

Section 7.4Special Rules for Exercise of Tandem SARs.    Tandem SARs may be exercised for all or part of the Shares subject to the related Option upon the surrender of the right to exercise the equivalent portion of the related Option. A Tandem SAR may be exercised only with respect to Shares for which its related Option is then exercisable. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Plan to the contrary, with respect to a Tandem SAR granted in connection with an ISO: (i) the Tandem SAR will expire no later than the expiration of the underlying ISO; (ii) the value of the payout with respect to the Tandem SAR may be for no more than one hundred percent (100%) of the difference between the Option Price of the underlying ISO and the Fair Market Value of the Shares subject to the underlying ISO at the time the Tandem SAR is exercised; and (iii) the Tandem SAR may be exercised only when the Fair Market Value of the Shares subject to the ISO exceeds the Option Price of the ISO.

Section 7.5Payment.    Upon exercise of a Stock Appreciation Right, the Participant shall be entitled to receive payment from the Company in an amount determined by multiplying: (i) the difference between the Fair Market Value of a Share on the date of exercise over the Grant Price; by (ii) the number of Shares with respect to which the SAR is exercised. At the discretion of the Committee, payment shall be made in cash, in the form of Shares at Fair Market Value, or in a combination thereof, as the Committee may determine.

Article VIII

Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units

Section 8.1Grants.    The Committee, at any time and from time to time, may grant Shares of Restricted Stock or grant Restricted Stock Units to Participants in such amounts as the Committee shall determine. Each Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Unit grant shall be evidenced by an Award Agreement that shall specify the Period(s) of Restriction, the number of Shares of Restricted Stock or the number of Restricted Stock Units issued to the Participant, and such other provisions as the Committee shall determine. Such Award Agreements shall be consistent with the provisions of this Article VIII.

Section 8.2Period of Restriction.    The end of any Period of Restriction for Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Units may be conditioned upon the satisfaction of such conditions as are satisfied by the Committee in its sole discretion and set forth in an applicable Award Agreement. Such conditions include, without limitation, restrictions based upon the continued Service of the Participant, the achievement of specific performance goals, time-based restrictions on vesting following the attainment of the performance goals, and/or restrictions under applicable federal or state securities laws, prohibitions against transfer, and repurchase by the Company or right of first refusal. The Committee shall have the power to permit in its discretion, an acceleration of the expiration of the applicable Period of Restriction with respect to any part or all of the Shares or number of Restricted Stock Units awarded to a Participant.

Section 8.3Certificates.    If a certificate is issued in respect of Shares awarded to a Participant, each certificate shall be deposited with the Company, or its designee, and shall bear the following legend:

“This certificate and the shares represented hereby are subject to the terms and conditions (including forfeiture and restrictions against transfer) contained in the NiSource Inc. 2010 Omnibus Incentive Plan and an Award Agreement entered into by the registered owner. Release from such terms and conditions shall be obtained only in accordance with the provisions of the Plan and Award Agreement, a copy of each of which is on file in the office of the Secretary of said Company.”

Section 8.4Lapse of Restrictions.    A Restricted Stock Award Agreement or Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement shall specify the terms and conditions upon which any restrictions upon Shares awarded or RSUs awarded under the Plan shall lapse, as determined by the Committee. Upon the lapse of such restrictions, any Shares that have been awarded, free of the previously described restrictive legend, shall be issued to the Participant or his legal representative.

Section 8.5Termination of Service.    Each Restricted Stock Award Agreement and Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement shall set forth the extent, if any, to which the Participant shall have the right to continued or accelerated vesting of Shares of Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Units following termination of the Participant’s Service. Such provisions shall be determined in the sole discretion of the Committee, shall be included in the Award Agreement entered into with each Participant, need not be uniform among all Awards granted pursuant to the Plan, and may reflect distinctions based on the reasons for termination.

Section 8.6Code Section 83(b) Election.    If a Participant makes an election pursuant to Code Section 83(b) with respect to a Restricted Stock Award, the Participant shall be required to promptly file a copy of such election with the Company.

Article IX

Performance Shares Awards

Section 9.1Grants of Performance Shares.    The Committee, at any time and from time to time, may grant Awards of Performance Shares to Participants in such amounts as the Committee shall determine. Each Performance Shares grant shall be evidenced by an Award Agreement that shall specify the applicable performance period, the number of Shares subject to a Performance Shares Award that are to be delivered to the Participant upon satisfaction of the performance targets by the expiration of the performance period, and such other provisions as the Committee shall determine. Such Award Agreements shall be consistent with the provisions of this Article IX.

Section 9.2Performance Period and Performance Goals.    At the time of award, the Committee, in its sole discretion shall establish a performance period and the performance goals to be achieved during the applicable performance period with respect to an Award of Performance Shares.

Section 9.3Delivery of Shares.    Following the conclusion of each performance period, the Committee shall determine the extent to which performance goals have been attained for such period as well as the other terms and conditions established by the Committee. The Committee shall determine the amount of Shares, if any, to be delivered to the Participant in satisfaction of the Award.

Section 9.4Termination of Service.    Each Performance Shares Award Agreement shall set forth the extent, if any, to which the Participant shall have the right to continued or accelerated vesting of Performance Shares following termination of the Participant’s Service. Such provisions shall be determined in the sole discretion of the Committee, shall be included in the Award Agreement entered into with each Participant, need not be uniform among all Performance Shares Awards granted pursuant to the Plan, and may reflect distinctions based on the reasons for termination.

Section 9.5Code Section 162(m).    If any Performance Shares are intended to be 162(m) Awards, the Committee shall follow the procedures set forth in Section 13.1 with respect to such Performance Shares.

Article X

Performance Units

Section 10.1Grant of Performance Units.    Subject to the terms of the Plan, Performance Units may be granted to Participants in such amounts and upon such terms, and at any time and from time to time, as shall be determined by the Committee. Performance Units shall be evidenced by Award Agreements that are subject to the terms of this Article X.

Section 10.2Performance Period and Performance Goals.    Unless otherwise determined by the Committee, at the time of award, the Committee shall establish with respect to each Performance Unit a performance period of not less than two years. At the time of award, the Committee also shall establish, in its sole discretion, the performance goals to be achieved during the applicable performance period with respect to an Award of Performance Units.

Section 10.3Value of Performance Units.    At the time Performance Units are granted, the Committee shall establish with respect to each such Award a value for each Performance Unit, which may vary thereafter determinable from criteria specified by the Committee at the time of Award.

Section 10.4Code Section 162(m).    If any Performance Units are intended to be 162(m) Awards, the Committee shall follow the procedures set forth in Section 13.1 with respect to such Performance Units.

Section 10.5Payment of Performance Units.    Following the conclusion of each performance period, the Committee shall determine the extent to which performance targets have been attained for such period as well as the other terms and conditions established by the Committee. The Committee shall determine what, if any, payment is due on the Performance Units. Payment shall be made as soon as practicable after the end of the applicable performance period, but no later than the March 15th of the year after the year in which such performance period ends, in cash, in the form of Shares, or in a combination thereof, as the Committee may determine.

Section 10.6Termination of Service.    Each Performance Unit Award Agreement shall set forth the extent, if any, to which the Participant shall have the right to continued or accelerated vesting of Performance Units following termination of the Participant’s Service. Such provisions shall be determined in the sole discretion of the Committee, shall be included in the Award Agreement entered into with each Participant, need not be uniform among all Performance Units Awards granted pursuant to the Plan, and may reflect distinctions based on the reasons for termination.

Section 10.7Other Terms.    The Award Agreements with respect to Performance Units shall contain such other terms and provisions and conditions not inconsistent with the Plan as shall be determined by the Committee.

Article XI

Cash-Based Awards

Section 11.1Grant of Cash-Based Awards.    Subject to the terms of the Plan, Cash-Based Awards may be granted to Participants in such amounts and upon such terms, and at any time and from time to time, as shall be determined by the Committee, subject to the terms of this Article XI.

Section 11.2Performance Period and Performance Goals.    Unless otherwise determined by the Committee, the performance period for any Cash-Based Award shall be one year. At the time of award, the Committee also shall establish, in its sole discretion, the performance goals to be achieved during the applicable performance period with respect to Cash-Based Awards.

Section 11.3Value of Cash-Based Awards.    At the time Cash-Based Awards are granted, the Committee shall establish the value of such Awards, which may vary thereafter determinable from criteria specified by the Committee at the time of Award.

Section 11.4Code Section 162(m).    If the grant of any Cash-Based Awards are intended to be 162(m) Awards, the Committee shall follow the procedures set forth in Section 13.1 with respect to such Cash-Based Awards.

Section 11.5Payment of Cash-Based Awards.    If payable, the Participant’s Cash-Based Award will be distributed to the Participant, or the Participant’s estate in the event of the Participant’s death before payment, in cash in a single sum as soon after the end of the applicable performance period as practicable, but no later than March 15th after the end of the performance period, in accordance with the Company’s payroll practices.

Section 11.6Termination of Service.    With respect to Cash-Based Awards, the Committee shall set forth the extent, if any, to which the Participant shall have the right to continued or accelerated vesting of such Cash-Based Awards following termination of the Participant’s Service. Such provisions shall be determined in the sole discretion of the Committee, need not be uniform among all Cash-Based Awards granted pursuant to the Plan, and may reflect distinctions based on the reasons for termination.

Article XII

Other Stock-Based Awards

The Committee may from time to time grant Shares and other Awards under the Plan that are valued in whole or in part by reference to, or are otherwise based upon and/or payable in Shares. The Committee, in its sole discretion, shall determine the terms and conditions of such Awards, which shall be consistent with the terms and purposes of the Plan.

Article XIII

Awards Under the Plan; Code Section 162(m)

Section 13.1Compliance with Code Section 162(m).

(a)General.    The Committee may grant Awards that are designed to qualify as 162(m) Awards and Awards that are not 162(m) Awards. In the case of Awards granted to Covered Officers that are intended to be 162(m) Awards, the Committee shall make in writing all determinations necessary to establish the terms of such 162(m) Awards within 90 days of the beginning of the applicable performance period (or such other time period required under Code Section 162(m)), including, without limitation, the designation of the Covered Officers to whom such 162(m) Awards are made, the Performance Measures applicable to the Awards and the Performance Targets that relate to such Performance Measures, and the dollar amounts or number of Shares payable upon achieving the applicable Performance Targets. To the extent required by Code Section 162(m), the provisions of such 162(m) Awards must state, in terms of an objective formula or standard, the method of computing the amount of compensation payable to the Covered Officer. The specific Performance Targets established by the Committee shall be made while the achievement of such Performance Targets remains substantially uncertain in accordance with Code Section 162(m). Subject to the terms of this Plan, after each applicable performance period has ended, the Committee shall determine the extent to which the Performance Targets have been attained or a degree of achievement between minimum and maximum levels with respect to 162(m) Awards in order to establish the level of payment to be made, if any, with respect to such 162(m) Awards, and shall certify the results in writing prior to payment of such 162(m) Awards.

(b)Performance Targets and Performance Measures.    With respect to 162(m) Awards, at the time of grant of a 162(m) Award, the Committee shall establish in writing maximum and minimum Performance Targets to be achieved with respect to each Award during the performance period. The Participant shall be entitled to payment of the entire amount awarded if the maximum Performance Target is achieved during the performance period, but shall be entitled to payment with respect to a portion of the Award according to the level of achievement of Performance Targets, as specified by the Committee, for performance during the performance period that meets or exceeds the minimum Performance Target but fails to meet the maximum Performance Target. With respect to Cash-Based Awards, the Committee may assign payout percentages based upon various potential Performance Targets, ranging from a minimum “Trigger” percentage to a maximum “Stretch” percentage, to be applied if the Performance Targets are met. The Committee has full discretion and authority to determine the “Target,” “Trigger,” and “Stretch” payouts for Cash-Based Award’s performance period.

The Performance Targets established by the Committee may relate to corporate, division, department, or business unit performance and may be established in terms of any one or a combination of the following Performance Measures: (i) growth in gross revenue, (ii) earnings per share, (iii) operating earnings per share, (iv) business unit operating earnings, (v) specified revenue targets, (vi) expense control, (vii) productivity, (viii) ratio of earnings to stockholders’ equity or to total assets, (ix) dividend payments, (x) total stockholders’ return, (xi) operating income, (xii) return on capital or return on investment, (xiii) return on assets, (xiv) return on net assets, (xv) operating margins, (xvi) earnings before interest and taxes, (xvii) earnings before interest taxes depreciation, amortization and depletion, (xviii) funds from operations, (xix) total debt or change in total debt or the rating on our debt as determined by external rating agencies, (xx) cash from operations, (xxi) gross margins, (xxii) return on equity, (xxiii) net income, (xxiv) pre-tax income, (xxv) specified customer satisfaction targets, (xxvi) specified safety targets, and (xxvii) specified reliability targets. Multiple Performance Targets

may be used and may have the same or different weighting, and they may relate to absolute performance or relative performance as measured against other institutions or divisions or units thereof.

(c)Calculation and Adjustments.    The Committee may provide in any such Award that any evaluation of performance may include or exclude any of the following events that occur during a performance period: (a) asset write-downs, (b) litigation or claim judgments or settlements, (c) the effect of changes in tax laws, accounting principles or other laws or provisions affecting reported results, (d) any reorganization and restructuring programs, (e) mergers, acquisitions or divestitures, (f) foreign exchange gains and losses, and (g) extraordinary, unusual, or other nonrecurring items as described in U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles or in management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations appearing in the Company’s consolidated report to the investment community or investor letters. To the extent such inclusions or exclusions affect Awards to Covered Officers, they shall be prescribed in a form that meets the requirements of Code Section 162(m) for deductibility except as otherwise determined by the Committee in its sole discretion. Awards that are intended to qualify as 162(m) Awards may not be adjusted upward from the amount otherwise payable to a Covered Officer under the pre-established Performance Target. The Committee shall retain the discretion to adjust such Awards downward, either on a formulaic or discretionary basis or a combination of the two, as the Committee determines. If applicable tax and securities laws change to permit Committee discretion to alter the governing Performance Measures or Performance Targets without obtaining shareholder approval of such changes, the Committee shall have sole discretion to make such changes without obtaining shareholder approval.

Section 13.2Non-Code Section 162(m) Awards.    In the case of Awards that are not intended to be qualifying as “performance-based compensation” under Code Section 162(m), the Committee may designate performance targets from among the previously described Performance Measures in this Article or such other business criteria as it determines in its sole discretion. The Committee also may make adjustments to such Performance Measures or other business criteria in any manner it deems appropriate in its discretion.

Article XIV

Dividends and Dividend Equivalents

No dividends or dividend equivalents may be awarded with respect to any Options or SARs. An Award (other than Options or SARs) may, if so determined by the Committee, provide the Participant with the right to receive dividend payments, or, in the case of Awards that do not involve the issuance of Shares concurrently with the grant of the Award, dividend equivalent payments with respect to Shares subject to the Award (both before and after the Shares are earned, vested or acquired), which payments may be either made currently, credited to an account for the Participant, or deemed to have been reinvested in additional Shares which shall thereafter be deemed to be part of and subject to the underlying Award, including the same vesting and performance conditions. Notwithstanding the foregoing, with respect to Awards subject to performance conditions, any such dividend or dividend equivalent payments shall not be paid currently and instead shall either be credited to an account for the Participant or deemed to have been reinvested in additional Shares. Dividend or dividend equivalent amounts credited to an account for the Participant may be settled in cash or Shares or a combination of both, as determined by the Committee, and shall be subject to the same vesting and performance conditions as the underlying Award. Except as provided otherwise in an Award Agreement, any Participant entitled to receive a cash dividends or dividend equivalents pursuant to his applicable Award may, by written election filed with the Company, at least ten days before the date of payment of such dividend equivalent, elect to have such dividend equivalent credited to an account maintained for his benefit under a dividend reinvestment plan maintained by the Company.

Article XV

Beneficiary Designation

Each Participant under the Plan may, from time to time, name any beneficiary or beneficiaries (who may be named contingently or successively) to whom any benefit under the Plan is to be paid in case of his or her death before he or she receives any or all of such benefit. Each such designation shall revoke all prior designations by

the same Participant, shall be in a form prescribed by the Company, and will be effective only when filed by the Participant in writing with the Company during the Participant’s lifetime. In the absence of any such designation, benefits remaining unpaid at the Participant’s death shall be paid to the Participant’s estate.

Article XVI

Change in Control

Section 16.1Effect of Change in Control.    Except as otherwise provided in the Plan or any Award Agreement granted hereunder, upon a Change in Control, all outstanding Awards shall become fully exercisable and all restrictions thereon shall terminate; provided, however, that the Committee may determine and provide through an Award Agreement or other means the extent of vesting and the treatment of partially completed performance periods (if any) for any Awards outstanding upon a Change in Control. Further, the Committee, as constituted before such Change in Control, is authorized, and has sole discretion, as to any Award, either at the time such Award is granted hereunder or any time thereafter, to take any one or more of the following actions: (i) provide for the cancellation of any such Award for an amount of cash equal to the difference between the exercise price and the then Fair Market Value of the Shares covered thereby had such Award been currently exercisable; (ii) make such adjustment to any such Award then outstanding as the Committee deems appropriate to reflect such Change in Control; or (iii) cause any such Award then outstanding to be assumed, by the acquiring or surviving corporation, after such Change in Control.

Section 16.2Participant Elections to Minimize Code Section 4999 Excise Tax.

(a)Excess Parachute Payment.    In the event that any acceleration of vesting pursuant to an Award and any other payment or benefit received or to be received by a Participant would subject the Participant to any excise tax pursuant to Code Section 4999 due to the characterization of such acceleration of vesting, payment or benefit as an excess parachute payment under Code Section 280G, the Participant may elect, in his or her sole discretion, to reduce the amount of any acceleration of vesting called for under the Award in order to avoid such characterization. Such an election, however, may not change the time and form of any payment in a manner that would cause the Participant to incur additional taxes or penalties under Code Section 409A.

(b)Determination by Independent Accountants.    To aid the Participant in making any election called for under part (a) above, no later than the date of the occurrence of any event that might reasonably be anticipated to result in an excess parachute payment to the Participant as described in part (a) above, the Company shall request a determination in writing by independent public accountants selected by the Company (the “Accountants”). As soon as practicable thereafter, the Accountants shall determine and report to the Company and the Participant the amount of such acceleration of vesting, payments and benefits which would produce the greatest after-tax benefit to the Participant. For the purposes of such determination, the Accountants may rely on reasonable, good faith interpretations concerning the application of Code Sections 280G and 4999. The Company and the Participant shall furnish to the Accountants such information and documents as the Accountants may reasonably request in order to make their required determination. The Company shall bear all fees and expenses the Accountants may reasonably charge in connection with their services contemplated by this subpart (b).

Article XVII

Deferrals

The Committee may permit (upon timely election by the Participant) or require a Participant to defer such Participant’s receipt of the payment of cash or the delivery of Shares that would otherwise be due to such Participant by virtue of the exercise of an Option or SAR, the lapse or waiver of restrictions with respect to Restricted Stock or Performance Shares, or the satisfaction of any requirements or goals with respect to Performance Units or Cash-Based Awards. If any such deferral election is required or permitted, the Committee may, in its sole discretion, establish rules and procedures for such payment deferrals in a manner consistent with Code Section 409A and the regulations thereunder.

Article XVIII

Withholding

Section 18.1Tax Withholding.    The Company shall have the power and the right to deduct or withhold, or require a Participant to remit to the Company, an amount sufficient to satisfy Federal, state, and local taxes, domestic or foreign, required by law or regulation to be withheld with respect to any taxable event arising as a result of this Plan.

Section 18.2Share Withholding.    With respect to withholding required upon the exercise of Options or SARs, upon the lapse of restrictions on Restricted Stock, or upon any other taxable event arising as a result of Awards granted hereunder, Participants may elect, subject to the approval of the Committee, to satisfy the withholding requirement, in whole or in part, by having the Company withhold Shares having a Fair Market Value on the date the tax is to be determined equal to the minimum statutory total tax which could be imposed on the transaction. All such elections shall be irrevocable, made in writing before the date in which income is realized by the recipient in connection with the particular transaction, signed by the Participant, and shall be subject to any restrictions or limitations that the Committee, in its sole discretion, deems appropriate. The amount of required withholding shall be a specified rate not less than the statutory minimum federal, state and local (if any) withholding rate, and not greater than the maximum federal, state and local (if any) marginal tax rate applicable to the Participant and to the particular transaction.

Article XIX

Compliance with Code Section 409A

Section 19.1Awards Subject to Code Section 409A.    The provisions of this Section 19.1 shall apply to any Award or portion thereof that is or becomes subject to Code Section 409A, notwithstanding any provision to the contrary contained in the Plan or the Award Agreement applicable to such Award. Awards subject to Code Section 409A include, without limitation:

(a)Any Nonqualified Stock Option having an exercise price per share less than the Fair Market Value determined as of the date of grant of such Option or that permits the deferral of compensation other than the deferral of recognition of income until the exercise or transfer of the Option or the time the shares acquired pursuant to the exercise of the option first become substantially vested.

(b)Any Award that either provides by its terms, or under which the Participant makes an election, for settlement of all or any portion of the Award either (i) on one or more dates following the end of the Short-Term Deferral Period (as defined below) or (ii) upon or after the occurrence of any event that will or may occur later than the end of the Short-Term Deferral Period.

Subject to U.S. Treasury Regulations promulgated pursuant to Code Section 409A (“Section 409A Regulations”) or other applicable guidance, the term “Short-Term Deferral Period” means the period ending on the later of (i) the 15th day of the third month following the end of the Company’s fiscal year in which the applicable portion of the Award is no longer subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture or (ii) the 15th day of the third month following the end of the Participant’s taxable year in which the applicable portion of the Award is no longer subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture. For this purpose, the term “substantial risk of forfeiture” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 409A Regulations or other applicable guidance.

Section 19.2No Acceleration of Distributions.    Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, this Plan does not permit the acceleration of the time or schedule of any distribution under this Plan pursuant to any Award subject to Code Section 409A, except as provided by Code Section 409A and Section 409A Regulations.

Section 19.3Separation from Service.    If any amount shall be payable with respect to any Award hereunder as a result of a Participant’s termination of employment or other Service and such amount is subject to the provisions of Code Section 409A, then notwithstanding any other provision of this Plan, a termination of employment or other Service will be deemed to have occurred only at such time as the Participant has experienced a “separation from service” as such term is defined for purposes of Code Section 409A.

Section 19.4Timing of Payment to a Specified Employee.    If any amount shall be payable with respect to any Award hereunder as a result of a Participant’s separation from Service at such time as the Participant is a “specified employee” and such amount is subject to the provisions of Code Section 409A, then notwithstanding

any other provision of this Plan, no payment shall be made, except as permitted under Code Section 409A, prior to the first day of the seventh (7th) calendar month beginning after the Participant’s separation from Service (or the date of his or her earlier death). The Company may adopt a specified employee policy that will apply to identify the specified employees for all deferred compensation plans subject to Code Section 409A; otherwise, specified employees will be identified using the default standards contained in the regulations under Code Section 409A.

Article XX

Amendment and Termination

Section 20.1Amendment, Modification, and Termination of the Plan.    The Board or the Committee may at any time terminate, suspend or amend the Plan without the authorization of stockholders to the extent allowed by law, including without limitation any rules issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission under Section 16 of the 1934 Act, insofar as stockholder approval thereof is required in order for the Plan to continue to satisfy the requirements ofRule 16b-3 under the 1934 Act, or the rules of any applicable stock exchange. No termination, suspension or amendment of the Plan shall adversely affect any right acquired by any Participant under an Award granted before the date of such termination, suspension or amendment, unless such Participant shall consent; but it shall be conclusively presumed that any adjustment for changes in capitalization as provided for herein does not adversely affect any such right.

Section 20.2Amendment of Awards.    The Committee may unilaterally amend the terms of any Award Agreement previously granted, except that (i) no such amendment may materially impair the rights of any Participant under the applicable Award without the Participant’s consent, unless such amendment is necessary to comply with applicable law, stock exchange rules or accounting rules; and (ii) in no event may an Option or SAR be amended or modified, other than as provided in Section 4.4, to decrease the Option or SAR exercise or base price thereof, or be cancelled in exchange for cash, a new Option or SAR with a lower exercise price or base price, or other Awards, or otherwise be subject to any action that would be treated for accounting purposes as a “repricing” of such Option or SAR, unless such action is approved by the Company’s stockholders.

Article XXI

Miscellaneous

Section 21.1Approval Restrictions.    Each Award under the Plan shall be subject to the requirement that, if at any time the Committee shall determine that (i) the listing, registration or qualification of the Shares subject or related thereto upon any securities exchange or under any state or federal law, or (ii) the consent or approval of any government regulatory body, or (iii) an agreement by the recipient of an Award with respect to the disposition of Shares is necessary or desirable as a condition of, or in connection with, the granting of such award or the issue or purchase of Shares thereunder, such Award may not be consummated in whole or in part unless such listing, registration, qualification, consent, approval or agreement shall have been effected or obtained, free of any conditions not acceptable to the Committee.

Section 21.2Securities Law Compliance.    With respect to Participants subject to Section 16 of the 1934 Act, transactions under this Plan are intended to comply with all applicable conditions of Rule 16b-3 or its successors under the 1934 Act. If any provision of this Plan or of any Award Agreement would otherwise frustrate or conflict with the intent expressed in the preceding sentence, that provision to the extent possible shall be interpreted and deemed amended in the manner determined by the Committee so as to avoid the conflict. To the extent of any remaining irreconcilable conflict with this intent, the provision shall be deemed void as applicable to Participants who are then subject to Section 16 of the 1934 Act. In addition, no Shares will be issued or transferred pursuant to an Award unless and until all then applicable requirements imposed by federal and state securities and other laws, rules and regulations and by any regulatory agencies having jurisdiction, and by any stock exchanges upon which the Shares may be listed, have been fully met. As a condition precedent to the issuance of Shares pursuant to the grant, exercise, vesting or settlement of an Award, the Company may require the Participant to take any reasonable action to meet such requirements. The Committee may impose such conditions on any Shares issuable under the Plan as it may deem advisable, including, without limitation, restrictions under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, under the requirements of any stock exchange upon which such Shares of the same class are then listed, and under any blue sky or other securities laws applicable to such Shares.

Section 21.3Gender and Number.    Except where otherwise indicated by the context, any masculine term used herein also shall include the feminine, the plural shall include the singular and the singular shall include the plural.

Section 21.4Rights as a Stockholder.    The recipient of any Award under the Plan, unless otherwise provided by the Plan, shall have no rights as a stockholder with respect thereto unless and until certificates for Shares are issued to the recipient.

Section 21.5Forfeiture.    The Committee may specify in an Award Agreement that the Participant’s rights, payments, and benefits with respect to an Award shall be subject to reduction, cancellation, forfeiture, or recoupment upon the occurrence of specified events, in addition to any otherwise applicable vesting or performance conditions of an Award. Such events may include, but shall not be limited to, termination of Service for Cause or any act by a Participant, whether before or after termination of Service, that would constitute Cause for termination of Service.

Section 21.6Rights as Employee or Nonemployee Director.    No person, even though eligible pursuant to Article V, shall have a right to be selected as a Participant, or, having been so selected, to be selected again as a Participant. Nothing in the Plan or any Award granted under the Plan shall confer on any Participant a right to remain an Employee or Nonemployee Director or interfere with or limit in any way any right of the Company or Affiliate to terminate the Participant’s Service at any time. To the extent that an Employee of an Affiliate receives an Award under the Plan, that Award shall in no event be understood or interpreted to mean that the Company is the Employee’s employer or that the Employee has an employment relationship with the Company.

Section 21.7Fractional Shares.    The Company shall not be required to issue fractional shares upon the exercise or settlement of any Award.

Section 21.8Effect on Other Plans.    Unless otherwise specifically provided, participation in the Plan shall not preclude a Participant’s eligibility to participate in any other benefit or incentive plan. Any Awards made pursuant to the Plan shall not be considered as compensation in determining the benefits provided under any other plan.

Section 21.9No Constraint on Corporate Action.    Nothing in this Plan shall be construed to: (a) limit, impair, or otherwise affect the Company’s or an Affiliate’s right or power to make adjustments, reclassifications, reorganizations, or changes of its capital or business structure, or to merge or consolidate, or dissolve, liquidate, sell, or transfer all or any part of its business or assets; or (b) limit the right or power of the Company or an Affiliate to take any action which such entity deems to be necessary or appropriate.

Section 21.10Over/Under Payments.    If any Participant or beneficiary receives an underpayment of Shares or cash payable under the terms of any Award, payment of any such shortfall shall be made as soon as administratively practicable. If any Participant or beneficiary receives an overpayment of Shares or cash payable under the terms of any Award for any reason, the Committee or its delegate shall have the right, in its sole discretion, to take whatever action it deems appropriate, including but not limited to the right to require repayment of such amount or to reduce future payments under this Plan, to recover any such overpayment. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the Company is required to prepare an accounting restatement due to the material noncompliance of the Company, as a result of misconduct, with any financial reporting requirement under the securities laws, and if the Participant knowingly or through gross negligence engaged in the misconduct, or knowingly or through gross negligence failed to prevent the misconduct, or if the Participant is one of the individuals subject to automatic forfeiture under Section 304 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the Participant shall reimburse the Company the amount of any payment in settlement of an Award earned or accrued during the twelve- (12-) month period following the first public issuance or filing with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission of the financial document embodying such financial reporting requirement.

Section 21.11Unfunded Obligation.    Participants shall have the status of general unsecured creditors of the Company. Any amounts payable to Participants pursuant to the Plan shall be unfunded and unsecured obligations for all purposes, including, without limitation, Title I of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. No Affiliate shall be required to segregate any monies from its general funds, or to create any trusts, or establish any special accounts with respect to such obligations. The Company shall retain at all times beneficial ownership of any investments, including trust investments, which the Company may make to fulfill its payment

obligations hereunder. Any investments or the creation or maintenance of any trust or any Participant account shall not create or constitute a trust or fiduciary relationship between the Committee or any Affiliate and a Participant, or otherwise create any vested or beneficial interest in any Participant or the Participant’s creditors in any assets of any Affiliate. The Participants shall have no claim against any Affiliate for any changes in the value of any assets which may be invested or reinvested by the Company with respect to the Plan.

Section 21.12No Liability With Respect to Adverse Tax Treatment.    Notwithstanding any provision of this Plan to the contrary, in no event shall the Company or any Affiliate be liable to a Participant on account of an Award’s failure to (i) qualify for favorable U.S., foreign, state, local, or other tax treatment or (ii) avoid adverse tax treatment under U.S., foreign, state, local, or other law, including, without limitation, Code Section 409A.

Section 21.13Severability.    In the event any provision of the Plan shall be held illegal or invalid for any reason, the illegality or invalidity shall not affect the remaining parts of the Plan, and the Plan shall be construed and enforced as if the illegal or invalid provision had not been included.

Section 21.14Requirements of Law.    The granting of Awards and the issuance of Shares under the Plan shall be subject to all applicable laws, rules, and regulations, and to such approvals by any governmental agencies or national securities exchanges as may be required.

Section 21.15Governing Law.    To the extent not preempted by federal law, the Plan, and all agreements hereunder, shall be construed in accordance with and governed by the laws of the state of Indiana.

Section 21.16Successors.    All obligations of the Company under the Plan with respect to Awards granted hereunder shall be binding on any successor to the Company.

Section 21.17Provisions Regarding Transferability of Awards.

(a)General.    Except as otherwise provided below, Awards may not be sold, transferred, pledged, assigned, or otherwise alienated or hypothecated, other than by will or the laws of descent and distribution or pursuant to a qualified domestic relations order as defined in the Code or Title 1 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act or the rules thereunder. Except as otherwise provided in the Plan, all rights with respect to an Award granted to a Participant shall be available during his or her lifetime only to such Participant.

(b)Nonqualified Stock Options and Stock Appreciation Rights.    No NSO or SAR granted under the Plan may be sold, transferred, pledged, assigned, or otherwise alienated or hypothecated, other than by will or the laws of descent and distribution or pursuant to a qualified domestic relations order as defined in the Code or Title 1 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act or the rules thereunder. Notwithstanding the foregoing or anything in part (a) above, a Participant, at any time prior to his death, may assign all or any portion of the NSO or SAR to (i) his spouse or lineal descendant, (ii) the trustee of a trust for the primary benefit of his spouse or lineal descendant, or (iii) atax-exempt organization as described in Code Section 501(c)(3). In such event the spouse, lineal descendant, trustee ortax-exempt organization shall be entitled to all of the rights of the Participant with respect to the assigned portion of such NSO or SAR, and such portion of the NSO or SAR shall continue to be subject to all of the terms, conditions and restrictions applicable to the NSO or SAR as set forth herein, and in the related Award Agreement, immediately prior to the effective date of the assignment. Any such assignment shall be permitted only if (i) the Participant does not receive any consideration therefore, and (ii) the assignment is expressly approved by the Committee or its delegate. Any such assignment shall be evidenced by an appropriate written document executed by the Participant, and a copy thereof shall be delivered to the Committee or its delegate on or prior to the effective date of the assignment.

(c)Incentive Stock Options.    Notwithstanding anything in part (a) and (b) above, no ISO may be sold, transferred, pledged, assigned, or otherwise alienated or hypothecated, other than by will or the laws of descent or distribution.

(d)

Nonemployee Directors.    Notwithstanding anything in parts (a), (b), or (c) to the contrary, a Nonemployee Director at any time prior to his or her death, may assign all or any portion of an Award granted to him or her under the Plan to (i) his or her spouse or lineal descendant, (ii) the trustee of a trust for the primary benefit of his or her spouse or lineal descendant or (iii) atax-exempt organization as described in Code Section 501(c)(3). In such event, the spouse, lineal descendant, trustee, ortax-exempt

organization shall be entitled to all of the rights of the Participant with respect to the assigned portion of such Award, and such portion of the Award shall continue to be subject to all of the terms, conditions and restrictions applicable to the Award as set forth herein, and in the related Award Agreement, immediately prior to the effective date of the assignment. Any such assignment shall be permitted only if (i) the Participant does not receive any consideration therefore, and (ii) the assignment is expressly approved by the Committee or its delegate. Any such assignment shall be evidenced by an appropriate written document executed by the Participant, and a copy thereof shall be delivered to the Committee or its delegate on or prior to the effective date of the assignment.

LOGO

LOGO
Electronic Voting Instructions

Available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week!

Instead of mailing your proxy, you may choose one of the voting methods outlined below to vote your proxy.

VALIDATION DETAILS ARE LOCATED BELOW IN THE TITLE BAR.

Proxies submitted by the Internet or telephone must be received by 11:59 PM, Eastern Time, on May 11, 2015.

LOGO     Vote by Internet

•  Go towww.investorvote.com/NI

•  Or scan the QR code with your smartphone

•  Follow the steps outlined on the secure website

Vote by telephone

•   Call toll free 1-800-652-VOTE (8683) within the USA, US territories & Canada on a touch tone telephone

•   Follow the instructions provided by the recorded message

Using ablack inkpen, mark your votes with anXas shown in this example. Please do not write outside the designated areas.

x

LOGO

q IF YOU HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNETOR TELEPHONE, FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.q

 A 

Proposals — The Board of Directors recommends a vote “FOR” Proposals 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7.LOGO

Proposal 1 – To elect eleven directors to hold office until the next annual stockholders’ meeting and until their respective successors have been elected or appointed.

ForAgainstAbstainForAgainstAbstainForAgainstAbstain
1.1 - Richard A. Abdoo¨¨¨1.2 - Aristides S. Candris¨¨¨1.3 - Sigmund L. Cornelius¨¨¨
1.4 - Michael E. Jesanis¨¨¨1.5 - Marty R. Kittrell¨¨¨1.6 - W. Lee Nutter¨¨¨
1.7 - Deborah S. Parker¨¨¨1.8 - Robert C. Skaggs, Jr.¨¨¨1.9 -  Teresa A. Taylor¨¨¨
1.10 - Richard L. Thompson¨¨¨1.11 - Carolyn Y. Woo¨¨¨

For

Against

Abstain

For

Against

Abstain

Proposal 2 –

To approve executive compensation on an advisory basis.

¨¨¨Proposal 3To ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accountants.¨¨¨
Proposal 4 –

To amend the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation to give stockholders the power to request special meetings.

¨¨¨Proposal 5 –To amend the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation to reduce the minimum number of Company directors from nine to seven.¨¨¨
Proposal 6 –

To re-approve the Company’s 2010 Omnibus Incentive Plan.

¨¨¨Proposal 7 –To approve an amendment to the Company’s Employee Stock Purchase Plan.¨¨¨

The Board of Directors recommends a vote “AGAINST” Proposal 8.

For

Against

Abstain

Proposal 8 –

To consider a stockholder proposal regarding reports on political contributions.

¨¨¨

IF VOTING BY MAIL, YOUMUST COMPLETE SECTIONS A - C ON BOTH SIDES OF THIS CARD.

LOGO


Important notice regarding the Internet availability of proxy materials for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

The Proxy Statement and the 2014 Annual Report to Stockholders are available at:http://ir.nisource.com/annuals.cfm.

q  IF YOU HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNETOR TELEPHONE, FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.   q

Proxy — NiSource Inc.

 LOGO

This Proxy is Solicited on Behalf of the Board of Directors of NiSource Inc.or its Compensation Committee, at such time designated by the Board or Compensation Committee, which in no event shall be earlier than the first day of any Savings Period in which such change is made. Notice of suspension, modification or termination will be given to all participants.

for its Annual Meeting of Stockholders,In no event, however, may the Board or the Compensation Committee amend the Plan to (i) materially adversely affect any rights outstanding under the Plan during the Savings Period in which such amendment is to be held on May 12, 2015.

The undersigned hereby appoints Robert C. Skaggs, Jr. and Stephen P. Smith, or eithereffective, (ii) increase the maximum number of them,shares of Common Stock which may be purchased under the proxiesPlan (except with the approval of the undersigned, with all powerstockholders of substitution, for andNiSource, or as described in response to question 12), (iii) decrease the namepurchase price of the undersignedCommon Stock below 90% of the fair market value, or (iv) adversely affect the qualification of the Plan under Section 423 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Upon termination of the Plan for any reason, the cash then credited to representyour Purchase Account will be refunded to you by the NiSource Payroll Department. All full and vote thefractional shares of common stockCommon Stock held in your Fidelity Account will be available to you in your Fidelity Account.

33. HOW ARE MY RIGHTS UNDER THE PLAN AFFECTED BY EVENTS SUCH AS A DISSOLUTION, LIQUIDATION OR MERGER OF NISOURCE?

In the event of the undersigned atproposed dissolution or liquidation of NiSource, any and all offerings under the Annual MeetingPlan will terminate immediately prior to the consummation of Stockholderssuch proposed action, unless otherwise provided by the Board. The Board may, in its sole discretion, declare that your right to purchase shares under the Plan will terminate as of a date fixed by the Company,Board and give you the right to be held atpurchase shares of Common Stock under the Hyatt Rosemont, 6350 N. River Road, Rosemont, IL 60018, on Tuesday, May 12, 2015, at 10:00 a.m., local time, and atPlan.

In the adjournmentevent of a proposed sale of all or adjournments thereof.

Unless otherwise marked, this proxy will be voted: “FOR”substantially all of the nominees listedassets of NiSource, or the merger of NiSource with or into another corporation (or a parent or subsidiary of another corporation) when NiSource is not the surviving corporation, any and all offerings under the Plan shall terminate

C-4

TABLE OF CONTENTS

immediately prior to the consummation of such proposed action, unless otherwise provided by the Board. The Board may, in Proposal 1, “FOR” advisory approvalthe exercise of executive compensationits sole discretion in Proposal 2, “FOR” ratificationsuch instances, and in lieu of assumption or substitution of the independent registered public accountantsrights to purchase shares of Common Stock under the Plan by a successor corporation, provide that you will have the right to purchase shares under the Plan.

If the Board permits a share purchase under the Plan in Proposal 3, “FOR” the proposed amendments to the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation in Proposals 4 and 5, “FOR” re-approvallieu of the Company’s 2010 Omnibus Incentiveassumption or substitution of the right to purchase shares of Common Stock by a successor corporation in the event of a merger or sale of assets, the Board will notify you that the rights shall be fully exercisable for a period of ten (10) days from the date of such notice (or such other period of time as the Board shall determine), and the rights shall terminate upon the expiration of such period.

34. IS AN EMPLOYEE REQUIRED TO ENTER THE PLAN?

Absolutely not. Each employee who participates in the Plan does so on a strictly voluntary basis. Each employee should decide whether the purchase of shares is a wise investment for him or her. An employee may wish to consult a specialist in Proposal 6, “FOR” the proposed amendment to the Company’s Employee Stock Purchase Plan in Proposal 7, and “AGAINST” the stockholder proposal regarding reports on political contributions in Proposal 8.investment or tax matters before making his or her decision.

35. IS THE PLAN SUBJECT TO ANY PROVISIONS OF THE EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT INCOME SECURITY ACT OF 1974 (“ERISA”)?

The undersigned stockholder hereby acknowledges receiptPlan is not subject to any provisions of the Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and Proxy Statement relating to the Annual Meeting and hereby revokes any proxy or proxies previously given. The undersigned stockholder may revoke this proxy at any time before it is voted by filing with the Corporate Secretary of the Company a written notice of revocation or a duly executed proxy bearing a later date, by voting by telephone or through the Internet, or by attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person.ERISA.

PLEASE VOTE YOUR SHARES BY TELEPHONE, THROUGH THE INTERNET, OR BY MARKING, SIGNING, DATING AND MAILING THIS PROXY CARD PROMPTLY USING THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.C-5

TABLE OF CONTENTS


 

B

Non-Voting Items

Change of Address — Please print your new address below.Comments — Please print your comments below.Meeting Attendance
Mark the box to the right if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting.¨

TABLE OF CONTENTS


 

C

Authorized Signatures — This section must be completed for your vote to be counted. — Date and Sign Below

NOTE: Please sign as name appears hereon. Joint owners should each sign. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, trustee or guardian, please give full title as such.

Date (mm/dd/yyyy) — Please print date below.    Signature 1 — Please keep signature within the box.Signature 2 — Please keep signature within the box.

                    /                    /

¢

IF VOTING BY MAIL, YOUMUST COMPLETE SECTIONS A - C ON BOTH SIDES OF THIS CARD.

LOGO